Don't even try to kinkshame me. My kinks are my business.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

I've always said the most oppressed group of people on earth are rich people in california, finally they're pushing back.

Can't wait until the same blue checkmarks go on twitter to explain to us lowly scumbags how important it is to care about the poor and disadvantaged.

If the homeless shelter is in our neighbourhood then the police will start asking us questions when the homeless start disappearing.

They're not wrong though.

That area is more "up and coming" than really the rich area of SF. It's like 10 new towers and the baseball park dragging up all the rent prices. Still tons of junkies in that spot. I don't blame them though, I wouldn't want a shooting gallery in my neighborhood either.

If you guys want a fun read, look up the millennium tower in sf. Tons of drama involving a sinking foundation, early buyers getting fucked covering costs for lawsuits, layerds and layers of lawsuits in general. It's pretty funny

I got stuck down a YouTube rabbit hole about real estate. The whole situation is fucked. There is a fuck ton red tape for building any new housing. A lot of it is sjw shit like keeping a neighborhood diverse.

This one guy wanted to convert his laundry mat into housing. He even had a bunch of it planned for reduced rate housing. Nope, 5 years and a million dollars later he still couldn't start his project.

Yah SF's housing problem makes NYC's look tame. Can't even build the new construction for chinese/russian/saudi investors to gobble up and leave empty

Didn't the anti-gentrification people try to get the dude's laundromat declared a historical building to keep him from re-building?

I really hope they build this shelter in their nouveau riche hellhole side of town tbh

to all the poor ppl complainin about this thinkin it shows irony or w/e. if u actually owned property u would be very mad if homeless shelter moved in. decreases property value! more crime to! upvote me if u agree!

I don't blame them for opposing it. It's just very hypocritical of them

up vote me if u agree with i said..end of discussion.

This comment may be the beginning of a discussion about your borderline illiteracy

You never said I couldn't also leave a comment 😎😎

How so? Not everyone in SF is a mid 40's white woman rocking a pair of these, while lecturing everyone how to live life over THERE

The Twitter thread includes a $1000 donation from a fund manager at a firm that specializes in progressive society/governance projects.

Brb, I'm gonna go vote for Trump again.

The homeless shelter either has to go somewhere else, or doesn't get built at all. Why should it go into a poor neighborhood? Why is it that people who are already suffering are the ones who are asked to make sacrifices?

Because if God loved them they wouldn't be poor

Not as much to lose.

Not everyone in SF is a mid 40's white woman rocking a pair of these, while lecturing everyone how to live life over THERE

Maybe not in body, but certainly in spirit.

You're right, but most of them keep electing that woman to city council year after year.

So they're still hypocrites.

Agreed. They probably pushed for a shelter to be built, and are SHOCKED when their neighborhood was chosen.

But did u upvote?

The irony of the Californian landowners is that on one hand they dont like getting told what to do with their property but at the same time without that restriction the building frenzy will shatter their asset values in one fell swoop.

It's not like it'll even matter. The homeless problem in SF is SO bad that no matter where you live, you simply can't avoid it. There's just too many of them.

as if youve left pennsyltucky once in yur life

fucken BODIED this man LMAO

Someone apparently spent $5 on this, but I've looked through the donations and can't find it.

please find so i can have a friend

inst San Fransisco rampant with poverty and crime?

Megashelter

Oh, well when you put it that way, that doesn't sound nice at all.

Judge Dredd is real

Just set one up on Alcatraz island. Make the ferries to it free, but proof of residence to leave.

There is a book called "Virtual Light" by William Gibson from 1993 that centers around the Bay Bridge. A new Bay Bridge is built, and the old gets turned into a huge shanty town for the homeless.

I thought SF was a homeless shelter? Why else are the streets covered with human shit?

That's just what comes out of their mouths when they talk there.

San Francisco is actually a nonstop prank show where its residents are pranked with the wacky outcomes of their hilarious politics.

"My name is Katie and I care a lot about the homeless" smash cut to Katie crossing the street to avoid being hugged by a sidewalk camper approaching her with outstretched arms.

Reminds me of George Lucas wanting to expand his production company stupid and being cock blocked by Marin county, so he threatened to build low income housing instead

George Lucas has always been sympathetic to the downtrodden. That's why he's always had great diversity in his films such as the race of underwater Jaimacans who are only a letter away from having "massa" as their catch phrase, and we can't forget about the happy merchant.

