I did a research paper this summer on this subreddit and there was a published study that found that 74% of attacks on Reddit came from 1% of source subreddits. I assume that subs like r/Drama are the 1%.
I like how AOC is constantly calling people out on twitter and engaging in publicity stunts and still tries to pretend she doesn't understand why she gets it jsut as good back as she gives.
Like did she really expect to stroll into congress making as much noise as she possibly could and no Republicans would tell her to go fuck herself.
Also the girl changing the pictures in this vid is hotter than AOC
Whats there not to get? We're going to build trains until we fix the environment, create more americans through immigration than ever before so they can eat burgers and grow fat and die, and repurpose every house to be compliant with California tax code policy.
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained dumb) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.
If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I legit love her low key laughter, i wouldnāt have been able to contain myself. I really donāt like climate change denialism this will most likely feed to, but, it was funny as shit and ultimately he is right about something: innovation > political posturing.
Itās weird how her plan is legitimately retarded, yet conservatives managed to laser focus on one thing the plan never said (banning planes) and something else that is an actual issue (methane from industrial cattle farming).
I donāt get it. Sheās got UBI and economy breaking public works projects listed but conservatives are giggling about āhurrrhurr cow fartsā.
Oh nice, an actual r-word in the wild. Iāve always wanted to ask; what possesses someone to watch 10 minutes of tauntaunās (I donāt know how to spell space-capeshit) and aqua-man as solutions to global warming and latch onto baby-pumping thinking you can convince anyone for 1 sec that you arenāt some drooling dipshit your pretending not to be?
Minimum wage increase + better health care = stop carbon emissions.
You'll never lower or stop carbon emissions until there is something to replace fossil fuels that the entire world, including the developing nations who produce the most of these, can use. So in that right, Congressman tauntaun here is correct - innovation is the only way out of this mess considering the USA can't create legislation for countries outside of it's borders.
Having more babies will not create enough innovation to offset the their harm to the environment
Well, you're wrong on two points.
1) Larger populations lead to larger demands for goods and services, including green energy technology. In fact, many green energy technologies that we currently used were not viable to produce until population and demand reached a certain point. Take electric cars for instance - asides from the demand for the vehicles themselves, there were issues with both power storage, power distribution and infrastructure required to support them. All problems that were solved because of the demand the growing population put on those services.
2) Given that you sound like a butthuffing chapotard, this argument may appeal to you as it's relies on the same argument used for universal education. To wit - we don't know where and when the next Albert Einstein or Jonas Salk is going to be born. Higher levels of population lead to increased base levels of education, so the individual that's going to solve the ignition problem we're currently having with nuclear fusion might be born in the next generation, or the one after that and then all our issues with carbon emissions are solved forever as a side product of everyone getting unlimited free energy.
So yes, increasing the population means that we're far more likely to solve global warming than we would be in successfully genociding the populations of africa, india and china, which is really the only other viable solution to solving the problem.
Populating the planet to rush for the next Einstein is also how we're going to hit the technological great filter that accidentallies the whole planet, and explains the alarming lack of Von Neumann probes on our planet.
So kinda lose lose. Environmental fudgery or an /r9k/ kid making a quarkbomb or whatever in his basement because lol that'll show the planet
America actually has lowered it's carbon emissions, but it's really nothing in the big picture, if the apocalypse really is 10 years away we should currently be considering a nuclear option on China, India, and Africa
The same people who think the world's gonna end in 12 years because of climate change are pants-shittingly scared of nuclear power because their entire understanding of it comes from the Simpsons.
49 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-27
I did a research paper this summer on this subreddit and there was a published study that found that 74% of attacks on Reddit came from 1% of source subreddits. I assume that subs like r/Drama are the 1%.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Zac1245 2019-03-27
Twitter is coping really hard this.
1 TheColdTurtle 2019-03-27
Vid of the speech btw
1 wwyzzerdd 2019-03-27
I strongly encourage people to watch it. Grab a a beer or whatever, you'll laugh.
1 Corporal-Hicks 2019-03-27
"TON TONS! REPTO-MAMMALS!!" i fuqqin lost it
1 SNCommand 2019-03-27
Reusable as well, you can use them for warmth
1 wwaalleess 2019-03-27
Holy shit that cow chart š
1 Whomscape 2019-03-27
I was happily listening to the intro then i accidentally skipped to 9:40 in
1 elephantofdoom 2019-03-27
Please tell me those are the real images he used.
1 TheColdTurtle 2019-03-27
Absolutley. That is his own YouTube channel too.
1 nybbas 2019-03-27
https://youtu.be/sK27NZon11w?t=549
Pretty fucking great
1 tHeSiD 2019-03-27
whoever this man is, he is a treasure and the US must elect him forever
1 error404brain 2019-03-27
I have seen perfection.
1 ConnectWar 2019-03-27
fuck that was great
1 moondoggy101 2019-03-27
I like how AOC is constantly calling people out on twitter and engaging in publicity stunts and still tries to pretend she doesn't understand why she gets it jsut as good back as she gives.
Like did she really expect to stroll into congress making as much noise as she possibly could and no Republicans would tell her to go fuck herself.
Also the girl changing the pictures in this vid is hotter than AOC
1 telandrias 2019-03-27
Whats there not to get? We're going to build trains until we fix the environment, create more americans through immigration than ever before so they can eat burgers and grow fat and die, and repurpose every house to be compliant with California tax code policy.
