Because someone trying to defend their unreasonably hated interests is just soooooo fucking funny. I'm only here for this post. Sorry kid, but I don't get off on laughing at other's expense so I'm going to gtfo of this degenerate cesspool asap. People wanna get rid of furries. Well how about places like this instead? The world would be infinitely better without drama. This sub is like the young people version of watching the Hallmark channel.
unironically I think a lot of anti-sanders dialogue is implicitly antisemitic but Dems are sneaky enough to give themselves plausible deniability when you call them out
a couple years ago I saw several blue checks comparing Bernie to Judas or saying he "stabbed the Dems in the back" by not supporting Hillary with enough enthusiasm
His following isn’t likely going to sustain itself. He jus jumped in really and people are just following up on what he was in 2015.
Harris is the most likely candidate as she’s been steady and well, black. This is unless Biden jumps in. If he does he’s most likely an auto-win because he would only do it if he got Obama’s endorsement beforehand. Which would clinch it for him going into the primaries.
I'm neither an American nor someone born in the west, so my 'name recognization skills' are just barely enough to say "SomethingStein = Jewish, McSomething = Irish, Daquanay or some shit = Black"
She said the N word like 20 times over the weekend, literally smoked hash with Snoop and Tupac. Here's a picture of them chillin in college.
Call me sexist, but I don’t see a woman winning in 2020. After all of Trump’s campaigning of Clinton being “crooked,” it will take an extraordinary woman to regain whatever may have been lost in the 2016 election. I do, however, see a woman having a high probability of winning in 2024.
Thanks, I hate it. I won't vote for a fucking Narcotics officer. I bet she'll be unironically wearing a wire in the oval office and bust her help for smoking weed and little crimes. She needs to have not spent her career putting minorities in the clank and not charging Steve Munchkin with financial crimes.
Bernie is in a similar position to Trump at the beginning of 2015: probably the front-runner, but opposed by most other candidates and written off by the media as a long-shot.
With a wider field of candidates, Bernie has a much better shot than he did last time. However if he can't appeal to older black voters and blue-state moderates better than he did in 2016, I don't think he has a serious chance.
Asians count towards white privilege now. They’ve been known as model minorities cause they stay out of trouble, conform to American culture the same way most Europeans do, like the US as a country and are pretty successful.
So if they run anyone not black they basically lose 30% of their core black voting block just from the primary.
Asians count towards white privilege now. They’ve been known as model minorities cause they stay out of trouble, conform to American culture the same way most Europeans do, like the US as a country and are pretty successful.
I heard about the controversy at harvard where asians are suing for being discriminated against.
So if Dems run anyone not black they basically lose 30% of their core black voting block just from the primary so there’s that too.
Come on, they can't be THAT petty. An asian guy is worse than a white guy in their eyes?
Asian's are too successful to be a minority by the standard of the "progressive" left. They're basically white people, so an asian man is just really a white man and oof, yikes, gross.
The whole intersectional thing is a leftist communist tactic to seperate a population into competing groups and make an argument for larger government controls to ensure everyone has a place in society.
In the US there are those who do well on average: whites, Asians, Jews, Indians and those who do bad on average, black, Latinos etc.
They use race as a surrogate for class divide. It’s just to lead up to a class argument which takes over once the race, sex and regional divides are filled.
Basically it’s saying that the top races are the oppressors of the bottom.
That’d be a pretty shitty surrogate, though. Most members of every race are proles.
Yes but as I said, minorities are overwhelmingly in poverty. So that creates a pseudo-class system to pull politics to the left.
So wait, does this mean the “separating into groups” is a temporary step intended to eventually subside into unified class consciousness? Or am I misreading this?
To build something up you have to tear the existing social fabric down. They use the have and have not divide that’s present in racial demographics to push socialist policies, which they hope will let them pull further to the left to communist policies.
They do! Every white person regardless of status has white privilege.
You see how they start working it in? Whites regardless of what they have not will always have. That’s how they rig it to say people in poverty I.e. blacks and Latinos, need intersectional politics to address systemic problems. And one primary way to fix that? Socialist programs. Which is a stepping stone for communist programs.
