This whole scandal is pretty bizarre to me because he was talking about himself being pedo'd on. Gay Conservative Ken Doll was the victim in his story, even if he didn't come at it with the attitude of a victim. It's weird that people got so furious, George Takai said the same shit but worse because in Takai's stories he was the one perving.
Kind of feels like he's being punished for pissing people off, and the bluechecks are using his own sexual assault as their weapon of choice.
Exactly. If someone like Dan Savage said the same exact thing there would have been zero consequences. They were just looking for any excuse to ban Milo and, unfortunately for him, no one wants to defend an annoying faggot.
Just watching the the actual conversation that Milo Snuffulupogis got in shit for, it really just seems like it wasn't a huge deal and his explanation - "I use dark humour to deal with the fact that grown men sexually assaulted me"
The problem is that once you recognise he is notoriously unreliable you've no reason to believe him when he decribes it as a coping mechanism. I wouldn't be surprised if he had never been sexually abused, that he was just making a dumb joke about Catholic priests raping boys that he never expected his hosts to pick the ball up and run with. And when they did, he interjected the opinion that people under the legal age of consent can nonetheless be capable of consenting, which incidentally is how the law in the UK interprets consent, but something which was none of the people who had been protecting him from the consequences of pissing off absolutely everyone, were willing to defend him over.
The problem is that once you recognise he is notoriously unreliable you've no reason to believe him when he decribes it as a coping mechanism.
Well sure but still - his story that he got in shit for in the first place was about he himself being pedo'd. His response to negative controversy that arose is kind of irrelevant. He didn't get shit on for being a pedo, he got shit on for being okay with his own experiences of being molested.
Not quite. He went beyond just saying he was okay with his experience, and actually said that this sort of inter-generational experience between an adult and a ‘mature minor’ or whatever, was permissible, which is creepier, and all his enemies needed to destroy him.
I think the more controversial thing was when he said something along the lines of "Being sexually assaulted by a pedophile made me grow". Even then, I do remember that seeing the thing in context made it far less shocking, though probably still pretty stupid to say on a "Will people think I'm a retard" level.
The big gay is actually a virus that gets spread memetically from one pedo to another. Embracing gayness is embracing the destruction of society and the extinction of the human race.
hes not (and theres a big difference medically between them, in that respect theyrw totally unrelated; ie. hebephillia if it gets a classification at all is oyrely society based).
he literally just cracked a joke about it on a podcast.
Saying it was just a joke is a terrible excuse when there's still the same intention behind it. He thinks that it's acceptable for the gay community to practice pederasty. To him it's a part of developing maturity as a gay person. But to the rest of us its grooming, plain and simple. And he's downplaying the impact these pedo rings have in the catholic church. Basically a much more flamboyant version of stockholm syndrome.
You know, as a Burgerlander I've always wondered why the Aussies hate their natives so much. Like our natives routinely fucked with us, burning towns, massacring armies, scalping random mayos who wandered into their territory. Your guyses natives just kinda sat around flinging shit at each other while the mayostralians colonized shit.
And yet, all the Australians I've met go on and on about how insufferable the aboriginals are. It's crazy! Even the liberal aussies are like "Yeah nah the abbos are annoying and they don't do shit lol." So like, what is the actual beef that you guys have with them? Im unironically curious.
I'm a Burger myself so I can't really say. The reason we don't really care about our natives is because we killed most of them and send the rest to remote reservations. In Australia they actually have to deal with theirs. From what I understand, They provide absolutely nothing except buffoonery, petty crime, and a drain on public funding.
Our natives do that too. It's impossible to build an oil pipeline, new highway, railroad, etc. without a 100 different tribes claiming you're building it on some sacred burial site.
I think you might be mixing up with taking pictures of Aboriginal people. I think some don't like their image taken, and it is forbidden to name or show images of the deceased, to the point our media organisations don't name dead Aboriginal people unless permitted by the family.
Ohhhhh thats probably it. Maybe I was getting it confused with some of the things our natives do here in the states. I remember reading about how there was a kerfuffle at the Pueblo sky city because some stupid tourist was taking pictures where he wasn't supposed to and the tour guide literally smashed his camera right in front of him lol.
