Ok I just checked out that sub. It appears to be a den of snakes, trolls, and alt right Nazis. I saw several clear violations of Reddit law. We're are smarter than the average cookies, they had to know we'd be on to them. Sad.
We had time when I was born, but — ticktock — nothing got done. As the youngest member of Congress, I wish we didn’t have 12 years. It’s our lungs that are going to get choked with wildfire smoke. ... Climate delayers are the new climate deniers," said the 29-year-old lawmaker said on Instagram.
"VOTE FOR BLUE OTHERWISE YOU WILL DIE REEERR!!"
This shit is retarded. Even if America dropped to zero emissions, it wouldn't matter because every country (i.e China) isnt going to change. 12 years before tip, too? Come the fuck on, lol.
Ackchyually India and China are investing heavily into greener energy and decarbonization. India's biggest problem is probably rapidly increasing meat consumption.
But yeah developing countries will always go for cheaper methods of energy or give foreign investors leeway on emission to ensure economic growth.
I don't really have an issue with lowering emissions but it has to be realistic - you can't retrofit all buildings, you NEED planes whether for intercontinental travel whether you like it or not, building a high speed rail takes ages and is expensive, unrealistic for a 10-12 year plan, carbon taxes should be included, and fuck off with solar and wind - they don't work 24/7, so you need cover in the grid either with fossil fuels (conveniently oil companies are investing into solar companies and startups, really makes you 🤔) or battery packs that are inefficient as fuck - the Tesla battery in Australia that's like 100x50m long can power..... 30k homes for about an hour. Imagine how big a battery to cover drops in solar/wind would have to be for let's say New York.
This is why American foreign should just consist of giving low cost or free American made solar panels and wind generators to poor countries. It gets fentanyl-americans back to work building things, and allows the pajeets and africans to develop without relying on coal.
Ackchyually India and China are investing heavily into greener energy and decarbonization. India's biggest problem is probably rapidly increasing meat consumption.
They’re leasing growth in all energy sectors though. More than 1/2 their energy is from coal, the dirtiest form of energy. It will be a long, long time before they are close to as environmentally-friendly as us.
Speaking of which, maybe we could just sell West Virgina as a state and people to China for the coal?
The whole point of the plan is to attract environmentalist and woke votes. If the dems do win in 2020 (which at the moment is lol), then it will most likely be quietly swept under the rug.
Whatever AoC does feels like she's trying to capture the youth vote. Dems know GOP has the boomer demographic so they need to somehow get millenialls and zoomers to vote - and what better way to do it than by telling them they will die and their kids too so they should not have any?
Once she has their attention she'll endorse a candidate and send them all to vote.
If we had just shot all the hippies back in the 70s and kept cranking out nuclear plants, we could probably have most of our power grid be carbon-neutral right now.
Yea but if we go to zero emissions we'd have the moral high ground to wage preemptive war and have the upper hand in the inevitable conflict that will happen if the broken clock is actually right this time
That headline is why Americans need to be genocided. “If ok” wtf is that? If it is ok. Americunts have destroyed the English language more than the planes destroyed the Twin Towrs.
Wrong, it's already sinking and continuing to sink. The majority of their most densely inhabited territory is below sea level. The province they dug out of the sea needs constant maintenance to the sewage systems because the land around them keeps sinking. The current dikes and stormflood barriers are mainly useful to stop stormfloods from destroying everything next to the rivers (Rotterdam etc.) and to keep polders intact without too much hassle. The flood control system needs constant updates if they want to keep the sea at bay.
In all seriousness, It's the absolute height of lunacy to assume that we can simply just stop having kids while having modern society continue chugging along as normal. We would unironically end up like "Children of Men" as the economy/society rapidly collapses.
Then in the ashes of the post-collapsed, childless and balkanized remains of the United States of America, we all rise up and elect 😍😍COMMIE MOMMY😍😍
We will either mitigate and avoid the worst effects of climate change or we'll get totally fucked. The greatest irony will be if the people screaming the loudest about climate change opt out of breeding and we all survive, leaving the non-libs making up the entirety of the future gene pool.
Between this, all the pro-cuckolding/poly articles getting pushed, and sterilizing kids with HRT it's like the libs are trying to embody alt-right fever dreams of the Great Replacement.
“There’s scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult. And it does lead young people to have a legitimate question: Is it OK to still have children?” she said.
I didn't think i could like her any less but here we are. This is gonna lead to progressives having less children and right wing people having more as a fuck you to the left.
