An organized response to the DDF.
88 2019-03-26 by IDFSHILL
A disclaimer for the DDF, because I know they tend to have low cognitive ability and NPC traits: I never thought collusion was a thing. I've been saying for months that the report likely wouldn't find collusion. What I DID think would take place was obstruction of justice/perjury. That is, until Barr came into the picture.
- Who is William Barr?
A known Republican operative that specializes in political cover-ups. You might known him from the iron contra affair, likely one of the most obvious examples of treason in US history:
Barr is called up when the GOP is desperate and needs someone to muddy the waters enough to get away with some type of illegality.
This is why Sessions was fired, Sessions, for all of his faults, isn't a guy willing to roll in the mud to shield Donald Trump from obstruction.
Even more evidence that Barr is not credible is the fact he authored a memo a year in advance basically claiming a sitting president can not legally obstruct justice:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5638848-June-2018-Barr-Memo-to-DOJ-Muellers-Obstruction.html
- What does this mean?
Not much, in the end it doesn't matter. Trump is still a deeply unpopular president, he's still incompetent, he's still a pathological liar. Most people didn't care about the Russian collusion, the investigation was about propaganda. It was meant to hurt Trump politically, and that's exactly what it did. And before the DDF responds and says "SEE, YOU ADMIT IT WAS PROPAGANDA!!"
Yes, I do, it's called giving the GOP a taste of their own money. From whitewater, to Christmas cards, to Benghazi; the GOP has repeatedly used conspiracy and fake investigations for political gain. Cry me a river, DDF.
255 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-03-26
Yawn, another brigade from Drama? They must be tired of disrespecting the trans community or creeping on underage children if they're willing to shit on a wholesome subreddit that actually does something to help others.
Outlines:
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/6845... - Outline
https://www.documentcloud.org/docum... - Outline
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-26
I totally realize most people are going to disagree with me here but I feel compelled to say that closing the sub for a joke wasn't a very kind thing to do. We have seen TONS of posts from vulnerable populations talking about how this sub is a source of support and humor in a dark time. Irony and dirtbagism aside, taking away that support without warning was not okay.
You can say I'm being silly, or humorless or reactionary. Whatever. I love the show and I love this community. But sometimes I come home after dealing with ableism and our nightmare reality all day, and this sub is one of many things that make me feel better. It wasn't a good feeling to find this sub closed for the sake of irony. Maybe that's laughable or pathetic. But for me, it's true.
Snapshots:
This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, removeddit.com, archive.is
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/6845... - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is
https://www.documentcloud.org/docum... - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 READ-SIEGE 2019-03-26
Cope
1 -I-II-II-IL- 2019-03-26
C O P E
O
P
E
1 Awayfone 2019-03-26
I finally understand what that means
This posr still wasn't worth it
1 KingPhilipIII 2019-03-26
I still don’t understand please tell.
1 averagewhitebrah69 2019-03-26
hAhahahahaha
1 dazivostri 2019-03-26
Did you mean to post this on your facebook page or your blog or something?
1 Snowayne2 2019-03-26
He meant to post it on his blog, which is exactly where we are at.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
Nah he has a Xanga page on the side where he vents about his mother
1 WithoutAComma 2019-03-26
This is a true exercise of narcissism. He just knew we were all trembling with anticipation to hear how he was really right about everything all along.
1 dazivostri 2019-03-26
It's so over the top I would think it's a troll, but I can't see someone putting that much time and effort into impressing people on drama.
1 PunchTrumpNow 2019-03-26
Dude, don't waster your time. /r/Drama has become T_D2.0.
1 EyeseeFN 2019-03-26
Seething
1 ChipChippersonAMA 2019-03-26
1 Ed__ButteredToast 2019-03-26
bussy lmao
1 Tecacotl 2019-03-26
Honestly, I can't argue against this. You should spread this wherever you can.
1 Chicup 2019-03-26
So glad the lolcow mascot returned.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Ah, chicup! my favorite /r/drama rightoid. What's the score now, you've lost what, 5 arguments to me to the point you had to stop responding?
1 [deleted] 2019-03-26
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-26
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
incel
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 -6x- 2019-03-26
Have sex, incеl.