They want to tear down the system. That system is oppressive because its capitalistic. Capitalism is controlled by whites with the privilege in the US and this needs to end.
They do! Every white person regardless of status has white privilege.
But all white privilege gets you is decent starting odds, an initial assumption that you might know what you’re talking about, and probably not being shot by police. It doesn’t work as a stand-in for class dynamics any more than “first-world problems” does.
Whites regardless of what they have not will always have.
But what they’d have would be lesser than what they have not.
That’s how they rig it to say people in poverty I.e. blacks and Latinos, need intersectional politics to address systemic problems.
Well, they do. But whatever solutions they’d propose to address the systemic problems of black and hispanic poverty would necessarily have to address poverty in general, including that of whites.
In any of the schemes I’ve heard, “solving” systemic racism wouldn’t immediately solve the poverty enabled by it, it’d just prevent it from being perpetuated needlessly— poverty as its own systemic issue would need similar, separate attention. And most of the mechanisms of systemic racism also negatively affect poor whites, albeit usually at a much lower rate.
Capitalism is controlled by whites with the privilege in the US
But only some whites control capitalism. And while they maintain the largest share domestically, these days they have to share it with vampires of all colors. It’s no longer sufficient just to share it with Persians, Jews and the occasional North African.
White privilege may be derived in large part from capitalism, but it doesn’t grant people control of capitalism. Only money and guards can do that.
You do realize that this is literally just a /pol/ PsyOp?
They have been grooming and trolling this poor guy just to piss on dems and for lulz.
YangGang is literally an inside joke about Nazbol (National bolsheviks.)
$1000 is a reference to "free money" or "magic government money."
His only real fans are disenfranchised centrists abandoning the bipartisan system, adn those are a really fringe minority. Rest of his fanbase is just frog-worshippers stroking his ego and trolling him along exactly where they want him.
You must be beyond stupid to shill this guy.
He might hadYou do realize that this is literally just a /pol/ PsyOp?
They have been grooming and trolling this poor guy just to piss on dems and for lulz.
YangGang is literally an inside joke about Nazbol (National bolsheviks.)
$1000 is a reference to "free money" or "magic government money."
You must be beyond stupid to shill this guy.
He might had chance in 2024 but eating this bait now has probably cost him that too.
/pol/ is never the cause or effect of any political movement. it's right in between- the figurehead for all avânt gárdę politics that normies don't realize they identify with yet
pol claims to be behind anything that seems like it disrupts a system because their whole board is basically that anyway. Along with hating blacks, Jews, Muslims and anyone from south of the equator including Australians.
I don't move on, that's pretty much the first fact about me, it's astonishing how you people don't even know that much and you still believe whatever random shit you make up about me like it makes you experts
Question: How old is too old for you? 18? 16? What if you're in Europe and the age of consent is like 14? Do you see a 15 year old that you fancy and after asking for her age, do you go like "nah, too old for me"?
All the gibs aside this dude seems un compromised to a certain extent, but the only truly based progressive candidate is tulsi gabbard. Look at how much the establishment has smeared her already. There are already been Russia truther fake news pieces worries by nbc linking her to the kremlin. She’s the real deal, and smoking hot too
The only way I'll vote for a female candidate who isn't completely physically repulsive is if she attends the Presidential debates as close to nude as possible. There is no excuse for living a life of feminine privilege by America's divine will and then hoarding your tits while asking Americans for their votes unless you're some pug creature like Hillary Clinton who never could have gotten much feminine privilege to owe America for to begin with. Someone like that is exempt from being judged based on clothing, she just didn't get my vote because she was a retarded psychopath.
Clinton was also ugly af, which is the main reason I didn’t vote for her. I agree female candidates should have full disclosure and show tits before they announce their candidacy. All I’m saying is tulsi unironically is the only female candidate with hot tits worth looking at.
