Latex enthusiasts argue about consent again when OP gets deepthroated by their Dr.

24  2019-02-22 by acidoverbasic

8 comments

Y⭕️u're👊 n🅾w ⭕️ne☝️ 🅾f 3️⃣ 🖖🅿️e🅾🅿️le👨🏿👩🏻👦🏽 ℹ️'ve 🅱l⭕️cked😡❌🚷🚫‼️ 🅾n 🅱eddit👽. ℹ 💁d⭕️n't even Ⓜ️ℹ️nd💅 🅿️e🅾🅿️le 👦🏽👴👵🏼👮🏻 s🅿️er🅱ℹ️ng ⭕️ut😡😤😤 at Ⓜ️e😱, 🅱ut wh🅰t ✋☝️ℹ d🅾 Ⓜ️ℹ️nd👀😤 ℹ️s just the c⭕️Ⓜ️🅿️lete😣 l🅰ck 🅾f re🅰l™💯🕵 🅰r🅱uⓂ️ents.📚

Y⭕️u're 👊👐✋just 🅱🅾rℹ️ng🙄😣.

Outlines:

  1. This Post - Outline

I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues

And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

What about pedophiles that don't act on anything but love fantasizing of children? Just a question.

I'm not a pedophile but my fetish is to be pedantic about it all the time.

He's just asking questions!!1!

You could say that he's JAQing off about kids.

It's actually a good question, with radical premise, yes, but still.

Because I FUCKING BET that they would screetch to the world's end, if someone, let's say, had an amputee/rape/bestiality/other degenerate fantasy about THEM. All while being sort of ok with "lifestyle" folks doing their degeneracy in public.

Got off on a technicality?

hot