1 mygoodpostingalt 2019-03-26
l-slurs raus
1 Chicup 2019-03-26
When I picture you I get this image of a midget yelling at me and talking about how he's going to kick my ass.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Well, I'm bigger than you are, manlet, but no, I'll stick to winning internet arguments against you.
Though you've stopped responding to me as much after the uranium one stomping.
1 DrWTFITS 2019-03-26
Hmmmm.... Link?
1 Chicup 2019-03-26
Ever see an angry chihuahua? 4 billion years of evolved fury, warped by man into a harmlessness? The chihuahua thinks it's a fierce opponent, but we all laugh at it.
1 solastsummer 2019-03-26
Can you two post your measurements?
1 RobKaBobby 2019-03-26
1.5 inches. combined
1 dazivostri 2019-03-26
You're literally the dude from that "Internet arguments won" meme.
1 RobKaBobby 2019-03-26
By bigger you mean wider right?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
my dick is pretty wide tbh
1 RobKaBobby 2019-03-26
But if it's short then you have a chode, not like there's anything wrong with chodes
1 life_is_painful_3 2019-03-26
chode == dick manlet
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-03-26
No! Smalldickproblems said girth is king! King! 👑 📏📐
1 Kelkymcdouble 2019-03-26
You cant talk about it without posting it
1 d4ddyd54m4 2019-03-26
Nah, you don’t get the benefit of that doubt since we’ve seen your face
1 BeanerShnitzel 2019-03-26
Like a tuna can!!
1 Ed__ButteredToast 2019-03-26
W I D E B O I 🍆
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-26
Oh my god lmao
1 RandolphCox 2019-03-26
i hv beaten u in debate. u said sessions bein fired was new and related to trump jr being indicted when i gave a link from months prior saying he would be fired after midterms.
let that sink in. me, randy, beat you in intellextusl debate. lmao. u are a hack. lol
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
I said sessions was fired because he wasn't willing to protect Donald Trump from obstruction, not whatever you just said.
1 RandolphCox 2019-03-26
ya now u changes ur tune after i took u down a notch. this was awhile ago n u were like all the other r-w*rds sayin that sessions was fired for trump jr and trump jr would be indicted. i dont expect ur memory to be good by how clearly not smart u are tho!
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
What the fuck are you talking about lmao.
1 RandolphCox 2019-03-26
cope much?
1 Ed__ButteredToast 2019-03-26
Based Pastor Randy!
1 Quietus42 2019-03-26
Damn, get em Randy!
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
Have you considered running for city council like I admonished you a week or so back? I'm 100% sure with me as your CoS we could get you elected
1 _narrows 2019-03-26
I just wanted to interject here and say that you have some fine dickslurping lips.
1 wwyzzerdd 2019-03-26
RANDY!
1 elephantofdoom 2019-03-26
C O P E
1 [deleted] 2019-03-26
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-26
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
dumb
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 raebake 2019-03-26
Chicup is the d-slur, but you are much, much worse.
You're like "that" cousin. 24 and kinda bright, but not nearly as smart as he thinks is, and far too old to still be doing whatever menial job he's still doing. He argues with the older cousins at family gatherings because he's Overly Online but as far as real life experience or even actual education goes, he's kind of a joke.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Responses to my post in this comment: 0.
1 Arbys_Official 2019-03-26
He's also a pedo if that helps
1 Nastaya 2019-03-26
Let me preface this by saying you sound like a seriousposter.
Seriousposters are f-slurs.
Now thats outta the way, f-slur, i need you to accept a few simple realities in life, okay? Alright....first 1) Women hate you. That may be a tough pill to swallow, but youre doing God's work by being eliminated from the breeding pool, and i appreciate that, as it leaves more vaginas privy to my insemination. Kuddos.
Secondly 2) when i tell you to do shit, its an extention of my generousity. Do you think id just trust anybody to go pick up a pizza or clean the bathroom? Of course not. Ur my special beta-boi and i luv you for all that u do.
Lastly 3) just remember ur a f-slur, is all.
Cheers (not u, just the general reading audience) 🍻
1 MG87 2019-03-26
This P Word is SEETHING.
1 RollBread 2019-03-26
Did you try reading the name of the poster, you r-slur? This is something beyond serious post.
1 Wopitikitotengo 2019-03-26
Oh is swearing why I got banned
1 pepperouchau 2019-03-26
Seriousposter is the most vulgar slur and yet it's not banned smh
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-26
Are you new?
