Td:lr Sam was female, i was male, and we had been having sex on and off. One night i wasnt in the mood, Sam sprayed me with a mystery liquid, and suddenly i wasnt in control of my inner self or my thoughts. It was a trip and ended with a headache and a bit of talk about trust and boundaries
Lol at this faggot being such a loser that even in his gay fanfiction fantasy he needs to excuse his awkward behavior by saying he was drugged.
JJBA is pretty unique, I really doubt your comparison is valid. They have this cast of vibrant but under-developed characters who really make the main character, Jojuo or however you spell his name, stand out, but then they use the main character really sparingly, which makes him stand out far more. Usually, if one character is far and away more interesting and more watchable than other characters, storytellers will start leaning on that character more and more - see Martin Sheen as President on the West Wing for an example, it was originally planned to be a small part in a show focusing more on the office. But in JJBA this dynamic of the main character standing out strongly for just a moment or two in each episode is like, the whole point, the whole premise, it's what JJBA is, it's like a bad anime that knows how to be a good anime but only shows you glimpses of being a good anime in each episode while forcing you to remember the alternative so that you really appreciate those glimpses of good. And as bad of a concept as that explanation sounds like, JJBA is the one unimaginable possibility where it's executed well, which is why it's so famous and gets run on American TV. It's actually quite interesting and definitely worth glancing up at when Adult Swim puts it on.
it's like a bad anime that knows how to be a good anime but only shows you glimpses of being a good anime in each episode while forcing you to remember the alternative so that you really appreciate those glimpses of good
So it is just like every other shonen anime ever, only all the characters are hypermasculine David Bowies?
I don't know what a "shonen anime" is but I've never seen any other anime where they use the main characters sparingly and only put effort into them and still have it actually turn out watchable or compelling like JJBA
lol you actually think it has a similar effect in Dragon Ball Z? Maybe in the abridged, but barely. Don't get me wrong DBZ is fun to watch but your taste is fuckin terrible.
Gotcha, I thought you had secretly at least caught an episode or two on night time TV or something.
I wouldn't recommend it enough to say you should seek it out to watch, but if it ever is on TV in the same room as you, give it some attention. I bet $5 the exact experience is that you will be unsure it's worth it the whole time until the end of the episode, and at the end of the episode, you will be like "damn that was actually pretty fuckin great, I might should catch the next one if it's convenient"
Yeah, my friend has been bugging me to read the manga since before they rebooted the anime. There's too much shit I plan to read but I never read manga anymore. I'm not even caught up on berserk.
Because last time I lived in a motel room they still played Teen Titans in the same hour bloc as Teen Titans Go and even though that's ruined now, old habits die hard, and I don't know any other channels that can be trusted to usually play anything watchable at all.
Imagine being so insecure that you can't heterosexually jack off to RPD without feeling gay. If you can't suck a dick to completion without feeling weird about it you're not ready for Jojo.
People spend hours trying to picture an imaginary friend. Like what they look like in detail, for example if a person imagines a women (it doesn't have be a women, or even be human) they think about her eyes, her hair color, what she is like, for hours and hours, months after months. Eventually people that do this claim that they start seeing their creation, this creation they claim to see is a called a tulpa.
Because that just seems like the only right number to me, honestly, if you're going to have an age of consent. Anything higher and you will definitely have some fringe cases of people who are ready early that you're placing a huge life-changing restriction on for no reason, anything lower and those fringe cases stop mattering because the restriction on them stops being so hugely life-changing while at the same time they get so much more rare that I wouldn't even be sure any exist. I don't think there should be an age of consent though, so you're still kinda off saying I think it "should be" 10, just because that's the only number that makes sense for it to be doesn't mean I think it "should be" anything since it still doesn't make sense on principle anyway
TFW /r/subredditdrama doesn't even remember darqwolfs origins. He was originally a lolcow over there, before /r/drama got anywhere near as amazing as it is today.
So you're saying that it's more traumatizing for the 1% of 10 year olds "ready" to have sex to be prohibited from doing so, than it is to protect 10 year olds in general from rape?
No, I'm saying it's more traumatizing for whatever percentage of 10 year olds "ready" to have sex to be prohibited from doing so than not. You made up the rape thing yourself, we were talking about age of consent, which is actually a thing, not "age of rape being legal" or whatever you're trying to twist it into.
No what he's saying is that if we abandon capitalism the commie libtards will force everyone to rape children under their enforced monogamy regime. In which case he'd mash dat pussy fam.😤😤😤
Son, I'm going to tell you what everyone else is thinking but too awkward to say: you are dangerously disconnected from reality and probably losing your mind.
​
Please get some help before your life spirals further out of control.
We live in an era were a teenager-cum-manchild is reddit famous because he's spent like 7 years doubling down on his bad takes and now wants everyone to think he's just been trolling all along
It should be noted that I've upvoted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know.
That said.
In 7th grade, I took an SAT test without preparing for it at all, it was spur-of-the-moment, I knew about it about an hour ahead of time and didn't do any research or anything. I scored higher on it than the average person using it to apply for college in my area.
An IQ test has shown me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test.
My mother's boyfriend of 8 years is an aerospace engineer who graduated Virginia Tech. At the age of 15, I understand physics better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding thermodynamics. He's not particularly successful as an engineer, but I've met lots of other engineers who aren't as good as me at physics, so I'm guessing that's not just a result of him being bad at it.
I'm also pretty good at engineering. I don't have a degree, and other than physics I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of engineering than any actual engineer, but I have lots of ingenuity for inventing new things. For example, I independently invented regenerative brakes before finding out what they were, and I was only seven or eight years old when I started inventing wireless electricity solutions (my first idea being to use a powerful infrared laser to transmit energy; admittedly not the best plan).
I have independently thought of basically every branch of philosophy I've come across. Every question of existentialism which I've seen discussed in SMBC or xkcd or Reddit or anywhere else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Philosophy has pretty much gotten trivial for me; I've considered taking a philosophy course just to see how easy it is.
Psychology, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike engineering, there's no aspect of psychology which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can debunk many of even Sigmund Freud's theories.
I'm a good enough writer that I'm writing a book and so far everybody who's read any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect to have published. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far; people have critiqued it, but not insulted it.
I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code.
I believe firmly that everybody deserves a future. If we were to capture Hitler at the end of WWII, I would be against executing him. In fact, if we had any way of rehabilitating him and knowing that he wasn't just faking it, I'd even support the concept of letting him go free. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them.
I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others. I don't have any issue with any type of sexuality whatsoever (short of physically acting out necrophilia, pedophilia, or other acts which have a harmful affect on others - but I don't care what a person's fantasies consist of, as long as they recognize the difference between reality and fiction and can separate them). I don't have any issue with anybody over what type of music they listen to, or clothes they wear, etc. I know that's not really an impressive moral, but it's unfortunately rare; a great many people, especially those my age, are judgmental about these things.
I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Rick Perry is a vile, piece of shit human being, deserving of zero respect, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone.
I'm pretty much a pacifist. I've taken a broken nose without fighting back or seeking retribution, because the guy stopped punching after that. The only time I'll fight back is if 1) the person attacking me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back. I've therefore never had a reason to fight back against anyone in anything serious, because my ability to take pain has so far made it so that I'm never in a situation where I'll be worse off after a fight. If I'm not going to get any hospitalizing injuries, I really don't care.
The only exception is if someone is going after my life. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them.
I consider myself a feminist. I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. As in, the societal pressure for gender roles should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of relationships continue operating the same way of their own accord. I treat women with the same outlook I treat men, and never participate in the old Reddit "women are crazy" circlejerk, because there are multiple women out there and each have different personalities just like there are multiple men out there and each with different personalities. I don't think you do much of anything except scare off the awesome women out there by going on and on about the ones who aren't awesome.
That doesn't mean I look for places to victimize women, I just don't believe it's fair to make generalizations such as the one about women acting like everything's OK when it's really not (and that's a particularly harsh example, because all humans do that).
I'm kind of tired of citing these examples and I'm guessing you're getting tired of reading them, if you've even made it this far. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the Reddit brony community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. Yesterday someone quoted a case of me doing this in a post asking everyone what their favorite motivational/inspirational quote was, and that comment was second to the top, so I guess other people agreed (though, granted, it was a pretty low-traffic post, only about a dozen competing comments).
And, uh, I'm a pretty good moderator.
All that, and I think your behavior in this thread was totally assholish. So what do you think, now that you at least slightly know me?
Yeah, why do you end that question with "retard" when you're the one retarded enough that you thought I might not know? There are plenty of situations those exception clauses don't cover and I'm not even sure if they ever go all the way to exempting 10 year olds ever at all, let alone in all states.
Just because I remember being 10 and didn't change my mind about age of consent being retarded since I was 10 doesn't mean I'm still attracted to 10 year olds, it just means I'm not retarded
Society has come so far you people will now admit the guides and shit actually work to create a persistent hallucination but you'll still just call it "mental illness" smh
I created my tulpa in 2012 but she's always looked a year older than I am because I based her body on the hottest girl I ever knew who's a year older than me.
Yeah some people train themselves to hallucinate the physical sensations along with the visuals, that seems kinda like escapism to me but go for it if you want
My last comment was copied and pasted, you then typed something fresh in response to it when you're "not going to argue." I definitely need your attention so badly
Except "mental illness" actually has a definition and you're just some retard who doesn't know that definition and wants to pretend your made-up understanding of it is more valid than my actual knowledge of the actual one.
