im going to avoid serious posting and sperging out, which is hard to do because my charity work deals with adoption, but the shit the Virginia governor said yesterday about delivery/abortions makes me sick to my stomach
you can look up his exact words but he essentially said doctors and the mother would be able to make a decision about a babies life after it had already been delivered
that kind of destroys all the bodily autonomy arguments for abortion if you can kill a child after it has been born and is no longer a part of the womans body, when does the child get bodily autonomy?
When the poor child isn't born dead and brainless. Parents and doctors ready make decisions for the children after they are born since children obviously can't make informed medical decisions for themselves.
And it's done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that's non-viable. So in this particular example, if a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that's what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother. So I think this was really blown out of proportion
He's saying that if a retard flipper baby is born not breathing, it should be up to the parents to decide to resuscitate it. I can see why you are all emotional and crying about deformed abominations being born with no brain function, since after all you came into the world with the same condition.
Misleading. It's still 24 weeks for elective abortions, just as it has been since 1970. The main change was that they allow for abortions where the 'health' of the mother is in danger up to term, whereas before it was only if the 'life' of the mother was in danger. Whatever that means.
They also moved it out of the criminal section of the code and into the health code section or something.
This is a good step for humanity because the next obvious milestone for the abortion activists is retroactive late-term abortions after birth so now we actually have a chance to abort u Ed.
The main change was that they allow for abortions where the 'health' of the mother is in danger up to term,
Yeah and now a mother can say she's going to get PTSD the day she's crowning and terminate the baby which effectively gets rid of the law you're trying to claim is still in place.
βIf a mother is in labor...the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if thatβs what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians & mother..." as to whether or not to terminate the now born child
this seems to be the only argument that people have against the legislation, which states that it must be "necessary to protect the patient's life or health". Given that 24 weeks is already like five and a half months, I don't see many women suddenly deciding to bullshit their way to a late-term abortion that far along, for which they'd have to convince a doctor that it is "necessary" to protect their mental health. And I imagine actual cases of someone getting an ok for a 'mental health late-term abortion' would be extraordinarily few in number. When you're that far along in pregnancy already, I think most people would just finish it out and go the adoption route. And even besides that, how ethical would it be to stick in a 'but not mental health reasons' clause in there? If doctors say someone's pregnancy is a severe risk to their mental health, I'll take their word for it over the barely-informed fears of random tards who aren't actually dealing with pregnant women all the time. There's not gonna be a sudden rash of six to nine month pregnant women getting abortion passes because they claim to be suicidal or something. It's retarded political fear-mongering.
Here in Manhattan I cannot sleep for the incessant booming of the anti-baby cannons on all sides, but you complain to be the community board and they're just like "Eh we gotta get those babies"
Have you not yet been conscripted into your block's anti-baby battery? They have me doing 10 hrs a week. Deblasio personally threatened my family when I initially resisted.
WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE LABELS HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THIS DRAWING FROM THE MODERN MICHELANGELO IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT? ANSWER ME THAT YOU WHORE
I think ben garrison is either reading this sub causing him to becoming more self concious.
His recent drawings have really cut down on all the retarded labels and become simple and straightforward enough to the point where the scribbles actually look like half decent political cartoons.
Maybe good ol' Benny actually got into fentanyl rehab after all.
This actually swings a bit to far to the other side where it's hard to understand what's going on without context. Still an improvement for Benny G though.
129 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-01-31
This is not the time or place for another black-dick joke
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 cochnbahls 2019-01-31
Maybe he does need to label more things, because i have literally no idea what this is about.
1 sharasdal 2019-01-31
New York is pushing abortions right up until the baby's born. It's is causing some controversy as you'd expect.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-01-31
smh, pussy westerners. In India you can just ask the abortion hog to kill your baby up to a month after birth.
1 grep_var_log 2019-01-31
If you shout 'PΞΏst HΞΏg' three times in a mirror, the abortion porcine will bless your household.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-01-31
Post Hog
Post Hog
Post Hog
It worked!
1 6969696970 2019-01-31
wew
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2019-01-31
Lmao superpoower by 2020
1 911roofer 2019-01-31
This is the most fucking awful thing I've ever seen.
1 Tenshimaru_tokugawa1 2019-01-31
Fuck you /u/Ultrashitposter
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-01-31
Relax, it's an Indian. Theyve got like a billion extra.
1 Corporal-Hicks 2019-01-31
Like.......... How does a pig perform the abortion?
1 911roofer 2019-01-31
It kills and eats the bby.