1 Mexagon 2019-03-26
Pointless stickying, selfposting, and seriousposting. This could be the worst r/drama post of all time.
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-03-26
How can you disrespect darkwolf (however he spelled it) like that?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
Dharqqwholff
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-03-26
Something like that.
1 CrosbyStillzandSwag 2019-03-26
I would argue this is necessary seriousposting to counterbalance the MDE rapefugee seriousposting. This sub is becoming /r/SRSsucks. Pizza is just restoring radical centrism.
1 -6x- 2019-03-26
😴😴😴
1 diggity_md 2019-03-26
😴😴😴
1 madaramen 2019-03-26
The terrorists win if you don't snoozepost.
1 fsdgfhk 2019-03-26
Yeah, I'll go with the "terrorists win"option, tbh. Getting Sharia'd for being an infidel sounds less unpleasant than reading all that.
1 dazivostri 2019-03-26
Dear Mom, I yelled about Drumpgf on the internet again today. Love, shill
PS, tell Dad I still hate him.
1 FmW-41 2019-03-26
Shouldn't this be sticking to /r/politics?
1 [deleted] 2019-03-26
[removed]
1 stereomono1 2019-03-26
Take the Barrpill.
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-26
Grrrrr. STAY OFF MY PAGE!!
*Shoves you against the wall.*
You do NOT want to mess with me.
*You try to lean off the wall but I put my hand on your throat and press you harder against it. You struggle to breath as I lean in closely, calm and collected.*
Back. Off. Mess with me again, and you'll receive FAR more than just my rage.
*Smirks as your chin trembles.*
Catch you later, little boy.
1 Thatlookedlikeithurt 2019-03-26
I think we found a new bot post!
1 MG87 2019-03-26
unzips pants, bends you over a table
1 Ed__ButteredToast 2019-03-26
DO ME, DADDY!! 😩💦
1 White_Dudeness 2019-03-26
OwO what's that?
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-03-26
This pasta gets me hot n heavy. 🥵🥵🥵
1 PM_ME_UR_NIPPLES_BAE 2019-03-26
harder daddy
1 Volhar 2019-03-26
Serious posting in 2019
Omegalul
1 mygoodpostingalt 2019-03-26
twitch emotes in 2019
Problematic
1 Volhar 2019-03-26
no u
1 Matues49 2019-03-26
lots of triggered rightoids in this thread 👀
1 dazivostri 2019-03-26
Literally no rightoids are triggered over anything that's happened regarding this news. Zero. None.
1 Matues49 2019-03-26
https://i.imgur.com/8HnT78H.jpg
1 dazivostri 2019-03-26
They're all really disappointed that your conspiracy theory got debunked in Trump's favor. They're really struggling to cope.
1 MG87 2019-03-26
Irony
1 MG87 2019-03-26
Are you sure?
1 virohm 2019-03-26
L I T E R A L L Y
1 seenten 2019-03-26
That explains their sperging all over pizza's seriouspost
1 florida_navy 2019-03-26
this post is COPE phaggot
1 Doesnt_Draw_Anything 2019-03-26
What rank are you in the force?
1 florida_navy 2019-03-26
Colonel
1 Chicup 2019-03-26
Remember when you did that remind me over the election? That was great.
1 Matues49 2019-03-26
are u having a stroke or something?
1 diggity_md 2019-03-26
Ed, get on your main account to snoozepost here. You know this post deserves it. Stop agendaposting.
1 MikeStoklasaAlcohol 2019-03-26
Smells like cope in here. Unbased and bluepilled Pizza
1 SwiftOnSobriety 2019-03-26
DDF: 1; Shills: 0
1 ArlenBilldozer 2019-03-26
Why's it gotta be WHITEwater?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
Because the Clinton's were racist
1 _narrows 2019-03-26
You ignorant slutslur.
Oh, it’s the GOP that’s desperate in all of this.
All of this is actually true, and that’s why it’s so remarkably funny that he keeps pounding your bussies like he gets paid by the hour to do it.
Iron Contra (lel) isn’t just a Nintendo game, you rtarded faggotslur. It’s the very same kind of desiccated political horse trotted out by mouth breathers on your side of the fence.
As the kids say, get “yeetedslur” on.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Oh man, a typo.
