I need people to stop banning my lolis. That's all I need! Just let me be with my drawings. Let me enjoy cute happy anime lolis that are so full of love and affection. That let me forget about this horrible world and the shitty people in it. Is that so hard to ask for? Why are people so fucking hell bent on banning lolis? What do they or society gain? I don't like scary slasher movies about people murdering people(illegal BTW). But I don't call for them to be banned nor insult those that enjoy them. One of the few things in life that makes me happy. Little glimmers of joy in my shit life and they fucking ban it because they want to make an extra buck fron ad investors.
Maybe there's a reason why people want these pure, perfect maidens? Could it be that the real world is filled with darwinistic people? Filled with murder, drugs, deasise, genocide, virtue signalling, inequality, false politicians, false ronance, bullies, ect. Where everyone is out to push eachother down to get on top? Yea, no wonder people are so eager to want something better.
Is it really difficult for people to mind their own business? If you don't harm anyone, why ban it?
You know. What about GTA that glorifies crime and actually hurts people in the real world with predatory microtransactions? What about rape fantasies? What about guro? What about furry porn? What if she's canonlly legal age? What about girls that look mature but are underage(Ikkitousen, HSoTD)? What about all that incest porn on pornhub? That's illegal IRL but no one is harping to ban that. What about r/trees? A sub dedicated to glorifying marijuana but one problem...weed has been and still is illegal and classified as a class1 drug in the US. Or the sub that literally shows real kids being killed. Or all those propaganda and ad shilling? But no one bans that!
BUT BAN THE LOLIS!!!!!
IF. PEOPLE. JUST. STOPPED. BANNING. LOLIS. I'LL. BE. HAPPY
This is pretty obviously them mocking ITers who ask for a source on even the most mundane and obvious things. So it's no surprise that it flew right over their heads.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Inceltears is literally barely 1 tier above being an incel. The posters are either really smug dudes who had sex once thinking they are better or literal 30 year old virgin losers who also think they are superior but can barely hold a conversation with a girl.
Looksmatch would put them match up with primordial ooze. Everyone knows that women can easily bat 2 points above their own level, sometimes even as much as 4. Where does that leave subhuman filth men who are 3 and under? There's no one for them to date... There's a reason femcels(who usually have already had sex or could have with their looks match a million times) are all volcels just thirsting for chad or chang or tyrone thundercock, but tens of millions of men around the world have and never will touch a pussy. The world is sexist, and against men sweatie. Feminism and women voting was a mistake
Except that isn't how it works because women continue to pass down ugly genes. Make up and surgery has done wonders for foids to trick men into getting shit genes with their kids. Best example of this is California, Brazil, and Korea
Great counter argument faggot. I'm not an incel, I just realize they have very salient points when discussing foids. Foids are good to bag and tag and even murder, but they aren't good for anything else. All they'll do is suck you dry of life and money and leave you for someone higher on the scale. Unless you are a 10/10 gigachad, you'll be cheated on and fucked over in marriage. It's a guarantee with how loose average women are
Yes, men are much more likely to have fetishes that create this scenario. Additionally, it’s easier for a female 1 to ascend to a 3 or 4(or higher if they have kardashian money)with surgery since the plastic surgery field is much more accustomed to working with femoid tissue.
See that’s where the dilemma is because for chicks even 1s can put on make up and elevate themselves to at least a two. I’m trying to imagine a straight up one while they’ve tried everything and they’re at their best. Maybe a shaven yet pink haired butch chick that is also over 600 lbs?
"well it's not the fact you're ugly, it's that women have magical senses and can sense your bitterness and muhsoggyknee, even though they date guys who beat them and get raped by guys they just met on tinder."
no way, instead of going out in public and mom's spaghetti as soon as a girl talks to you, you can jerk off real quick and think before speaking to not instantly sound like a loser when you reply online to a girl.