58 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-02-25
Ok I just checked out that sub. It appears to be a den of snakes, trolls, and alt right Nazis. I saw several clear violations of Reddit law. We're are smarter than the average cookies, they had to know we'd be on to them. Sad.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2019-02-25
Hahaha, you were so butthurt you reported all my posts to the moderators too.
You win this one, I'm not allowed to make fun of you anymore. Enjoy living your internet life every day, goodbye.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Neon_needles 2019-02-25
"VOTE FOR BLUE OTHERWISE YOU WILL DIE REEERR!!"
This shit is retarded. Even if America dropped to zero emissions, it wouldn't matter because every country (i.e China) isnt going to change. 12 years before tip, too? Come the fuck on, lol.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-25
Ackchyually India and China are investing heavily into greener energy and decarbonization. India's biggest problem is probably rapidly increasing meat consumption.
But yeah developing countries will always go for cheaper methods of energy or give foreign investors leeway on emission to ensure economic growth.
I don't really have an issue with lowering emissions but it has to be realistic - you can't retrofit all buildings, you NEED planes whether for intercontinental travel whether you like it or not, building a high speed rail takes ages and is expensive, unrealistic for a 10-12 year plan, carbon taxes should be included, and fuck off with solar and wind - they don't work 24/7, so you need cover in the grid either with fossil fuels (conveniently oil companies are investing into solar companies and startups, really makes you 🤔) or battery packs that are inefficient as fuck - the Tesla battery in Australia that's like 100x50m long can power..... 30k homes for about an hour. Imagine how big a battery to cover drops in solar/wind would have to be for let's say New York.
1 jailbot3 2019-02-25
This is why American foreign should just consist of giving low cost or free American made solar panels and wind generators to poor countries. It gets fentanyl-americans back to work building things, and allows the pajeets and africans to develop without relying on coal.
1 cragfar 2019-02-25
China is opening like 30 coal plants this year.
1 heavenlytoaster 2019-02-25
Given the size of china that sounds pretty tame.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-25
Yes, they kinda need it when you see their growth in the last 20 years - they're leading in the number of opened renewables though
1 automated_russian 2019-02-25
They’re leasing growth in all energy sectors though. More than 1/2 their energy is from coal, the dirtiest form of energy. It will be a long, long time before they are close to as environmentally-friendly as us.
Speaking of which, maybe we could just sell West Virgina as a state and people to China for the coal?
1 AirForceUn 2019-02-25
Bullshit. China started releasing Co2 large scale in the last 30 years. US had been doing it for 150 years now.
1 trilateral1 2019-02-25
per year though.
But even the totals might not end up in China's favor: US population back then was less than 100M, China's is over 1B.
1 escebar_ortez 2019-02-25
now just imagine if everyone wasnt scared of the nuclear energy boogeyman
1 arandomloser21 2019-02-25
The whole point of the plan is to attract environmentalist and woke votes. If the dems do win in 2020 (which at the moment is lol), then it will most likely be quietly swept under the rug.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-25
Whatever AoC does feels like she's trying to capture the youth vote. Dems know GOP has the boomer demographic so they need to somehow get millenialls and zoomers to vote - and what better way to do it than by telling them they will die and their kids too so they should not have any?
Once she has their attention she'll endorse a candidate and send them all to vote.
1 THECHEF47 2019-02-25
Dude nuclear lmao
1 xthek 2019-02-25
you didn't even say anything about her stance on nuclear.
The green/hippie scaremongering about nuclear power is probably the biggest factor in American contributions to climate change
1 jailbot3 2019-02-25
If we had just shot all the hippies back in the 70s and kept cranking out nuclear plants, we could probably have most of our power grid be carbon-neutral right now.
1 charming_tatum 2019-02-25
Yea but if we go to zero emissions we'd have the moral high ground to wage preemptive war and have the upper hand in the inevitable conflict that will happen if the broken clock is actually right this time
1 Stupid-Sexy-Servitor 2019-02-25
It's what the IPCC wrote in their report. But I guess Daddy knows better than all those nerds in glasses.
1 OutrageousForever 2019-02-25
That headline is why Americans need to be genocided. “If ok” wtf is that? If it is ok. Americunts have destroyed the English language more than the planes destroyed the Twin Towrs.