Why are they blocking the report?
English please.
1 _narrows 2019-03-26
No worries. I got ya covered, chief:
desiccated [ˈdesikeədəd] ADJECTIVE having had all moisture removed; dried out. "the withered, desiccated landscape" · [more] lacking vitality or interest. "a desiccated history of ideas"
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
This is an American sub, please form coherent sentences that can be understood.
We have a lot of rightoids here and their reading skills don't tend to be up to snuff.
1 UBIisLazy 2019-03-26
True, my reading ability is stuck at a 5th grade level because that's when I dropped out to make moonshine up in the woods and start a family with my sister.
1 _narrows 2019-03-26
As God intended
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-26
Whenever I’m coping because meanie-weenie politicians listen to lawyers over journalists I like to blow off a bit of steam over in r/familyman.
It’s the bee’s knees, Jesus-approved, and good stuff.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Explain to me how lying to congress under oath isn't perjury.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-26
No
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Then stop wasting my time.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-26
You do it to yourself, pizza.
1 _-ctrl-_ 2019-03-26
That’s why it really hurts
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-26
Right.
Imagine being literally this guy
1 _narrows 2019-03-26
You and no one else
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-26
Based law bomb
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-03-26
FIF
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-26
You ever order a burger with nothing in it?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
-no bun
-no patty
-no lettuce
-no tomato
-no pickles
-ADD ketchup
You get a bag full of ketchup packets for $7
1 -Steve_French- 2019-03-26
The McMueller Nothing-Burger, one of my favorites
1 AFellowCanadianGuy 2019-03-26
Ddf should be thankful they are allowed to post on this sub.
They should be banned the instant they post something pro trump.
1 xlhat 2019-03-26
Nope. Rad cents mock, not ban.
1 MG87 2019-03-26
Are you proposing a final solution to the DDF problem?
1 BaguetteFetish 2019-03-26
Once the DDF is done, you champagne socialist fucks will be the next to go in our glorious workers revolution.
1 nio151 2019-03-26
Silly canuk. This is Maga country 😤😤😤
1 AFellowCanadianGuy 2019-03-26
OUT
1 nio151 2019-03-26
What are you going to do? Call the pony patrol?
1 UBIisLazy 2019-03-26
Pizza, you're scaring me 😨
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egPQBPYWA2s
1 The_DHC 2019-03-26
Maddow alt account?
1 [deleted] 2019-03-26
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-26
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
faggot
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2019-03-26
cope
1 throwaway-familyhelp 2019-03-26
When's the last time you left the house buddy? You ok?
1 JeanPeuplu 2019-03-26
TL;DR
1 callaghanrs 2019-03-26
Trump avoiding criminal charges is actually a huge win for the DNC.
1 Chapocel 2019-03-26
R-slur
1 ncervo 2019-03-26
I have a feeling the information Mueller passed onto the SDNY will get Trump in deep shit.
1 jorkus_ 2019-03-26
Wtf does DDF mean?
1 Party_Independence 2019-03-26
Beyond this, I've been trying to make a flatbread but I always get a flattish loaf rather than flat bread any ideas?
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
You're mixing too much air into the batter. Don't whisk. Fold it together until you get a shaggy dough and then LIGHTLY knead it together
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
Yes it's the republicans who have come off looking bad lmao
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
That ship sailed years ago after the great Christmas card scandal of the 1990s.
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
I don't know what to tell you if you think this Mueller report shit hasn't come off as a huge W for Trump, very few people care about the 'full report' shit.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Nobody has even seen the full report. How on earth can that be justified? How can the barr letter be considered the mueller report?
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
It's about public perception, perhaps the Barr report isn't representative of the Mueller report but that's certainly what everyone has taken it as. 80% people may prefer it to be released but do they actually care if it's not?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
I'd argue the GOP refusing to release the report is politically damaging for them.
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
I guess it could be marginally? This entire saga looked at as a whole is a big victory for Trump though.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
I think people over estimate how relevant the Russia shit was, lol.
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
No he's not but when one of the main dem lines of attack against him proves to be completely ineffectual it's a big L for them.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
You realize like no dems ran on Russia in 2018, right?