1 d4ddyd54m4 2019-01-31
Are you sure it's just a month? I've seen some shit in the slums, boy
1 cochnbahls 2019-01-31
Oh man /r/antinatalism must be pumped!
1 ManBearFridge 2019-01-31
I support abortion rights, but that's straight up sick. Make up your damn mind before you grow a full fledged human.
1 dootwthesickness_II 2019-01-31
This is for cases when the "full-fledged human" turns out to be a deformed, mindless abomination.
1 Remove_honk 2019-01-31
So another drama mod?
1 SJCards 2019-01-31
/u/DarqWolff on suicide watch
1 aunty_strophe 2019-01-31
So business as usual, then.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
kek
1 jubbergun 2019-01-31
This should honestly trouble you more than anyone else in this sub. I'm sure your mom would love to abort you in the 674th Trimester.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
Imagine projecting this hard *and* SπEπEπTπHπIπNπG
1 jubbergun 2019-01-31
My mom can't abort me, Ed, she's dead, like your sex life.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
libtard rekt epic style πππ
1 ManBearFridge 2019-01-31
Ah, so conservatives freaking out over nothing per usual.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-01-31
im going to avoid serious posting and sperging out, which is hard to do because my charity work deals with adoption, but the shit the Virginia governor said yesterday about delivery/abortions makes me sick to my stomach
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-01-31
what did he say?
1 reptilia987 2019-01-31
βgussy > bussyβ
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2019-01-31
1776 pt2 now
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-01-31
you can look up his exact words but he essentially said doctors and the mother would be able to make a decision about a babies life after it had already been delivered
1 Ghdust2 2019-01-31
Good.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-01-31
that kind of destroys all the bodily autonomy arguments for abortion if you can kill a child after it has been born and is no longer a part of the womans body, when does the child get bodily autonomy?
1 sex_tourism 2019-01-31
When they get their first gun.
1 MrPierson 2019-01-31
The real American answer. Ron Paul would be proud
1 OccasionallyClueless 2019-01-31
Itβs up to them to enforce their own rights
1 just_the_tip_mrpink 2019-01-31
Shut the fuck up.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-01-31
Nice argument
1 just_the_tip_mrpink 2019-01-31
Stop serious posting here.
1 LSU_Coonass 2019-01-31
no u
1 LightUmbra 2019-01-31
You got owned my dude.
1 usedtobread 2019-01-31
He's just mad because he doesn't know how to have a good time
1 911roofer 2019-01-31
You sound triggered.
1 Matues49 2019-01-31
No one is arguing with you, retard
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-01-31
When the poor child isn't born dead and brainless. Parents and doctors ready make decisions for the children after they are born since children obviously can't make informed medical decisions for themselves.
1 cochnbahls 2019-01-31
I feel like that is something someone would have noticed before it looked out.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-01-31
Yeah but it still has to pop out at some point and then the doctors and parents have to deal with giving the baby end of life care.
1 cochnbahls 2019-01-31
Is there money to be made in baby hospice?
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-01-31
I'm sure insurance companies have found a way to profit off dying babies
1 usedtobread 2019-01-31
age of majority
We should go back to the old ways of the Romanii
The paterfamilias has ultimate right over the life of every member of the household
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
K E K
E
K
ZOINKS
1 comic630 2019-01-31
Does the "father" has a say if said child is of a melanistic persuasion?
1 BanMeMFer 2019-01-31
He's saying that if a retard flipper baby is born not breathing, it should be up to the parents to decide to resuscitate it. I can see why you are all emotional and crying about deformed abominations being born with no brain function, since after all you came into the world with the same condition.
1 Dr_Cocker 2019-01-31
Two independent clauses though. You can be born missing a leg and not be considered non-viable.
And then the part you left out is that the mother can then choose to keep or terminate the baby.
Imagine pretending to be centrist and not reading lmao.
1 cptnhaddock 2019-01-31
Isnβt killing retards something the nazis did? Now the left wants to off βem too. What a topsy turvy world
1 Pro_Extent 2019-01-31
Adult retards, and without choice.
But yes.
1 SNCommand 2019-01-31
Let's just say post birth aborting the subhumans are no longer off the table
1 EviscerateTheProles 2019-01-31
Misleading. It's still 24 weeks for elective abortions, just as it has been since 1970. The main change was that they allow for abortions where the 'health' of the mother is in danger up to term, whereas before it was only if the 'life' of the mother was in danger. Whatever that means.
