They had about 24 hours of self reflection and outright salt, and than they spring right back into action to call everybody they donāt like a traitor and a Russian shill. They play a lot of semantic wordgames to act as duct tape to patch up their cracking world view.
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained drama) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.
If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained drama) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.
If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained retard) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.
If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
He's a complete r-slur who is also a criminal mastermind capable of completely juking Mueller and his crack team of investigators, but he is also a dumbass
Remember heās an r-slur but itās his (((controlers))) that are 100% not J-slurs that are undermining and controlling the give me reality. No weāre serious itās not the J-slurs, weāre l-slurs, not neonslurs like drumohlf
Same as Obama was to people like my grandmother: simultaneously the stupidest man on the planet while ALSO being able to effectively conceal his Kenyan, Muslim status... somehow.
Yeah, the dichotomy with Obama was whether he was a ruthless dictatorial Muslim who would institute sharia law, or a g*y p(ussy) who couldnāt stand up to Americaās enemies.
cogntitice dissonance is the absolute foundation SJWism
Trump/men/the patriarchy/Nazis/whatever are simultaneously mewling pissbabies and also the greatest threat to humanity in history
for thousands of years the church had demonstrated that you can command an army of idiots if you can convince to believe up is down, white is black etc, and what is the church today if no my academia and far left doctrine?
No no no no, you're supposed to pet them, feed them upvotes and pretend that you care about their opinions and when they're least expecting you ridicule and laugh in their face and they're like "wtf I thought I'm WELL RESPECTED here".
The fucking retards.
It is strange how people cant see how obstructing justice could lead to an investigation having difficulty proving a crime. If the report is good for Trump, it would have been released already.
i'm claiming anybody in the federal gov't who thinks they have dirt on daddy ends up getting it leaked and then CNN runs it into the ground for a week, and then nothing happens
Does it ever get boring thinking you're right all the time? How about you start living in a constant mindset of contradiction, cognitive dissonance and depression, always changing what you believe depending on the day of the week until you eventually decide that nothing matters, like a normal middle class American young adult.
Thatās true, I mean look at how apathetic and occasionally even lionizing to George W Bush the Mueller and politics crowd is. That guy started a war that directly destabilized the Middle East and killed ~2 million people. And because it happened in the past (read: when all the teenagers on this sub were in diapers) they think only what is happening now is the most extreme shit ever.
Trump swung some economic stuff nobody will care about, and even his wall is peanuts compared to what GWB did.
Ten years from now, people will barely think about Trump.
I have never heard this discussed and the idea is quite shocking to consider, but looking at the state of things today and imagining where they may lead, it does seem weird to have such (nearly) unlimited power bestowed upon one person. Especially when that one person is such a terror.
I mean, for people who insist the guy's the biggest dumbass out there, they sure seem to take him rather seriously.
I wish... I WISH, my biggest worry in life was the terror that is the burger president.
At the risk of serious posting it's odd how much centralized authority threatens them when the largest consolidation of power to the oval office came in the eight years prior to when trump was elected.
I am pretty sure what they imagine will happen in their heads is similar to what happened in a particular space capeshit where one guy became the Senate.
The only restrictions on amendments you can pass are ones limiting equal representation in the Senate or anything on the topic of slavery before the year 1808.
The only restrictions on amendments you can pass are ones limiting equal representation in the Senate or anything on the topic of slavery before the year 1808.
That's what amendments do, though. They fundamentally alter the system of government. If they had the votes they could amend the constitution to, for example, strip the Senate of all power and have the House pick the President.
Unless I am mistaken any ammendment to the constitution would override any other prior provisions, including if it abolished the executive. That's why the senate is now directly voted for, prior to something like the 24th ammendment the senate was appointed by the state legislatures if I remember correctly.
Well the congressional method is generally understood to install an ammendment at a time parliamentary style.
An article V has never been called as it'd be a new convention. The first republic Era was the articles of confederation, the second republic is the constitution.