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
I don't disagree, dems not focusing on the russia shit was a shrewd political move, however accusations of collusion have dogged his presidency, dispelling them is a huge PR win. I don't really get what argument you're making, either this shit is as big as benghazi (it really isnt, the republican base still think hillary was responsible for those deaths and libs have by in large given up on the Mueller report) or it's not important at all?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
The point of the report isn't about Russia, it's obstruction of justice. It was unlikely he'd ever go down for collusion, but obstruction is real and it happened.
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
Look the extent of my argument is that Trump has scored a PR victory this weekend, if you think he's going to get impeached or whatever I disagree but I dont care enough to argue with you about it.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
I don't think he's gonna get impeached.
1 NacerVirginli 2019-03-26
The Mueller report certainly isn't going to be as damaging as the examples of you gave of, say, Benghazi.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
It'll likely be far worse given what is already public info.
1 EffOffReddit 2019-03-26
TOO SOON TO BRING UP BENGHAZI
So many fake tears we have shed
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-03-26
There are actually quite valid, non partisan reasons why a full, unredacted, report, can't be released right now. I'm hoping you are smart enough to figure out why.
Honestly though, you lost this one, even the media has accepted this. You put all your bets here and it was a bust. Now just wait for the other investigations, maybe you'll get something there.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
There is no valid reason to not release the full report. This is too big of an issue for anything other than 100% transparency.
A) Trump obstructed Justice.
B) jr lied to congress under oath.
Both of these are true, so how did I lose?
1 telandrias 2019-03-26
Five americans dead vs. Someone hacking hillarys private email server and buying facebook ads.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Lmao her private server was never even hacked and the Russians did a hell of a lot more than buy facebook ads.
They literally hacked the democratic party and slowly released said stolen emails during the election to damage Clinton.
Furthermore, Clinton didn't even have anything to do with Benghazi, the entire point of that Benghazi scandal was to fish up election propaganda for 2016 and that's exactly what it did (that's where the email story came from.)
1 telandrias 2019-03-26
Uh, head of state department testifying on an embassy attack. Literally was her job title.
Russians also hacked rnc servers but it was all boomer memes so nobody cares
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Had nothing to do with what happened, not that embassies aren't under the state department.
Why exactly do you think 8 different investigations couldn't pin shit on her? hint: they made it up, they were looking for the email thing for 2016.
Yeah, I'm sure that's all they found.
1 telandrias 2019-03-26
Lol (r)s retardly revealed the cia annex smuggling weapons on accident and the atate department tried to cover it up by blaming some people protesting a video. There was a lot of shit going on but everyone had a hardon for illegal military actions so (r)s thought they could kill two birds while stoned and pin it all on hillary.
Investigation was justified but butt bangled imo. B-slur
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Lmao what.
1 telandrias 2019-03-26
Tldr once Republicans realised they were investigating warcrimes they decided to focus on hillary instead
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-03-26
Pizza, what's your take on the recent admin actions?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
I'm a free speech absolutist so my take is the admins are a joke.
1 Party_Independence 2019-03-26
It's over for fagcels
1 Momruepari 2019-03-26
Pizza "DDT for the DDF" shill
1 noxpallida 2019-03-26
Nice Cope
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Responses in this comment: 0.
1 wow___justwow 2019-03-26
In lieu of longpostbot god rest his soul.
Your Pulitzer's in the mail.
1 The_Almighty_Demoham 2019-03-26
not around these parts he ain't
1 seenten 2019-03-26
We can tell
1 RollBread 2019-03-26
When this turns out to be wrong how will you use your Big Brain to bend reality to still be right, too?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
What am I wrong about?
1 RollBread 2019-03-26
Well what if theh release the report.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Considering they're aggressively blocking it, that doesn't seem to be the case.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
Seems like you get your news from Rachel Maddow. They have to redact grand jury testimony from people who weren't indicted. It's a federal law, and the way we've done things for a while now
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
They're blocking any release. They are doing this for a reason.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
Quoted from the AG's letter
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
The AG is not a credible person and literally a year in advance made it clear he was there to shield Trump.
He's a joke, he has less credibility than Trump even. Not to mention, Trump, as president, can declassify whatever he wants. He has absolute authority over the system.
I don't give a shit about the other investigations. They're worthless at this point because the AG has shown he's not willing to do his job.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
But the law does. Run for congress and change the laws
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
If he gave a shit about the law Trump and his kid would have been indicted.