You people do this all the fucking time. And you'll usually refuse to look up the actual definitions of things when I point it out, and you'll just pretend not to understand words in the definition itself if the definition itself would otherwise not let you pretend not to understand the word it's of anymore.
Not the academic definition or even the dictionary definition, just your made-up definition that you're trying to pretend the academic definition and dictionary definition are both invalid in comparison to because you're such an arrogant little bitch.
You're too lazy to consider reality, you're too lazy to care that you're just making shit up, and you're too lazy to notice that you constantly damage yourself by trying to reconcile a pretend reality with the existence of your sensory system and the world around you. You're exacerbating your own mental illness and right now, while you do that, you're simultaneously trying to project mental illness on others. You are fucking up your entire life by being like this. You will die alone with no possessions great enough to comfort you and leave no legacy behind because your brain will not work for your entire life because you're so absolutely trash at operating a brain, unless at some point the pain gets too severe for you to ignore and you break down and make a serious promise to yourself that you'll put serious effort into getting your shit together.
: any of a broad range of medical conditions (such as major depression, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, or panic disorder) that are marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, or emotions to impair normal psychological functioning and cause marked distress or disability and that are typically associated with a disruption in normal thinking, feeling, mood, behavior, interpersonal interactions, or daily functioning
A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder, is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning.
: any of a broad range of medical conditions (such as major depression, schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, or panic disorder) that are marked primarily by sufficient disorganization of personality, mind, or emotions to impair normal psychological functioning and cause marked distress or disability and that are typically associated with a disruption in normal thinking, feeling, mood, behavior, interpersonal interactions, or daily functioning
Having a permanent hallucination is a significant disorganisation of the mind impairing normal psychological functionning, lmao.
A mental disorder, also called a mental illness or psychiatric disorder, is a behavioral or mental pattern that causes significant distress or impairment of personal functioning.
Having a permanent hallucination is a mental that cause significant impairment of personnal functionning lmao.
Having a permanent hallucination is a significant disorganisation of the mind impairing normal psychological functionning, lmao.
Which of those words are you pretending not to know the meaning of now, so that you can continue pretending not to know the meaning of "mental illness?"
I see two possibilities. Either you are simply pretending not to know what the word "functioning" means, or you are doing the old translabel switcheroo on "permanent," where you use a term to figuratively describe something (calling the hallucinations "permanent" because they tend to be kept permanently), and then once you have figuratively applied that label, you've now gained the ability to pretend you're making sense while you say some retarded insane shit that uses the label literally (like the hallucinations are actually permanent, which would make them uncontrollable). This allows you to make your own bullshit fly over your own head, so that you can give yourself suspension of disbelief while you pretend you're not retarded.
It's like if you were talking about whether bikes count as aircraft, and someone was like "well an aircraft is something that can fly," so you're like "well I was absolutely FLYING down the road on my bike the other day, so it's an aircraft." Imagine making that argument completely seriously, not ironically, not as a little joke, not like "haha I knew what you meant," but actually being so fucking dumb you can use a figure of speech to immerse yourself in a falsehood by slapping figurative labels on things and immediately making yourself forget doing that. You don't have to imagine.
Unless it was the "functioning" one, which is a lot simpler of a trick, you just straight-up pretend not to know what a word means and replace it with your own made-up meaning, which you've already shown inclination to do by doing it with "mental illness." (Interesting how now you're pretending you were going by the actual definition of "mental illness" even though you didn't actually know it, and using more pretending-not-to-know-words to try to sell your retarded lie)
You should know this isn't the definition they meant the word with in the definition of "mental illness," but just in case you're that retarded, having a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) can't impact your professional or official position. If it could, it would probably be by other people's reactions to it, which are too subjective to count, and also not a factor here since you don't have to tell other people to begin with.
: the action for which a person or thing is specially fitted or used or for which a thing exists
Having a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) also can't impact this except by other people's highly subjective reactions which still aren't a factor since you still don't have to tell people. However you define this one, the purpose for which a person exists - I'd say reproduction, it's the scientific answer - it can't be something so fragile that having a hallucination damages it.
: any of a group of related actions contributing to a larger action especially
: the normal and specific contribution of a bodily part to the economy of a living organism
Having a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) won't stop literally any function at all of your brain, and has been found to probably improve certain functions, particularly the ones the area of your brain a tulpa runs on is responsible for, like empathizing with and predicting other people.
: an official or formal ceremony or social gathering
Can't really -ing this one so this can't be it, which sucks for you since this is the first thing on the list that a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) can actually have any impact on at all, but it's still a stretch to say something only one person can see would count as a "disruption" to any formal ceremony or social gathering.
a : a mathematical correspondence that assigns exactly one element of one set to each element of the same or another set
b : a variable (such as a quality, trait, or measurement) that depends on and varies with another
Can't really -ing these ones so they can't be it either and I can't imagine how you'd argue a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) impacts them either.
: characteristic behavior of a chemical compound due to a particular reactive unit
The only chemical compounds involved here are in your brain and we've already gone over that.
: a computer subroutine
The human brain is the computer here so still already gone over it.
There is no actual definition of "functioning" by which your argument would make sense like it does with your imaginary definitions of things.
Or were both my guesses wrong, and you used one of the other words? If so, I'm excited to learn your method, and smash it to pieces.
Yes, I can understand each of those three words and also fully understand what they mean together in a clinical context. You are the one who can't answer that question with "yes" in either of those ways (or, therefore, any way at all).
No, and I'm also not the one dumb enough to call the hallucination "permanent" and then pretend it's "actually" permanent immediately afterward because I can't remember why I called it that in the first place two seconds ago (which I wouldn't to begin with because I don't oversimplify)
A tulpa is a mental companion created by focused thought and recurrent interaction, similar to an imaginary friend. However, unlike them, tulpas possess their own will, thoughts and emotions, allowing them to act independently.
Okay, which part of this sound non permanent to you ?
So it was the translabel switcheroo the whole time? Let me repeat my deconstruction and roast of that, then.
you are doing the old translabel switcheroo on "permanent," where you use a term to figuratively describe something (calling the hallucinations "permanent" because they tend to be kept permanently), and then once you have figuratively applied that label, you've now gained the ability to pretend you're making sense while you say some retarded insane shit that uses the label literally (like the hallucinations are actually permanent, which would make them uncontrollable). This allows you to make your own bullshit fly over your own head, so that you can give yourself suspension of disbelief while you pretend you're not retarded.
It's like if you were talking about whether bikes count as aircraft, and someone was like "well an aircraft is something that can fly," so you're like "well I was absolutely FLYING down the road on my bike the other day, so it's an aircraft." Imagine making that argument completely seriously, not ironically, not as a little joke, not like "haha I knew what you meant," but actually being so fucking dumb you can use a figure of speech to immerse yourself in a falsehood by slapping figurative labels on things and immediately making yourself forget doing that. You don't have to imagine.
Onto answering you.
A tulpa is a mental companion created by focused thought and recurrent interaction, similar to an imaginary friend. However, unlike them, tulpas possess their own will, thoughts and emotions, allowing them to act independently.
Okay, which part of this sound non permanent to you ?
The whole thing, because I'm aware of the fact that it's not permanent. Why would a description of a non-permanent thing I have a lot of experience with and have done a lot of research on have any part that doesn't "sound non permanent to" me?
It sounds semi-permanent since people tend to keep it and it can be hard to get rid of, but luckily it's also not the hallucination we were just discussing. The hallucination is the projection of their form, what you just copied and pasted isn't a description of that, it's a description of the tulpa itself. I'm not sure if you were trying to change the subject because you know you're wrong or if you're just so retarded you don't know the difference, but either way, pretty amazingly fucking dumb. The hallucination aspect isn't even semi-permanent like the thing you just copied and pasted a description of is.
So it's permanent so long you have that mental sickness ?(aka a tulpa)
Would you translate this sentence to English for me? I have a lot of patience for the language barrier but this one looks too difficult for me to even bother trying to translate.
You are extremely retarded and need to get more fluent at a language before you try to use it, and it sounds like you're from a country of retards where they don't even have the scientific method and just define mental illness as anything strange.
If you have difficulty to understand this you might not be well spoken in your own language. A high IQ individual would be able to anticipate what might be asked and conclude from the context of what was talked about before what the question is.
How could you not have understood that he meant that they are permanent for the duration of the mental illness?
How could you not have understood that I was just making him say it again more clearly so everyone could hear the retarded question "so it's permanent temporarily right?"
> How could you not have understood that I was just making him say it again more clearly so everyone could hear the retarded question "so it's permanent temporarily right?"
​
That's like, your thing buddy.
​
As fas as I understood his argument, he wanted to distinguish between the illness as a cause - which could, as an example, last from the 1 January 2018 to the 1 January 2019 - and the hallucinations as a symptom - which, being permanent, would be persistent from 1. January 2018 throughout to the 1 January 2019, OR - being non- or semi-permanent - would only intermittendly pop up in that time-frame.
​
I find it interesting that you didn't understand him. I'm not even talking about the merits of the argument itself, but you seem to not have gotten it to begin with, which would arguing against it a futile enterprise. That's were the confusion between the two of you comes. You not understanding him.
As fas as I understood his argument, he wanted to distinguish between the illness as a cause - which could, as an example, last from the 1 January 2018 to the 1 January 2019 - and the hallucinations as a symptom - which, being permanent, would be persistent from 1. January 2018 throughout to the 1 January 2019, OR - being non- or semi-permanent - would only intermittendly pop up in that time-frame.
