/r/Drama is one of the most reactionary and transphobic subreddits on this website. Their moderators consistently promote this behaviour, and their userbase has been known to harass leftists and brigade their posts.
I created this subreddit as a response to that. All hatred and shenanigans at /r/drama can be catalogued and made fun of accordingly.
There are only two rules: no bigotry and no /r/drama users.
What's the the point of this article? He sent that letter over a month ago, before the full report was released. Arguing over Barr's summary at this point is ridiculous.
Such a long article that says basically nothing. This is all you need to read:
In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel’s obstruction analysis
What the fuck is this supposed to mean? He says it's not misleading but lacks context. I don't know about you but I would say that something lacking context would classify as misleading. I couldn't find anything more specific than that. You would think that he'd point to a specific part of the summary that he takes issue with. It couldn't be any more vague.
8 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-05-01
/r/Drama is one of the most reactionary and transphobic subreddits on this website. Their moderators consistently promote this behaviour, and their userbase has been known to harass leftists and brigade their posts.
I created this subreddit as a response to that. All hatred and shenanigans at /r/drama can be catalogued and made fun of accordingly.
There are only two rules: no bigotry and no /r/drama users.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 Ainaman 2019-05-01
How to summarize the ineffable?
1 sokolovey 2019-05-01
democracy dies in darkness or something gay like that
1 Ainaman 2019-05-01
So why didn't he leak the whole report to them? That was his usual m. o.
1 El_Guero_Alto 2019-05-01
It’s gonna produce bussyblasting regardless of outcome, and will in turn make for great capital gains in the dramacoin market
1 Kalvthe 2019-05-01
What's the the point of this article? He sent that letter over a month ago, before the full report was released. Arguing over Barr's summary at this point is ridiculous.
1 Doctor-Pavel 2019-05-01
The point is that Barr is testifying before congress today smooth brain.
1 headasplodes 2019-05-01
Such a long article that says basically nothing. This is all you need to read:
What the fuck is this supposed to mean? He says it's not misleading but lacks context. I don't know about you but I would say that something lacking context would classify as misleading. I couldn't find anything more specific than that. You would think that he'd point to a specific part of the summary that he takes issue with. It couldn't be any more vague.