I am thoroughly trouncing you. I've seen your mo and I spanked you at your own game. I found your flaw and exploited it quite nicely, my slaughtered braised goose.
Why doesn’t drama do a verification to tag mayos/non mayos 🤔. BPT is actually pretty damn based. Of course most of those their country club users are mayos that just found photos of black people online that aren’t reverse searchable, or snapped a shot at the gym of a black person. But if you put in that effort to pretend to be black online props
Because apparently you can't just put in an exemption for rape?
Things have degrees and shades to them; the drunk drivers example you gave is absurd, but people being forced to carry their rapist's children to term is an abomination.
Plan B exists. If you get raped you go to the emergency room and they do a rape kit on you and give you plan B. Rape abortions are less than 1% of all abortions.
Using rape as an example is way more absurd than drunk driving, as drunk driving proportionally affects way more people than rape.
No exemptions are for the law to make moral and logical sense. If you say abortion is murder, there can be no exceptions. If you kill your rapist you are still charged with manslaughter
If you get raped you go to the emergency room and they do a rape kit on you and give you plan B.
Yes because it never occurs that a rape isn't reported soon enough for a plan B.
Using rape as an example is way more absurd than drunk driving, as drunk driving proportionally affects way more people than rape.
However, a ban on alcohol has a large effect on people other than drunk drivers, while allowing rape abortions has literally 0 side effects.
No exemptions are for the law to make moral and logical sense. If you say abortion is murder, there can be no exceptions.
Although less internally morally consistent, a similar law with a rape exception would be morally better due to not forcing people to carry their rapist's child to term.
Yes because it never occurs that a rape isn't reported soon enough for a plan B.
Ah great, more technicalities and even rarer outlier events for us to cater national laws to!
Although less internally morally consistent, a similar law with a rape exception would be morally better due to not forcing people to carry their rapist's child to term.
Suffering a traumatic event doesn't give you the right to kill.
This is all a red herring anyway. Again, less than 1% of abortions are because of rape.
Again, less than 1% of abortions are because of rape.
And there are hundreds of thousands of abortions carried out per year. 1% is still thousands of cases a year.
Ah great, more technicalities and even rarer outlier events for us to cater national laws to!
When modifying the law to include such cases takes no effort, yes, I support doing so if it prevents people from having to carry their rapist's child to term.
Suffering a traumatic event doesn't give you the right to kill.
A fetus, up to a certain age, does not have the same rights as a human being; killing it is not murder and justifiable.
After all, it's the child of a rapist.
The reason to abort the fetus of a rapist is due to the emotional trauma carrying it causes.
Before you ask how a specific term limit is set at which it instantly becomes a person, there is no specific such age.
However, it is still possible to say whether a fetus is a person at certain ages, with the certainty changing depending on how close the age is to either extreme. So someone can say that a fetus is certainly not a person at 1 week of age, but certainly a person 1 week before birth.
There are edge cases where it becomes difficult to come a definitive decision regarding whether a fetus is a person. Fortunately, this has a simple solution.
An age is chosen such that all fetuses below it are definitely not people, with no ambiguity. Fetuses above that age are treated as people and not abortable, even if depending on the age they are not.
This has the effect of resolving all ages for which personhood is uncertain as non-abortable, preventing murder.
It is like the paradox of the heap; you can say that 2 sticks is not a heap, and that 5 sticks is a heap. But is 3 or 4 sticks a heap? Is there a certain number of sticks at which heap-ness is decided? You set the limit of heap-ness at 2 to stop heaps from being labelled as non-heaps and aborted.
It's funny how this guy is a Democratic state representative in Alabama. I think everyone from that state might be stupid
It's funny how it's always the states with the highest black population that people write off this way. I think it's time to acknowledge that generalizing southerners as stupid is a racist dogwhistle.
No, we want the revolution to not require guns. It's 2019, and for the last 200+ years we've been running on the principal that changing your government can and should happen peacefully. It's usually the people resisting change that fall back on violence to stop it.
55 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-05-16
I am thoroughly trouncing you. I've seen your mo and I spanked you at your own game. I found your flaw and exploited it quite nicely, my slaughtered braised goose.