You have 4 links and not one of them is to information. The signal to noise ratio of the shit I've read from your links is absolutely abysmal. If basic income actually failed, you could give at least some semblance of a concise explanation of the failure instead of being like "here's an opinion, now immerse yourself in verbose repititions of that opinion for a half hour since hopefully that's enough to make you agree with it." You are a prime brainwashee and the reason Trump will win again.
You have 4 links and not one of them is to information
?
I also have no qualms against UBI that arent any general opinion against unfair taxation and its cost. Im pretty sure you could gleam that from like maybe a majority of the articles.
You said UBI "failed," not that it wasn't successful. There is a subtle but important difference and you know it, because your goal with the word "failed" was to imply UBI had been given a chance to succeed to begin with and it was its own fault it never worked.
We arent a post scarcity civilization. We will never be. The only thing that is infinite is human desires. Lotto winners a year down the line are just as happy as the avg person.
Also i didnt use a strawman and UBI was given a chance to succeed. Your arguments are incredibly emotional as well
Yeah, fucktard, what seems like a big deal about that to you? Is your long term memory so bad you can't even remember when shock humor wasn't a political thing? How are this many of you this severely mentally handicapped and so few willing to stand against it?
It's not really shocking nor humorous to say you fuck kids, just gross and not surprising cause it's the internet and Poe' s law. If social interaction isn't your strong suit( I know i am hazarding a gues here with this one), just remember that this makes people laugh at YOU, not with you.
Yep, you literally have such a bad memory you can't remember a time when you weren't brainwashed to think shock humor is unfunny.
If it's just gross and "not surprising" to you seeing a comment like the one you're talking about, that's not because of Poe's "law," that's because you're retarded. Incidentally, the #1 most common reason "Poe's Law" gets mentioned is because some retard with no social skills needs an excuse for their complete lack of intelligence or social skills, which is funny because it subconsciously made you need to start talking about social interaction as a "strong suit" immediately after to detract from you doing that and then you still couldn't think of any wittier way to sell that projection than to regurgitate the old AtYouNotWithYou.txt
Yep, now that I’ve thought about it, you’re right. Saying you fuck kids is really funny and idk why you don’t already have your own netflix comedy special
I would say that Bernie and Yang along with Warren to a degree are genuinely who they portray themselves as. I'm a Bernie supporter but I'm also supporting Yang as well for transparency.
157 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-11
Because someone trying to defend their unreasonably hated interests is just soooooo fucking funny. I'm only here for this post. Sorry kid, but I don't get off on laughing at other's expense so I'm going to gtfo of this degenerate cesspool asap. People wanna get rid of furries. Well how about places like this instead? The world would be infinitely better without drama. This sub is like the young people version of watching the Hallmark channel.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 HiMyNameIs_REDACTED_ 2019-03-11
This bot always fucks with me for a second before I see the username.
1 Stalin_vs_hitler 2019-03-11
How is this a bot. I refuse to believe it.
1 bendable_girder 2019-03-11
Snappy achieved sentience back in 1993
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
Democrats would never run an Asian. That’s like running a Jew.
1 heretobefriends 2019-03-11
Lol, they should run a jew and call anti-Semitism every time someone agrees with her.
1 aX10mAt1CaL1Y 2019-03-11
They had their chance to run Sanders already.
1 zenicaone 2019-03-11
Hillary converts to Judaism confirmed.
1 FakeFactFan 2019-03-11
Chelsea married a Jew
1 Vladith 2019-03-11
unironically I think a lot of anti-sanders dialogue is implicitly antisemitic but Dems are sneaky enough to give themselves plausible deniability when you call them out
a couple years ago I saw several blue checks comparing Bernie to Judas or saying he "stabbed the Dems in the back" by not supporting Hillary with enough enthusiasm
1 Special_Ed_Principal 2019-03-11
I think there was some official merchandise sold at a Clinton event that depicted Sanders in a similar manner to Nazi anti-Jew propaganda.
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-03-11
Daddy Bernie lost though
1 UseLotionOrGetHose 2019-03-11
But doesn’t Bernie have a high, un-ironic, early following? I will predict it now that Bernie is who the Democrats run for 2020.