They also moved it out of the criminal section of the code and into the health code section or something.
https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2019/01/22/abortion-laws-new-york-how-they-change-immediately/2643065002/
1 sharasdal 2019-01-31
Thanks for the details, I never read all that the boring shit underneath the headlines.
1 vtesterlwg 2019-01-31
Nah it's legal in most cases now because u just need one doc to agree with the vague wording of the law
1 obsequium_ 2019-01-31
You left out something major. Itβs not just health itβs βmental healthβ
That is, if a foid gets neurotic about having a baby she could have it killed, even in the midst of delivery.
1 vtesterlwg 2019-01-31
yeah this means that if ya pretend to be a bit of a fag and find a baby hungry moloch servant who agrees, abortion 4 u
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2019-01-31
Better than a foid killing herself, the dad, and the baby.
1 shanewater 2019-01-31
Not really, this is bad for Dramacoin.
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2019-01-31
No, it's good cause it triggers the moids and the Cuckservatives.
1 StrategicSarcasm 2019-01-31
Not if it's a mayo foid.
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-01-31
Who cares tbqh?
1 usedtobread 2019-01-31
ruh roh Raggy
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
Imagine being this big of a pussy faggot cry about this, lmfao
Not surprised.
1 yourdeadwife 2019-01-31
Post pic
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
πππππππππππππππ
πππππππππππππππ
πππ―ππππ―ππ―π―π―ππππ
πππ―π―ππ―π―ππ―ππ―π―πππ
ππππ―ππ―πππ―πππ―π―ππ
ππππ―π―π―πππ―ππππ―ππ
πππππ―ππππ―ππππ―ππ
ππππ―π―π―πππ―ππππ―ππ
ππππ―ππ―πππ―πππ―π―ππ
πππ―π―ππ―π―ππ―ππ―π―πππ
πππ―ππππ―ππ―π―π―ππππ
πππππππππππππππ
πππππππππππππππ
1 obsequium_ 2019-01-31
Oh you donβt care? Well I care even less, so I guess I win. Bye L O S E R
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
1 I_FART_OUT_MY_BUTT69 2019-01-31
This is a good step for humanity because the next obvious milestone for the abortion activists is retroactive late-term abortions after birth so now we actually have a chance to abort u Ed.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
πandπthat'sπaπgoodπthingπ
1 lua_x_ia 2019-01-31
βMental healthβ usually requires a psychiatristβs signoff.
1 obsequium_ 2019-01-31
Nah family docs do most mental health treatment in practice
1 Dr_Cocker 2019-01-31
Yeah and now a mother can say she's going to get PTSD the day she's crowning and terminate the baby which effectively gets rid of the law you're trying to claim is still in place.
1 Dr_Cocker 2019-01-31
Bruh lmao
Sorry for serious post but don't pretend to be the one correcting a misleading statment.
1 911roofer 2019-01-31
Wow, that's the most fucking thing I've read all day, and I hang out on r/subredditdrama.
1 I-165 2019-01-31
βHealthβ expands it to include mental health and since aborting the baby will improve the mothers mental health it de facto extends it till term.
1 EviscerateTheProles 2019-01-31
this seems to be the only argument that people have against the legislation, which states that it must be "necessary to protect the patient's life or health". Given that 24 weeks is already like five and a half months, I don't see many women suddenly deciding to bullshit their way to a late-term abortion that far along, for which they'd have to convince a doctor that it is "necessary" to protect their mental health. And I imagine actual cases of someone getting an ok for a 'mental health late-term abortion' would be extraordinarily few in number. When you're that far along in pregnancy already, I think most people would just finish it out and go the adoption route. And even besides that, how ethical would it be to stick in a 'but not mental health reasons' clause in there? If doctors say someone's pregnancy is a severe risk to their mental health, I'll take their word for it over the barely-informed fears of random tards who aren't actually dealing with pregnant women all the time. There's not gonna be a sudden rash of six to nine month pregnant women getting abortion passes because they claim to be suicidal or something. It's retarded political fear-mongering.
1 RyuunDragon 2019-01-31
Good. The more dead mayo babies the better for humanity. Inshallah.
1 KingNothing305 2019-01-31
When will people learn that life isn't sacred its more of a joke.
1 none_to_remain 2019-01-31
Here in Manhattan I cannot sleep for the incessant booming of the anti-baby cannons on all sides, but you complain to be the community board and they're just like "Eh we gotta get those babies"
1 preserved_fish 2019-01-31
Have you not yet been conscripted into your block's anti-baby battery? They have me doing 10 hrs a week. Deblasio personally threatened my family when I initially resisted.