The convention could be charged for a specific purpose but once convened they do have authority to write a third republic as long as it'd pass the 75% majority approval of the states.
It's never been done before so it's all hypothetical.
It's borderline impossible. The American constitution is pretty much tailor made to make passing any major legislation extremely difficult as getting a majority in both houses and giving the executive veto power is a massive hurdle. Since we've made it the constituon has been amended 17 times and there are still pending ammendments from the founding fathers age that haven't been fully passed or rejected.
Yeah, that's the way the constitution is set up, you can essentially alter it however you want but the hurdles of doing so are fucking massive. It's an extraordinarily conservative document in the original sense of the word, which is good because it gives immense stability but bad because it's also extraordinarily rigid.
I enjoy this stuff, but I'm by no means and expert so anyone who's knowledable should correct me if I'm wrong. I also like to imagine how I would make a constitution if I was given the ability to, its such an interesting idea.
extraordinarily conservative document in the original sense of the word, which is good because it gives immense stability but bad because it's also extraordinarily rigid.
That's a good thing. You shouldn't be able to bum stuff.
Or you end up like third world countries where you have a dozen constitutions and 170 amendments or something.
Definitely, that is a massive benifit. I just also hate how there are genuinely serious constitutional problems that do need to be addressed that may not be able to because of the difficulty of doing so. Its definitely a better structure than most constitutions but it has its problems, and maybe it does strike the proper balance and I just don't realize it.
True, I just wish we could constitutionally amend the first amendment to allow limits on money in politics. Citizen United was the correct constitutional ruling from what I can see, but it doesn't mean that there isn't a huge problem with money in politics. Plus I'd love to have a legislature with proportional representation.
It ruled that money is considered speech, and it did allow corporate backers to donate with practically no limits. I do think it was the correct interpretation of the constitution, however it at the same time reveals a pretty big flaw in the first amendment. Otherwise our free speech laws are probably the best in the world, but that is one major issue we need to resolve. I'd honestly consider voting democrat if it meant they could push that through congress and the executive.
Its a good ruling in the sense that campaign donations are a form of speech and therefore protected under the 1st amendment, its a bad ruling in the sense that unlimited money in politics is extremely damaging to democracy. I think I'm a bit weird, I'm extremely conservative in my ideas on how to judge the constitution but also have a lot of progressive ideas on how I would want to change it, the thing is I want to change it through the legislative branch and not through trying to pretend the contitution says something it doesn't which seems to be the modus operani of progressives.
Holy shit the perjury claim was always a stretch. Clinton out maneuvered the prosecutor of the grand jury, defined the questions on his terms, got the prosecutor to agree to those terms, and then answered his own question truthfully.
Saying he committed perjury is like saying "well he answered the question like this but if he had the same answer to a completely different question that would've been a lie"
Obama used executive power like it was going out of style lmao. It was a political gamble hoping that Hillary would be such an unbearable candidate that that power wouldnāt immediately be in the hands of the Rs. Fortunately for him Trump is to retarded to do anything of substance.
How do these people take themselves seriously after this? I honestly can't imagine telling yourself that because a special investigation that literally all of these fuckheads were saying was going to be the unbiased truth, turned up with nothing so the reasonable solution is to abolish presidency.
Have you every caught yourself making a stupid argument and thought, "oh shit wait I just realized this doesnt make sense"? Are these guys literally incapable of that?
It because they're convinced it's some battle against evil since their understanding of morality is based on young adult novels. It's comfy to think the world is black and white without any nuance. Trump's a reeetard but they treat him like Voldemort or some shit lmao.
Putting it like that makes it quite ridiculous. I think that thought process stems from just being tired of all this shit surrounding Trump and wanting it to end. Hell its been a ton of fun seeing people freak out about it but even if you gave me steak every day after 2 years I might want to eat something else.
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained incel) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.