Yeah you only met bogans then. The government was literally kidnapping aboriginal children so they could be raised in white families until the 70's. The whole thing is a really sad situation.
There was fighting with the Abos during the early colonisation, but they had no quite small tribes and practically no technology that they were BTFO by farmers and drunks to the shittiest desert areas of the country.
Similar to reservations, now that they've been pushed to empty shitholes with no economic activity, they turn to alcohol, touching kids and beating the shit out of each other.
Its quite sad now as these communities are really fucked with some of the worst life expectancies in the world, but the left's solution is to give them money whilst the right is called racist if they take concrete steps to fix the issues. It's gonna take decades but as per usual, our politicians are fuckwit Muppets.
Australia had the power to block someone from entering the country if there was a risk that person would "incite discord in the Australian community or in a segment of that community".
so in other words they’ll bar anyone they want from entering on practically any pretext
"incite discord in the Australian community or in a segment of that community".
A segment of that community? So like if I got invited to Perth to talk about how awful weebs are, the Australian Foundation for Weeaboo Weirdos could petition the government to get me bounced at the border?
Only for protected classes of God's chosen innocent peoples, such as satanic sodomites, semites, the world's most peaceful islamic peoples and other various savages.
84 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-03-06
That entire subreddit is a cesspool. It's like a sewer that empties directly into a stagnant pond.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-06
A downvote from a commie is the equivalent of an upvote from someone with braincells. So thanks, man.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 pvijay187 2019-03-06
Who would have thought that advocating for pedophilia would totally tank your career?
1 DeliciousExit 2019-03-06
He should have converted to Islam first.
1 pvijay187 2019-03-06
Inshallah
1 193208123908 2019-03-06
or identified as a woman
1 pepperouchau 2019-03-06
Literally censorship smh
1 Pinksister 2019-03-06
This whole scandal is pretty bizarre to me because he was talking about himself being pedo'd on. Gay Conservative Ken Doll was the victim in his story, even if he didn't come at it with the attitude of a victim. It's weird that people got so furious, George Takai said the same shit but worse because in Takai's stories he was the one perving.
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-03-06
Exactly. If someone like Dan Savage said the same exact thing there would have been zero consequences. They were just looking for any excuse to ban Milo and, unfortunately for him, no one wants to defend an annoying faggot.
1 DougieFFC 2019-03-06
The problem is that once you recognise he is notoriously unreliable you've no reason to believe him when he decribes it as a coping mechanism. I wouldn't be surprised if he had never been sexually abused, that he was just making a dumb joke about Catholic priests raping boys that he never expected his hosts to pick the ball up and run with. And when they did, he interjected the opinion that people under the legal age of consent can nonetheless be capable of consenting, which incidentally is how the law in the UK interprets consent, but something which was none of the people who had been protecting him from the consequences of pissing off absolutely everyone, were willing to defend him over.
1 absract 2019-03-06
> The problem is that once you recognise he is notoriously unreliable you've no reason to believe him when he decribes it as a coping mechanism
​
What a vaginal sentence
1 Pinksister 2019-03-06
Well sure but still - his story that he got in shit for in the first place was about he himself being pedo'd. His response to negative controversy that arose is kind of irrelevant. He didn't get shit on for being a pedo, he got shit on for being okay with his own experiences of being molested.
1 DougieFFC 2019-03-06
Not quite. He went beyond just saying he was okay with his experience, and actually said that this sort of inter-generational experience between an adult and a ‘mature minor’ or whatever, was permissible, which is creepier, and all his enemies needed to destroy him.
1 unrulyfarmhand 2019-03-06
Gays and their handlers get really upset when the tradition is exposed to normies.
1 Nadare3 2019-03-06
I think the more controversial thing was when he said something along the lines of "Being sexually assaulted by a pedophile made me grow". Even then, I do remember that seeing the thing in context made it far less shocking, though probably still pretty stupid to say on a "Will people think I'm a retard" level.