1 CucksLoveTrump 2019-03-26
For what?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Obstruction and perjury.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
So the Russia conspiracy wasn’t enough, now you have to push a new conspiracy about Whitaker, bc it’s all you have left. They legally can’t release certain portions bc witnesses have protection under the law. Whitaker said he was going to release as much as possible. Quit reeeeeing and for Pete’s sake, Stop watching Rachel Maddow, she’s basically Alex Jones for wine moms ps.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
A) His name is Barr.
B) Explain to me how documented, public history is a conspiracy theory.
I don't take the word of treasonous pieces of shit seriously. After what he pulled in Iran contra he has no credibility.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Attack his character, bc your baseless claim is conspiracy. Take off the tin foil hat and join the adults.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
He literally agreed with president bush that pardoning multiple people involved in high treason was a good idea.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Lol wut. Lets go into any Washington politicians past and find stuff so we can assassinate their character with, all bc we disagree with their conclusions. Stop being such an extreme partisan mayo ps
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Yeah, just pardoning people guilty of high treason, nbd.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Are you retarded? He pardoned people as attorney general lol. He likely supported bushes tough call, this type of shit happens in every administration. Stop getting so ginned up by wapo articles ps. They are designed to be red meat for partisans, to sway public opinion of the masses.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
He himself didn't pardon them, he made the legal argument to support the Bush choice to pardon them:
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/24/706206090/who-is-attorney-general-william-barr
He was absolutely involved in covering up iran contra.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Imagine thinking that’s a reason to discredit him from making a judgment about a literal conspiracy theory. I appreciate that you dig into this stuff, but you should work on being a bit less Partisan.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
So to be clear, you believe a history of covering up presidential crimes is not reason to doubt his current assessment of the evidence against... a president?
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
He backed his bosses pardoning on of officials within their party involved in scandal. That’s hardly a charge to discredit anything he says. He is the sitting AG ffs. You guys are reeeeing so hard, but he said in his letter that he plans to release as much of the findings as he can.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
So a history of doing what your boss tells you to do, no matter what the law says, isn't enough evidence to doubt his assessment of the evidence in relation to his current boss?
How about his misunderstanding of executive power:
That's just objectively false. Noticing a pattern here, almost like this guy is a republican shill.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Imagine thinking Eric holder wasn’t a shill, etc.. He was immersed in scandal as well, like so many others on both sides. I don’t doubt trump appointed this guy as a yes man, not for a second. But Barr isn’t the only one that’s seeing this report, and it’s going to be released in some form or another eventually. Mueller is the one that found there was no collusion. It was within his purview to say whether or not obstruction of Justice occurred. Why didn’t he choose to weigh in, probably because the very crime he was accused of obstructing didn’t exist, and the proof needed for a sitting president would need to be pretty incredible. Also he was more than likely attempting to protect his buddy comie from further inquiry. You gotta look at things rationally, and try and drop partisanship, as much as possible ime
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
And stopped reading. I don't give a shit about Eric Holder, this isn't you responding to anything said about Barr.
PS:
https://www.businessinsider.com/barr-mueller-report-white-house-executive-privilege-2019-3?utm_source=reddit.com
He's giving the report to the white house to redact before the public can see it. The person that is the subject of the investigation will be allowed to remove whatever he wants from the report.
Stop defending these people, you aren't rational, it's why you repeated 3-4 different blatant lies here.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
You “stopped reading” bc you know I’m right. You’re sperging over the latest hot topic in the MSM. You had an entire special council comprised of democrats investigating him for two years, and they found nothing. I’ve never seen someone get so ginned up over literal cope-smut released by the msm. Grab a beer and chill out ps
1 PrebisWizard 2019-03-26
Lol, you K-word F-word N-word slur coper
1 Heyjoe1818 2019-03-26
Why so serious?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-03-26
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1110027367882346496?s=19
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Nobody with an above room temp IQ gives a shit what Glenn greenwald has to say.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-03-26
What did he get wrong? Drop that bombshell on us.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
It's not even that he's wrong about how the media handled it, the reality is this was nothing new, it wasn't any different than the last 25 presidential scandals, not in how it was covered, not in how it unfolded.
This is why I don't take any of these people seriously. If there wasn't some type of reckoning for how the media covered Clinton's emails, why would there be one for how the media covered the Russia investigation?
