Christcucks debate what is and what isn't rape.

1  2019-01-11 by GodOf_WisdomWar_Wine

13 comments

You're oversimplifying a complex situation to the point of adding nothing to the discussion.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, removeddit.com, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

When I was an enlightened supreme atheist I used to think religoncels were retarded for thinking everything in the bible is meant to be taken literally.

Then I realized that atheistcels are just as retared expecting everything in the bible is meant to be taken seriously, and every time it isn't, it's some sort of victory for science and athesists everywhere.

ye shall stone them with stones that they die

Everybody else: it means you stone them

christcucks: WHAT DID HE MEAN BY THIS??

expecting everything in the bible is meant to be taken literally

order your cult to do something but don't follow through it because it's "figurative" for (((reasons)))

That defense sounds similar to "merely pretending to be retarded", lmao.

come on mate, it's a instruction manual on how a group of downie nomads can make it out of the stone age, written by downie nomads. The best and only thing you can do with it, outside of edgy UK atheist comedy in the late 90s, is try to interpret it and make it whatever the fuck you want it to mean.

Stone Age

The Stone Age is also divided into three different periods. Paleolithic or Old Stone Age: from the first production of stone artefacts, about 2.5 million years ago, to the end of the last Ice Age, about 9,600 BCE.

Lmao, the New Testament was written around 1 AD. I'm sure you didn't mean it literally (heh) but still tho. It's not like the Pre-Bible era was devoid of any morality.

*If* you can call a set of communally agreed upon morals as "religion" then there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. The problem with 'classical religion' is the supposed 'divine' nature of these morals. There's no cherry-picking in that. It is what it is. It's rigid and doesn't change with the times. It's immune to reason or newly found findings of any kind e.g treating drug addicts like low life sinners rather than looking at substance addiction like any other disease. (Most religions heavily contributed to our false understanding of substance addiction)

On the other hand, edgy nihilists are insufferable.

I mean, yeah, I would expect a religious text to be serious when laying out the laws and prescribing executions for those laws.

I would expect a religious text to be serious

Are they ever though ?

The bible was absolutely meant to be taken seriously until white people realized (((Jesus))) couldn’t be trusted

jihad soon, brother

hi guys im an atheist Ama

Gay

Christcuks

Like r/christianity is 50% atheists

Big surprise, group who routinely fucks kids in the ass have delusions on the meaning of rape