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
His following isn’t likely going to sustain itself. He jus jumped in really and people are just following up on what he was in 2015.
Harris is the most likely candidate as she’s been steady and well, black. This is unless Biden jumps in. If he does he’s most likely an auto-win because he would only do it if he got Obama’s endorsement beforehand. Which would clinch it for him going into the primaries.
1 rastafaris 2019-03-11
Harris didn't look Black at breakfast club.
1 Vyrnie 2019-03-11
This but unironically. I didn't even realize Harris was black till people mentioned it online.
1 look4alec 2019-03-11
Her last name is HARRIS, how did that not clue you off.
1 Vyrnie 2019-03-11
I'm neither an American nor someone born in the west, so my 'name recognization skills' are just barely enough to say "SomethingStein = Jewish, McSomething = Irish, Daquanay or some shit = Black"
I take pride in not having known that 🤗
1 prizzle92 2019-03-11
are you retarded?
1 Vyrnie 2019-03-11
Yes, people that don't follow the minutiae of foreign politicians are retards.
1 prizzle92 2019-03-11
I have not clue who she is either, but look at the picture
1 heavenlytoaster 2019-03-11
You've pretty much got it
1 Momruepari 2019-03-11
when will gussy realize that pearl necklaces make them look older?
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
I still don’t believe she’s black, I’m pretty sure she’s just pulling a Dolezal
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-03-11
She's half Indian.
1 UseLotionOrGetHose 2019-03-11
Call me sexist, but I don’t see a woman winning in 2020. After all of Trump’s campaigning of Clinton being “crooked,” it will take an extraordinary woman to regain whatever may have been lost in the 2016 election. I do, however, see a woman having a high probability of winning in 2024.
1 Trudy_Wiegel 2019-03-11
Haley 2024
1 look4alec 2019-03-11
Thanks, I hate it. Kirstjen Nielsen 2020, I heard that's why she quit DHS.
1 diggity_md 2019-03-11
We need Haley 2020 to fulfil the superpower by 2020 prophecy
1 Still_youngjustice 2019-03-11
Id vote for Tulsi Gabbard. Too bad the rest of the left hates her
1 look4alec 2019-03-11
Thanks, I hate it. I won't vote for a fucking Narcotics officer. I bet she'll be unironically wearing a wire in the oval office and bust her help for smoking weed and little crimes. She needs to have not spent her career putting minorities in the clank and not charging Steve Munchkin with financial crimes.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
but nobody likes Harris. she’s less popular than O’Malley was
And you wouldn’t even be able tell Harris is black if she didn’t say so
1 Vladith 2019-03-11
Bernie is in a similar position to Trump at the beginning of 2015: probably the front-runner, but opposed by most other candidates and written off by the media as a long-shot.
With a wider field of candidates, Bernie has a much better shot than he did last time. However if he can't appeal to older black voters and blue-state moderates better than he did in 2016, I don't think he has a serious chance.
1 BillyRayAtkins 2019-03-11
He's not winning in the polls Biden is. He's more like Ted Cruz. Though Biden could be a Jeb. Or maybe he doesn't even run again.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
Biden hasn’t even announced yet
1 BillyRayAtkins 2019-03-11
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
ohh, he was Biden all along
1 1029384756-mk2 2019-03-11
Can you seriouspost for a second? Is there an actual political reason for this, or are you just joking?
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
Asians count towards white privilege now. They’ve been known as model minorities cause they stay out of trouble, conform to American culture the same way most Europeans do, like the US as a country and are pretty successful.
So if they run anyone not black they basically lose 30% of their core black voting block just from the primary.
1 1029384756-mk2 2019-03-11
I heard about the controversy at harvard where asians are suing for being discriminated against.
Come on, they can't be THAT petty. An asian guy is worse than a white guy in their eyes?
1 Mexagon 2019-03-11
According to college applications, yes.
1 VapeOnYourNape 2019-03-11
What's the minimum SAT to get the nomination?
1 SloppySynapses 2019-03-11
this is an extremely retarded interpretation
1 mcslibbin 2019-03-11
this entire thread is extremely retarded
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-03-11
Do you seriously want an educated reply in this sub?