Should we bring up the empirical data on that email scandal?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/08/25/studies-agree-media-gorged-on-hillary-clinton-email-coverage/
And it's even worse than that.
So Circo, explain to me in detail why there was no "reckoning" for that, and why there should be one for the Russia investigation?
Better yet, explain to me why there was no reckoning for:
Benghazi.
The Christmas card scandal of the 1990s.
Or any of the other manufactured scandals the GOP came up with for political gain?
Why has there been no reckoning for Trump calling for a revolution and a march on Washington when he thought Obama lost the popular vote.
Why has there been no reckoning for Trump and his pushing of bither conspiracies for multiple years.
Where is the reckoning circo? It's almost like you, and people like Glenn, are just morons with a very selective understanding of modern political events.
1 LongPostBot 2019-03-26
All them words won't bring your pa back.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-03-26
Deflection and coping, understood.
No one should listen to him unless they are stupid even though he was right and literal mainstream media went fucking full blown Sandy Hook for two years.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Responses to a single thing I said in this comment: 0.
Where?
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-03-26
https://twitter.com/RBReich/status/1109339162933485568?s=19
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Robert Reich is the "media" now?
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Imagine comparing using a private server, as Secretary of State, and ‘oops misplacing’ thirty thousand emails, to running a baseless media campaign to push a completely unfounded conspiracy theory for almost three years. They literally drew the conclusion that trump colluded with Russia based on a meeting with a person that was Russian and 45k in fb ads, then tried to connect the dots. Neo liberalism is cancer, use common sense, not emotion.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Not illegal.
Not misplaced, deleted well before any subpoena was delivered. Following department guide lines.
Also known as an investigation literally started by Republicans because Trump fired an FBI director and said it was over the investigation on live TV.
Factually incorrect and this reveals you have no idea where the investigation came from, why it happened, or literally anything about it.
Common sense like not even knowing why the investigation happened, what caused it, or who ordered it?
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Daily reminder that the government still hasn’t seen the DNC servers and been able to say the Russians hacked them. Imagine believing fusion GPS, a DNC shill organization that helped create the discredited pp dossier. They colluded with a limey red coat, Christopher Steele, who colluded with Russia intelligence to create the document that ultimately caused the special council to be formed. That’s why I hope they investigate FISA abuse. PS you’re out of your element, hit the showers hot rod.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Daily reminder that Barr, the corrupt AG you worship literally said what Russia did.
Daily reminder that every intelligence agency, law enforcement agency, and Trump's own national security advisors have said they hacked the DNC.
Imagine thinking anything said here has anything to do with fusion GPS.
Daily reminder that the mueller investigation had nothing to do with the dossier and that is a lie you people have repeated for over 2 years now:
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/22/686537515/the-mueller-report-is-getting-a-lot-of-attention-heres-how-we-got-here
Weird, considering you're getting destroyed.
1 LongPostBot 2019-03-26
still unemployed then?
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
We are talking about the special council, not when they first looked into Muh Russia. It was three agencies that went along with what fusion GPS said about the DNC servers being hacked. So the marketing ploy of ‘all the top agencies said Russia hacked into our elections’ was straight propaganda lapped up by mother jones readers, like yourself. And when did I ever say I worship Barr, I’m just not willing to discount him over a conspiracy or hurt feelings.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
And the special council was hired after Trump fired an FBI director and said it was due to the FBI investigation on live TV, again, nothing to do with the dossier.
Again, you've already lost horribly on the dossier, do you really want to double down and avoid admitting russia hacked the DNC, something even the Trump admin admits?
A) Which agency claimed the election was hacked.
B) Do you understand the difference between "the DNC servers were hacked" and "the election was hacked."
Should I explain this to you?
Is it true or false Barr helped pardon multiple people guilty of high treason?
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Muh high treason. Attack his character bc you’re upset he didn’t corroborate the conspiracy you guys are so invested in. Yes, Fusion GPS helped fund the dossier, but they are also the only ones that saw the DNC servers. No government agencies saw the servers, so their claims are going off of what was told to them by fusion gps. The ‘election was hacked’ line, was me mocking you and tin foil hat partisans FYI
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
How in the fuck was iran contra not high treason?
