This sub is what happens when minimally educated unintelligent people join together to find common ground and project their own self loathing to the rest of the world. There has never been anything clever that I have ever seen from this sub. I will continue to look for humor but I am just starting to think that loss and anger plus unemployment equals humor

Snapshots:

1. This Post - archive.org, megalodon.jp, removeddit.com, archive.is*

^{I am a bot. (Info / Contact)}

Spirit is synonymous with "essence"

Oh shit, you got in a fight with a New Ager or something. Get a witch doctor IMMEDIATELY to protect you from their spells!!!

Look bro he eats unhealthy yet he has a trim waist and like most chapos is a total cutie.

Here he is fighting the good fight against those nutrition chuds who hurt people's feelings.

Just googled and I disagree. Too masculine.

BTW how's that show ? Is it really like the Thick Of It ?

Thanks I'll check it out sometime.

Nah, this guy

🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢🤢 sugar water

I. WANT. TO. PIIIIIIIIIIIING

You /u/scrongdongerton?

Yeah.

Well says here you once ironically said nigger on the internet! I'm boutta take you out!

this boy need to chill

This has a pretty damn good rage : being reasonable ratio. Nice work.

The good old boomer black statistics meme while ignoring context and the idea of multi generational effects of system racism.

Communism lost, get over it already and lick 👅😋 those ↘️👮‍♂️ boots 🥾👨🏿 faggot

Ayo I'm poor n sheit and that's why I had to shoot Jamal for his Jordans

God damn it he's a cumboy. God DAMN IT.

God damn it he's a cumboy. God DAMN IT.

I’m a lot of ways I would argue that cumtown is even more radically centrist than r/Drama. So much layover there

Reee no pinging

Leftists felt the same way about me because my mother is pro life

The summer posters😔😔😔

Hodor din do nuffin

People who support the prison industrial complex will be executed en masse. That wasn't a threat, that was a prediction. It's going to happen.

Yeah, I agree entirely - if we get rid of prisons a whole lot of people will get murdered. What an astute observation.

What will replace prisons when that happens?

The People's Prisons. Now with more work and less food.

The People's Prison: where any sentence could be a death sentence

Prisons.

Concentration camps for humans run by dinosaurs ?

👆

People who support the trans industrial complex will be castrated or executed en mass. That wasn’t a threat, that was a prediction. It’s going to happen.

If you spend your whole life defending a delusional system and that system gets overturned, you’re going to face consequences.

Damn why the fuck are you guys so obsessed with girls with dicks 🤔 almost like its a fetish or something

Almost? Lmao 👈😂

Are you suggesting that penises can't be feminine?

Let me guess, you'll be on the Right Side of History™?

Just a heads up for you noodle brains, more often than not, those who carry out bloody revolutions end up tasting their own medicine.

You chapotards don't see the irony of promising freedom and justice while defending the mass incarceration and killing of an entire group of people. No wonder so many of you are genocide apologists.

There is no right side of history. That's the mistake liberals defending the system make when they call upon some sense of moral perfection or superiority inherent in liberal democracy.

There is only the side that wins. I want the side that I believe is more just based on my personal ethical beliefs to win, just like you do.

For the record, killing political opponents is not genocide by any definition of the word

For the record, killing political opponents is not genocide by any definition of the word

Lol, everytime 🐴👞. Tankies always show their true colors.

Well, no. Its technically “Democide” of which Genocide is a subset. Democide is simply the government and its official agents deliberately killing a large group of people aka a “demographic”. Genocide is when that killing is targeted at a certain race or religion or nationality. This was defined by the man who created the term Genocide so its about as authoritative as it can get.

So like I said, it wasn't genocide

Don't act for a second like western liberal democratic nations do not commit "democratic" frequently and on a massive scale. Ask an Iraqi citizen what they think about whether the US government is guilty of genocide

commit democratic

Im using this from now on tbh.

Also while we weren’t amazing at preventing civilian casualties in places, overall we were about as good as possible in a war. Ask a kurd whether the us coming in stopped saddam actually for real genociding them. We found the mass graves.

There is only the side that wins. I want the side that I believe is more just based on my personal ethical beliefs to win, just like you do.

What side would that be?

If you can't tell what my ethical beliefs are from my posts I don't know what to tell you

I know your type, you're just another edgy pompous Marxist with delusions of grandeur. A blind idiot to reality stuck in a fantasy wishful thinking of a perfect society. Probably a Bernietard that believes he stands a chance at winning the presidency. Most likely blames all the world's problems and grievances on Capitalism and wishes to overthrow it and supplant it with Socialism. Probably also ignores all the innovation and progress that was made possible by our Capitalist economy.

