Seriously. If pornhub is suggesting cuck porn for you, it's because their algorithm has determined, scientifically, that you're a cuck. That's all.

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

Reeeeeeeepost

https://reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/bhm464/a_scientist_is_upset_at_climate_change/

Everything climatologists say is predicated on their models, no part of which we have actual reason to believe is correct. They don't have a history of being correct, and we don't observe in the climate record the types of things they claim will happen.

Why do rightoids always try to claim the "models have been wrong."

https://skepticalscience.com/climate-models-intermediate.htm

Because "all models are wrong but some are useful" and they're tired of hearing about global warming causing this and that.

The models have not been inaccurate. And no, they deny climate change because their tribe does.

Their tribe denies climate change because they need fossil fuel money.

There's nothing else to it.

Shillbill, all models are wrong in some way. You can't perfectly model reality, only reality can do that. You can only usefully model reality, but your model is still "wrong".

They're exploiting that idea to win over rubes.

Tie that to some sensational predictions and declarations and yeah, you can solidify those that already agree and possible persuade some new comers along

They aren't perfect models. They're still decently accurate enough.

Yeah, climate change is definitely real and closely linked to human industrial activity on Earth.