If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
You vote in the shittiest two-party elections one could hope for, and when that fails instead of realizing the limitations of the American-style two-party democracy, you turn on the concept of a "leader" all together.
Remember when they made /r/The_Meltdown in anticipation of /r/The_Donald users losing their minds after losing the election, but when Trump one they basically shut the subreddit down?
They should just do the same thing here. /r/The_Mueller is a failed subreddit that has no need to exist anymore.
I still don't understand why anyone would have thought Mueller was going to indict Donnie. It is like they forgot the whole impeachment is indictment and all Mueller was going to do involving POTUS is write a report.
189 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-03-28
womp womp
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Phixer7 2019-03-28
Cant believe losers are still subscribed to that salty sub.
1 RecallRethuglicans 2019-03-28
Drumpf is the loser. He didn't even win the votes.
1 Lokamayadon 2019-03-28
Hillary won the true victory by staying classy. š¤šŖ
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-28
It's like still posting in /r/apocalympics2016 or /r/fffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu, it's over, go home.
1 2938_throwd 2019-03-28
They had about 24 hours of self reflection and outright salt, and than they spring right back into action to call everybody they donāt like a traitor and a Russian shill. They play a lot of semantic wordgames to act as duct tape to patch up their cracking world view.
1 WAR10CK 2019-03-28
I've lost track. Trump is at the same time incompetent and gets literally nothing done while also having dictatorial power that he abuses constantly?
1 yourdeadwife 2019-03-28
Trump is whatever people need him to make people feel like they're fighting for something important. An amorphous blob of pseudo oppression.
1 [deleted] 2019-03-28
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-28
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
drama
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 headasplodes 2019-03-28
š¤š¤š¤
1 [deleted] 2019-03-28
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-28
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
drama
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 [deleted] 2019-03-28
[removed]
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-28
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
retard
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 Unstumpable2020 2019-03-28
He's a complete r-slur who is also a criminal mastermind capable of completely juking Mueller and his crack team of investigators, but he is also a dumbass
1 Power_Incarnate 2019-03-28
This, but unironically
It's why he's got my vote in 2020
1 aqouta 2019-03-28
The word you're looking for is au
thentistic1 LongPostBussy 2019-03-28
Authentisemitic
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-03-28
Holy shit
He's Reagan Reborn
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2019-03-28
Remember heās an r-slur but itās his (((controlers))) that are 100% not J-slurs that are undermining and controlling the give me reality. No weāre serious itās not the J-slurs, weāre l-slurs, not neonslurs like drumohlf
1 Wordshark 2019-03-28
This is right on the line of where I can no longer understand a comment
1 SNCommand 2019-03-28
I think he\s talking about long nose tribe
1 not-a-painting 2019-03-28
Sarah Jessica Parker has a fucking tribe now?
1 SNCommand 2019-03-28
Yes
1 Wordshark 2019-03-28
I could figure out all of it except
1 redmako101 2019-03-28
Libcels, not neoconcels.
I mean uh dude b-slur.
1 TayloTayloBookito 2019-03-28
Same as Obama was to people like my grandmother: simultaneously the stupidest man on the planet while ALSO being able to effectively conceal his Kenyan, Muslim status... somehow.
1 aqouta 2019-03-28
I don't remember my conserv-slur relatives saying oBAMa was stupid, they usually claimed he was just corrupt and lied a lot.
1 MalcolmFFucker 2019-03-28
Yeah, the dichotomy with Obama was whether he was a ruthless dictatorial Muslim who would institute sharia law, or a g*y p(ussy) who couldnāt stand up to Americaās enemies.
1 MG87 2019-03-28
Same logic conspiratards use
1 ObnoxiousFactczecher 2019-03-28
Not Chaotic Evil, but an evil chaotic?
1 BumwineBaudelaire 2019-03-28
cogntitice dissonance is the absolute foundation SJWism
Trump/men/the patriarchy/Nazis/whatever are simultaneously mewling pissbabies and also the greatest threat to humanity in history
for thousands of years the church had demonstrated that you can command an army of idiots if you can convince to believe up is down, white is black etc, and what is the church today if no my academia and far left doctrine?