Those cunning space merchants had nothing to do with the Chinese either.

The one with the long nose and the weird hat, right?

Yeah, the one who pinched his fingers together and is impervious to Jesus' Liam Neeson's mind tricks

who are only a letter away from having "massa" as their catch phrase

Shit, I've never noticed.

I've made it a game to count how many needles I can see on my walk from my office to the bus stop. The city is hiring people who's job is literally just cleaning up shit on the sidewalk.

No one would care if they put it on treasure island, but if no one cares then why would the city try to do it?

• hyper f-slur from frisco

I dislike wealthy people

/u/xNotch tho

He's an exception to the rule

Hes hardly a person

The Twitterbeast is not human, tho.

Basically a less ironic drama user. His dedication to being miserable is commendable though

I don't like the way they name their children.

I dislike you too.

Poor are not really people, so your dislike doesn't matter.

Tay's wealthy, so...?

I'm not wealthy and I wouldn't want to live near San Francisco street rats either. Lived in the Bay Area, and worked in San Francisco for years before invading Texas. These aren't nice people down on their luck, they are vile junkies, lunatics, and thieves. They are not like Otis the town drunk on Andy Griffith.

Everything's bigger in Texas except for brains.

C O P E O P E

We don't think about you

On one hand, homeless people smell bad.

On those other hand fuck SF residents.

Virtue signaling is great until you have to see poorfags on your way to starbucks

Its a lot more complex than simply virtue signaling. This is a classic case of false equivalence employed by conservautists and far left tards. On one side we have MAGAtards engaging in SRDine levels of smug while talking about homelessness issue in California, and on the other side we have chapotards calling for guillotine because liberals dared suggesting not wanting homeless menace in their neighborhood.

Its one thing to support liberal causes. Its another thing to expect them bear the brunt of the destruction and life threatening encounters back to their homes. I sure want these people to get help, but I sure as hell didn't sign up for bums yelling at my family and camping near my house, blatantly shoot up heroin out in the open, shit on the sidewalk every fucking day, sleep butt naked, and spread venereal diseases to whole of the neighborhood.

but I sure as hell didn't sign up for bums yelling at my family all day and all night and camping near my house, blatantly shoot up heroin out in the open, shit on the sidewalk every fucking day, sleep butt naked, and spread venereal diseases to whole of the neighborhood

Sure you did, it's called voting Democrat pal

Its one thing to support liberal causes. Its another thing to expect them bear the brunt of the destruction and life threatening encounters back to their homes.

So another way of saying it would be that of course you want homeless people to have shelters, you just feel that someone else should "bear the brunt of the destruction and life threatening encounters back to their homes."

That's not all that complex, honestly. It's just peak progressive.

Actually no, i don't think building homeless shelter is a solution. I mean, sure, I am okay with limited size shelters where it actually helps the people to get back on their feet who aren't suffering from crippling psychiatric disorders or drug addiction issues.

Better solution would be to bring back mental asylums. People with permanent mental health disorders, drug addicts will get the treatment they require from these places. Fund these places similar to how we fund other federal/state institutions. You need people who are qualified to handle these people.

This California experiment has proven that homelessness is an extremely complex issue and you can't simply solve it using shelters alone. Its like trying to fix a fracture by applying oils or something.

To be honest, I'd probably do the same thing.

This city truly is the Democrats utopia.

Homeless people are everywhere in san fran, how can anyone object to any effort to at least hide a few of them indoors?

I knew the homeless problem was bad in SF, but I didn’t know it was so bad that subway escalators were breaking down because too many homeless people shit in them.

Ah, Rich Liberals strike again. They're all for homeless shelters, but not in their neighborhood.

Rich Conservatives ironically don't live anywhere anyone wants to put a homeless shelter.

DEATH TO NIMBYS

Everyone angry about this should have to take one of those poor helpless homeless people into their homes.

Id be so fucking pissed if my property values plummeted because of that. I like the suggestion to just move the shelter far into the desert

Yeah that San Fran real estate is going to be worth nothing if a homeless shelter opens up down the block, you absolute mong

Never talk about real estate on this forum again!

It would plummet in my heart

Isn't the whole city of SF a homeless shelter at this point?