Snapshots:
I am a bot. (Info / Contact)
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-05-16
Yaaaaaaaaaaaa'llllllllllllll
1 Kat_B0T 2019-05-16
Why doesn’t drama do a verification to tag mayos/non mayos 🤔. BPT is actually pretty damn based. Of course most of those their country club users are mayos that just found photos of black people online that aren’t reverse searchable, or snapped a shot at the gym of a black person. But if you put in that effort to pretend to be black online props
1 FearOfBees 2019-05-16
Wait hol up
1 Kat_B0T 2019-05-16
I think comedicsans is a burrito American 🤔. But other than that, pretty much.
1 FearOfBees 2019-05-16
Yeah its just a joke but its over 80% probably
1 Kat_B0T 2019-05-16
The mod team is exactly 99.94871794% Mayo and that’s even taking out goys!
1 d-amazo 2019-05-16
thought he didn't even live in america, aint he from australia or some shit
1 LightUmbra 2019-05-16
He's a Kiwifag.
1 ubermanwolf 2019-05-16
I didn't know we had our own Tarrantino.
1 LightUmbra 2019-05-16
Idk if he likes feet
1 ubermanwolf 2019-05-16
I meant a disciple of Tarrant reeee
1 LightUmbra 2019-05-16
Oh lol
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-05-16
Fiverr is racial reparations
1 Helter_SkeIter 2019-05-16
Me be slut, me kill baby so me can be slut again. Alabama BAD. Me not allowed to be slut no more
1 wfwfwfqwfqwef 2019-05-16
yes because being raped means you're a slut.
1 El_Guero_Alto 2019-05-16
It is in the eyes of Allah most high 🕌☪️🕋
1 boyoyoyoyong 2019-05-16
They're lucky were not stoning them
1 lannister_stark 2019-05-16
Akbar
1 Helter_SkeIter 2019-05-16
Rape rape rape!
Let's make all laws based on outlier events. All alcohol and drugs are no illegal because drunk drivers crash and hurt people
1 wfwfwfqwfqwef 2019-05-16
Because apparently you can't just put in an exemption for rape?
1 wfwfwfqwfqwef 2019-05-16
Because apparently you can't just put in an exemption for rape?
Things have degrees and shades to them; the drunk drivers example you gave is absurd, but people being forced to carry their rapist's children to term is an abomination.
1 Helter_SkeIter 2019-05-16
Plan B exists. If you get raped you go to the emergency room and they do a rape kit on you and give you plan B. Rape abortions are less than 1% of all abortions.
Using rape as an example is way more absurd than drunk driving, as drunk driving proportionally affects way more people than rape.
No exemptions are for the law to make moral and logical sense. If you say abortion is murder, there can be no exceptions. If you kill your rapist you are still charged with manslaughter
1 wfwfwfqwfqwef 2019-05-16
Yes because it never occurs that a rape isn't reported soon enough for a plan B.
However, a ban on alcohol has a large effect on people other than drunk drivers, while allowing rape abortions has literally 0 side effects.
Although less internally morally consistent, a similar law with a rape exception would be morally better due to not forcing people to carry their rapist's child to term.
1 Helter_SkeIter 2019-05-16
Ah great, more technicalities and even rarer outlier events for us to cater national laws to!
Suffering a traumatic event doesn't give you the right to kill.
This is all a red herring anyway. Again, less than 1% of abortions are because of rape.
1 wfwfwfqwfqwef 2019-05-16
And there are hundreds of thousands of abortions carried out per year. 1% is still thousands of cases a year.
When modifying the law to include such cases takes no effort, yes, I support doing so if it prevents people from having to carry their rapist's child to term.
A fetus, up to a certain age, does not have the same rights as a human being; killing it is not murder and justifiable.
The reason to abort the fetus of a rapist is due to the emotional trauma carrying it causes.
Before you ask how a specific term limit is set at which it instantly becomes a person, there is no specific such age.
However, it is still possible to say whether a fetus is a person at certain ages, with the certainty changing depending on how close the age is to either extreme. So someone can say that a fetus is certainly not a person at 1 week of age, but certainly a person 1 week before birth.
