You may like gobbling up the same shit content, that doesn't mean the rest of us need to like your shit sandwich.

Outlines:

1. This Post - Outline

^{I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues}

I totally realize most people are going to disagree with me here but I feel compelled to say that closing the sub for a joke wasn't a very kind thing to do. We have seen TONS of posts from vulnerable populations talking about how this sub is a source of support and humor in a dark time. Irony and dirtbagism aside, taking away that support without warning was not okay.

You can say I'm being silly, or humorless or reactionary. Whatever. I love the show and I love this community. But sometimes I come home after dealing with ableism and our nightmare reality all day, and this sub is one of many things that make me feel better. It wasn't a good feeling to find this sub closed for the sake of irony. Maybe that's laughable or pathetic. But for me, it's true.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

"progressives" and NIMBY name a more iconic duo.

reddit mods and tr🅰nnies

Which came first the being a mod or being a trainie

i think it's latter, some sort of group mental illness contagion. We have a few studies that are already pointing out that within peer groups people tend to "develop" gender dysphoria at rates something like 20x the national average.

dr@m@ and radical centrists

True, I had a chapo who thought he landed a sick burn when he called me this.

>While little research has been done on the impact shelters have on communities, the campaign cites one study done in Vancouver that found a sharp increase in thefts.

>However, a separate analysis, done by the Guardian last year, found that 11 sanctioned encampments in Portland and Seattle did not have this effect.

fucking lol

Study done by Guradian's "Opinion is Free" section. A reliable source according to Wikipedia.

Oh that’s rich.

The fucking loliest part is next:

In 2008, an NYU researcher concluded that supportive housing in New York City did not negatively affect property values and that they actually increased in the five years after the facilities were established in the area.

loliest

wtf was I thinking

Having all the homeless conveniently off the streets and in one building would probably increase the values because people mistakenly believe there are no homeless in that area.

“Sanctioned encampments”

😂 they are “sanctioning” tent cities 😂

A thriving tech economy has squeezed the San Francisco housing market, and like many cities on the west coast it is grappling with an overwhelming homelessness crisis. The number of homeless people has remained constant despite massive investments, and the new shelter in the Embarcadero was to be part of the city’s promise to increase the number of shelter beds by 1,000. There are roughly 7,500 homeless residents in the city and more than 1,400 are waiting for temporary spots to open.

I like how they're acting like the homelessness issue totally isn't related to the permissive policies in the city where they hand out free methadone and literally let the homeless shit and sleep wherever they want to.

It's exactly the same shit (literally, human shit, in the street) in Portland. It's not shocking that people don't want to live next to a bunch of bums fucking in the street for drugs.

they hand out free methadone...

I was told that legalising hard drugs would totally rid society of all its ills ! 😱

it works in other countries. but burgers, especially homeless burgers, and ESPECIALLY west coast homeless burgers are some of the most braindead cretins of our society. so of course it doesnt work here.

That's American Exceptionalism.^TM

Even the nations where it does work, those nations still have a higher murder/crime rate than Burgerlandia for example some South American country who's name I can't remember.

Murder capital of the world Portugal

No Uruguay who's murder rate is higher than Burgenland.

Portugal has decriminalized all drugs too esse and has a lower homicide rate

What was their murder rate before decriminalisation of all drugs ?

Japan, has a lower murder rate than Portugal and they haven't legalised all drugs.

Same for Singapore and Burkina Faso.

I'm not gonna look up murder rates of different countries and compare them on Reddit let alone on arr slash dråma

Seems like a good thing do.

I’m sure japans actual murder rate is low but it’s artificially lowered by cops closing wrongful death cases and declaring many of them as suicides because they never want to admit people get murdered

Huh, but is that practice specific to Japan ?

They used to just congregate on 5th or 6th Street all day, but not sure where they hang out anymore.