Something that's "permanent" until you decide to get rid of it obviously wouldn't be permanent in the way that makes it a mental illness, so what this doesn't change is that his argument was fucking retarded. "It's a mental illness because you have it for as long as you have it" is the least compelling thing I can imagine any of you retards trying to call an "argument."
I find it interesting that you didn't understand him.
I find it interesting that you're too retarded to understand how retarded he is but still think you could understand something I don't.
Something that's "permanent" until you decide to get rid of it obviously wouldn't be permanent in the way that makes it a mental illness, so what this doesn't change is that his argument was fucking retarded.
That would be your counter if you had understood him from the beginning. Which you did not.
I'm not arguing his position, I was merely explaining to you what he tried to argue since you did not understand it, and seemingly, still have not.
I find it interesting that you're too retarded to understand how retarded he is but still think you could understand something I don't.
How good is your understand of european civil law systems? I think mine might be slightly better than yours. Anyhow, it takes some basic understanding to understand somebody else, and the mere fact that you, the genius, did not understand him, is telling.
Well, I sort of see their point. It's like an all natural way to leave reality behind without drugs or wires into your brain or whatever.
To try to give yourself a belief that you currently know is completely false, is a very messed up course of action if you ask me. But it's a question of values. If you think that you'll be happier that way, and that your future happiness matters more than your future beliefs corresponding to reality, then it's not insane. In much the same way it's not insane to kill yourself if you think life is not worth living.
But today's doctors are OK with asserting that life is worth living and people who think it's not are delusional. Maybe they should be OK with asserting that reality matters too.
Tl/dr maybe you're not crazy, tulpa people, but if it's at all possible to be crazy, you are it.
Hello, this is the OP of the post being discussed here. I implore you to do some research on plurality. You’ll learn that tulpas, alters, headmates or whatever the plural communities call them are more than imaginary. They are all real people with different personalities and sometimes physical attributes. These are very real mental conditions that can sometimes be extremely problematic (therefore categorised as a mental illness). But sometimes (like in the case of tulpas), they are constructive. There’s a lot of stigma surrounding these things, especially with all the judgement on the internet, but I hope that at least some people who reads this will get off this drama subreddit and learn about it for themselves.
Well, you might be interested in this thing I wrote, she was my girlfriend in 11th grade when I was going trough my worst hearth break and we never did anything without consent,... I learned what a tulpa is yesterday
Ani what? Nah m8, it's just like an imaginary friend but autonomous, like another person inside your head but without the ability to control stuff. It's basically a guest user but in your brain
Bah, but losing control of your body to your autonomousal actions is the best part of my day. If any tulpa can hijack my body when I'm busy thinking up the next fanfic of Nanking fuck that lmao
imagine being pathetic enough that you only care about the feelings of others when you're required to and you think others are pathetic for having the integrity to just care inherently
OK, I get that hallucinating is a thing, but being able to do it on purpose without drugs sounds like bullshit.
OK, I get that the world surprises me constantly because I'm the kind of retard who thinks shit like "you can't hallucinate on purpose without drugs" and assumes the random shit I think must be true without actually looking it up, but I'm still not going to consider that maybe there are actually well-established processes for training your brain to hallucinate.
OK, I get that brain scans show unique brain activity for tulpa that people don't get if they don't have a tulpa or if they don't engage with their tulpa during the scans, but I don't know anything about brain scans so I'm just going to pretend these patterns are normal and not that unique or indicative of anything the people dedicated to studying it say they seem indicative of.
And I get that I don't always know what my dream characters are going to do, and I've heard writers talk about characters taking on a mind of their own and stories taking their own direction when the motives and only realistically possible actions of those characters become clear, and I get that the conscious mind is just one thing the brain does and that there is also a lot of processing power being used completely unconsciously, and I've seen how some of the unconscious processing constantly shows itself to include almost cognitive levels of mental function, and I know it can kinda involve feelings, but I've never really noticed how if you empathize with a dream character you can actually feel another part of you having the feelings you're empathizing with instead of the feeling just being the conscious part of you empathizing with them like with other real-world people, and it's too scary for me to start wondering now if the parts of my brain that aren't me could actually be cognitive or feel emotions.
What I don't get is, how can you believe this shit? How dare you have the balls to think more than me? Please excuse me while I laugh at you nervously.
What's your background? What about the formation of you is different from the formation of the average person? I want to know how you ended up this way
A tulpa is a mental companion created by focused thought and recurrent interaction, similar to an imaginary friend. However, unlike them, tulpas possess their own will, thoughts and emotions, allowing them to act independently.
So is this like schizophrenia/multiple personality disorder/dissociative identity disorder?
Not at all! Schizophrenia and DID (formerly called MPD, and still called MPD in some areas outside the US) are disorders characterized by clinically significant distress, dysfunction, or danger. Schizophrenia is a breakdown in perception of physical reality and consistency that has strong genetic influences, and does not always involve hearing voices. DID is a dissociative disorder caused by significant childhood trauma.
Neither disorder is "self-inflicted", and we recognize them as very different experiences from tulpa creation. The experience of having tulpas is much more accurately likened to the experiences of fiction writers whose characters come alive and begin talking to them; in fact, a great number of tulpa creators have formed tulpas that way!
No, the "coping" is idiots like you wanting to feel smart so you pretend you know psychology better than cutting-edge research hobbyists and as well as actual professionals.
Well to be honest that wasn't actually me that had said that. It as my unicorn called Bob. Him and I have been going through a rough patch ever since I caught him with a My Little Pony and now he has been telling me to write comments which I don't actually agree with. Please forgive me.
Basically you just take the part of your brain that does stuff like empathize with others and predict other peoples' behaviors, tell it it has free will and you want to converse with it, then let it learn how to present you with a persistent hallucination of a separate personality it's processing so that you have a supercompatible really close friend with you all the time for the rest of your life.
Hey man you really should speak to your Tulpa to relax a little. Maybe treat it to a nice imaginary dinner to help chill you out a little. I like to give my Tulpa rainbow drops in unicorn tears.
It's actually pretty safe, it just attracts people with mental illness and then confirmation bias makes it look dangerous to people who just see a lot of tulpamancers having the associated mental illness. What you don't understand is that for those people, it's usually beneficial/therapeutic, and for mentally healthier people, it's often a mild superpower in terms of both the brain-exercise-based cognitive improvements and just the having a second mind in your head with you itself.
You specifically mention foreseeable chances of it blowing up in your face. What you don't understand is these outcomes you're picturing are indeed very, very foreseeable, like literally everyone who gets into this topic can imagine, but not very realistic, since it turns out the human brain can just do lots of shit and activating a rarely-used set of processes doesn't actually break anything or else we would not be the adaptable creatures we are or even have survived trying to become the species we are today.
interesting psychological construct in which you essentially partition off part of your self-identity and treat it like another person. useful learning exercise.
for some reason online communities related to it seem to be overrun by virgins who want an imaginary friend to fuck.
Hello, this is the OP of the post being discussed here. I implore you to do some research on plurality. You’ll learn that tulpas, alters, headmates or whatever the plural communities call them are more than imaginary. They are all real people with different personalities and sometimes physical attributes. These are very real mental conditions that can sometimes be extremely problematic (therefore categorised as a mental illness). But sometimes (like in the case of tulpas), they are constructive. There’s a lot of stigma surrounding these things, especially with all the judgement on the internet, but I hope that at least some people who reads this will get off this drama subreddit and learn about it for themselves.
Tulpas are not real people. They physically do not exist. There just a manifestation that you created in your mind that you now think is real because you’re a schizo. I’d sooner believe a 10 year old autistic boy’s sonic OC is real than I would believe in a grown ass adult’s imaginary friend
Tulpas are not real people. They physically do not exist. There just a manifestation that you created in your mind that you now think is real because you’re a schizo.
Are you so woke and informed you're saying the mind is entirely separate from the brain and neuroscience is just completely wrong as a field, or so sleepy and uninformed you've never heard of neuroscience and you have no understanding at all of the idea that the human mind is how we experience neural pathways that actually physically exist in our heads, or some other retarded third option like a translabel switcheroo from the "physically" to the "real" in this passage?
What if I said “mind” because in this situation it’s interchangeable for “brain” and I’m not a neuroscientist so I don’t have a reason to be pedantic about it?🤔🤔🤔
All I said was that tulpas are mental illness. No need to sperg out chief.
What if I said “mind” because in this situation it’s interchangeable for “brain” and I’m not a neuroscientist so I don’t have a reason to be pedantic about it?🤔🤔🤔
Then you're fucking retarded because you just said in this situation "mind" is interchangeable with "brain" when this is one of the least interchangeable situations the two words can be in.
Not really, you’re the only person who has had any problem with it, you’re also the only retard on this subreddit who believes in tulpas so I’m guessing that’s why you’re making such a fussy wussy
I used to talk to this British dude I met on Steam (team fortress I think, this was years ago) and one day he told me he about his tulpa. He described it as some anthro bird furry and told me about a few times where he imagined it raping him. He said its name was "birdy" and went into pretty vivid detail about the rape sessions.
Not long after that he came out as a tranny. Not sure what he's like now, I unfriended him one day after I decided I didnt want to deal with the insanity anymore.
349 comments
1 PC_Master_Baits 2019-03-04
Imagine being that beta
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
So beta that you're too shy to ask your imaginary friend to fuck
1 uniqueguy263 2019-03-04
Tyler Durden didn't die for this
1 CosmoSucks 2019-03-04
I wanna fuck that’s guys imagination for him
1 CouchRadish 2019-03-04
Does he have other imaginary guys who cuck him?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
fake: imagination is imaginary
gay: you want to fuck that guy
1 Chicup 2019-03-04
Oh god, no, don't give them cuck fantasies on top of their mental illness.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
You mean "imagine being that morally upstanding"
1 QinEmperor 2019-03-04
I'd rape his underage tulpa.