1 GARBAGE_MACHINE 2019-03-06
Should have waited about 10 years for when is considered normal
1 solid4outof10hmu 2019-03-06
More like Milo Byeannopoulos😡
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-03-06
More like Bylo.... Nah you had it first.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-03-06
Byelo Byeannopolous :)
1 automatic_cluck 2019-03-06
Sad! 😂😂😂😂😂
1 bamename 2019-03-06
u sure bout that lol
1 automatic_cluck 2019-03-06
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Imagine white knighting a social reject.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
1 bamename 2019-03-06
1 automatic_cluck 2019-03-06
imagine being a cuck
imagine using meme arrows in reddit
imagine spelling wrong
imagine not using the capital M in Milo
imagine imagining
1 bamename 2019-03-06
imagine spellchecking
imagine thinking you can only quote on the 4chins
imagine being an autust
imagine dragons
1 automatic_cluck 2019-03-06
5 vs 4 imagines. Sorry, fam, but you lost.
1 bamename 2019-03-06
2 fpr 1
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-06
Sorry we mean ephebeheebejeebophile
1 wow___justwow 2019-03-06
child rape is how fags reproduce, after all
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-06
The big gay is actually a virus that gets spread memetically from one pedo to another. Embracing gayness is embracing the destruction of society and the extinction of the human race.
1 Woolgun 2019-03-06
Oh so that's why Japanese people wear those masks. Based and (sadly not) gaypilled.
1 bamename 2019-03-06
hes not (and theres a big difference medically between them, in that respect theyrw totally unrelated; ie. hebephillia if it gets a classification at all is oyrely society based).
he literally just cracked a joke about it on a podcast.
thats it.
1 Karmaisforsuckers 2019-03-06
The above poster is also a pedophile
1 bamename 2019-03-06
The above poster is a gerontophile.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-06
This but unironically
​
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-06
Saying it was just a joke is a terrible excuse when there's still the same intention behind it. He thinks that it's acceptable for the gay community to practice pederasty. To him it's a part of developing maturity as a gay person. But to the rest of us its grooming, plain and simple. And he's downplaying the impact these pedo rings have in the catholic church. Basically a much more flamboyant version of stockholm syndrome.
1 bamename 2019-03-06
Well no, not really.
didnt rly, he makes tons of offensive joles
1 Kiru-Kokujin36 2019-03-06
hes none of those he just made an edgy pedo joke and people only cared because hes milo
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-06
Found the libertarian.
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-06
kek
1 Kiru-Kokujin36 2019-03-06
i dont even like milo but he didnt endorse pedophilia he was raped as a child i believe
he just made a shitty joke for attention and it backfired
1 pepperouchau 2019-03-06
Imagine being too D A N G E R O U S for the prison colony lmao
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-03-06
Wtf? I'll have you know that only 96% of Australians are defended from convicts, and only 78% of Australians have more than one DUI charge.
We're a country on the grooooooow!
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-03-06
wh*te Australians should be driven into the sea by the abbos
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-03-06
Fast forward 10 years and all of the abbos are demanding immigration to this new sea colony after destroying Australia.
1 SgtViktorReznov 2019-03-06
You know, as a Burgerlander I've always wondered why the Aussies hate their natives so much. Like our natives routinely fucked with us, burning towns, massacring armies, scalping random mayos who wandered into their territory. Your guyses natives just kinda sat around flinging shit at each other while the mayostralians colonized shit.
And yet, all the Australians I've met go on and on about how insufferable the aboriginals are. It's crazy! Even the liberal aussies are like "Yeah nah the abbos are annoying and they don't do shit lol." So like, what is the actual beef that you guys have with them? Im unironically curious.
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-03-06
I'm a Burger myself so I can't really say. The reason we don't really care about our natives is because we killed most of them and send the rest to remote reservations. In Australia they actually have to deal with theirs. From what I understand, They provide absolutely nothing except buffoonery, petty crime, and a drain on public funding.
1 SgtViktorReznov 2019-03-06
I hear that the aboriginals actually banned people fron visiting Ayers Rock because they claim it's some kind of "sacred holy site" or whatever.
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-03-06
Our natives do that too. It's impossible to build an oil pipeline, new highway, railroad, etc. without a 100 different tribes claiming you're building it on some sacred burial site.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-03-06
You can climb it but the local indigenous people prefer if you don't.
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
Nah, they ask people not to climb it, which they're also considering banning.
They're not so retarded to ban the only source of income for like the whole region.
1 SgtViktorReznov 2019-03-06
Well that's good. Probably stops a few dumb tourists from falling and cracking their heads open.