1 headasplodes 2019-03-28
This post is far too serious friendo
1 number_11310 2019-03-28
No no no no, you're supposed to pet them, feed them upvotes and pretend that you care about their opinions and when they're least expecting you ridicule and laugh in their face and they're like "wtf I thought I'm WELL RESPECTED here".
The fucking retards.
1 clusternuts 2019-03-28
gpt-2 finish this
1 xthek 2019-03-28
This is considered a "hallmark of fascism" when it's something literally everyone does.
1 Ted_UtteredBoast 2019-03-28
hey /u/idfshill, explain it
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-28
I don't think Trump is competent or some elite dictator, not really sure what you want me to explain.
1 Ted_UtteredBoast 2019-03-28
i was just looking for you to cope and eat downvotes lol
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-28
Imagine caring about downvotes when you're right.
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-28
It is strange how people cant see how obstructing justice could lead to an investigation having difficulty proving a crime. If the report is good for Trump, it would have been released already.
1 Ted_UtteredBoast 2019-03-28
and if it was bad it would have been leaked
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-28
That involves someone risking their entire career for a leak.
Releasing the report, because it will put Trump in a positive light, risks no one's career.
1 Ted_UtteredBoast 2019-03-28
have you been covering your eyes and ears for the last 2 years?
they've done it once a week since
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-28
You are claiming the Muller team has been leaking information for two years?
1 Ted_UtteredBoast 2019-03-28
i'm claiming anybody in the federal gov't who thinks they have dirt on daddy ends up getting it leaked and then CNN runs it into the ground for a week, and then nothing happens
keep copin'
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-28
Source?
1 Nosefuroughtto 2019-03-28
So you are saying [asinine take], and thatās not the definition of socialism
Name a more iconic duo
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-28
š
1 Nosefuroughtto 2019-03-28
š š š
1 prune_gang 2019-03-28
GuIltY beForE pRoVeN InnoCEnT
1 shitpersonality 2019-03-28
If only congress could see the report to determine obstruction of justice. How long did the Starr report take to be released, sweaty?
1 thebuscompany 2019-03-28
But you're on the left. You're basically required by law to virtual signal for social credit.
1 AugustinesBitchBoy 2019-03-28
Does it ever get boring thinking you're right all the time? How about you start living in a constant mindset of contradiction, cognitive dissonance and depression, always changing what you believe depending on the day of the week until you eventually decide that nothing matters, like a normal middle class American young adult.
1 IDFSHILL 2019-03-28
You're so close.
1 KikiFlowers 2019-03-28
Redditors are stupid, who knew?
1 clusternuts 2019-03-28
gpt-2 finish this
1 aelfwine_widlast 2019-03-28
Welcome to the left's version of QAnon.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
[+97] that comment.
So is Trump an incompetent buffoon or is he some evil mastermind ?
1 gulducats 2019-03-28
If he did become dictator for life, would it even be that big of a deal? Heās pretty old, probably only has about 10 years left
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Yes it would be a bit of a deal. Can you imagine a world where the leading superpower isn't Anglo ?
Do you want to live in a world where the chanks and Borscht slurper dominate ? I don't.
No Trump will somehow end up living longer than that.
1 gulducats 2019-03-28
ten years, tops
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Maybe but I wouldn't bet on it.
1 ObsessedAussie 2019-03-28
Yes.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
OK.
1 jwil191 2019-03-28
The most terrifying thing to these people is that trump will go down as merly just a president
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Damn you're right. They
wantcrave that big moment.1 2938_throwd 2019-03-28
Thatās true, I mean look at how apathetic and occasionally even lionizing to George W Bush the Mueller and politics crowd is. That guy started a war that directly destabilized the Middle East and killed ~2 million people. And because it happened in the past (read: when all the teenagers on this sub were in diapers) they think only what is happening now is the most extreme shit ever.