1 Anonymous-throwaway0 2019-03-04
Would you call yourself an alpha then?
1 PC_Master_Baits 2019-03-04
Only when I'm fucking my 'my little pony' tulpa.
1 Anonymous-throwaway0 2019-03-04
Oh will you grow up? Put on your big boy pants for a civilised discussion? Nah don’t think so.
1 PC_Master_Baits 2019-03-04
Putting on pants is offensive to Lunasparkle and we won't have that
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-04
Congratulations! I do not often downvote. You have earned mine.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Neon_needles 2019-03-04
Lol at this faggot being such a loser that even in his gay fanfiction fantasy he needs to excuse his awkward behavior by saying he was drugged.
1 DeathBahamutXXX 2019-03-04
That is a new beta low. Getting drugged and raped by your female imaginary friend.
1 nicerredditaccount 2019-03-04
The mystery liquid is probably his dog pissing on him after his step-dad beats him unconscious for being such a loser.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
The mystery liquid is probably completely imaginary
1 nicerredditaccount 2019-03-04
I thought about making a JJBA "enemy stand" reference but I don't read or watch JJBA because it's basically RuPaul's Drag Race for weebs.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
JJBA is pretty unique, I really doubt your comparison is valid. They have this cast of vibrant but under-developed characters who really make the main character, Jojuo or however you spell his name, stand out, but then they use the main character really sparingly, which makes him stand out far more. Usually, if one character is far and away more interesting and more watchable than other characters, storytellers will start leaning on that character more and more - see Martin Sheen as President on the West Wing for an example, it was originally planned to be a small part in a show focusing more on the office. But in JJBA this dynamic of the main character standing out strongly for just a moment or two in each episode is like, the whole point, the whole premise, it's what JJBA is, it's like a bad anime that knows how to be a good anime but only shows you glimpses of being a good anime in each episode while forcing you to remember the alternative so that you really appreciate those glimpses of good. And as bad of a concept as that explanation sounds like, JJBA is the one unimaginable possibility where it's executed well, which is why it's so famous and gets run on American TV. It's actually quite interesting and definitely worth glancing up at when Adult Swim puts it on.
1 nicerredditaccount 2019-03-04
So it is just like every other shonen anime ever, only all the characters are hypermasculine David Bowies?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I don't know what a "shonen anime" is but I've never seen any other anime where they use the main characters sparingly and only put effort into them and still have it actually turn out watchable or compelling like JJBA
1 nicerredditaccount 2019-03-04
Dragon Ball Z
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
lol you actually think it has a similar effect in Dragon Ball Z? Maybe in the abridged, but barely. Don't get me wrong DBZ is fun to watch but your taste is fuckin terrible.
1 nicerredditaccount 2019-03-04
I told you I never watched or read JJBA.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Gotcha, I thought you had secretly at least caught an episode or two on night time TV or something.
I wouldn't recommend it enough to say you should seek it out to watch, but if it ever is on TV in the same room as you, give it some attention. I bet $5 the exact experience is that you will be unsure it's worth it the whole time until the end of the episode, and at the end of the episode, you will be like "damn that was actually pretty fuckin great, I might should catch the next one if it's convenient"
1 nicerredditaccount 2019-03-04
Yeah, my friend has been bugging me to read the manga since before they rebooted the anime. There's too much shit I plan to read but I never read manga anymore. I'm not even caught up on berserk.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I don't even know how to read. Solo is my favorite Star Wars movie
1 raltov431 2019-03-04
Why are you watching JoJo? There's no lolis for you to abuse.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Adult Swim puts it on and it's like the last thing on their schedule worth watching before they start shitting out Naruto and boring talking food.
1 raltov431 2019-03-04
Better question;why are you watching a children's tv network?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Because last time I lived in a motel room they still played Teen Titans in the same hour bloc as Teen Titans Go and even though that's ruined now, old habits die hard, and I don't know any other channels that can be trusted to usually play anything watchable at all.
1 Kiru-Kokujin36 2019-03-04
shounen just means boy
shounen anime = anime targeted for young boys
1 BlessThisBussy 2019-03-04
You're sperging all over this post in defense of Tulpas, do you have one?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Look it up
1 BlessThisBussy 2019-03-04
I don't want to. Ill just assume its a yes.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
You made the smart move, for once.
1 nio151 2019-03-04
Imagine being so insecure that you can't heterosexually jack off to RPD without feeling gay. If you can't suck a dick to completion without feeling weird about it you're not ready for Jojo.
1 ItsSugar 2019-03-04
https://youtu.be/bl8BSgUlkHs
1 GunOfSod 2019-03-04
On the contrary, you just created a stunning headmate made entirely from Unicorn Jizz.
1 Luniar123 2019-03-04
With jumper cables no less
1 ZIIReactionzV 2019-03-04
Getting raped by your imaginary friend this the funniest thing I've heard all month. God damn.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
How do you let yourself get like this?
We need pinging
1 Vurtizontal 2019-03-04
Make an account for your tulpa and ping them.
1 Crumps_brother 2019-03-04
What the fuck's a tulpa?
1 Vurtizontal 2019-03-04
People spend hours trying to picture an imaginary friend. Like what they look like in detail, for example if a person imagines a women (it doesn't have be a women, or even be human) they think about her eyes, her hair color, what she is like, for hours and hours, months after months. Eventually people that do this claim that they start seeing their creation, this creation they claim to see is a called a tulpa.
1 Tony_Tony_Chopper_ 2019-03-04
That sounds fucking retarded
1 FishFireTritonBoyYT 2019-03-04
not sounds retarded, it is retarded
1 demotecontrol 2019-03-04
Tupla's are great. Next time the mods ban you, just blame it on your Tupla taking over at the keyboard so it's completely not your fault.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
That's not how it works
1 darkinard 2019-03-04
why I'm not surprised that it's YOU who's rushing to defend self-induced schizophrenia
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Because you know who I am? How complicated is this question to you?
1 darkinard 2019-03-04
It's pretty easy, doesn't even requier an answer. Normal people call these questions rhetorical.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
And some rhetorical questions are still just dumb
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-04
Heres a non-rhetorical question: what do you think the age of consent should be and why is it 10?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Because that just seems like the only right number to me, honestly, if you're going to have an age of consent. Anything higher and you will definitely have some fringe cases of people who are ready early that you're placing a huge life-changing restriction on for no reason, anything lower and those fringe cases stop mattering because the restriction on them stops being so hugely life-changing while at the same time they get so much more rare that I wouldn't even be sure any exist. I don't think there should be an age of consent though, so you're still kinda off saying I think it "should be" 10, just because that's the only number that makes sense for it to be doesn't mean I think it "should be" anything since it still doesn't make sense on principle anyway
1 TotesMessenger 2019-03-04
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
1 nybbas 2019-03-04
TFW /r/subredditdrama doesn't even remember darqwolfs origins. He was originally a lolcow over there, before /r/drama got anywhere near as amazing as it is today.
1 uniqueguy263 2019-03-04
That version of /r/SubredditDrama moved here and got mixed up with 50,000 incels in the process
1 nybbas 2019-03-04
Oh I know that. It's just funny seeing SRD not even recognize him, when that was the first place I ever heard of him.
1 D_Neon 2019-03-04
They know him, they just tend to not use names in titles I think.
The last thread of his that was posted over there was very directly implying it was him but still not naming him in the title.
1 Kellere31 2019-03-04
Fuck you attracted the SRDines.
1 lewildcard 2019-03-04
honestly the worst part of all of this
1 maybe-unlikely 2019-03-04
Why do you hate that sub?
1 fernguts 2019-03-04
They're too earnest and too mayo.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-04
It's a bit like this sub if you suck all the fun out of it and pretend it's your civic duty to participate.
1 maybe-unlikely 2019-03-04
I feel personally attacked
1 tsetnocamrak 2019-03-04
So you're saying that it's more traumatizing for the 1% of 10 year olds "ready" to have sex to be prohibited from doing so, than it is to protect 10 year olds in general from rape?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No, I'm saying it's more traumatizing for whatever percentage of 10 year olds "ready" to have sex to be prohibited from doing so than not. You made up the rape thing yourself, we were talking about age of consent, which is actually a thing, not "age of rape being legal" or whatever you're trying to twist it into.
1 flotus_scrotus 2019-03-04
Imagine how traumatized the rest of the world will be if you ever do have sex.
1 ItsOverForTayceIIs 2019-03-04
I'm pretty sure there's actually a negative chance of that ever happening.
1 backltrack 2019-03-04
You're really arguing 10 years old, huh
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
It's the only age that makes sense for an age of consent, age of consent itself is still retarded
1 JumbledFun 2019-03-04
peak ancap retardation
1 melokobeai 2019-03-04
I can’t wait for your thesis on why babies can consent
1 daneelr_olivaw 2019-03-04
Well sure, the whole world is retarded. Definitely not you, right?