Do they not like people taking pictures of it? I remember reading somewhere that they aren't allowed to look at it.
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
Yup, people fall off quite often I think lol.
I think you might be mixing up with taking pictures of Aboriginal people. I think some don't like their image taken, and it is forbidden to name or show images of the deceased, to the point our media organisations don't name dead Aboriginal people unless permitted by the family.
1 SgtViktorReznov 2019-03-06
Ohhhhh thats probably it. Maybe I was getting it confused with some of the things our natives do here in the states. I remember reading about how there was a kerfuffle at the Pueblo sky city because some stupid tourist was taking pictures where he wasn't supposed to and the tour guide literally smashed his camera right in front of him lol.
1 running_out_of_alts 2019-03-06
I mean, we killed most of the Native Americans. It would be like the Patriots being annoyed by the Browns or something.
1 Wheretheflowersgrow 2019-03-06
Yeah you only met bogans then. The government was literally kidnapping aboriginal children so they could be raised in white families until the 70's. The whole thing is a really sad situation.
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-03-06
It is sad they stopped in the 70s, agreed
1 Lier_X_Agerate 2019-03-06
Yeah, seriously. That sounds like winning the abbo lottery.
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
There was fighting with the Abos during the early colonisation, but they had no quite small tribes and practically no technology that they were BTFO by farmers and drunks to the shittiest desert areas of the country.
Similar to reservations, now that they've been pushed to empty shitholes with no economic activity, they turn to alcohol, touching kids and beating the shit out of each other.
Its quite sad now as these communities are really fucked with some of the worst life expectancies in the world, but the left's solution is to give them money whilst the right is called racist if they take concrete steps to fix the issues. It's gonna take decades but as per usual, our politicians are fuckwit Muppets.
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-03-06
so in other words they’ll bar anyone they want from entering on practically any pretext
Australia remains the most embarrassing colony
1 NapoleonBonerpart5 2019-03-06
Honestly, Milo should have been banned a long time ago from every country. He fucking sucks so much. Send him to the moon.
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-06
This is the least embarrassing thing Australia has done. Any country with Milo in it should be blushing.
1 Think_Once 2019-03-06
Maybe the Australian government knows that their Catholic priests can resist some used UK bussy.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-03-06
Tbh they're just protecting Milo from more priest molestation
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-03-06
A segment of that community? So like if I got invited to Perth to talk about how awful weebs are, the Australian Foundation for Weeaboo Weirdos could petition the government to get me bounced at the border?
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-03-06
bingo
1 bat_mayn 2019-03-06
Only for protected classes of God's chosen innocent peoples, such as satanic sodomites, semites, the world's most peaceful islamic peoples and other various savages.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-03-06
Hey, I used to be in a tech metal band called Other Various Savages. Is that you, Tim? You still owe me 20 bucks for those bass strings.
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
Its my FREEZE PEACH to go to any country and spout faggy shut.
Stop infringing on much rights!
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-03-06
lol if your country is so pozzed it sees a threat in Milo “Dangerous Faggot” Yiannopolous
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
Literally where?
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-03-06
Poztralia apparently
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
Fuck, if this is what you think threatened is, /r/drama must be the most threatened place on the internet.
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-03-06
lol no, /r/drama would welcome Milo with open arms not ban him like a bunch of Pozzies
1 DayyyTripper 2019-03-06
Thankfully we don't run our country like a shitposting forum, unlike Burgerstan for some reason.
1 ry8919 2019-03-06
Pretty sure basically any Country can do that. Due process doesn't apply to non citizens.
1 hurrff 2019-03-06
as usual his response is fucking gold
1 WiggityWatchinNews 2019-03-06
Damnit ya got me
1 aqouta 2019-03-06
He didn't fuck off to nowhere after the election? How is his name still floating around?
1 1029384756-mk2 2019-03-06
This is talking about a biracial racemixing gay jew btw
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-06
George Soros helped the nazis though
1 1029384756-mk2 2019-03-06
He was onto something.
1 jrolle 2019-03-06
I always disliked this guy, but I admire how he can make a country so butthurt that they ban him from entry because he hurt their feelings.
1 fernguts 2019-03-06
And nothing of value was lost.