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-03-11
Do you seriously want an educated reply in this sub?
1 cheers_grills 2019-03-11
No, they are BETTER than white guys, so they have to be discriminated against.
1 4Pb27o8OsBMYDJ59 2019-03-11
C'mon blacks wouldn't vote for a white Republican over an Asian Democrat, especially one offering $1000/month
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
What they hate most is when someone gets out of shitty and poor areas. Those typically tend to be Asians and Jews.
1 diggity_md 2019-03-11
Seriousposting for a sec, but the Asians = white people is 100% righty cope
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
but they ran a white last time. so why not an asian?
1 Plexipus 2019-03-11
A take so hot it burned the roof of my mouth
1 xlhat 2019-03-11
Orientals are white. Infact they're white and not mayo, which is worst.
1 VidiotGamer 2019-03-11
Asian's are too successful to be a minority by the standard of the "progressive" left. They're basically white people, so an asian man is just really a white man and oof, yikes, gross.
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
They redefined People of Color to not include Asians.
Which is going to make it awkward given that Indians are the next group up that fit the bill.
1 l-Removed-l 2019-03-11
Kamala Harris’ mother is Indian. That might count her out.
1 Medibee 2019-03-11
Aryans will finally be recognized as white.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
...who’s “they”?
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
Take a guess.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
The Jews?
It ain’t the folks over at WikiMedia, that’s for true
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
I was gonna say commies but
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
since when do commies get to decide anything
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
The whole intersectional thing is a leftist communist tactic to seperate a population into competing groups and make an argument for larger government controls to ensure everyone has a place in society.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
wait why would “communists” want to “separate a population into competing groups”
that seems like kind of a contradiction lol
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
In the US there are those who do well on average: whites, Asians, Jews, Indians and those who do bad on average, black, Latinos etc.
They use race as a surrogate for class divide. It’s just to lead up to a class argument which takes over once the race, sex and regional divides are filled.
Basically it’s saying that the top races are the oppressors of the bottom.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
That’d be a pretty shitty surrogate, though. Most members of every race are proles.
So wait, does this imply the “separating into groups” is a temporary step intended to subside into general class consciousness?
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
Yes but as I said, minorities are overwhelmingly in poverty. So that creates a pseudo-class system to pull politics to the left.
To build something up you have to tear the existing social fabric down. They use the have and have not divide that’s present in racial demographics to push socialist policies, which they hope will let them pull further to the left to communist policies.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
Wouldn’t it be a little easier to just use the have and have not divide in general, though? Seems like an unnecessary intermediary
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
They do! Every white person regardless of status has white privilege.
You see how they start working it in? Whites regardless of what they have not will always have. That’s how they rig it to say people in poverty I.e. blacks and Latinos, need intersectional politics to address systemic problems. And one primary way to fix that? Socialist programs. Which is a stepping stone for communist programs.
They want to tear down the system. That system is oppressive because its capitalistic. Capitalism is controlled by whites with the privilege in the US and this needs to end.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
But all white privilege gets you is decent starting odds, an initial assumption that you might know what you’re talking about, and probably not being shot by police. It doesn’t work as a stand-in for class dynamics any more than “first-world problems” does.
But what they’d have would be lesser than what they have not.
Well, they do. But whatever solutions they’d propose to address the systemic problems of black and hispanic poverty would necessarily have to address poverty in general, including that of whites.
In any of the schemes I’ve heard, “solving” systemic racism wouldn’t immediately solve the poverty enabled by it, it’d just prevent it from being perpetuated needlessly— poverty as its own systemic issue would need similar, separate attention. And most of the mechanisms of systemic racism also negatively affect poor whites, albeit usually at a much lower rate.
But only some whites control capitalism. And while they maintain the largest share domestically, these days they have to share it with vampires of all colors. It’s no longer sufficient just to share it with Persians, Jews and the occasional North African.
White privilege may be derived in large part from capitalism, but it doesn’t grant people control of capitalism. Only money and guards can do that.
1 LongPostBot 2019-03-11
OUT!