There's now a whole generation of kids whose parents let the internet raise them; iirc the average 18-year-old today is at the developmental level of an 8-year-old in terms of EQ or social skills (I forget which one it was, or if it was both). I think the average teen exhibits symptoms of autism as well. Getting laid must be tough if most of your social interaction growing up has been done on online platforms, let alone having a meaningful relationship. Some of these poor souls have convinced themselves that they can't get laid because of their appearance or cultural conditions rather than the fact that they don't understand people and don't know how to talk to them outside of the context of a video game or imageboard. Sad!
iirc the average 18-year-old today is at the developmental level of an 8-year-old in terms of EQ or social skills (I forget which one it was, or if it was both). I think the average teen exhibits symptoms of autism as well.
I read an article about it about a year ago but since then can't find the source because they keywords are too broad. I could be mis-remembering, but there's also plenty of evidence to suggest that gen z has a prolonged adolescence and can't self-regulate their emotions very well
Inceltears is literally barely 1 tier above being an incel
Correction, they're a tier below. They spend their entire day mocking 30 year old virgins. While also being virgins themselves. They are literally smug incels with somehow more hatred, just less of it is directed towards women.
They are the lowest of the low, and yet they're fine to make fun of due to their sheer hypocrisy.
A linguist enters the conversation and has a lengthy analysis as to whether this posts constitutes a sarcastic element, with the conclusion that it is too complex to give a definitive answer.
Oh wow, that self-post to r/whoosh is pathetic. "hurdur, I'm obviously too stupid to understand sarcasm, people told me I took this too seriously, hihi how silly of me"...
That dude really wrote a grad school critical analysis essay about how he can't tell if the obvious sarcasm is sarcasm or not. So any time somebody tries to tell me that education makes people smarter, I'm showing them this.
Hmm, seems like that Linguist could have used a /s somewhere along the way.
I'd make a witty reply to him asking "how he liked them apples" but I'd probably get a 3000 word essay on the flavour of the apples before concluding I was, in fact, talking shit.
My pelvic floor is good. I could break some shit with my kegels, seriously. I just leak like a faucet cause the urethra shifts around, it’s fucked. It’s not the prettiest pussy anymore, but she can wreck a dude, she still got superpowers.
I don't see how this is incels. I also can't guarantee it's even sarcastic. This could easily be a statement by the kind of person who talks constantly about "feminine penis" in women subs.
The only people more pathetic than the folks who made a subreddit about incels and spend time bitching about incels in there are people who spend time bitching about the people who bitch about incels
If it makes any difference I'm not bitching about them, this is more like going to a human zoo where instead of it being different species of animals it's different forms of pathetic humans.
another testament to reddit's autism is when you see posts on /r/askreddit where a reply to a joke explaining the joke has more upvotes than the original joke
I always think it's funny when someone drops obvious bait that's plain wrong and 100 redditors flip out and go off on how wrong it is. Like, it's ok guys. One or two people pointing out it's wrong is fine. 100 people piling on to get their 'this is wrong" post in there is LOL autistic.
Everyone will read a comment the way they hope to interpret it. If they already dislike someone before reading the comment, they won't accept any sarcasm or wit from it.
Yeah. Reddit users have spent years trying to discover a way to broadcast that they’re being sarcastic. Before /s, there was blue text. Like /blue redditors are so good at detecting sarcasm /blue
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
128 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-02-24
I need people to stop banning my lolis. That's all I need! Just let me be with my drawings. Let me enjoy cute happy anime lolis that are so full of love and affection. That let me forget about this horrible world and the shitty people in it. Is that so hard to ask for? Why are people so fucking hell bent on banning lolis? What do they or society gain? I don't like scary slasher movies about people murdering people(illegal BTW). But I don't call for them to be banned nor insult those that enjoy them. One of the few things in life that makes me happy. Little glimmers of joy in my shit life and they fucking ban it because they want to make an extra buck fron ad investors.
Maybe there's a reason why people want these pure, perfect maidens? Could it be that the real world is filled with darwinistic people? Filled with murder, drugs, deasise, genocide, virtue signalling, inequality, false politicians, false ronance, bullies, ect. Where everyone is out to push eachother down to get on top? Yea, no wonder people are so eager to want something better.