1 Ghdust2 2019-03-27
šššššš
1 UnexpectedLizard 2019-03-27
Nah it's all part of the kayfabe which politicians and pundits all practice anymore.
This generation will go definitely down in history as the Age of Outrage.
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-27
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
dumb
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-03-27
I legit love her low key laughter, i wouldnāt have been able to contain myself. I really donāt like climate change denialism this will most likely feed to, but, it was funny as shit and ultimately he is right about something: innovation > political posturing.
1 OniTan 2019-03-27
It doesn't ban planed and cows, though. Those are shitty conservative memes.
1 2938_throwd 2019-03-27
Itās weird how her plan is legitimately retarded, yet conservatives managed to laser focus on one thing the plan never said (banning planes) and something else that is an actual issue (methane from industrial cattle farming).
I donāt get it. Sheās got UBI and economy breaking public works projects listed but conservatives are giggling about āhurrrhurr cow fartsā.
1 Anus_of_Aeneas 2019-03-27
The problem is that as retarded as UBI and impossible infrastructure projects are, American voters are also retarded enough to support them.
1 OniTan 2019-03-27
They're playing to their base.
1 Blankface888 2019-03-27
Well yah. She's literally an actress playing a part
1 Party_Independence 2019-03-27
She's mixed race from New York
So yeah kinda
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-03-27
In a silly uncle kind of way, that's pretty funny
1 UnexpectedLizard 2019-03-27
The solution for global warming is more families?
Even for a conservative Mormon, this is an impressively stupid take.
1 freet0 2019-03-27
You can thank Tyler Cowen. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-03-14/want-to-help-fight-climate-change-have-more-children
1 Peetrius 2019-03-27
Wow, zero lies detected.
1 Chukril 2019-03-27
Oh nice, an actual r-word in the wild. Iāve always wanted to ask; what possesses someone to watch 10 minutes of tauntaunās (I donāt know how to spell space-capeshit) and aqua-man as solutions to global warming and latch onto baby-pumping thinking you can convince anyone for 1 sec that you arenāt some drooling dipshit your pretending not to be?
1 UnexpectedLizard 2019-03-27
The Green New Deal is itself a galaxy-brain take. Minimum wage increase + better health care = stop carbon emissions.
1 VidiotGamer 2019-03-27
You'll never lower or stop carbon emissions until there is something to replace fossil fuels that the entire world, including the developing nations who produce the most of these, can use. So in that right, Congressman tauntaun here is correct - innovation is the only way out of this mess considering the USA can't create legislation for countries outside of it's borders.
1 UnexpectedLizard 2019-03-27
All of which just so conveniently dovetails with his conservative e Mormon agenda.
Having more babies will not create enough innovation to offset the their harm to the environment.
1 VidiotGamer 2019-03-27
Well, you're wrong on two points.
1) Larger populations lead to larger demands for goods and services, including green energy technology. In fact, many green energy technologies that we currently used were not viable to produce until population and demand reached a certain point. Take electric cars for instance - asides from the demand for the vehicles themselves, there were issues with both power storage, power distribution and infrastructure required to support them. All problems that were solved because of the demand the growing population put on those services.
2) Given that you sound like a butthuffing chapotard, this argument may appeal to you as it's relies on the same argument used for universal education. To wit - we don't know where and when the next Albert Einstein or Jonas Salk is going to be born. Higher levels of population lead to increased base levels of education, so the individual that's going to solve the ignition problem we're currently having with nuclear fusion might be born in the next generation, or the one after that and then all our issues with carbon emissions are solved forever as a side product of everyone getting unlimited free energy.
So yes, increasing the population means that we're far more likely to solve global warming than we would be in successfully genociding the populations of africa, india and china, which is really the only other viable solution to solving the problem.
1 LongPostBot 2019-03-27
Posts like this is why I do Heroine.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 sweetyellowknees 2019-03-27
Heroin*
1 SNCommand 2019-03-27
Hermoine*
1 nahnotreallytho 2019-03-27
Populating the planet to rush for the next Einstein is also how we're going to hit the technological great filter that accidentallies the whole planet, and explains the alarming lack of Von Neumann probes on our planet.
So kinda lose lose. Environmental fudgery or an /r9k/ kid making a quarkbomb or whatever in his basement because lol that'll show the planet
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2019-03-27
This is retarded even for /r/drama. The demand for stuff that will invariably cause pollution will outweigh demand for new technology.
1 shitposts_constantly 2019-03-27
So we really crank up the cultural enrichment my iPhone will have a longer battery life? No wonder libs want to open the borders.
1 VidiotGamer 2019-03-27
Yeah, this is pretty much how capitalism works. Immigrants are a great source of cheap labor and a market for new goods and services.
1 OniTan 2019-03-27
America can easly lower carbon emissions. Nuclear now!
1 SNCommand 2019-03-27
America actually has lowered it's carbon emissions, but it's really nothing in the big picture, if the apocalypse really is 10 years away we should currently be considering a nuclear option on China, India, and Africa
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-03-27
The same people who think the world's gonna end in 12 years because of climate change are pants-shittingly scared of nuclear power because their entire understanding of it comes from the Simpsons.
1 OniTan 2019-03-27
I've heard pro oil and coal people argue that nuclear is too dangerous.
1 Aivias 2019-03-27
Yeah because a bunch of single occupant households and single user cars will decrease you fuq stick
1 ManBearFridge 2019-03-27
You get how multiplication works?
1 AOCs_Tits 2019-03-27
/u/cdace dinosaurs and machine guns are now part of the official record of the US Senate.