A few had tables and chessboards and would set up on market but they misbehavin

Last time I was there was a couple of years ago (I used to live in the east bay). I was staying around market and drumm at the time and I came back from dinner with my wife to be treated with the scene of one homeless man giving another one a handjob in the doorway of a building about 40 feet from our hotel. The rest of the trip didn't go very much better.

My wife is from Australia, so I spent the majority of the time we were there saying, "Well it wasn't this bad when I was living around here..." it was pretty fucking embarrassing.

I lived on the edge of the tenderloin and would constantly see this one Jamaican/Islander dude who would walk around and loudly pretend to be r-slurred.

One day I pulled out a five and he went from “aaaaaaaauuuggggggggghhh ppoweeeoooeereaaaahhh” to “hello good sir” in about a half-second.

Yeah Easy Coast cities, or NY and DC at least, have homeless people—WC cities have homeless communities.

A thriving tech economy has squeezed the San Francisco housing market

Yes, and this has nothing to do with the local government blocking as much new housing as possible.

Puerto Ricans aren’t in San Francisco

It’s a song you sperg

Your comment has been removed. As of recently, we have figured out that using mean words (your comment contained sperg) is verboten as per reddit's magical rules.

If you would like to use your slurs in an illustrative context as per SRS theory, type the first letter and then "-slur". You are also encouraged to report violations of the reddit rules to the reddit admins using this report form.

Thank you for doing your part to keep reddit safe.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

There's always room 4 Jello.

What's the money for if not to separate from the rest of the society.

I was gonna say, yeah, move a homeless shelter into a rich conservative neighborhood and the same thing is gonna happen lol

Well, unless a liberal says we should help refugees. Then the righties pretend to care about homeless veterans.

Then the righties pretend to care about homeless veterans.

We still dont want to live near em though

Nah, dude, if you care about their welfare, that means you have to have them live in your house. That's how this works.

Seriousposter out

The bottom line is GULAG ANYONE WHO VOTES

It’s over for votercels

Of course we shouldn't gas the poor.

We should hunt them for sport.

This, but unironically

Don't get too close now, the liberal mantra.

Lefties love the poor until they start living near their gated communities.

based ochsposting

we need more ochsposting

Yikes y'all, the lack of compassion here is just oof. I can't believe y'all could be so heartless. I mean sure I don't own property so home values don't affect me and my job as a mental laborer doesn't earn enough for me to even contribute via taxes and I don't live in this area so I'd get all the benefits of appearing to be a good person without having to contribute to the situation or deal with its consequences but this is still super icky. Do better.

While little research has been done on the impact shelters have on communities, the campaign cites one study done in Vancouver that found a sharp increase in thefts.

However, a separate analysis, done by the Guardian last year, found that 11 sanctioned encampments in Portland and Seattle did not have this effect.

In 2008, an NYU researcher concluded that supportive housing in New York City did not negatively affect property values and that they actually increased in the five years after the facilities were established in the area.

Fact: Socioeconomic status is what determines crime rate.

Fact: Bringing people into your neighborhood with the lowest socioeconomic status doesn’t increase the crime rate. In fact, it actually raises property value!

I wonder if the valus "raise" was actually just regular inflation lol

There’s always room for Jello.

Rich people don't want crazy drug addicts near them big fucking shock.

It blows my mind how many liberals suddenly have a complete 360 on their beliefs once it comes around to something that actually affects them.

Then suddenly they go full conservative.

have a complete 360

so their beliefs remain the same? I dont it brother

Either hes retarted or the xbox 360 and walk away memeing here idk

ok, thank you.

They're 360'ing and then moonwalking the other way.

I know it's virtually impossible for it to ever happen, however in some mod world where it was possible for a city in America to do an outright massacre of the homeless it would be San Francisco. They're fucking horrid, they pass laws making it impossible to build housing then pay money to make sure they don't see the homeless population the built.

In this mad world they would argue its progressive as it would help lower the homeless rate among minorities or something.