1 bigtoecamel 2019-03-04
I have a strange feeling that, to this day, you dont find people that are willing to have sex with you and thats where your desire comes from
1 MikeStoklasaAlcohol 2019-03-04
Please stop
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No
1 MikeStoklasaAlcohol 2019-03-04
It's over
1 broden 2019-03-04
No comrade Premier, it has only begun
1 just1pirate 2019-03-04
> Hell_March.exe
1 Rhazior 2019-03-04
https://youtu.be/fnd0qg4I_MM?t=152
1 flotus_scrotus 2019-03-04
You should be advocating for the age of consent being 100. That way you have an excuse when people ask why you still don’t know what boobs feel like.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
Would you fuck a 10 year old that was ready?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I wouldn't want to, but I would have to, to spare her from the trauma of the alternative this society offers.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
So you're saying that you want to fuck a 10 year old
1 RedditorsAreRetarts 2019-03-04
He doesn’t want to, but he would have to, whatever that means
1 Doctor-Pavel 2019-03-04
He's like Jesus, really if you think about it
1 LeninadeOfficial 2019-03-04
No what he's saying is that if we abandon capitalism the commie libtards will force everyone to rape children under their enforced monogamy regime. In which case he'd mash dat pussy fam.😤😤😤
1 Moist___ 2019-03-04
😎😎😎
1 uniqueguy263 2019-03-04
I really hope you're memeing. That's such a fucked up thing to say
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
We live in an era where a grown man can say he would mercy-fuck a 10-year-old out of moral obligation and you only "hope" they're memeing
1 UnexpectedLizard 2019-03-04
Son, I'm going to tell you what everyone else is thinking but too awkward to say: you are dangerously disconnected from reality and probably losing your mind.
​
Please get some help before your life spirals further out of control.
1 famicommie 2019-03-04
We live in an era were a teenager-cum-manchild is reddit famous because he's spent like 7 years doubling down on his bad takes and now wants everyone to think he's just been trolling all along
1 totally_not_ac3 2019-03-04
Nigga all his shit was very obvious trolls. Did you all actually fall for it?
1 dangp777 2019-03-04
Did you forget to post as your alt or something?
1 RedditorsAreRetarts 2019-03-04
Nigga what the FUCK?
1 crtrmls 2019-03-04
Username checks out
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2019-03-04
This but ironically
1 Stenwalden 2019-03-04
"Sorry sweaty, I will have to fuck you to spare you from the trauma of not being fucked by an 30 year old neckbeard with a micropenis"
I hope this is bait.
1 crtrmls 2019-03-04
Drink yourself
1 redblaze17 2019-03-04
Would you be willing to spare black dudes name bubba from trauma as well?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Wtf? Please never share your mental images in this subreddit again.
...wait is that how you guys feel when I post about being attracted to teenagers? I am so fucking sorry. I repent. I repent
1 redblaze17 2019-03-04
Weird, I thought your comment was being sponsored by Subway.
1 InTheOvenYouGo 2019-03-04
It should be noted that I've upvoted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know.
That said.
In 7th grade, I took an SAT test without preparing for it at all, it was spur-of-the-moment, I knew about it about an hour ahead of time and didn't do any research or anything. I scored higher on it than the average person using it to apply for college in my area.
An IQ test has shown me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test.
My mother's boyfriend of 8 years is an aerospace engineer who graduated Virginia Tech. At the age of 15, I understand physics better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding thermodynamics. He's not particularly successful as an engineer, but I've met lots of other engineers who aren't as good as me at physics, so I'm guessing that's not just a result of him being bad at it.
I'm also pretty good at engineering. I don't have a degree, and other than physics I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of engineering than any actual engineer, but I have lots of ingenuity for inventing new things. For example, I independently invented regenerative brakes before finding out what they were, and I was only seven or eight years old when I started inventing wireless electricity solutions (my first idea being to use a powerful infrared laser to transmit energy; admittedly not the best plan).
I have independently thought of basically every branch of philosophy I've come across. Every question of existentialism which I've seen discussed in SMBC or xkcd or Reddit or anywhere else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Philosophy has pretty much gotten trivial for me; I've considered taking a philosophy course just to see how easy it is.
Psychology, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike engineering, there's no aspect of psychology which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can debunk many of even Sigmund Freud's theories.
I'm a good enough writer that I'm writing a book and so far everybody who's read any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect to have published. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far; people have critiqued it, but not insulted it.
I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code.
I believe firmly that everybody deserves a future. If we were to capture Hitler at the end of WWII, I would be against executing him. In fact, if we had any way of rehabilitating him and knowing that he wasn't just faking it, I'd even support the concept of letting him go free. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them.
I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others. I don't have any issue with any type of sexuality whatsoever (short of physically acting out necrophilia, pedophilia, or other acts which have a harmful affect on others - but I don't care what a person's fantasies consist of, as long as they recognize the difference between reality and fiction and can separate them). I don't have any issue with anybody over what type of music they listen to, or clothes they wear, etc. I know that's not really an impressive moral, but it's unfortunately rare; a great many people, especially those my age, are judgmental about these things.
I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Rick Perry is a vile, piece of shit human being, deserving of zero respect, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone.
I'm pretty much a pacifist. I've taken a broken nose without fighting back or seeking retribution, because the guy stopped punching after that. The only time I'll fight back is if 1) the person attacking me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back. I've therefore never had a reason to fight back against anyone in anything serious, because my ability to take pain has so far made it so that I'm never in a situation where I'll be worse off after a fight. If I'm not going to get any hospitalizing injuries, I really don't care.
The only exception is if someone is going after my life. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them.
I consider myself a feminist. I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. As in, the societal pressure for gender roles should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of relationships continue operating the same way of their own accord. I treat women with the same outlook I treat men, and never participate in the old Reddit "women are crazy" circlejerk, because there are multiple women out there and each have different personalities just like there are multiple men out there and each with different personalities. I don't think you do much of anything except scare off the awesome women out there by going on and on about the ones who aren't awesome.
That doesn't mean I look for places to victimize women, I just don't believe it's fair to make generalizations such as the one about women acting like everything's OK when it's really not (and that's a particularly harsh example, because all humans do that).
I'm kind of tired of citing these examples and I'm guessing you're getting tired of reading them, if you've even made it this far. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the Reddit brony community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. Yesterday someone quoted a case of me doing this in a post asking everyone what their favorite motivational/inspirational quote was, and that comment was second to the top, so I guess other people agreed (though, granted, it was a pretty low-traffic post, only about a dozen competing comments).
And, uh, I'm a pretty good moderator.
All that, and I think your behavior in this thread was totally assholish. So what do you think, now that you at least slightly know me?
1 LongPostBot 2019-03-04
Sorry ma'am, looks like his delusions have gotten worse. We'll have to admit him,
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 TheLatinCello 2019-03-04
All that for 3 upvotes
1 Halo6when 2019-03-04
Its a copy pasta, actually from darq, I think he just copied text so it doesnt show as quoted
1 LeninadeOfficial 2019-03-04
Fucking ancap shill scum REEEEEEE.
comment sponsored by Leninade
1 GhostOfJohan 2019-03-04
I love you DarqWolff.
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-03-04
God bless this conscientous pedophile ;_;7
1 UsernameNotFound2600 2019-03-04
M'lady
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2019-03-04
Honest question, is your family aware of your ideas?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Honest answer, idk
1 BigDaddy_Delta 2019-03-04
Have you told them?
1 Kink__Shamer 2019-03-04
They know.
1 daneelr_olivaw 2019-03-04
I'm sure his family didn't want to have him but they had to.
1 HagenKopter 2019-03-04
Yes FBI this comment right here.
1 Stenwalden 2019-03-04
So how many 10 year olds ready for sex do you know?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
None but that's probably because I don't know any 10 year olds
1 Ranilen 2019-03-04
It's a small percentage of all 10 year olds that just happen to be all the ones near him.
1 Abberline1888 2019-03-04
Underrated comment, this. Well fucking done.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-04
Are you familiar with Romeo and Juliette clauses that protect minors and near 18ers from consent laws, retard?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Yeah, why do you end that question with "retard" when you're the one retarded enough that you thought I might not know? There are plenty of situations those exception clauses don't cover and I'm not even sure if they ever go all the way to exempting 10 year olds ever at all, let alone in all states.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-04
Because you are retarded either way. Kids can expiriment with each other, they don't need you to diddle them.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-04
yup thats gonna be a big YIKES from me.
Is the FBI still checking on you from time to time?
1 ANTORICO2THELEGEND 2019-03-04
shut the fuck upppp
1 elksandturkeys 2019-03-04
How are you still a free citizen?
1 SJCards 2019-03-04
Look what you've done you disgusting filth. Now even the SRDines are deriving gratification from your degeneracy.
1 BasicallyADoctor 2019-03-04
Hey big guy, how's postgrad working out for you? https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/sf2e7/i_sent_gabe_newell_a_question_about_what_his_life/c4dl04p/
1 Ashleychud 2019-03-04
This is how your brain works when you’re one of the world’s smartest civilians.
1 marsisbest 2019-03-04
Were do you go to pick up chicks? The local sandbox?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Just because I remember being 10 and didn't change my mind about age of consent being retarded since I was 10 doesn't mean I'm still attracted to 10 year olds, it just means I'm not retarded
1 Ashleychud 2019-03-04
How many 10 year olds have you hit on?
1 SomniaPerdita 2019-03-04
No. You’re definitely retarded.
1 lincoln1222 2019-03-04
post hog chud
1 FailedTech 2019-03-04
u/snallygaster
u/ComedicSans
Glad to know mods are a bunch of kid fuckers.
1 ComedicSans 2019-03-04
You didn't already know /u/darqwolff is a kiddy-fiddler? Pay attention, jeez.
1 What__in__tarnation 2019-03-04
I would hate to be you.