You're also, probably, someone that believes social stratification and inequality isn't inevitable and natural despite it being easily observable throughout the entirety of our history to be so. You probably believe that a classless society is not only achievable but also natural. Someone that can't come to terms that our history and human nature is ugly and violent. Most likely a proponent of "sins of the father" type of philosophy. Probably also bought onto the pipe dream that is workers "owning the means of production".

You're someone that believes Communist/Socialist governments weren't/won't be extremely prone to corruption, political oppression and devolving into dictatorships. Quick to defend and rationalize crimes and genocides committed by said governments. Probably holds resentment and anger towards those that refuse to subscribe to your ideology, believes himself intellectually and morally superior to them and can't understand why they would never follow your movement. It's because you lack the introspection and critical thinking to realize you're a pseudo-intellectual with delusions of grandeur. Just the typical edgy Marxist college student, probably middle/upper class that enjoys a life of entertainment and escapism or better known as a "champagne socialist" type.

Schumpeter prophesied your existence, the disgruntled, privileged, unemployable pseudo-intellectuals that would try to bring down Capitalism and supplant it with Socialism. But unlike your daddy Marx, Schumpeter recognized fully well that Capitalism, despite all its flaws, was a far superior ideology to Socialism and that its possible or certain fall should not be cheered but mourned, for the alternative will inevitably lead us into an authoritarian dystopic nightmare.

I could go on and on deconstructing your "ethical" beliefs and political ideology but I lack the time or patience to do so.

k

Hit too close to home sweaty?

No I just didn't want to read your novel. It's funny that you would waste your time writing all that when no other person will ever read it

I can sum it up for you

you're a pseudo-intellectual with delusions of grandeur. Just the typical edgy Marxist college student, probably middle/upper class that enjoys a life of entertainment and escapism or better known as a "champagne socialist" type.

I would wager most Marxists come from the lower class, I'm not edgy whatsoever, and I'm not forwarding my views as a form of escapism, I want them to become reality and I am doing what I can to organize people and make them happen.

I don't know what world you exist in where a military officer who studied economics and mathematics at one of the best colleges in the world, who grew up in poverty and espouses Marxist political views would be considered "typical"

I don't know what world you exist in where a military officer who studied economics and mathematics at one of the best colleges in the world, who grew up in poverty and espouses Marxist political views would be considered "typical"

'X' Doubt, but I'll bite, what college?

Also, you grew up in poverty but managed to become a military officer, study economics and mathematics in one of the best colleges in the world resulting in you leaving poverty and becoming middle-upper class. Do you think this was in spite of or thanks to our Capitalist society?

I don't want to reveal too much about my identity buts it's a global top 50 economics program in the North-East/Mid-West region and it's a public university.

I think that the system is certainly superior to ones that existed in the past, much in the same way Marx viewed capitalism as far superior to feudalism, but I view myself as being extraordinarily lucky to have ended up where I am.

When I see so many other people who grew up in situations such as mine who continue to live miserable lives in abject poverty, I can't forget about their plight and I never will. Let alone all those across the globe who suffer to support the system that allowed me to prosper.

Funny how our upbringing and education are so similar yet our political views are so different.

I've changed a lot. I'd say I was a left leaning libertarian in high school, a centrist liberal for most of university, and now I've become a full on hard-left Marxist.

I unironically hated communism and thought communists were scum. From my experiences and education I've started to realize the liberal democratic system is so much less ethical, rational, and just than I thought it to be.

I've started to realize the liberal democratic system is so much less ethical, rational, and just than I thought it to be.

It's not perfect but it surely is better than full blown Socialism/Communism. Do you really believe Communism can be achieved? Considering how much diversity of ethnicities, cultures, religions, sexuality, politics there are and the size of our population?

I think communism can be achieved in some fashion, I mean to Marx communism is just whatever succeeds capitalism after it collapses under its internal contradictions. He never laid out some ideal form of what it was.

I think the diversity of opinions, cultures, and ethnicities will not be an obstacle to communism. The most succesful communist nations were ones with huge diversity in their demography. I also believe that the self is far more socially embedded and malleable than liberals believe, in that way I'm much a communitarian.

When it comes to the self vs the community the self was socialized within I think that socialization has by far the biggest impact on what you decide is ethical and how you choose to live your life, based on how people tend to form their political beliefs.

The belief global communism fell from internal pressure rather than external pressure from militarily more powerful and economically stronger western capitalist nations is really a myth. By the end of the Soviet Union the idea of the USSR continuing as a Soviet Socialist association of states was far more domestically popular than some liberal alternative.

I believe a communitarian style of communism, which would include freedom of religion unlike Soviet Russia, would provide people more meaningful lives. The overabundance of consumer goods under capitalism has failed to make us happy, and the consumerism which fuels a need for ever expanding economic growth is more of a factor of socialization than inherent human ambition.

The most succesful communist nations were ones with huge diversity in their demography.

What would those nations be?

