You probably don't get bussy because you're the type of guy who fucking nails his dick to a board

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

Wow that's really hurtful why would you say something like that I'm trying my best 😢😢

She probably means mayo men but has to let the informed reader read between the lines because of the anti-mayocide censorship.

The only problem is that she is enabling mayo women, but nobody's perfect.

The perfidious female mayo. 😡

"How can I make an issue that doesn't involve me more about me..."

Rather, we ought to sympathize more, that is equally, with similarly policed, incarcerated, not to mention evicted, Black girls and women.

But... black girls and women aren't similarly policed, incarcerated, and evicted.

SHHhhh. Don't mansplain.

I am not convinced that people sometimes sympathize more with men being accused of a sexual crime because they are men, and not because they think these men are being falsely accused and would feel the same empathy if a women was the accused

No, not all men, just the right ones. The privilege she's talking about isn't racial, but financial.

Also even among the rich, white women still get away with worst shit than men. Just looked at how Martin Shkreli went to jail, but Elizabeth Holmes didn't for the same shit.

rich, white women

This is the true problem, greed is only an unavoidable consequence of wealth for mayos.

That's why we need socialism for the mayocide, and then liberterianism will be possible.

Just looked at how Martin Shkreli went to jail, but Elizabeth Holmes didn't for the same shit.

Just fyi, the criminal trial against Holmes isn't done. That's the reason why she is still out there. And if she is found guilty, then she is facing 20 years in prison. But it will take some time, since the prosecution has to go through 17 million pages of documents.

https://www.law360.com/lifesciences/articles/1116482/theranos-execs-days-of-reckoning-draw-nearer

She'll cry, people are going to be moved by her emotions and give her 3 months in the prison resort where Martha Stewart went and a book deal when she gets out.

the male judge is going to be moved by her emotions and give her 3 months in the prison

FTFY.

Nah. Suspended sentence. Calling it now.

At least she'll finally stop using that ridiculous voice.

Idk how people could have any sympathy for her after watching her body language, bitch has those great white shark serial killer looking-ass eyes. If you told me she was getting locked up for murdering 30 infants I’d believe it in a second.

Honestly from where I'm sitting Holmes seem far worse than Shkreli

Shkreli got caught in misleading investors into thinking his shit was less high risk than it actually was and ponzi schemes, which honestly happens so frequently half of investing bureaus should be in jail if the authorities decided to prosecute every single case

Holmes fooled people to invest in a product that didn't exist at all, she sold fake products to the state and knew her product would never worked.

So if you consider both Shkreli and Holmes service providers, Shkreli misled people who used his service, but it was still a service, he even proved in several cases that his investors made profits from it. But Holmes didn't have a product, she sold magic beans to clueless state officials

And yet Holmes will be given the same sentence or perhaps even less. Most likely because Shkreli's parents were janitors while the father of Holmes was the VP of Enron.

And yet Holmes will be given the same sentence or perhaps even less.

I don't know. We will see. Shkreli faced a maximum amount of 15 years as far as I know. Holmes has 11 charges against her and every single one of them is worth 20 years.

And she's not the only one charged. The COO of the company, Ramesh Balwani, is also charged. Would be funny if he gets more.

The day these idiots start addressing the highest factor of inequality - wealth - is the day I let out a sigh of relief and have hope for humanity again.

That's not the point of the exercise though; it's not really an issue of myopia

"Look how much I, a mayo, can shit on mayos" and other such nonsense isn't a misplaced attempt to help the fuzzy-wuzzies. Instead, it's intended to show off how high-status the speaker is -- i.e. "look, I'm so well off that I can afford to deal with everyone else routinely shitting on me because of my innate characteristics, and still live comfortably." The best analogy might be "going to a bar that costs ten times as much as it should, just because that'll keep the poors out" or something like that

It's hard to do that with "wealth inequality," ironically because none of these Ignatius J. Reilly-types actually have money, and it's hard to try to put yourself at the top of the totem pole with an earnest request to "plz gib." By the same token, you're not going to get a worker's movement out of it since none of them actually seem to do any work

(We could try to make it a similar status game among the actual wealth holders -- e.g. somebody like Warren Buffett could come out with "look how much I can pay in taxes and not care" -- but they don't really seem to give a shit)

Like wtf am I seriously being expected to believe that people would sympathize more with a poor irish guy being accused of rape than with a blonde rich young women?

