Asexuals: Oppressed identity, or the *most* oppressed identity? Round 2 -- Chapo v Stupidpol

6  2019-05-06 by -Kite-Man-

10 comments

Also, the autocorrect dictionary doesn't even think "asexuals" is a word. Is this proof either way?

This is not the time or place for another black-dick joke

Snapshots:

  1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, archive.is

I am a bot. (Info / Contact)

At this rate, everything but a 1950's caricature of a "normal suburban American" is going to get labeled 'queer'

Queer Nuclear Family when?

probably an odd-numbered handful in japan in the 1950S, or western russia in the 80s

I’m unironically almost completely asexual.

"Good for you," or "I'm sorry to hear that?"

I’ve only been attracted to two people in my life and I’m with one of them. So, good?

that sounds good to me

By the way, asexuality was hijacked by tumblr SJWs years ago. It was a real thing for people like me who didn’t experience sexual attraction as most people do. There were even academics who began to study us and then, there was the great tumblr war and almost all of us had left the movement after that. I mean, the real asexuals are a very small number of the population. Kinsey estimated less than 1%. We were outnumbered by tumblrinas. They took everything. All our forums? They are the mods because most of us have lives and don’t spend our time on forums all day. Even the founder is now not so active anymore. Basically, we got kicked out of pur own movement 🤷🏻‍♀️

kicked out of our own movement

lotta that goin around i hear. poor gays and truscum