Joe “Hold her tighter, she’s a fighter” Biden gets accused of rape by two more women.

86  2019-04-03 by Ghdust2

22 comments

Ok I just checked out that sub. It appears to be a den of snakes, trolls, and alt right Nazis. I saw several clear violations of Reddit law. We're are smarter than the average cookies, they had to know we'd be on to them. Sad.

Outlines:

  1. This Post - Outline

I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues

If you support free speech, you must support people pinging other users. It's completely legal speech. If you won't defend pinging as free speech because you or someone else finds it disgusting, then no speech that you or anyone else views as disgusting is safe.

if it is in fact on shaky legal ground it's reasonable to not want to be the case that establishes it as illegal.

It's not, The reddit admins are straight up lying to the ignorant (like yourself) to justify their prejudice. Pinging being protected speech has long since been estabilished, as it has undeniable artistic merit. The only time it's been included under any obscenity laws is when someone is being charged with possession of harassment, so the state can slap them with more charges. The courts have been very careful to not charge anyone for pinging, because they'd get their asses fucking annihilated by a higher court due to the firm precedence of pinging being completely legal speech. /r/Drama had nothing to worry about, this guy was just making shit up to fool people into thinking his censoring wasn't entirely personally motivated.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

rape

Like the Lucy Flores and Amy Lappos, who leveled accusations of inappropriate physical contact, the Times reports that none of the women have accused Biden of sexual harassment or assault.

Sorry /u/Ghdust2 Bernie's still not gonna win

Oh I meant to put grope but I fucked up the title ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Well you messed up because now all I can think about is shriely old Biden balls in some political interns vag

His balls? Is he dunking them like Lipton?

Like a donkey's sack of marbles

F3minists have literally turned me more hostile to f3minism today than I was five years ago.

F-slur 1:

she "squirmed in her seat to show her discomfort," per the Times.

_

F-slur 2:

Her husband, seeing the movement, put his hand on Mr. Biden’s shoulder and interrupted with a joke.

Spot the difference!

One m-slur didn't let his f-slur get toxic masculinitied. Gillette be praised. 🙏

Honestly fingering your secretary should be an American right.

I mean, I dont have one and never got to be one. But it would be a great way to make Monday mornings fly by.

You know I finally understand

Democrats can't figure out gun control or rape cause they just don't understand shall not

According to RFC2219:

SHOULD NOT This phrase, or the phrase "NOT RECOMMENDED" mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed before implementing any behavior described with this label.

So, you shouldn't infringe unless you've weighed up the consequences and have a valid reason to do so.

It's over for John Hancockcels. 😎

nice username fellow ganoo linux aficionado xD

MUST NOT This phrase, or the phrase "SHALL NOT", mean that the definition is an absolute prohibition of the specification.

/u/Party_Independence was right about you, or so it seems.

I'm going to have to fire my lawyer.

This isn't assault or unwanted touching you r-[slur]s. Mr Biden just has an affectionate, physical style with women.

just think of how fun it would be to have a jovial Vice President who goes around the room speaking to everyone but refuses to touch any of the women.

Biden put his hand on her thigh and hugged her “just a little bit too long” during an event at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas.

We should have never given women rights.

Look, an election is like a job interview, not a court of law. We don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt in a job interview. So if you have one candidate who has some (unsubstantiated and probably manufactured by his competitors) allegations against him, and you have 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 candidates who don't have such allegations, who are you going to choose?

Accused of rape? None of them accused them of rape you dumb fuck. Can't you even get a title in drama right you, worthless sack of dried cum.