1 uniqueguy263 2019-01-31
Some random bird eats a baby while New Yorkers try to save the baby by shooting down the bird
1 car_tire 2019-01-31
Thehe stork is savving the babay from blade runer
1 Serial_Peacemaker 2019-01-31
wat
1 PlumCorruptor 2019-01-31
WHERE THE FUCK ARE ALL THE LABELS HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THIS DRAWING FROM THE MODERN MICHELANGELO IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT? ANSWER ME THAT YOU WHORE
1 Thatlookedlikeithurt 2019-01-31
This is actually one of his more subtle ones.
1 Van-Diemen 2019-01-31
It's actually kind of clever, even if I don't agree with it.
1 JamesRobotoMD 2019-01-31
It seems to be a pelican carrying disgraced former NY governor Eliot Spitzer out of New York and to Real America so that he can whorefuck in peace.
1 OccasionallyClueless 2019-01-31
I can't believe I forgot about this.
It's not Eliot Spitzer though because he'd be trying to take the whore with him.
1 Chapocel 2019-01-31
Carlos Danger died for this
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
Based NY. It's hilarious how much r/conservative cryposts about these "evil" abortion laws lol.
1 GandalftheChromatic 2019-01-31
Ok, I think I understand this now after seeing the first link
We need to enslave all children instead of aborting them
1 White_Dudeness 2019-01-31
Nonono, we need to enslave the children of our children by making compromise with sin. Not our children directly. This is kabbalistically important!
1 detroitvelvetslim 2019-01-31
1 subliiime4668 2019-01-31
ftfy
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-01-31
Aborting Tyrone first
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-01-31
kek
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2019-01-31
Thankfully the daughter actually was not pregnant from Cletus Sr. since the libs enforced nationwide spermicide extinction programs since 2013.
1 usedtobread 2019-01-31
I figure it's because their base rewards them for pretending to care
1 Ranilen 2019-01-31
Is Ben Garrison pro gun control now?
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2019-01-31
No those are flak cannons.
1 Patsy02 2019-01-31
Your founding fathers actually intended for navy and artillery to be privately contributed. Smh my head, learn some history.
1 jubbergun 2019-01-31
You jest, but that kinda was a thing.
1 Patsy02 2019-01-31
I don't jest, that's what happened. The barbary war was won with libertarian 24-pounders.
1 jubbergun 2019-01-31
Oh, so we don't disagree and we're all on the same page?
Well, fuck you anyway, Patsy, this is /r/Drama. It's time to stir the puddin'.
1 Patsy02 2019-01-31
No fuck u nerd
1 jubbergun 2019-01-31
Thank you.
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-01-31
This is actually a pretty well made cartoon.
Could Ben be kicking the habit?
1 sex_tourism 2019-01-31
Maybe its a false flag
1 DoctorMort 2019-01-31
It's surprisingly well done. He must have been off the fentanyl when he thought of this idea. No worries, I'm sure he'll relapse tomorrow.
1 HerpDerpDrone 2019-01-31
You should be able to abort age 0 to 18 tbh
1 Tobans 2019-01-31
No reason not to extend that to 90
1 Jinzub 2019-01-31
Surprised the stork didn't have a phat ass considering Ben's recent comics
1 RyuunDragon 2019-01-31
Don't give Fentanyl Ben ideas to become a furry.
1 Remove_honk 2019-01-31
>when the knot is labeled
1 RyuunDragon 2019-01-31
Why would you give me those thoughts of a 80-year old man snorting fentanyl while drawing an anatomically correct knot.
God I wish WW3 would start right now.
1 Remove_honk 2019-01-31
-knot, about to enter Hillary's big ol' brapper
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2019-01-31
Same tbh
1 elephantofdoom 2019-01-31
Without labels, I can only assume that the moral of the comic is that guns are bad.
1 JustLions 2019-01-31
I do not believe that this was made by Ben "Mo Mochies No Problems" Garrison.
1 1029384756-mk2 2019-01-31
I think ben garrison is either reading this sub causing him to becoming more self concious.
His recent drawings have really cut down on all the retarded labels and become simple and straightforward enough to the point where the scribbles actually look like half decent political cartoons.
Maybe good ol' Benny actually got into fentanyl rehab after all.
1 retarded4bustin 2019-01-31
This actually swings a bit to far to the other side where it's hard to understand what's going on without context. Still an improvement for Benny G though.
1 Metatron58 2019-01-31
The real drama is in the comments here.
As is tradition when the sub is open to all the normies srs posting.
1 muck4doo 2019-01-31
Blood for the blood god.