Trump swung some economic stuff nobody will care about, and even his wall is peanuts compared to what GWB did.
Ten years from now, people will barely think about Trump.
1 Alimentas 2019-03-28
There's still time, I believe in you daddy!
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-03-28
I mean, for people who insist the guy's the biggest dumbass out there, they sure seem to take him rather seriously.
I wish... I WISH, my biggest worry in life was the terror that is the burger president.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Further proof that they're either trolling, Russian bots or mentally ill.
No sane human can think like this.
1 CosmoSucks 2019-03-28
At the risk of serious posting it's odd how much centralized authority threatens them when the largest consolidation of power to the oval office came in the eight years prior to when trump was elected.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Is it even possible ? Someone said that it's being discussed since Watergate.
How would one even go about such a thing ?
Constitutional convention and/or 2/3rds majority of States agreeing ?
I assume that it's literally impossible to do such a thing.
1 Stoicpeace 2019-03-28
I am pretty sure what they imagine will happen in their heads is similar to what happened in a particular space capeshit where one guy became the Senate.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
These days, they're giving MAGAtards a run for their money in matters of re(tardation).
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-28
Based and l'Ć©tat c'est moi-pilled.
1 tHeSiD 2019-03-28
I'm ashamed I even understood that reference
1 Stoicpeace 2019-03-28
Considering how much redditors spam that part of the movie, it's not surprising you recognize it.
1 fqpgme 2019-03-28
I AM THE S-SLUR
1 Van-Diemen 2019-03-28
Switzerland has this Étistic method where their seven leaders rotate the presidency yearly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Council_(Switzerland)
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
We don't deserve
swissSwedes.1 gfour 2019-03-28
Switzerland is unironically the best country in the world
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
The most based and redpilled too.
Direct democracy, guns and didn't give all f(oids) the vote until the 70s.
1 Carl_Schmitt 2019-03-28
based and rousseau-pilled.
imagine having a government that acted in the people's interests.
1 Kellere31 2019-03-28
They banned building š there mashallah
1 watermark08 2019-03-28
No
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-03-28
Best women too lol
1 gfour 2019-03-28
Sweden dawg, Swiss women can be kind of āhardyā
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-03-28
NO
fuck the gnomes
1 watermark08 2019-03-28
Nothing ever gets done under the Swiss system, it's designed to eternally preserve the status quo.
1 gfour 2019-03-28
Luckily their status quo is being rich in paradise
1 SNCommand 2019-03-28
And it's beatiful
1 LightUmbra 2019-03-28
If you passed an amendment it's probably legal.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
I don't think so, you're fundamentally altering the system of govt.
You can curtail the President's powers but I don't think one can abolish the office itself.
1 LightUmbra 2019-03-28
Idk.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
That makes sense.
1 hisverbisdictis 2019-03-28
You could but it would never happen.
The only restrictions on amendments you can pass are ones limiting equal representation in the Senate or anything on the topic of slavery before the year 1808.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
I don't understand.
1 hisverbisdictis 2019-03-28
What don't you understand? Article V of the Constitution only places two limits on what kinds of amendments can be passed. Anything else is fair game.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Oh, well now I understand. Thanks.
1 hisverbisdictis 2019-03-28
š
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
š
1 Covert_Cat5 2019-03-28
But article 5 is amendable, which makes everything fair game.
1 IllustriousQuail 2019-03-28
Yep. Or in Latin, Expressio unius est exclusio alterius.
1 watermark08 2019-03-28
There is nothing in the constitution eternally embedding the current system of government.
1 Phantom_Engineer 2019-03-28
That's what amendments do, though. They fundamentally alter the system of government. If they had the votes they could amend the constitution to, for example, strip the Senate of all power and have the House pick the President.
It won't happen, but it would be legal.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
I didn't know that.
Can they turn the States into a parliamentary system ?
