Two researchers wrote an article literally advocating for post-birth abortion. The responses to it contain some good drama.

32  2019-05-03 by queerjihad

13 comments

And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

Euthanasia in infants has been proposed by philosophers for children with severe abnormalities

Ahh yes who isnt familiar with the philosophies of A. Hitler

"lmao slippery slope isnt real" -prochoicers in 2005

Finally, there's some hope for Lawlz!

its like a pro-lifer trying to make pro-abortionists look bad wrote this... have we gone this far off the deep end?

It was just ethicists doing their thing.

But there is the whole thing of euthanasia for minors, atop the euthanasia debate as a whole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_euthanasia

I think this all started last month or around then after an asian lady proposed a late term (including during birth) abortion bill and that governor with the blackface controversy defended it

The linked article was published six years ago.

Hmm that’s true. Anyway if you want to see what I’m mentioning, click here!

Still, I think it all started with Drumpf

Fourthly, the authors consistently refer to the foetus and newborn eligible for abortion or killing by the pronoun 'she'. Though this most likely represents a poor attempt at inclusive language,

When you're so woke that your baby killing argument only references female infants

Accurate if written in china lol

Anything to give women more choices! Good on them!

Mandatory post-birth abortions when?