I also believe that the self is far more socially embedded and malleable than liberals believe, in that way I'm much a communitarian. When it comes to the self vs the community the self was socialized within I think that socialization has by far the biggest impact on what you decide is ethical and how you choose to live your life, based on how people tend to form their political beliefs.

Do you think this is still true considering the size of our population and the ever more crowded cities and suburbs? In my opinion, the sense of community is a thing of the past, the crowded asocial cities like the East Asian countries are the future. We're just too many.

The belief global communism fell from internal pressure rather than external pressure from a military ily more powerful and economically stronger western capitalist nations is really a myth. By the end of the Soviet Union the idea of the USSR continuing as a Soviet Socialist association of states was far more domestically popular than some liberal alternative.

It was both. Don't forget the era of stagnation that plagued the union from the 60's to the 80's played a big part.

I believe a communitarian style of communism, which would include freedom of religion unlike Soviet Russia, would provide people more meaningful lives. The overabundance of consumer goods under capitalism has failed to make us happy, and the consumerism which fuels a need for ever expanding economic growth is more of a factor of socialization than inherent human ambition.

What would be more meaningful lives? Also, what in your opinion makes us humans happy? We're complicated creatures and happiness is very subjective.

Where is the long post bot ?

Sleeping for now.

Why ?

We need it in the field.

Chapos are comin'.

That's different, you're forced to pay taxes. You have no choice if you want to avoid reprisal from the government.

Actively defending the current system as a good thing that should be maintained is much different than being forced to fund it.

There is literally nothing wrong with US prisons and everyone in prison deserves it 100%

That wasn't a threat, that was a prediction. It's going to happen.

Oooh I'm literally shaking. Come on chapo get your revolution on already.

you're going to face the consequences

COPE.

I know your teachers probably told you this but most of us baddies don't.

I don't understand what coping there is to be done. If a system is unjust it's unjust, coping is just giving up.

I function quite well in this current system. I'm a military officer, soon to be college grad, work a good job, going to law school. I just don't think the system is right.

People who support the prison industrial complex will be imprisoned or executed en masse. That wasn't a threat, that was a prediction. It's going to happen.

COPE isn't this ?

you're going to face the consequences

More COPE.

I just don't think the system is right.

Nor do I.

I think America should be more like low crime Singapore i.e. light on non violent crimes but execute hard drug dealers and whip people instead of jailing them.

I think Singapore does have a much better system I'd agree on that. Disagree about the drug dealer portion though

Well we'll agree to disagree.

cope

No u.

Whipping is preferable. Hopefully followed by some time in the stocks.

Stocks would be a liability since some idiot would try to harm the fellow.

That’s the point. The community has to hold you accountable.

No the law should.

Not the mob.

Just put a guard up there and let the victims of his crime pelt him with rotten produce.

Just put a guard

Unnecessary waste of money.

let the victims of his crime pelt him with rotten produce.

Again the mob.

Laws are nebelous, arbitrary, and can be variably applied. A law gives you no more protection from unjust punishment than mob rule

A law gives you no more protection from unjust punishment than mob rule

The rule of law does.

Certain rights are inalienable and they've evolved since the past centuries.

That's what guides and continues to guide most civilised societies.

And that's why few societies are direct democracies.

Liberal democracy or constitutional monarchy works rather well.

There are literally no inalienable rights in the United States. From right to life to right to vote every single one can be revoked constitutionally for an individual.

What has guided the development of "civilized society" is not some pure moral grounding in rationally determined ethical beliefs, it irrational self interest of groups and individuals as well as chaos that drives forward our development.

The morally grounded justification of every aspect of our society from democracy to law is a post-hoc rationalization, not the fundemental reasoning which drove the development and continued existence of these institutions.

Your Bill of rights can be revoked ?

Without due process and as punishment for a crime ?

That's my entire point, the legal system is so abritrarily determined, nebelous defined, and systematically biased that it is functionally used to strip idnviduals of their rights, making a mockery of the entire concept of an inalienable right.

How can a right truly be said to be "inalienable" if millions of Americans are currently not holders of these rights?

No system is perfect. I'd much rather not have anarchy.

And no a large prison population doesn't mean America is a hellhole.

There were fewer prisoners in the 60s yet that wasn't a great time now was it ?

Come on, reform rather than revolt.

How can a right truly be said to be "inalienable" if millions of Americans are currently not holders of these rights?

Literal rubbish. Call me when John Oliver is arrested and those Trump death squads make an appearance.

My last serious post.

Why would you murder your supporters?

That would be like Stalin rounding up and killing every Communist in Russia and freeing all of his political prisoners.

That whole thread is shooting chapo fish in a barrel

blacks are imprisoned because of systematic racism

ok but why are other non-whites not imprison at the same rates?

I JUST TOLD YOU!!! RACISM!!

people who post their own drama here are sad and lame

not your personal army