1 Phantom_Engineer 2019-03-28
Sure. They just need 3/4 of the country to agree on it, essentially.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Thanks, I didn't know that.
That makes their fantasy even more laughable.
Hildog couldn't even scrape 50% of the vote and yet somehow they think they can pull this off if they "discuss it seriously".
Absolute state.
1 IllustriousQuail 2019-03-28
Why not? The Constitution doesn't put any limits on the substance of amendments to itself; it only dictates the (rather difficult) procedure.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
Unless I am mistaken any ammendment to the constitution would override any other prior provisions, including if it abolished the executive. That's why the senate is now directly voted for, prior to something like the 24th ammendment the senate was appointed by the state legislatures if I remember correctly.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
You're right it seems.
1 Party_Independence 2019-03-28
Well I guess not. A full constitutional convention could rewrite the lawful authority and govt system.
In theory they could crown a king or establish a communist state through it.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Really ?
I didn't know that. Thanks for this.
1 Party_Independence 2019-03-28
Well the congressional method is generally understood to install an ammendment at a time parliamentary style.
An article V has never been called as it'd be a new convention. The first republic Era was the articles of confederation, the second republic is the constitution.
The convention could be charged for a specific purpose but once convened they do have authority to write a third republic as long as it'd pass the 75% majority approval of the states.
It's never been done before so it's all hypothetical.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Huh. Thanks for this. I didn't know that.
1 watermark08 2019-03-28
I would guess they want a switch to a parliamentary system.
1 FreedomFromIgnorance 2019-03-28
Youād need a constitutional amendment, thatās all. Itād never happen though.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-03-28
It's time to try the Articles of Confederation again.
1 KikiFlowers 2019-03-28
Legally I don't think it's possible, but they could impeach him and then charge him with a crime. But that isn't realistic.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Yeah it isn't. And it would only fuel his base.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
It's borderline impossible. The American constitution is pretty much tailor made to make passing any major legislation extremely difficult as getting a majority in both houses and giving the executive veto power is a massive hurdle. Since we've made it the constituon has been amended 17 times and there are still pending ammendments from the founding fathers age that haven't been fully passed or rejected.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
That's what I think.
At first I thought it was just impossible full stop.
Now I've been informed that it is theoretically possible.
Yet practically impossible.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
Yeah, that's the way the constitution is set up, you can essentially alter it however you want but the hurdles of doing so are fucking massive. It's an extraordinarily conservative document in the original sense of the word, which is good because it gives immense stability but bad because it's also extraordinarily rigid.
I enjoy this stuff, but I'm by no means and expert so anyone who's knowledable should correct me if I'm wrong. I also like to imagine how I would make a constitution if I was given the ability to, its such an interesting idea.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
That's a good thing. You shouldn't be able to bum stuff.
Or you end up like third world countries where you have a dozen constitutions and 170 amendments or something.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
Definitely, that is a massive benifit. I just also hate how there are genuinely serious constitutional problems that do need to be addressed that may not be able to because of the difficulty of doing so. Its definitely a better structure than most constitutions but it has its problems, and maybe it does strike the proper balance and I just don't realize it.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Better to have questions and lots of discussion.
Haste makes waste.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
True, I just wish we could constitutionally amend the first amendment to allow limits on money in politics. Citizen United was the correct constitutional ruling from what I can see, but it doesn't mean that there isn't a huge problem with money in politics. Plus I'd love to have a legislature with proportional representation.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Wasn't that the one that declared that corporations have first amendment rights and can hence donate as much money as they want ?
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
It ruled that money is considered speech, and it did allow corporate backers to donate with practically no limits. I do think it was the correct interpretation of the constitution, however it at the same time reveals a pretty big flaw in the first amendment. Otherwise our free speech laws are probably the best in the world, but that is one major issue we need to resolve. I'd honestly consider voting democrat if it meant they could push that through congress and the executive.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Yeah that was a messed up ruling.