Again, the dossier had nothing to do with the FBI investigation nor the Mueller probe. You can keep trying to double down on this lie or admit you were wrong.
This is a lie.
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/zmkxp9/dnc-server-conspiracy-theory-russian-hack-explained
So that's now the 3rd time I've put you down. Want to go for 4?
1 LongPostBot 2019-03-26
Wow, you must be a JP fan
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Sorry I mixed up crowd strike and fusion gps there. I meant crowd strike. That very slanted article makes my point, “they handed over a copy of what was (((likely))) better than the fbi going in and seizing a physical box”. The reason they didn’t storm the doors of the far left partisan crowd strike is unclear, but they definitely were able to send them a copy of what they wanted to see. Lmao the shills in this publication, “it’s likely better than them going in and getting the real thing”😂😂 The reason people took such issue was bc Comey was in charge of a lot of this, when it was happening. Motherboard 🤣🤣
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Dropper, do you unironically not understand that you don't need to hand over a physical copy of a server to get an image of said server?
How the fuck is one of the most respected cyber security firms on earth "partisan" or "far-left."
Is this where you start saying absurd shit to get out of the fact you got proven wrong 3 times in a row?
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
What are you talking about there has been a long time co mingling b/t the DNC and crowd strike. Obama appointed a CSO to a top position in his cabinet ffs. Lots of money exchange too, obviously. The entire Russia conspiracy stunk to high heavens ps. Rational, non partisan people, can see this.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Show me proof that crowd strike, one of the most respected cyber security firms on earth is 'far left" and "partisan."
I've already dismantled you here, so this is just me being generous, i'll give you 1 reply to present your proof.
1 [deleted] 2019-03-26
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-26
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
retard
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Don’t be a r-slur. It’s a private firm worth 1 billion dollars who is beholden to its clients and investors iE the DNC. We were told to trust them without any true verification, at the end of the day. A small amount of technocrats have the power to shape geo political narratives, and it concerns me tbh. This just reminds me of how I want all of the parties correspondence to be dealt with publicly. The fact that Obama felt emboldened enough to bring a crowd strike executive into the White House is pretty problematic. There needs to be absolute transparency.
dismantled 😂
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
I gave you 1 reply to provide proof that:
A) They're "partisan and far left."
B) proof the images given to the FBI and US intelligence were not valid.
You failed to do either, and with that, you are dismissed.
1 Kat_B0T 2019-03-26
Pizza before you completely shut yourself off from all reason, I’ll leave you with this. Think about if the shoe were on the other foot. I don’t think republicans or democrats should be above government oversight, regardless of the circumstances. But especially with technology and tech firms. Even though it seems like they are firmly in the DNCs corner rn who knows how that could change in the future. And you’re gonna be butt hurt when you see algorithms sniping yang gang shit on the internet, and if he does well you best believe that’s coming.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-03-26
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1110590797085315072?s=19
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
She's literally talking about collusion and contact with Russian nationals.
1 nanonan 2019-03-26
Who obstructed what and when?
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
Firing an acting FBI director after he refuses to let your adviser off is, in fact, obstruction.
Mueller also lays out other things in the report, the one they won't release.
1 nanonan 2019-03-26
That's not what got him fired though.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
That is what got him fired and Trump said as much.
1 telandrias 2019-03-26
Fat bois /elevators
1 rnjbond 2019-03-26
Congratulations, you stole the title of "worst mod stickies" from MasterLawlz
1 callaghanrs 2019-03-26
serious posting ironically is still serious posting
1 LaughAtLeftists 2019-03-26
COPE
1 [deleted] 2019-03-26
[removed]
1 Kornus 2019-03-26
Gay
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-26
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
Gay
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 At_Dawn_I_Sleep 2019-03-26
You sure love getting pounded by daddy, leave some for the rest of us
1 Vorbiz 2019-03-26
gay
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-26
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
gay
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Pepperglue 2019-03-26
Well, I had to give it to you. You sure are consistent with your stance. I can respect that.
DDF BTFO.
1 My_massive_dingaling 2019-03-26
>Benghazi
​
>Conspiracy
​
If I meet anyone this big brained again I might not be able to hold myself back from snooze posting
​
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-26
8 investigations.
0 evidence of wrong doing.
1 My_massive_dingaling 2019-03-26
keep up the hard work pizza