Imagine hating living so bad that you decide no one else should be living either. Because there's no possible way other people could be happy and if they are, they're wrong.
Because our diets have strayed from meat which requires lots of chewing to soft foods. Humans have also sheltered themselves from natures resulting in a rise of allergies. This can often lead to poor breathing technique that is adopted for the rest of ones life and ruins bone structure.
Our diets haven't strayed from meat, we consume more meat today than at any point in history. The issue is that the meat we eat is processed and cooked, which means it takes no effort to chew it.
Although, most of this isn't really proven. Facial bone structure is 90% genetics, not like the Chad in your neighbourhood chewed raw meat as a kid.
Raw meat isn't hard to chew, probably easier since its still soft.
Its quite likely that chewing does have a very strong influence on jaw definition. Search up 'mewing'.
I know what mewing is, I browsed Lookism years ago. As someone who has been mewing for 2 years, it really hasn't done anything for me. My parents both have recessed facial bones, and so do I. I don't remember ever mouth breathing as a child, nor did my diet differ from Chad's.
The truth is that mouth breathing may effect facial forward growth, but the majority of people who are ugly are ugly because of their ancestors are ugly. Skulls from tens of thousands of years ago aren't all that different from today's skulls, some of them have perfect bones, but the majority of them have imperfections.
Also, there are people with narrow palates and recessed maxillas who are good looking, Henry Cavill and Brad Pitt for example.
We've been cooking meat for 1-2 million years and Homo Habilis/Erectus etc had no chin at all. Homo Sapiens is the only animal species that has chins and we've always eaten cooked meat.
You can easily tell the difference between eurpeans amongst white people, africans amongst black people and chinks amongst american born chinese most of the time.
There is definitely more than 10% environmental impact.
What's your point? If a white dude grows up in Asia, he'll still be white. Those features are the product of natural selection, big noses for example are good in Africa because the air is humid, so people with bigger noses survived more often and had better chances of spreading their genes. It has nothing to do with environment directly shaping features, just natural selection influenced by environment through thousands of years.
You can maybe see it, but these differences are minor. If your ancestors have a weak jaw and recessed facial bones, it doesn't really matter where you grow up, you'll have those features.
[Anarcho-primitivists] are right to the extent that they oppose civilization and the technology on which it is based. But, because of the form in which this movement is developing, it may actually help to protect the technoindustrial system and may serve as an obstacle to revolution.
I think anarchy has some expectations baked into it, like 'no hierachies'. You could be a primitivist that recognises tribal/familial based 'governments' (very liberal with this term) as ideal.
Anarchists are against states not governments, which is an important distinction insofar as you could define a town council in New England congregating to decide democratically what is the best course of action for a particular piece of public land---no anarchist is against that ---they basically want to decrease everything down to that, ie, increase the level of "direct democracy" in society (usually also implicit in that is socializing production/property)
Either way have you ever actually read about primitive people or even the nomadic hunter gatherers that still exist today? They weren't and aren't particularly stratified (ie hierarchical) societies and concepts like land ownership are basically non existent. They're pretty "anarchist" with the exception of maybe things like punitive justice existing in them (exiling or murdering people who commit in group violence within each tribe) which anarchists tend to be against
63 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-06-05
womp womp
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 error404brain 2019-06-05
Good point as always, snappy.
1 LightUmbra 2019-06-05
First, not drama fuck off.
Second, what is this from.
1 error404brain 2019-06-05
This is the state of the 40k+ drama.
https://twitter.com/HakonRotmwrt
1 BlastMyBussy 2019-06-05
Unironically based
1 AugustinesBitchBoy 2019-06-05
Imagine hating living so bad that you decide no one else should be living either. Because there's no possible way other people could be happy and if they are, they're wrong.
That's pretty based tbh
1 drama_unbanned 2019-06-05
I love it https://twitter.com/HakonRotmwrt/status/1133778937178337280
1 drama_unbanned 2019-06-05
1 moddestmouse 2019-06-05
One of the only reasons to have twitter
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
The fuck does this mean. And how does industrialized society make your chin recede, OP?
1 error404brain 2019-06-05
The industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race
Less asking question, more purging the industrialists.
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
anarchist primitivism is probably the most stupid extreme ideology you could have chosen
1 error404brain 2019-06-05
Your train of hate run on the rails of my indifference.
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
👍
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-06-05
I think you meant to say most based.
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
nah dawg
1 trexmundi 2019-06-05
Uncle Ted would like to know your mailing address.