Your should if the Dems can override the ruling.
That much money in politics is dangerous.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
Its a good ruling in the sense that campaign donations are a form of speech and therefore protected under the 1st amendment, its a bad ruling in the sense that unlimited money in politics is extremely damaging to democracy. I think I'm a bit weird, I'm extremely conservative in my ideas on how to judge the constitution but also have a lot of progressive ideas on how I would want to change it, the thing is I want to change it through the legislative branch and not through trying to pretend the contitution says something it doesn't which seems to be the modus operani of progressives.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Exactly, Congress should pass a bill instead.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-03-28
It feels good to be an enlightened radical centrist.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Yes, because that's what God intended man to be.
1 Caqo 2019-03-28
UNLIMITED POWER
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2019-03-28
Jesus, theyāre still pushing the narrative that rapist Bill Clinton was impeached over a blowjob and not lying to the entire country l?
1 gfour 2019-03-28
He said he didnāt fuck her and he didnāt. Whereās the lie.
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2019-03-28
Sexual relations
1 gfour 2019-03-28
Since when is a blowie sex my n-slur
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2019-03-28
Since the rapist in chief lied to the country on tv twice about it
1 gfour 2019-03-28
He wiped the case away tho. Innocent until proven guilty. The constitution is on my side, Chud!
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-03-28
... So lying to the country is impeachable? Hmm...
And he got impeached for lying to the grand jury and only the smoothest brains could take as lying with the available evidence.
1 ArtisanalCollabo 2019-03-28
Lmao what is perjury
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-03-28
Holy shit the perjury claim was always a stretch. Clinton out maneuvered the prosecutor of the grand jury, defined the questions on his terms, got the prosecutor to agree to those terms, and then answered his own question truthfully.
Saying he committed perjury is like saying "well he answered the question like this but if he had the same answer to a completely different question that would've been a lie"
1 Zac1245 2019-03-28
Itās Thursday and those noobs are stil seething.
1 nomad1c 2019-03-28
i feel like half of those posts are very clever trolls, but they could just be g*d damn idiots
1 CuriousKrow 2019-03-28
Yeah, the democrats will shrink the size and reach of the government. These guys are complete r-slurs.
1 gfour 2019-03-28
Obama used executive power like it was going out of style lmao. It was a political gamble hoping that Hillary would be such an unbearable candidate that that power wouldnāt immediately be in the hands of the Rs. Fortunately for him Trump is to retarded to do anything of substance.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-03-28
Ironically Obama ceeded a shit ton of power back to Congress (which wasn't bright politically and really bit him later)
1 2938_throwd 2019-03-28
Although he did have his AG draft the memo that functionally legalized weed in states that had legalized it.
Part of me wishes Trump wakes up in a bad mood one morning, calls his AG, and tells him to put boot to ass to potheads in all the weed states.
1 SithisTheDreadFather 2019-03-28
I don't care really about pot one way or the other, but this would be very good for dramacoin.
1 Coonass_alt 2019-03-28
do these people not realize that obama expanded the executive more than bush did??? lol
1 rado1193 2019-03-28
How do these people take themselves seriously after this? I honestly can't imagine telling yourself that because a special investigation that literally all of these fuckheads were saying was going to be the unbiased truth, turned up with nothing so the reasonable solution is to abolish presidency.
Have you every caught yourself making a stupid argument and thought, "oh shit wait I just realized this doesnt make sense"? Are these guys literally incapable of that?
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Yes. I absolutely blame the parents for this.
Too much positive reaffirmation and not enough stern noes.
1 The_Long_Connor 2019-03-28
"Could it be be that trump isn't an evil Russian backed dictator? No, we must completely alter how our democracy works."
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
The thing that annoys me is, that they've fallen in love with WMD Bush and other silly people.
Just because FUCK DRUMPF.