Is it really difficult for people to mind their own business? If you don't harm anyone, why ban it?
You know. What about GTA that glorifies crime and actually hurts people in the real world with predatory microtransactions? What about rape fantasies? What about guro? What about furry porn? What if she's canonlly legal age? What about girls that look mature but are underage(Ikkitousen, HSoTD)? What about all that incest porn on pornhub? That's illegal IRL but no one is harping to ban that. What about r/trees? A sub dedicated to glorifying marijuana but one problem...weed has been and still is illegal and classified as a class1 drug in the US. Or the sub that literally shows real kids being killed. Or all those propaganda and ad shilling? But no one bans that!
BUT BAN THE LOLIS!!!!!
IF. PEOPLE. JUST. STOPPED. BANNING. LOLIS. I'LL. BE. HAPPY
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 WreckingYourHome 2019-02-24
Were antivaxxers right all along? 🤔🤔🤔
1 TotesMessenger 2019-02-24
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 White_Dudeness 2019-02-24
/u/the_marx why was it deleted? Dramautistic behaviour like the above must be documented!
1 ineed750bucks 2019-02-24
Based...sort of
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-02-24
This is pretty obviously them mocking ITers who ask for a source on even the most mundane and obvious things. So it's no surprise that it flew right over their heads.
1 Klappspaten66 2019-02-24
Source?
1 Non_Pirater1879 2019-02-24
Got a source for that buddy? Source? Source?
1 number_11310 2019-02-24
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
1 ZIIReactionzV 2019-02-24
Inceltears is literally barely 1 tier above being an incel. The posters are either really smug dudes who had sex once thinking they are better or literal 30 year old virgin losers who also think they are superior but can barely hold a conversation with a girl.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-02-24
IT is below Braincels. Braincels are virgins, but they're not virgins in denial.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
Is this something new? I'm almost 30 and I remember even the fattest, ugliest of people I knew still had sex.
Just have a walk around shopping centers of any western city and look at the quality of new mothers and fathers.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-02-24
I'd say that online dating has fucked it up.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
What do you mean?
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-02-24
Unless you're really attractive, you're at a huge disadvantage when using Tinder or OKCupid. As a guy, at least.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
Women can smell you bitterness, thats these guys problem.
Go stay at a backpackers, if you're a local its insane how easy it is to hook up with tourists.
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Meanwhile 5 foot tall balding indians with acne scars stare at you in confusion.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
So lower your standards, go fuck an untouchable or whatever the fuck you call the dregs of your society.
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Looksmatch would put them match up with primordial ooze. Everyone knows that women can easily bat 2 points above their own level, sometimes even as much as 4. Where does that leave subhuman filth men who are 3 and under? There's no one for them to date... There's a reason femcels(who usually have already had sex or could have with their looks match a million times) are all volcels just thirsting for chad or chang or tyrone thundercock, but tens of millions of men around the world have and never will touch a pussy. The world is sexist, and against men sweatie. Feminism and women voting was a mistake
1 EveryoneHasGoneCrazy 2019-02-24
it's so hideous ugly genes don't get passed on, makes sense to me
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Except that isn't how it works because women continue to pass down ugly genes. Make up and surgery has done wonders for foids to trick men into getting shit genes with their kids. Best example of this is California, Brazil, and Korea
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
Grow some balls mate, Christ almighty no girl wants to fuck a guy with your attitude.
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Great counter argument faggot. I'm not an incel, I just realize they have very salient points when discussing foids. Foids are good to bag and tag and even murder, but they aren't good for anything else. All they'll do is suck you dry of life and money and leave you for someone higher on the scale. Unless you are a 10/10 gigachad, you'll be cheated on and fucked over in marriage. It's a guarantee with how loose average women are
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
Yeah you went too far and showed you shitty trollness. i wont reply..
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Sources?
1 slingerg 2019-02-24
So stick your dick in some ooze, you pussy.