There are edge cases where it becomes difficult to come a definitive decision regarding whether a fetus is a person. Fortunately, this has a simple solution.
An age is chosen such that all fetuses below it are definitely not people, with no ambiguity. Fetuses above that age are treated as people and not abortable, even if depending on the age they are not.
This has the effect of resolving all ages for which personhood is uncertain as non-abortable, preventing murder.
It is like the paradox of the heap; you can say that 2 sticks is not a heap, and that 5 sticks is a heap. But is 3 or 4 sticks a heap? Is there a certain number of sticks at which heap-ness is decided? You set the limit of heap-ness at 2 to stop heaps from being labelled as non-heaps and aborted.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-05-16
Let me ask you this? Do. You. Want. More. Poor. People? Because outlawing abortion means more poors get born.
1 Helter_SkeIter 2019-05-16
I rather American poors than constant "we hav 2 many unfilled jerbs and not enouff ppl so we need 2 import all these third worlders"
1 trilateral1 2019-05-16
Real AmericaTM needs population growth, in case the Dems ever succeed at abolishing electoral college.
1 dinksimp 2019-05-16
Sounds like we've got a Libertarian in here.
I'm gonna take the other extreme and say that I am totally straight and am attracted to women in my age group.
1 PraisePerun 2019-05-16
Yes.
1 The_Live_Ghost 2019-05-16
Imagine wanting to be raised by a thot foid tho. Just garrote once I'm out of the womb honestly
1 collectijism 2019-05-16
You mean 90% of black people
1 The_Live_Ghost 2019-05-16
Yes, if anything Alabama is just based accelerationists for the mayocide
1 WeenieHutJrSupreme 2019-05-16
Babies don't stop women from being sluts
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-05-16
You are a retard. That is all.
1 Helter_SkeIter 2019-05-16
Found the salty slut 👆👆
1 Fascisteen 2019-05-16
jesus why do you people like people larping as niggers so much
1 rhyme-ocerus 2019-05-16
Truly we love in a post truth world. Who cares about facts, people just up vote shit that makes them feel outraged.
related: this guy having people argue with him cause he's pointing out that men and women aren't too different when it comes to abortion opinions, and adding "white" to the argument is actively making it worse
1 KKKUMARASWAMY 2019-05-16
> Who cares about facts, people just up vote shit that makes them feel outraged
t. Dramanaut
1 Corporal-Hicks 2019-05-16
Ive seen the poll numbers for pro-life women being more like 50%, but yah, that little factoid tends to rile people up
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-05-16
it's easier to claim the abortion debate is a gender war than realize most of it is intra-gender thot patrolling.
1 MoistLanguage 2019-05-16
Patrolling is the only legitimate economic strategy when sex and youth are your only virtues.
A lot of women realized that all these Thots devalue their social worth and leverage by giving sex for free.
1 autism_causes_autism 2019-05-16
Local Woman Insults Local Woman, Police Hunting for Local Man to Take Blame. More news and weather at 11.
1 FearOfBees 2019-05-16
Haha i get it
1 PraisePerun 2019-05-16
https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPeopleTwitter/comments/bpamc9/this_just_aint_adding_up/enr6h9o
God I wish I could ping this retard, fucking mayos
1 Scottfree00 2019-05-16
Dont drag my nigga leorio into this
1 200iqBigBrain 2019-05-16
It's funny how it's always the states with the highest black population that people write off this way. I think it's time to acknowledge that generalizing southerners as stupid is a racist dogwhistle.
1 Rentokill_boy 2019-05-16
what a dumb fucking take
1 ashleychudd 2019-05-16
200+ years? The 19th and 20th centuries have probably had more violent revolutions/rebellions than any others?
1 MoistLanguage 2019-05-16
Ah yes the very peaceful period that included 2 World Wars, countless mass genocides, revolutions and extensive destruction of the environment.
Uncle Ted was right 💣
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-05-16
You doubted him? 🙄
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-05-16
We're all weak at times
1 d-amazo 2019-05-16
Hunter X Hunter sucks.
1 bussylmao 2019-05-16
Foids are not good at math