1 Neon_needles 2019-02-25
Honestly if climate change happens a bunch of coastal cities here along with every faggy euro city sinks into the ocean
Imo climate change is a good thing.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-25
☝️☝️☝️☝️
Entirety of Netherlands will probably get flooded. That's like, fucking amazing.
Also think of all the new inhabitable regions in Russia and Canada.
1 trilateral1 2019-02-25
Netherlands with its current dams, no further development, won't "sink" for the next 150 years, even in the worst case models.
1 Detective_Fallacy 2019-02-25
Wrong, it's already sinking and continuing to sink. The majority of their most densely inhabited territory is below sea level. The province they dug out of the sea needs constant maintenance to the sewage systems because the land around them keeps sinking. The current dikes and stormflood barriers are mainly useful to stop stormfloods from destroying everything next to the rivers (Rotterdam etc.) and to keep polders intact without too much hassle. The flood control system needs constant updates if they want to keep the sea at bay.
1 trilateral1 2019-02-25
and has been below sea level for a thousand years.
and their dams are built for significantly higher sea levels than we currently have.
Rising sea levels will change nothing for Netherlands.
1 Woolgun 2019-02-25
That's a shame :(
1 trilateral1 2019-02-25
can't win them all
1 ztwizzle 2019-02-25
I hope your home gets destroyed in the floods of 2035
1 sokolovey 2019-02-25
I think this happened in a far away land (Yurrôhp?) and it went perfectly and everyone was happy.
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2019-02-25
In all seriousness, It's the absolute height of lunacy to assume that we can simply just stop having kids while having modern society continue chugging along as normal. We would unironically end up like "Children of Men" as the economy/society rapidly collapses.
Then in the ashes of the post-collapsed, childless and balkanized remains of the United States of America, we all rise up and elect 😍😍COMMIE MOMMY😍😍
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-02-25
Just kill people when they turn 60 and don't replace the population
1 TheButtholeOfBravery 2019-02-25
🕒tick🕞tock🕦
1 Woolgun 2019-02-25
Tik Tok?
1 charming_tatum 2019-02-25
1 serialflamingo 2019-02-25
What a winning message.
1 jailbot3 2019-02-25
We will either mitigate and avoid the worst effects of climate change or we'll get totally fucked. The greatest irony will be if the people screaming the loudest about climate change opt out of breeding and we all survive, leaving the non-libs making up the entirety of the future gene pool.
1 homosexisgaylol 2019-02-25
Oh you be sure da'queesha will be having 12 kids to make up for it.
1 alldouche_nobag 2019-02-25
I’m fixated on her dick sucker’s cramp in the article pic
1 AwanBros 2019-02-25
Can you imagine all those teeths doing what they do best? 😍🍆😁
1 boyoyoyoyong 2019-02-25
Be shit lib...tell people that they shouldn't have children
Also.....we should import as many third worlders as possible, borders are fascist
1 jailbot3 2019-02-25
Between this, all the pro-cuckolding/poly articles getting pushed, and sterilizing kids with HRT it's like the libs are trying to embody alt-right fever dreams of the Great Replacement.
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-02-25
1 newcomer_ts 2019-02-25
/r/madlasses
1 Vurtizontal 2019-02-25
I didn't think i could like her any less but here we are. This is gonna lead to progressives having less children and right wing people having more as a fuck you to the left.
1 doublenuts 2019-02-25
Progressives are already having less children, because it turns out pregnancy doesn't result from a woman pegging her boyfriend.
1 HaulOfChina 2019-02-25
If you're progressive enough it does 😏
1 White_Dudeness 2019-02-25
Is it still called pegging when it's a transwoman doing it to her genderfluid partner? Yes, yes it is.
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-02-25
Trans woman getting a trans man pregnant
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-02-25
"getting my cousin pregnant to own the libs"
1 gaynazifurry4bernie 2019-02-25
This isn't Pakistan.
1 Redactor0 2019-02-25
It's about time we had a politician who was brave enough to take a stand against the institution of motherhood.
1 cincilator 2019-02-25
Big motherhood is really annoying.
1 Redactor0 2019-02-25
Goddamn Jessica Alba or whoever trying to sell diapers to me every 5 minutes... 😠😠😠
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-02-25
Big mother is watching.
1 GoldenMonkeyPox 2019-02-25
Won't be long until that picture is the next AOC Photoshop scandal du jour.
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-02-25
lol what a fucking moron
1 ConfusionConcussion 2019-02-25
I really wish politicians didn't take on the retarded views of their most radical constituents.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-02-25
One Child Policy 🤤