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Oh dang, didn't think about it like that. Time to ascend
1 jaja10 2019-02-24
volcel if you wouldn't
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-24
This is so sad Alexa play despacito
1 killinrin 2019-02-24
So you’re saying a chick that’s a one could fuck a five? I wish I could conceptualize this
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
Yes, men are much more likely to have fetishes that create this scenario. Additionally, it’s easier for a female 1 to ascend to a 3 or 4(or higher if they have kardashian money)with surgery since the plastic surgery field is much more accustomed to working with femoid tissue.
1 killinrin 2019-02-24
See that’s where the dilemma is because for chicks even 1s can put on make up and elevate themselves to at least a two. I’m trying to imagine a straight up one while they’ve tried everything and they’re at their best. Maybe a shaven yet pink haired butch chick that is also over 600 lbs?
1 westofthetracks 2019-02-24
part of what makes 1s 1s is that they're incapable of trying their best i think. like the reverse of how confidence makes you sexy.
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2019-02-24
Just get rich lol.
Spend the money on prostitution or plastic surgery, your choice.
1 umar4812 2019-02-24
How would you even be an incel or femcel if you've actually slept with someone before?
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
There are foids that claim to be femcels... trust me
1 sadderreborn 2019-02-24
Callled dhallits
1 Mypussylipsneedchad 2019-02-24
Sweaty, you'll never gain VIP access to my foo foo noo noo.
Deal with it.
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
I want gussy anyway
1 morerokk 2019-02-24
Ah yes, the six senses. Touch, smell, taste, hearing, vision, and the excluse "bitterness-o-vision" that is only unlocked by having two X-chromosomes.
1 Femicide 2019-02-24
"well it's not the fact you're ugly, it's that women have magical senses and can sense your bitterness and muhsoggyknee, even though they date guys who beat them and get raped by guys they just met on tinder."
1 HereForCatharsis 2019-02-24
You're at a huge disadvantage in life if you are using Tinder or OKCupid.
1 Lehk 2019-02-24
no way, instead of going out in public and mom's spaghetti as soon as a girl talks to you, you can jerk off real quick and think before speaking to not instantly sound like a loser when you reply online to a girl.
1 uniqueguy263 2019-02-24
So don't? Those services claim to be 70% guys, we both know they're more
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-24
Huh... Never had that issue
1 snallygaster 2019-02-24
There's now a whole generation of kids whose parents let the internet raise them; iirc the average 18-year-old today is at the developmental level of an 8-year-old in terms of EQ or social skills (I forget which one it was, or if it was both). I think the average teen exhibits symptoms of autism as well. Getting laid must be tough if most of your social interaction growing up has been done on online platforms, let alone having a meaningful relationship. Some of these poor souls have convinced themselves that they can't get laid because of their appearance or cultural conditions rather than the fact that they don't understand people and don't know how to talk to them outside of the context of a video game or imageboard. Sad!
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-02-24
Yeah I'd like a source for that.
1 heavenlytoaster 2019-02-24
Source: Reddit.com
1 snallygaster 2019-02-24
I read an article about it about a year ago but since then can't find the source because they keywords are too broad. I could be mis-remembering, but there's also plenty of evidence to suggest that gen z has a prolonged adolescence and can't self-regulate their emotions very well
1 _-ctrl-_ 2019-02-24
/r/drama
1 westofthetracks 2019-02-24
christ, hate to think where that puts drama posters
1 umar4812 2019-02-24
EQ?
1 snallygaster 2019-02-24
Ability to identify and self-regulate emotions, identify emotions in others, etc.
1 umar4812 2019-02-24
Thanks
1 GARBAGE_MACHINE 2019-02-24
Braincels has a sense of humor and realizes they're subhumans, where as IT is just pathetic, doesn't realize it, and can't understand a joke.
1 hyledog 2019-02-24
when incels sperg out they say ridiculous shit that can be construed as funny because it’s so crazy
when the enlightened redditors the kind of which browse inceltears get mad they just get pretentious as fuck and its super boring
1 Fletch71011 2019-02-24
That recent thread where they all said they were virgins in IT makes me think otherwise. They're just as bad.