OUT!!!
OUT!!!
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 Grape_pez 2019-03-11
But they yellow
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
But the Democratic Party is full of white men
1 thesoundabout 2019-03-11
Not enough Asians to pander too. Most Asians vote conservative. Black people still have a problem with Koreans.
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
what lol? no korean ever called Ali “ni🅱️🅱️er.”
is this about that one guy who brandished a shotgun on a rooftop 27 years ago? that’s not exactly on a lot of black people’s minds these days
1 Special_Ed_Principal 2019-03-11
Asians are high up the privilege ladder, and the white woke base gains nothing from using them as tokens to advance themselves socially.
1 ParticleMare 2019-03-11
The two frontrunners rn are a Jew and a white guy.
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
The only thing that matters is who’s there when the smoke clears.
1 One_Y_chromosome 2019-03-11
So, two white guys?
1 mukumukum68-16 2019-03-11
You do realize that this is literally just a /pol/ PsyOp?
They have been grooming and trolling this poor guy just to piss on dems and for lulz.
YangGang is literally an inside joke about Nazbol (National bolsheviks.)
$1000 is a reference to "free money" or "magic government money."
His only real fans are disenfranchised centrists abandoning the bipartisan system, adn those are a really fringe minority. Rest of his fanbase is just frog-worshippers stroking his ego and trolling him along exactly where they want him.
You must be beyond stupid to shill this guy.
He might hadYou do realize that this is literally just a /pol/ PsyOp?
They have been grooming and trolling this poor guy just to piss on dems and for lulz.
YangGang is literally an inside joke about Nazbol (National bolsheviks.)
$1000 is a reference to "free money" or "magic government money."
You must be beyond stupid to shill this guy.
He might had chance in 2024 but eating this bait now has probably cost him that too.
1 MONTREAL_TAYLOR 2019-03-11
You're giving them too much credit, /pol/ is not that smart; they are nihilistic neets who just want gibs
1 SloppySynapses 2019-03-11
/pol/ is never the cause or effect of any political movement. it's right in between- the figurehead for all avânt gárdę politics that normies don't realize they identify with yet
1 DeliciousExit 2019-03-11
Coming from the people who easily eat up /pol/ memes like this.
1 mukumukum68-16 2019-03-11
I'm not giving them credit. /pol/ is not smart, everyone else is just stupider
1 BeiberFan123 2019-03-11
pol claims to be behind anything that seems like it disrupts a system because their whole board is basically that anyway. Along with hating blacks, Jews, Muslims and anyone from south of the equator including Australians.
1 DeliciousExit 2019-03-11
How stupid does it make you to buy into a /pol/ manufactured meme?
1 _Suprememe_ 2019-03-11
The meme war is not a joke, le maymays are srs bsns.
1 -Shank- 2019-03-11
Australian shitposters deserve the ire though. Only thing is a Leaf, may Allah forgive me for uttering the word.
1 Carl_Schmitt 2019-03-11
delet this
1 WholesomeDrama 2019-03-11
the trump train started with memeing on retards too
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
“psyop”? did i miss something? does this “Yang” guy exist outside of /r/drama?
1 razzmataz 2019-03-11
They would, however, run an Asian Jew.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-11
I'd pay good money to see Yang beat the shit out of Trump.
1 freet0 2019-03-11
I doubt you need martial arts to beat up a fat senile old man
1 kxxzy 2019-03-11
implying trump isn't a master of physical discipline
1 UBIisLazy 2019-03-11
Tbf half of reddit would break a bone if they did that.
1 SlowFatHusky 2019-03-11
Half of Reddit would brag that they couldn't knock the other guy to the ground.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-11
Hes so alpha that McMahon fell before he even touched him
1 xlhat 2019-03-11
Aren't orientals white ? Even more so. Can't have privileged types.
1 ironschlong22 2019-03-11
Yanggang ft Lil Pump
1 holditsteady 2019-03-11
$1000? Thank you Yang Gang, very cool!