1 barnabasss 2019-03-04
Oh you are a gamer? Didnt know
1 dick_head68 2019-03-04
Police yes this man here
1 BroItsJesus 2019-03-04
Wow you're a freak
1 SomniaPerdita 2019-03-04
Kill yourself.
1 0rangesword 2019-03-04
Pedocels OUT
1 ilikekingdomhearts 2019-03-04
You’re a stain on humanity
1 lemondiddles 2019-03-04
I've found it's not wise to reply or even read any of this pathetic excuse of a human beings comments.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-04
Yo unironically have you ever considered suicide?
1 J-Baby 2019-03-04
Definitely dissociative identity disorder not schizophrenia
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
Gonna cry? Gonna piss your pants maybe? Maybe shit and cum?
1 Wild_Hunt 2019-03-04
Are you denying my lived experience?
1 CCAlkie 2019-03-04
Ehhh. Not for people this out of touch with reality.
1 Wannabecossack 2019-03-04
Wait
is pinging banned?
Holy fuck it is!
1 iprobablyneedahobby 2019-03-04
Who needs pinging when you can message the mods and get an essay from drama's resident financial guru/loli enthusiast
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
I don't want to read an essay about pedophillia
1 GunOfSod 2019-03-04
It has Lamborghini's!
1 Vurtizontal 2019-03-04
Based and schizophrenicpilled.
1 LobotomyKid 2019-03-04
Imaginary women humiliate their creators in their own heads.
1 l3v1athaN_ 2019-03-04
When kids don't stop believing in their imaginary friend
1 ConfuseTheJews 2019-03-04
That would be my take
Except now they're past puberty so thoughts go toward fucking it now
Let me tell you how this is just like some book series in the young adult section
1 ItsGettinBetterMan 2019-03-04
Worse than that, they literally force this shit upon themselves, they literally look up guides and shit to give them a mental illness.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Society has come so far you people will now admit the guides and shit actually work to create a persistent hallucination but you'll still just call it "mental illness" smh
1 Zozbot 2019-03-04
zoz
1 Zozbot 2019-03-04
zle
1 Zozbot 2019-03-04
zozzle
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Thanks for backing me up, Zoz
1 LaterGround 2019-03-04
how underage is your imaginary gf?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I created my tulpa in 2012 but she's always looked a year older than I am because I based her body on the hottest girl I ever knew who's a year older than me.
1 Mayor_of_tittycity 2019-03-04
How do you fuck something without a corporeal form? Do you just stuff a fleshlight between two pillows and go to town?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
If you want
1 Mayor_of_tittycity 2019-03-04
So what other options are there? Like lie on your back and think yourself to nutting?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Yeah some people train themselves to hallucinate the physical sensations along with the visuals, that seems kinda like escapism to me but go for it if you want
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
of course you're the kind of retard who would believe in this
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
You're right, hallucination is a myth. I've been so blind.
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
i'm not going to argue with you about this hilariously insane shit
so i'm just going to call you a retard again and keep laughing
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I'm guessing you just don't believe it's possible to train your brain to hallucinate on purpose without psychoactives?
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
dear god, you're so stupid you can't even read
no wonder you believe in imaginary friends as an adult
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
So I'm guessing you just don't believe it's possible to train your brain to hallucinate on purpose without psychoactives
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
are you still talking?
you're such a little attention whore
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
My last comment was copied and pasted, you then typed something fresh in response to it when you're "not going to argue." I definitely need your attention so badly
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
GOTTEM
imagine being a pedophile who believes in imaginary friends and still thinking you have the high ground rofl
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
imagine needing attention from someone who you think is a pedophile
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
you poor, dumb motherfucker, ilu bb
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
no u
1 d-amazo 2019-03-04
rofl you're such a trip, say more autism-fueled things please
1 YEET_ON_THEM_LIBS 2019-03-04
Darq, were you raped as a kid?
Is that why you still cling on to your childhood fantasies and attractions?
1 fletcherbee 2019-03-04
Imagine being a straight up pedo and thinking you/your words have any value at all
1 uniqueguy263 2019-03-04
Jacking off. Duh
1 canipaybycheck 2019-03-04
How did I know this before you said it
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I don't know, that's pretty impressive
1 MG87 2019-03-04
Of course someone with an IQ of zero believes this shit
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
A persistant hallucination is mental illness buddy, even if the fact that they managed to do this to themselves is pretty fun.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Except "mental illness" actually has a definition and you're just some retard who doesn't know that definition and wants to pretend your made-up understanding of it is more valid than my actual knowledge of the actual one.
You people do this all the fucking time. And you'll usually refuse to look up the actual definitions of things when I point it out, and you'll just pretend not to understand words in the definition itself if the definition itself would otherwise not let you pretend not to understand the word it's of anymore.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
And a persistant hallucination fit that definition.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Not the academic definition or even the dictionary definition, just your made-up definition that you're trying to pretend the academic definition and dictionary definition are both invalid in comparison to because you're such an arrogant little bitch.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
It fit both tho.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
You're too lazy to consider reality, you're too lazy to care that you're just making shit up, and you're too lazy to notice that you constantly damage yourself by trying to reconcile a pretend reality with the existence of your sensory system and the world around you. You're exacerbating your own mental illness and right now, while you do that, you're simultaneously trying to project mental illness on others. You are fucking up your entire life by being like this. You will die alone with no possessions great enough to comfort you and leave no legacy behind because your brain will not work for your entire life because you're so absolutely trash at operating a brain, unless at some point the pain gets too severe for you to ignore and you break down and make a serious promise to yourself that you'll put serious effort into getting your shit together.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
That's not a definition, buddy.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Merriam-Webster:
Wikipedia:
/u/error404brain:
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
Having a permanent hallucination is a significant disorganisation of the mind impairing normal psychological functionning, lmao.
Having a permanent hallucination is a mental that cause significant impairment of personnal functionning lmao.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Which of those words are you pretending not to know the meaning of now, so that you can continue pretending not to know the meaning of "mental illness?"
I see two possibilities. Either you are simply pretending not to know what the word "functioning" means, or you are doing the old translabel switcheroo on "permanent," where you use a term to figuratively describe something (calling the hallucinations "permanent" because they tend to be kept permanently), and then once you have figuratively applied that label, you've now gained the ability to pretend you're making sense while you say some retarded insane shit that uses the label literally (like the hallucinations are actually permanent, which would make them uncontrollable). This allows you to make your own bullshit fly over your own head, so that you can give yourself suspension of disbelief while you pretend you're not retarded.
It's like if you were talking about whether bikes count as aircraft, and someone was like "well an aircraft is something that can fly," so you're like "well I was absolutely FLYING down the road on my bike the other day, so it's an aircraft." Imagine making that argument completely seriously, not ironically, not as a little joke, not like "haha I knew what you meant," but actually being so fucking dumb you can use a figure of speech to immerse yourself in a falsehood by slapping figurative labels on things and immediately making yourself forget doing that. You don't have to imagine.
Unless it was the "functioning" one, which is a lot simpler of a trick, you just straight-up pretend not to know what a word means and replace it with your own made-up meaning, which you've already shown inclination to do by doing it with "mental illness." (Interesting how now you're pretending you were going by the actual definition of "mental illness" even though you didn't actually know it, and using more pretending-not-to-know-words to try to sell your retarded lie)
So here are the dictionary definitions of "functioning"
You should know this isn't the definition they meant the word with in the definition of "mental illness," but just in case you're that retarded, having a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) can't impact your professional or official position. If it could, it would probably be by other people's reactions to it, which are too subjective to count, and also not a factor here since you don't have to tell other people to begin with.
Having a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) also can't impact this except by other people's highly subjective reactions which still aren't a factor since you still don't have to tell people. However you define this one, the purpose for which a person exists - I'd say reproduction, it's the scientific answer - it can't be something so fragile that having a hallucination damages it.
Having a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) won't stop literally any function at all of your brain, and has been found to probably improve certain functions, particularly the ones the area of your brain a tulpa runs on is responsible for, like empathizing with and predicting other people.
Can't really -ing this one so this can't be it, which sucks for you since this is the first thing on the list that a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) can actually have any impact on at all, but it's still a stretch to say something only one person can see would count as a "disruption" to any formal ceremony or social gathering.
Can't really -ing these ones so they can't be it either and I can't imagine how you'd argue a tulpa (or any other willful hallucination) impacts them either.
The only chemical compounds involved here are in your brain and we've already gone over that.
The human brain is the computer here so still already gone over it.
There is no actual definition of "functioning" by which your argument would make sense like it does with your imaginary definitions of things.
Or were both my guesses wrong, and you used one of the other words? If so, I'm excited to learn your method, and smash it to pieces.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
I know you are retarded, but do you even understand what a "normal psychological functionning" is ?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Yes, I can understand each of those three words and also fully understand what they mean together in a clinical context. You are the one who can't answer that question with "yes" in either of those ways (or, therefore, any way at all).
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
Like, do you actually believe having a permanent hallucination to be normal psychological functionning ?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No, and I'm also not the one dumb enough to call the hallucination "permanent" and then pretend it's "actually" permanent immediately afterward because I can't remember why I called it that in the first place two seconds ago (which I wouldn't to begin with because I don't oversimplify)
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
Buddy, do you know what having a tulpa means, lmao ?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Yes, you are, again, the one that doesn't. Why are you doing this to yourself?
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
Okay, which part of this sound non permanent to you ?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
So it was the translabel switcheroo the whole time? Let me repeat my deconstruction and roast of that, then.