1 ZIIReactionzV 2019-02-24
Do you have link?
1 umar4812 2019-02-24
Check the top posts of the past month or so. It's a Drake meme image.
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
LOL IT is below even the cuck and hotwife subs
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-24
Duh. This are awesome
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
to the gulag with you
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-24
But I'm not a furry
1 PingPongSauce 2019-02-24
I see no difference
1 -Steve_French- 2019-02-24
IncelTears is full of incels lmao
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-02-24
It's pretty much a law that any community created only to hate an existing community will eventually become worse than the people they were mocking
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-02-24
So if a community derides every community including itself, then...?
1 bittah_prophet 2019-02-24
Welcome, gentlemen, to /r/drama
1 kaczynskireborn 2019-02-24
Still holds
1 rnjbond 2019-02-24
Remember that guy who said "I'm not an Incel, I post on inceltears"?
1 morerokk 2019-02-24
Correction, they're a tier below. They spend their entire day mocking 30 year old virgins. While also being virgins themselves. They are literally smug incels with somehow more hatred, just less of it is directed towards women.
They are the lowest of the low, and yet they're fine to make fun of due to their sheer hypocrisy.
1 ZIIReactionzV 2019-02-24
Your probably right. I was being generous.
1 throwawaytothetenth 2019-02-24
I actually know one SUPER hot 26 year girl who goes on IT. Like legit Gigastacey.
Fuckin crazy tho.
1 WreckingYourHome 2019-02-24
Bonus:
OP herself posts this post on /r/whoosh even though she still believes she wasn't whooshed and get's into a fight with incels.
Incel RISES UP in x-post to /r/badwomensanatomy.
A linguist enters the conversation and has a lengthy analysis as to whether this posts constitutes a sarcastic element, with the conclusion that it is too complex to give a definitive answer.
1 Thor1138 2019-02-24
Oh wow, that self-post to r/whoosh is pathetic. "hurdur, I'm obviously too stupid to understand sarcasm, people told me I took this too seriously, hihi how silly of me"...
1 Cruentum 2019-02-24
honestly i wanna see the OP is probably like 10
1 furrthur 2019-02-24
That dude really wrote a grad school critical analysis essay about how he can't tell if the obvious sarcasm is sarcasm or not. So any time somebody tries to tell me that education makes people smarter, I'm showing them this.
1 Scramble187 2019-02-24
Hmm, seems like that Linguist could have used a /s somewhere along the way.
I'd make a witty reply to him asking "how he liked them apples" but I'd probably get a 3000 word essay on the flavour of the apples before concluding I was, in fact, talking shit.
1 Redactor0 2019-02-24
I would like to think that a real linguist wouldn't be so bad at communicating.
1 westofthetracks 2019-02-24
reminder that linguistics is actually a fairly "hard" scientific field, and therefore everyone who studies it is autistic and bad at writing
1 ilya732 2019-02-24
The guy in the second reply is definitely a undiagnosed turboautist. Zero self awareness.
1 westofthetracks 2019-02-24
god redditors are so fucking retarded
1 Cruentum 2019-02-24
honestly i wanna say the OP is like 10
1 Dungold 2019-02-24
I cant believe 10k retards upvoted that shit
1 dongas420 2019-02-24
Contrarily, I can certainly believe that 10,000 retards upvoted that shit.
1 Zac1245 2019-02-24
1 drogocarl 2019-02-24
Alot to unpack here
1 Non_Pirater1879 2019-02-24
Big yikes. Full stop. There’s a lot to unpack here
1 Voltairium 2019-02-24
Gussy is proof that God has abandoned us
1 Zac1245 2019-02-24
This is very problematic, we should not normalize this behavior, yikes y'all.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-02-24
Biblepilled
1 ryandanegayin 2019-02-24
Why did you make me read this? Why did I keep on reading it? Why did God abandon us?