1 The_Long_Connor 2019-03-28
It because they're convinced it's some battle against evil since their understanding of morality is based on young adult novels. It's comfy to think the world is black and white without any nuance. Trump's a reeetard but they treat him like Voldemort or some shit lmao.
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
Exactly. Rowling ought a be tried in court of law.
1 The_Long_Connor 2019-03-28
Was Rowling paid by the Russians to undermine our democracy š¤š¤š¤
1 xlhat 2019-03-28
I'm positive.
1 Captain_Bunghole 2019-03-28
They're like children, when they lose they want the rules changed.
It's like that time Harry Potter fought voldemort, but voldemort cheated by not actually doing anything wrong.
1 MG87 2019-03-28
What a bunch of man babies, yeah I am not thrilled with the result of the investigation either but I'm not letting it rule my life
1 Acsvf 2019-03-28
You are not thrilled that the president of the united states isn't actually a russian agent?
1 WeWuzKANG5 2019-03-28
Him and recallrethuglicans are devoted mommy defense special forces.
1 awataurne 2019-03-28
Putting it like that makes it quite ridiculous. I think that thought process stems from just being tired of all this shit surrounding Trump and wanting it to end. Hell its been a ton of fun seeing people freak out about it but even if you gave me steak every day after 2 years I might want to eat something else.
1 uk_bob 2019-03-28
A conspiracy theory can never end, it can only grow more complex and/or less relevant.
1 MG87 2019-03-28
The "not enough evidence to prove Obstruction of Justice thing" is what bothers me more.
1 Acsvf 2019-03-28
You can't really obstruct justice for a crime that wasn't committed.
1 The_Pandemonium 2019-03-28
How else would they phrase it r-slur?
1 SNCommand 2019-03-28
Hopefully the cops beat your ass and book you on obstruction of justice when you cry "police brutality"
1 MG87 2019-03-28
Take your meds kid
1 SNCommand 2019-03-28
Have sex
1 AutoModerator 2019-03-28
Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained
incel
) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.
Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 ElonMuskarr 2019-03-28
You vote in the shittiest two-party elections one could hope for, and when that fails instead of realizing the limitations of the American-style two-party democracy, you turn on the concept of a "leader" all together.
Imagine being this.
1 tifrifrudr 2019-03-28
Unironically a good idea.
1 Party_Independence 2019-03-28
Supporting a super powerful executive using his office to rape suboridinates to own the conservatives
Like a baws
Is metoo over?
1 amm928 2019-03-28
If Hillary had become president theyād be trying to declare her consul for life
1 dudenotcool 2019-03-28
until the next liberal president comes along and they want to expand her powers
1 Carl_Schmitt 2019-03-28
The moment is nigh for Emperor Bannon to cross the Rubicon with his civic nationalist army of liberation.
1 ironschlong22 2019-03-28
Why don't we just have a council of elders but each elder must represent one of the elements. And then they join together and become Captain America.
1 TendiesAndMeth 2019-03-28
Uhhh we have that r-slur, it's called the supreme court
1 employee10038080 2019-03-28
Shit, I kinda wanna abolish the presidency. Am I as r-slurred as chapocels
1 tdvx 2019-03-28
Remember when they made /r/The_Meltdown in anticipation of /r/The_Donald users losing their minds after losing the election, but when Trump one they basically shut the subreddit down?
They should just do the same thing here. /r/The_Mueller is a failed subreddit that has no need to exist anymore.
1 prune_gang 2019-03-28
The mueller is what the donald
A reversal. Left cant meme
Mich like how they appropriated the righrs npc meme and turned it to maga prople are npcs we are the real sentient people!!!
1 betazoom78 2019-03-28
Armstrong 2020
1 TruthPains 2019-03-28
I still don't understand why anyone would have thought Mueller was going to indict Donnie. It is like they forgot the whole impeachment is indictment and all Mueller was going to do involving POTUS is write a report.
1 aqouta 2019-03-28
I wonder if it will ever occur to these people that the president doesn't actually really do that much of anything.