In what world?

Is she looking only at MRAs or what?

(((mayo)))

Here's the thing. You said a "Ephebophile is a Pedophile." Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that. As someone who is a Ephebophile, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls Ephebophiles Pedophiles. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing. If you're saying "Pedophile Family" you're referring to the fetish of Pedophaila, which includes things from Pedophiles to Ephebophiles to Hebephilies. So your reasoning for calling a Ephebophile a Pedophile is because random people "call the ones who like kids Pedophiles?" Let's get Lolicons and Shotacons in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a BDSM Lover or an Fetisher? It's not one or the other, that's not how fetishes work. They're both. A Ephebophile is a Ephebophile and a member of the Pedophile family. But that's not what you said. You said a Ephebophile is a Pedophile, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the Pedophile family Pedophiles, which means you'd call Hebephiles, Lolicons, and other Fetishers Pedophiles, too. Which you said you don't.

Not to Seriouspost, but lobsters are right on this one.

Just the sentencing gap alone throws her book in the Flat Earth isle of the library.

It's the famous men are wonderful effect

I love the passive aggressive feminism in that article

Citations are sexist.

Believe women wiki editors.

Yeah that's the trouble with them - throw out some common sense that goes against pop culture's obsession with women and then hit 'em with that all carnivore diet for that one two punch.

By sentencing gap do you mean the tendency for women to complete full sentences while most men cannot compl

Take your upvote and g

Not to Seriouspost, but

👇

🔥

It's over as soon as you get Mad Online, even if you're right

Realizing that these people haven't darwined themselves out and, probably, make more money than you, while crying how they are oppressed, will get anyone mad, though.

mad

Consider it a cultural shock, I am not an american and shit like that was considered a justification for one-way trip to the looney house not so long ago.

yeah it’s pretty fucking stupid to make that idea a headlining concept

there are certainly prominent cases where men get more sympathy for not being women, but they’re specific to certain social contexts

the rest of the time men are savage animals you’re not supposed to feel sorry for

i mean maybe she goes into that in the book, but fuck that, i ain’t reading no book just to defend a poorly thought-out, easily corruptable choice of thesis

Maybe men deserve to be shit on until they stop raping and murdering women dumbass. Do you think you could control yourself enough to do that? No? Okay then. Shut up.

"Fempathy" is both more real and a much better portmanteau

How many times do you have to twist your brain around post-irony to seriously consider the idea that humans are more empathetic to men? Is it the root cause for why we let men get on the boats first in the titanic or why men are usually the people we ask to get out of hostage situations first?

Even caught myself in having more sympathy towards women than other men, it's fucking hard wired into us

Other men are competition.

Other men are also aesthetically displeasing

You're hanging around the wrong men.

Sounds gay

Only if your the bottom.

sure jan

Ah, the wisdom of the Romans. As true as it was 2000 years ago.

If your statement was true, all men would have to do is cake on with the make up, a woman is as an object much more than just a face

Based take.

It is only a man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual impulse that could give the name of the fair sex to that under-sized, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race; for the whole beauty of the sex is bound up with this impulse. Instead of calling them beautiful there would be more warrant for describing women as the unaesthetic sex.

Seems like the sex robots would change this, if its the case

Interesting, in the link above, women also like women better

The phrase was coined by Alice Eagly and Antonio Mladinic in 1994 after finding that both male and female participants tend to assign positive traits to women, with female participants showing a far more pronounced bias. Positive traits were assigned to men by participants of both genders, but to a lesser degree.

I almost always feel sorry for women who are homeless. The amount of shit that has to have gone wrong for a foid that nobody will take her in is horrifying to contemplate. A dude on the other hand...

it's fucking hard wired into us

If you read up a bit, the regions of the brain are pretty well mapped out these days. It's in the lower limbic system.