1 InboxMeYourButthole 2019-02-24
I don't see how this is incels. I also can't guarantee it's even sarcastic. This could easily be a statement by the kind of person who talks constantly about "feminine penis" in women subs.
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2019-02-24
Shaking rn at this blatant transphobia. What if a trans man gave birth then transitioned later?
Someone report inceltears to AHS.
1 Scramble187 2019-02-24
How transition could a transition sition if a transition could transition?
1 keeeeshawn 2019-02-24
Socially retarded virgins laughing at socially inept virgins
1 Scramble187 2019-02-24
Not for nothing but I'm a pedantic asshole and I downvote any post I see that ends in /s
If your post is so poorly written that you need to use that you belong in the gas chamber.
1 furrthur 2019-02-24
This but even less ironically
1 Scramble187 2019-02-24
Nothing ironic about this, cunt. Everything I said at the time of that post was true.
1 furrthur 2019-02-24
Well obviously it was all true, you didn't put a little sarcasm tag at the end to tell me it wasn't
1 Scramble187 2019-02-24
Yeah, cause I wasn't being fucking sarcastic, was I?
Jams to Janie's Got a Gun
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-02-24
The only people more pathetic than incels are the folks who made a subreddit about it and spend time bitching about incels in there.
1 Voltairium 2019-02-24
The only people more pathetic than the folks who made a subreddit about incels and spend time bitching about incels in there are people who spend time bitching about the people who bitch about incels
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-02-24
No u
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-02-24
If it makes any difference I'm not bitching about them, this is more like going to a human zoo where instead of it being different species of animals it's different forms of pathetic humans.
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2019-02-24
Source?
1 -Shank- 2019-02-24
Ironically they give incels more attention than anyone else ever will
1 SylvanasBiggieMilky 2019-02-24
bottomless pit sign in head feels guy . j peg
1 Non_Pirater1879 2019-02-24
https://i.redd.it/pqafkb6d9ba01.jpg
1 SylvanasBiggieMilky 2019-02-24
thank you
1 Moderator_Killer 2019-02-24
another testament to reddit's autism is when you see posts on /r/askreddit where a reply to a joke explaining the joke has more upvotes than the original joke
1 LSDawson 2019-02-24
This explains a lot
1 BasicallyADoctor 2019-02-24
Wow
1 umar4812 2019-02-24
Based and redpilled.
1 Matthew1J 2019-02-24
I see, r/incel2 just couldn't miss on a chance to support blatant transphobia! /s
1 furrthur 2019-02-24
/s-posters out OUT OUT
REEEEE
1 Matthew1J 2019-02-24
This comment of yours is so great and original. /s
1 Lysis10 2019-02-24
I always think it's funny when someone drops obvious bait that's plain wrong and 100 redditors flip out and go off on how wrong it is. Like, it's ok guys. One or two people pointing out it's wrong is fine. 100 people piling on to get their 'this is wrong" post in there is LOL autistic.
1 japsock 2019-02-24
r/inceltears is the real incel sub change my mind
1 ashent2 2019-02-24
Everyone will read a comment the way they hope to interpret it. If they already dislike someone before reading the comment, they won't accept any sarcasm or wit from it.
1 teeleer 2019-02-24
Wait, does /s mean sarcasm? I legit did not know that
1 Amelia521 2019-02-24
Yeah. Reddit users have spent years trying to discover a way to broadcast that they’re being sarcastic. Before /s, there was blue text. Like /blue redditors are so good at detecting sarcasm /blue
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-02-24
hahaha that sub has 200,000 subscribers
gas this site
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-02-24
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
1 KingWayneX 2019-02-24
Burn notice is garbage, but this comment is fiyah!!
1 Unstable_Scarlet 2019-02-24
Do tube babies count?
Can we make artificial eggs yet?
fucken scrub, not being a chinese test tube baby with a super brain
1 AutoModerator 2019-02-24
Your post/comment has been removed because it did not contain an emoji! 😱 😠😩
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 rnjbond 2019-02-24
https://i.redd.it/1yqiuey5bji21.png