Drama bible study #1

25  2019-04-19 by my_other_drama_alt

Bussy: Yes or no?

Leviticus 18:22 "'Do not have sexual relations with a man as one does with a woman; that is detestable." Romans 1:27 Likewise, the men abandoned natural relations with women and burned with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error. 1 Timothy 1:10 for the sexually immoral, for homosexuals, for slave traders and liars and perjurers, and for anyone else who is averse to sound teaching Genesis 19:5 They called out to Lot, saying, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Send them out to us so we can have relations with them!" Leviticus 20:13 If a man lies with a man as with a woman, they have both committed an abomination. They must surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.

I'm sensing some contention on the issue here ... tough one.

7 comments

Obviously it being forbidden just makes it hotter.

I'm sensing some contention on the issue here ...

Probably should since something translated and reinterpreted so many times isn’t reliable. It’s like a bad game of telephone.

After all if it scorns bussy that's all the proof I need that it's mistranslated.

We use the Quran and Torah here. 😤

Imagine dumping a load in a tight, hairy Nazarene when he was in his twenties

ugu

hm

Doesn't matter what a 2,000 year old book says. Bussy is bussy.