Reaching it can be a bit tricky but easily doable. Shortest path is through the eye.

Also knowing when you hit the right spot is also easy. Watch your favorite porn, then entire an ice-pick or something like it into your lower brain through your left eye. Then start stabbing or probing until you feel your erection going.

Takes a bit of courage but after the last foid turned me down, this was pretty obvious for me.

I did it 3 years ago and I could not be happier.

Sounds gay

How many times do you have to twist your brain around post-irony to seriously consider the idea that humans are more empathetic to men?

Only one time. Because as soon as you see that you can write a book about it and make money off it, it's a go.

they’re more empathetic to men if the subject is cheating, slander, or regret

that’s about it though

The opposite is true and it is a good thing.

Sympathy towards any human being needs to stop by 2020.

The absolute state of femoids

philosopher

How do these retards get hired by philosophy departments?

Worst part is that Martha Nussbaum praised the book.

Everyone was talking so much good shit about it, it was really disappointing. Even her criticism of a retard like Peterson was meh

The himpathy shit is what you would see retards in CB talk about, not in a proper analytical philosophy book. Is just seems bad analysis

Analytic philosophy has nothing to do with stupid ass feminist shit. Wittgenstein, Quine, Russell, etc. are turning in their graves.

There has been great feminist analytical philosophy though

Whomst? Most analytic philosophers eschew that kind of stuff, at least in their published works.

great... analytical philosophy

lmao

r/drama mocked me for saying modern philosiphy was a waste of time, but now they see the truth.

Philosophy is pretty meh tier nowadays, there was much cooler stuff in the 20th century

A feminist wrote a book on "HIMpathy" - the tendency of people to feel sympathy towards men.

One of these "World's Shortest Books" jokes here I guess.

Another reason to believe it is the ways in which Black boys and men are often centered in white liberals' discussions of systemic racism, to the relative exclusion/erasure of Black girls and women

Woke author: we really treat black men too good

Isn’t this that whataboutism thing they like to talk about

Feminists mention how you can be blinded by your privledge and that can lead to situations where you can't see the hardships others might experience that you don't. This lady took that to the extreme.

thinking women can be privileged

um excuse me sweaty but white american and british women are the most oppressed minority in the world

Black is white, up is down.

Thanks for getting that Weird Al song stuck in my head.

Talk about resting bitch face https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/651460023780925440/UyXjyB7b_400x400.jpg

She looks like a tranny.

Looked this up. She's a philosopher (aka I ain't gotta prove shit) for philosophers facts and reality are just details that get in the way.

out of all the problems with modern philosophy, yours is that they don’t “prove shit”?

that’s like all they try to do, though

Yup, that's it. That's my only problem with philosophy and my post totally stopped at that parentheses.

The rest of your sentence is just a vaguer version of the parentheses, though

Are you denying that there is no data collecting or mathematical modeling inherent in philosophy like there is in even the soft science of psychology ?

Not unless it’s necessary for whatever they’re trying to argue. When it is, they generally rely on the mathematical findings of others.

I'm don't think you understand how philosophy works. Most philosophical problems can only be solved through deductive reasoning. Let's take one of the simplest philosophical problems, the trolley problem which of two choices is ethical. How do you propose to solve it with data collection?

How do you propose to prove which is the ethical choice with data collection?

Quantiative empiricism using chapos.

Kant would agree it's always morally right to run over chapo user

I do understand how Philosophy works.... how does the trolley problem's gray vagaries help someone determine that people empathize with men too much?

Whatever this person is saying doesn't have much to do with philosophy even if she is a "philosopher". She seems to be making some (badly supported) sociological arguments. Now sociology is a field that tends to produce a lot of questionable work, especially since they make empirical arguments without good evidence. Like where is she going with the Brock Turner case? That the legal system shows more sympathy to men? That argument only works if you literally use one data point.

Well, to be fair, 1 in 4 homeless people are women, after all.

A feminist wrote a book on "HIMpathy"

Let me throw a wild guess and say that she might be also a Jew. We're hitting levels of chutzpah never seen before.

She sounds like the type to give you HERpes.