Onto answering you.
The whole thing, because I'm aware of the fact that it's not permanent. Why would a description of a non-permanent thing I have a lot of experience with and have done a lot of research on have any part that doesn't "sound non permanent to" me?
It sounds semi-permanent since people tend to keep it and it can be hard to get rid of, but luckily it's also not the hallucination we were just discussing. The hallucination is the projection of their form, what you just copied and pasted isn't a description of that, it's a description of the tulpa itself. I'm not sure if you were trying to change the subject because you know you're wrong or if you're just so retarded you don't know the difference, but either way, pretty amazingly fucking dumb. The hallucination aspect isn't even semi-permanent like the thing you just copied and pasted a description of is.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
So it's permanent so long you have that mental sickness ?(aka a tulpa)
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Would you translate this sentence to English for me? I have a lot of patience for the language barrier but this one looks too difficult for me to even bother trying to translate.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
So having a tulpa is permanent so long you are afflicated by that mental illness, right ?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Not even asking to make fun of you, is English not your first language?
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
It's not even my second one, lmao. But I am gonna simplify as you seems to be even more limited than I tought.
Having tulpa = mental illness.
So long you have a tulpa, you are mentally sick.
So it's permanent under the condition of you not being cured of having a tulpa.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
You are extremely retarded and need to get more fluent at a language before you try to use it, and it sounds like you're from a country of retards where they don't even have the scientific method and just define mental illness as anything strange.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
That's not a disapproval of my thesis, shitlord.
1 DWCS 2019-03-04
If you have difficulty to understand this you might not be well spoken in your own language. A high IQ individual would be able to anticipate what might be asked and conclude from the context of what was talked about before what the question is.
How could you not have understood that he meant that they are permanent for the duration of the mental illness?
​
​
​
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
How could you not have understood that I was just making him say it again more clearly so everyone could hear the retarded question "so it's permanent temporarily right?"
1 DWCS 2019-03-04
> How could you not have understood that I was just making him say it again more clearly so everyone could hear the retarded question "so it's permanent temporarily right?"
​
That's like, your thing buddy.
​
As fas as I understood his argument, he wanted to distinguish between the illness as a cause - which could, as an example, last from the 1 January 2018 to the 1 January 2019 - and the hallucinations as a symptom - which, being permanent, would be persistent from 1. January 2018 throughout to the 1 January 2019, OR - being non- or semi-permanent - would only intermittendly pop up in that time-frame.
​
I find it interesting that you didn't understand him. I'm not even talking about the merits of the argument itself, but you seem to not have gotten it to begin with, which would arguing against it a futile enterprise. That's were the confusion between the two of you comes. You not understanding him.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Something that's "permanent" until you decide to get rid of it obviously wouldn't be permanent in the way that makes it a mental illness, so what this doesn't change is that his argument was fucking retarded. "It's a mental illness because you have it for as long as you have it" is the least compelling thing I can imagine any of you retards trying to call an "argument."
I find it interesting that you're too retarded to understand how retarded he is but still think you could understand something I don't.
1 DWCS 2019-03-04
That would be your counter if you had understood him from the beginning. Which you did not.
I'm not arguing his position, I was merely explaining to you what he tried to argue since you did not understand it, and seemingly, still have not.
How good is your understand of european civil law systems? I think mine might be slightly better than yours. Anyhow, it takes some basic understanding to understand somebody else, and the mere fact that you, the genius, did not understand him, is telling.
1 vintermann 2019-03-04
Well, I sort of see their point. It's like an all natural way to leave reality behind without drugs or wires into your brain or whatever.
To try to give yourself a belief that you currently know is completely false, is a very messed up course of action if you ask me. But it's a question of values. If you think that you'll be happier that way, and that your future happiness matters more than your future beliefs corresponding to reality, then it's not insane. In much the same way it's not insane to kill yourself if you think life is not worth living.
But today's doctors are OK with asserting that life is worth living and people who think it's not are delusional. Maybe they should be OK with asserting that reality matters too.
Tl/dr maybe you're not crazy, tulpa people, but if it's at all possible to be crazy, you are it.
1 error404brain 2019-03-04
I means, the ability to willingly create a permanent hallucination is really fucking cool. But it's still fucking crazy.
1 Plexipus 2019-03-04
When your imaginary friend becomes your imaginary friend with benefits
1 Anonymous-throwaway0 2019-03-04
Hello, this is the OP of the post being discussed here. I implore you to do some research on plurality. You’ll learn that tulpas, alters, headmates or whatever the plural communities call them are more than imaginary. They are all real people with different personalities and sometimes physical attributes. These are very real mental conditions that can sometimes be extremely problematic (therefore categorised as a mental illness). But sometimes (like in the case of tulpas), they are constructive. There’s a lot of stigma surrounding these things, especially with all the judgement on the internet, but I hope that at least some people who reads this will get off this drama subreddit and learn about it for themselves.
1 Volhar 2019-03-04
Every day I learn about new mentally ill groups, neat
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-04
/r/tulpafetish
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
/r/tulpasgonewild
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
😍😍😍
1 metenamina 2019-03-04
best subreddit
1 Cdace 2019-03-04
Thank you for that laugh 😂
1 whamm000 2019-03-04
LOL wow OP this is pure gold. How did you even find this?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Clearly by regularly browsing /r/Tulpas until something dramapostable came up
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
Just for the drama, OP definitely doesn't have tulpas
1 PC_Master_Baits 2019-03-04
Except for Tyrone
1 rickhora 2019-03-04
I usually don't comment her because, I mean..look at you guys...but this fucking tulpas subreddit is the most ridiculous fucking think in the world...
1 NiggazWitDepression 2019-03-04
Mental Companion lol
1 demotecontrol 2019-03-04
I'll admit that sounds way more badass.
1 Gen_McMuster 2019-03-04
No, those are the ones that that tell you to kill people and abuse animals
1 jewdanksdad 2019-03-04
Good old hearth breaks!
1 SgtViktorReznov 2019-03-04
Oh, so that's what the person I see out of the corner of my eye is!
1 Boks1 2019-03-04
Isn't that just DPD?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No, how tf would it be?
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
Nah it's like giving yourself DID but stable
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Pretty good post with more info on it
This link is the kind of well-compiled informative academically-presented thing I would write if I weren't busy pointing out how retarded everyone is
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
I know, a have a tupper, i was just joking. Don't seriouspost on drama
1 ksatriamelayu 2019-03-04
you have a tulpa? Is it your anima/animus? I kind of want to resurrect Freud and have him research on this shit
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
Ani what? Nah m8, it's just like an imaginary friend but autonomous, like another person inside your head but without the ability to control stuff. It's basically a guest user but in your brain
1 ksatriamelayu 2019-03-04
https://www.reddit.com/r/Tulpas/comments/axats4/anima_vs_tulpa/
​
Bah, but losing control of your body to your autonomousal actions is the best part of my day. If any tulpa can hijack my body when I'm busy thinking up the next fanfic of Nanking fuck that lmao
1 Mrdrunkenbatman 2019-03-04
WOT WUT WAT WHAT
1 YourLocalMonarchist 2019-03-04
imagine being pathetic enough to need permission from your imaginary friends just so you can jack off to the thought of fucking them
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
imagine being pathetic enough that you only care about the feelings of others when you're required to and you think others are pathetic for having the integrity to just care inherently
1 MG87 2019-03-04
Imagine having a literal Neckbeard
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Imagine having an imaginary neckbeard.
1 MG87 2019-03-04
I don't have a tulpa
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Conceive. Believe. Achieve. And you two can have your own Tulpa.
1 NazbolWhiteSharia 2019-03-04
Hold on, do you actually believe in this tulpa bullshit?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
1 NazbolWhiteSharia 2019-03-04
Do you ask for consent from your underaged tulpas?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
For what?
1 Kilo_G_looked_up 2019-03-04
For dicking
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Why would I ask for consent for something I'm not doing anyway?
1 NazbolWhiteSharia 2019-03-04
It’s OK to talk about this. The FBI can’t lock you up for molesting imaginary children.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I talk about shit they can lock me up for, what's your logic?
1 QinEmperor 2019-03-04
Your tulpa probably hates you too.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
How can you be so retarded? Honest question, what's your background, what the fuck makes someone as dumb as you?
1 QinEmperor 2019-03-04
t. /u/DarqWolff to /u/DarqWolff [2019]
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
What's your background? What about the formation of you is different from the formation of the average person? I want to know how you ended up this way
1 QinEmperor 2019-03-04
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
?
1 Plexipus 2019-03-04
Reminds me of when SRDines were saying you should get your friends' permission before you jack off to them.
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Man this is the first time i've ever heard of Tulpa's. What exactly is it meant to be? Actual adults with imaginary friends??
1 Damuel 2019-03-04
Yes. It's all just a bunch of mentally ill adults.
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Jesus. I just read the side bar.
A tulpa is a mental companion created by focused thought and recurrent interaction, similar to an imaginary friend. However, unlike them, tulpas possess their own will, thoughts and emotions, allowing them to act independently.
So is this like schizophrenia/multiple personality disorder/dissociative identity disorder?
Not at all! Schizophrenia and DID (formerly called MPD, and still called MPD in some areas outside the US) are disorders characterized by clinically significant distress, dysfunction, or danger. Schizophrenia is a breakdown in perception of physical reality and consistency that has strong genetic influences, and does not always involve hearing voices. DID is a dissociative disorder caused by significant childhood trauma.