1 rastafaris 2019-03-11
1000 reasons #yangang
1 Ed_ButteredToast 2019-03-11
Absolutely based and 💵pilled
1 SWIMsfriend 2019-03-11
The good part about yang is now everyone on the alt right can admit the left was right about trump
1 Mnomeri 2019-03-11
Theres a lot to unpack here
1 UgandanWarlord 2019-03-11
kinda. it started mostly from twitter, most of the people are half serious half joking.
1 Medibee 2019-03-11
Keep your eye on the bag.
1 UgandanWarlord 2019-03-11
need those NEETbux ;0
1 MikeStoklasaAlcohol 2019-03-11
Yang dresses like he works the CIA and is looking for a Masketta man.
1 EasySchmitty 2019-03-11
Smee, Mimen, Doctor Pavelhier, Budd Donly, Juan Hovieu
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-11
YANG GANG let ya nuts hang
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Unironically the only candidate I would consider voting for so far other than Trump.
1 InstantSheepMix 2019-03-11
thanks for sharing. how far does $1000 go in child grooming, if you want to buy the kids toys and shit
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Like 1/75th of the way to buying a Lamborghini for the girl I love but she's over 18 now so idk if that counts as child grooming
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-03-11
Ahh so i see youre coping with having to move on now thats shes legal now.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
I don't move on, that's pretty much the first fact about me, it's astonishing how you people don't even know that much and you still believe whatever random shit you make up about me like it makes you experts
1 Unkill_is_dill 2019-03-11
Question: How old is too old for you? 18? 16? What if you're in Europe and the age of consent is like 14? Do you see a 15 year old that you fancy and after asking for her age, do you go like "nah, too old for me"?
1 [deleted] 2019-03-11
[removed]
1 yourdeadwife 2019-03-11
So this girl you "love". When is the last time you hung out with her?
1 TreLoon 2019-03-11
YIKES!
1 Plexipus 2019-03-11
Two 9 year olds do not count as over 18
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-11
All the gibs aside this dude seems un compromised to a certain extent, but the only truly based progressive candidate is tulsi gabbard. Look at how much the establishment has smeared her already. There are already been Russia truther fake news pieces worries by nbc linking her to the kremlin. She’s the real deal, and smoking hot too
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
The only way I'll vote for a female candidate who isn't completely physically repulsive is if she attends the Presidential debates as close to nude as possible. There is no excuse for living a life of feminine privilege by America's divine will and then hoarding your tits while asking Americans for their votes unless you're some pug creature like Hillary Clinton who never could have gotten much feminine privilege to owe America for to begin with. Someone like that is exempt from being judged based on clothing, she just didn't get my vote because she was a retarded psychopath.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-11
Clinton was also ugly af, which is the main reason I didn’t vote for her. I agree female candidates should have full disclosure and show tits before they announce their candidacy. All I’m saying is tulsi unironically is the only female candidate with hot tits worth looking at.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
But she's not going to show them, and therefore she doesn't really care about this country.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-11
Your based logic and reasoning has me wanting to look more into this yang gang. Asian tits are best tits!
1 stanman51 2019-03-11
we've got a big surprise here, known pedophile and avid Reddit user supports Trump.
1 grilledsandwhich 2019-03-11
Ubi is a failure in every country its been tried
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Source?
1 grilledsandwhich 2019-03-11
https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/commentary/canadian-experiment-quickly-shows-failures-universal-basic
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.livemint.com/Opinion/ZejGZeZLmL6L5a1RPvH4YJ/The-failure-of-Finlands-Universal-Basic-Income-experiment.html%3ffacet=amp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.economist.com/open-future/2018/05/31/universal-basic-income-wont-fix-problems-but-will-create-new-ones
https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/universal-basic-income-experiments-fail/
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
You have 4 links and not one of them is to information. The signal to noise ratio of the shit I've read from your links is absolutely abysmal. If basic income actually failed, you could give at least some semblance of a concise explanation of the failure instead of being like "here's an opinion, now immerse yourself in verbose repititions of that opinion for a half hour since hopefully that's enough to make you agree with it." You are a prime brainwashee and the reason Trump will win again.