Neither disorder is "self-inflicted", and we recognize them as very different experiences from tulpa creation. The experience of having tulpas is much more accurately likened to the experiences of fiction writers whose characters come alive and begin talking to them; in fact, a great number of tulpa creators have formed tulpas that way!
That is a lot of coping.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No, the "coping" is idiots like you wanting to feel smart so you pretend you know psychology better than cutting-edge research hobbyists and as well as actual professionals.
1 Trajan_ 2019-03-04
Oh sweaty....
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Well to be honest that wasn't actually me that had said that. It as my unicorn called Bob. Him and I have been going through a rough patch ever since I caught him with a My Little Pony and now he has been telling me to write comments which I don't actually agree with. Please forgive me.
1 ifuckpeopleforcrack 2019-03-04
So does MPD stand for My Pittle Dony?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Basically you just take the part of your brain that does stuff like empathize with others and predict other peoples' behaviors, tell it it has free will and you want to converse with it, then let it learn how to present you with a persistent hallucination of a separate personality it's processing so that you have a supercompatible really close friend with you all the time for the rest of your life.
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Yeesh
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
dat url \https://giphy.com/gifs/80s-commercial-commercials-26tPoyDhjiJ2g7rEs
dat title "awkward oh god gif"
dat 2010 aesthetic, thank you for bringing me back
1 Forgetmyglasses 2019-03-04
Hey man you really should speak to your Tulpa to relax a little. Maybe treat it to a nice imaginary dinner to help chill you out a little. I like to give my Tulpa rainbow drops in unicorn tears.
1 ifuckpeopleforcrack 2019-03-04
Oh boy, that sure sounds like a safe practice with no foreseeable chances of blowing up on your face. You go, girl!
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
It's actually pretty safe, it just attracts people with mental illness and then confirmation bias makes it look dangerous to people who just see a lot of tulpamancers having the associated mental illness. What you don't understand is that for those people, it's usually beneficial/therapeutic, and for mentally healthier people, it's often a mild superpower in terms of both the brain-exercise-based cognitive improvements and just the having a second mind in your head with you itself.
You specifically mention foreseeable chances of it blowing up in your face. What you don't understand is these outcomes you're picturing are indeed very, very foreseeable, like literally everyone who gets into this topic can imagine, but not very realistic, since it turns out the human brain can just do lots of shit and activating a rarely-used set of processes doesn't actually break anything or else we would not be the adaptable creatures we are or even have survived trying to become the species we are today.
1 ifuckpeopleforcrack 2019-03-04
Man, I fell asleep after like five words of that flood of a serious post.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I take it you are not a man of science
1 ifuckpeopleforcrack 2019-03-04
https://i.imgflip.com/17rmhj.jpg
1 canipaybycheck 2019-03-04
I couldn't read past "it just attracts people with mental illness" cuz I was laughing too hard
1 count_shaqula 2019-03-04
Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha You niggas really be wizards?????? Ahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
1 Ranilen 2019-03-04
Well some mayos are Grand Wizards, but that's a different thing.
1 wfwfwfqwfqwef 2019-03-04
interesting psychological construct in which you essentially partition off part of your self-identity and treat it like another person. useful learning exercise.
for some reason online communities related to it seem to be overrun by virgins who want an imaginary friend to fuck.
1 fatmanruns6969 2019-03-04
THEY ARE MAKING LOVE!!!!
1 SkaterMan 2019-03-04
Bunch of mentally Ill people affirming and validating the delusions of other mentally ill people
Burn it all down, we couldnt be trusted with the internet
1 tsetnocamrak 2019-03-04
Yeah is this just like a bunch of enablers? I'm assuming most of them aren't in character, like they genuinely mean what they say.
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
If you don't fuck your tupper what the fuck are you even doing?
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
chillin
1 fatmanruns6969 2019-03-04
Ever try talking to a girl?
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
Tulpas make people trans
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No, there are just lots of trans people in the tulpa community. Like MLP attracts gay people but watching MLP doesn't make you gay
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-04
\>seriousposting
1 PotatoPrince84 2019-03-04
Imagine being cucked by your imaginary friend
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No, don't. If you imagine it, that means it actually happens.
1 le_epic_xd 2019-03-04
Tulpa?
1 JennyDied4This 2019-03-04
Never have I seen an online cluster of such genuine mental illness.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Welcome to /r/Drama
1 Anonymous-throwaway0 2019-03-04
Hello, this is the OP of the post being discussed here. I implore you to do some research on plurality. You’ll learn that tulpas, alters, headmates or whatever the plural communities call them are more than imaginary. They are all real people with different personalities and sometimes physical attributes. These are very real mental conditions that can sometimes be extremely problematic (therefore categorised as a mental illness). But sometimes (like in the case of tulpas), they are constructive. There’s a lot of stigma surrounding these things, especially with all the judgement on the internet, but I hope that at least some people who reads this will get off this drama subreddit and learn about it for themselves.
1 DoesntSmellLikePalm 2019-03-04
Tulpas are not real people. They physically do not exist. There just a manifestation that you created in your mind that you now think is real because you’re a schizo. I’d sooner believe a 10 year old autistic boy’s sonic OC is real than I would believe in a grown ass adult’s imaginary friend
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Are you so woke and informed you're saying the mind is entirely separate from the brain and neuroscience is just completely wrong as a field, or so sleepy and uninformed you've never heard of neuroscience and you have no understanding at all of the idea that the human mind is how we experience neural pathways that actually physically exist in our heads, or some other retarded third option like a translabel switcheroo from the "physically" to the "real" in this passage?
1 floatland 2019-03-04
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
1 DoesntSmellLikePalm 2019-03-04
What if I said “mind” because in this situation it’s interchangeable for “brain” and I’m not a neuroscientist so I don’t have a reason to be pedantic about it?🤔🤔🤔
All I said was that tulpas are mental illness. No need to sperg out chief.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
Then you're fucking retarded because you just said in this situation "mind" is interchangeable with "brain" when this is one of the least interchangeable situations the two words can be in.
1 DoesntSmellLikePalm 2019-03-04
Not really, you’re the only person who has had any problem with it, you’re also the only retard on this subreddit who believes in tulpas so I’m guessing that’s why you’re making such a fussy wussy
1 TheBaltimoron 2019-03-04
And nipbros wonder why their ladies won't fuck them.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
1 somegurk 2019-03-04
Not wrong but I kind of enjoyed the nostalgia of it.
1 BlacJeesus 2019-03-04
It's a valid report, ngl.
1 elephantofdoom 2019-03-04
Are you OK? You've commented 41 times on this post so far.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
I used to be one of the world's foremost experts and researchers on the topic of tulpa and I'm a mod of /r/Drama do you really think 41 seems high?
1 elephantofdoom 2019-03-04
I'm not going to stop you. At this rate I should be able to post one of your threads for 50-60 karma.
1 canipaybycheck 2019-03-04
I'm curious, does your tulpa have the face of a girl that rejected you in high school?
1 uniqueguy263 2019-03-04
Yes. He very heavily implied it upthread
1 canipaybycheck 2019-03-04
Holy fuck, so predictable
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
No she has a face I've never seen on a real life person, that would be weird
1 canipaybycheck 2019-03-04
1 ksatriamelayu 2019-03-04
you said she's based on the hottest girl you've ever seen tho?
I thought your a furry from your name, seems I'm mistaken. Or is she an anthro?
1 Damuel 2019-03-04
Story time.
I used to talk to this British dude I met on Steam (team fortress I think, this was years ago) and one day he told me he about his tulpa. He described it as some anthro bird furry and told me about a few times where he imagined it raping him. He said its name was "birdy" and went into pretty vivid detail about the rape sessions.
Not long after that he came out as a tranny. Not sure what he's like now, I unfriended him one day after I decided I didnt want to deal with the insanity anymore.
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2019-03-04
This is why we need Sharia
1 UsedTree 2019-03-04
Muhammad is a tulpa
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
New politicoreligious movement?
1 UsedTree 2019-03-04
tips fedora
1 fatmanruns6969 2019-03-04
If it is the only way to get rid of it I am willing to declare jihad.
1 Xenepa 2019-03-04
What the fuck is a tulpa
or better question:
WHY THE FUCK
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-04
for science
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2019-03-04
Tulpahood, aka Advanced Otherkin Second Addition, is a gateway drug to sovereign citizenship and must be stopped
1 iprobablyneedahobby 2019-03-04
I love how the mods are the lolcows here
1 ksatriamelayu 2019-03-04
Mods are ALWAYS lolcows.
1 refrigenatron 2019-03-04
fucking hilarious. it would be like if somebody asked their dick if they could masturbate.
1 whoatethekidsthen 2019-03-04
So unmedicated schizophrenia
1 trappysaruh 2019-03-04
9th degree grand wizard tulpamancer here, ama 😎
1 theidiot221 2019-03-04
why did you sticky your comment? your comment isn't special and no one cares about it, dumbass
1 trappysaruh 2019-03-04
i cast a level 99 pox upon u and ur future tulpas
1 Just_end_this 2019-03-04
don't do it hes not worth it man
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-04
🗿🗿🗿
1 trappysaruh 2019-03-04
😎👉👌
1 Alicesnakebae 2019-03-04
Wtf is a tulpa
1 ItsSugar 2019-03-04
Are tulpas an incel coping mechanism?
1 ksatriamelayu 2019-03-04
no it's volcel af
1 tsetnocamrak 2019-03-04
oh hell yes. the fucking tulpa is community is by far the most bizarre internet community. period. No one else matches the level of delusion.