1 grilledsandwhich 2019-03-11
?
I also have no qualms against UBI that arent any general opinion against unfair taxation and its cost. Im pretty sure you could gleam that from like maybe a majority of the articles.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
1 grilledsandwhich 2019-03-11
Nice strawman.
So can i walk into an electronic store and take whatever? If a TV costs too much can i just steal it because i want my life to be better?
Name one successful UBI program then? I still stand by my statement that they all failed.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Nice strawman.
You said UBI "failed," not that it wasn't successful. There is a subtle but important difference and you know it, because your goal with the word "failed" was to imply UBI had been given a chance to succeed to begin with and it was its own fault it never worked.
1 grilledsandwhich 2019-03-11
We arent a post scarcity civilization. We will never be. The only thing that is infinite is human desires. Lotto winners a year down the line are just as happy as the avg person.
Also i didnt use a strawman and UBI was given a chance to succeed. Your arguments are incredibly emotional as well
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Again, you're a dumbass. These are retarded things to think or say. Have fun losing in 2020
1 grilledsandwhich 2019-03-11
I really hope you are trolling. That or you are the avg r/drama user
1 BussySundae 2019-03-11
Shut up you dumb faggot. If you have any desire for your candidates to win or not seem like a delusional pipe-dream, shut the fuck up.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
I could say the same to you with the key difference that I'd actually be right.
Retards who project pedophilia on internet strangers aren't a key voting demographic, trust me.
1 BussySundae 2019-03-11
Says the dude who talks online about fucking kids then says he's only being humorous
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Yeah, fucktard, what seems like a big deal about that to you? Is your long term memory so bad you can't even remember when shock humor wasn't a political thing? How are this many of you this severely mentally handicapped and so few willing to stand against it?
1 BussySundae 2019-03-11
It's not really shocking nor humorous to say you fuck kids, just gross and not surprising cause it's the internet and Poe' s law. If social interaction isn't your strong suit( I know i am hazarding a gues here with this one), just remember that this makes people laugh at YOU, not with you.
1 DarqWolff 2019-03-11
Yep, you literally have such a bad memory you can't remember a time when you weren't brainwashed to think shock humor is unfunny.
If it's just gross and "not surprising" to you seeing a comment like the one you're talking about, that's not because of Poe's "law," that's because you're retarded. Incidentally, the #1 most common reason "Poe's Law" gets mentioned is because some retard with no social skills needs an excuse for their complete lack of intelligence or social skills, which is funny because it subconsciously made you need to start talking about social interaction as a "strong suit" immediately after to detract from you doing that and then you still couldn't think of any wittier way to sell that projection than to regurgitate the old AtYouNotWithYou.txt
1 BussySundae 2019-03-11
Yep, now that I’ve thought about it, you’re right. Saying you fuck kids is really funny and idk why you don’t already have your own netflix comedy special
1 ironschlong22 2019-03-11
Shutup and vote for Jeb! you fucking traitor.
1 Kenopoly 2019-03-11
I would say that Bernie and Yang along with Warren to a degree are genuinely who they portray themselves as. I'm a Bernie supporter but I'm also supporting Yang as well for transparency.
1 Carl_Schmitt 2019-03-11
I, for one, welcome our new Chinese overlords.
1 Grindalid 2019-03-11
It is no coincidence that Yangchad looks like Kim
1 FakeFactFan 2019-03-11
He only looks like Kim if you’ve never seen another Asian person before
1 accreditedEditor 2019-03-11
Yang's Plank: "human-centered Capitalism"
I think we tried that already ...
I recall, the slaves were unhappy.
1 thx_II38 2019-03-11
Where's muh money?
1 Alfa229 2019-03-11
Orang man bad indeed.
1 Alfa229 2019-03-11
Also, op is a yang gang shill confirmed.
1 -Shank- 2019-03-11
Please daddy Yang gimme my NEETbux so I can buy more tendies
1 grungebot5000 2019-03-11
is that kim jong un
1 endestir 2019-03-11
all u need is
trump: is literally mentally retarded
yang: will give you free money