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
Isnt uncle ted a diehard conservative
1 trexmundi 2019-06-05
He did not have nice things to say about conservatives.
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
Uncle Teds brain was rewired by the CIA so he really had nothing to say
1 TrailerParkBride 2019-06-05
https://pics.me.me/who-would-win-some-kind-of-orange-shape-anprim-who-22760934.png
1 ralphbrenting 2019-06-05
You have to use your mouth as a suckhole for air as your nose gets clogged due to pollution
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
There aint no pollution except in fuckin China
1 Slump_o 2019-06-05
Because our diets have strayed from meat which requires lots of chewing to soft foods. Humans have also sheltered themselves from natures resulting in a rise of allergies. This can often lead to poor breathing technique that is adopted for the rest of ones life and ruins bone structure.
1 to_pimp_a_butter_fly 2019-06-05
huh
1 Anatolianian 2019-06-05
Our diets haven't strayed from meat, we consume more meat today than at any point in history. The issue is that the meat we eat is processed and cooked, which means it takes no effort to chew it.
Although, most of this isn't really proven. Facial bone structure is 90% genetics, not like the Chad in your neighbourhood chewed raw meat as a kid.
1 whatintitnation 2019-06-05
Raw meat isn't hard to chew, probably easier since its still soft. Its quite likely that chewing does have a very strong influence on jaw definition. Search up 'mewing'.
1 searingsky 2019-06-05
mewing is the biggest cope ever
1 Anatolianian 2019-06-05
I know what mewing is, I browsed Lookism years ago. As someone who has been mewing for 2 years, it really hasn't done anything for me. My parents both have recessed facial bones, and so do I. I don't remember ever mouth breathing as a child, nor did my diet differ from Chad's.
The truth is that mouth breathing may effect facial forward growth, but the majority of people who are ugly are ugly because of their ancestors are ugly. Skulls from tens of thousands of years ago aren't all that different from today's skulls, some of them have perfect bones, but the majority of them have imperfections.
Also, there are people with narrow palates and recessed maxillas who are good looking, Henry Cavill and Brad Pitt for example.
1 whatintitnation 2019-06-05
Aww thats kind of sad I thought it was true.
1 F_t_M_t_F 2019-06-05
mewing is fucking retarded lol if you don't naturally get an attractive face then faking one is just lying
1 F_t_M_t_F 2019-06-05
mewing is fucking retarded.
1 smegmasmellsnice 2019-06-05
We've been cooking meat for 1-2 million years and Homo Habilis/Erectus etc had no chin at all. Homo Sapiens is the only animal species that has chins and we've always eaten cooked meat.
1 Anatolianian 2019-06-05
It's not about the chin, mewing and chewing are about dental palate, maxilla and jaw. Some dumb people think it can make their chin grow.
1 rDramaWorstsubreddit 2019-06-05
You can easily tell the difference between eurpeans amongst white people, africans amongst black people and chinks amongst american born chinese most of the time.
There is definitely more than 10% environmental impact.
1 Anatolianian 2019-06-05
What's your point? If a white dude grows up in Asia, he'll still be white. Those features are the product of natural selection, big noses for example are good in Africa because the air is humid, so people with bigger noses survived more often and had better chances of spreading their genes. It has nothing to do with environment directly shaping features, just natural selection influenced by environment through thousands of years.
1 Anatolianian 2019-06-05
You can maybe see it, but these differences are minor. If your ancestors have a weak jaw and recessed facial bones, it doesn't really matter where you grow up, you'll have those features.
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-06-05
Thats gotta be the most smoothbrain take ive ever heard of.
1 Slump_o 2019-06-05
you sound pretty foolish here. Do you even watch youtube?
1 F_t_M_t_F 2019-06-05
It's just as much total lack of physical activity and shitty nutrition. It's more than half not due to chewing.
this is def true though.
1 trilateral1 2019-06-05
soft food I guess? that's what they're trying to suggest
1 darth_stroyer 2019-06-05
cringe
based
1 SaxophoneSeax 2019-06-05
how can you be a primitivist without being an anarcho?
states didn't exist in the paleolithic times and if you think they did you'd have to be a mentally deficient ecofascist
1 darth_stroyer 2019-06-05
I think anarchy has some expectations baked into it, like 'no hierachies'. You could be a primitivist that recognises tribal/familial based 'governments' (very liberal with this term) as ideal.
1 SaxophoneSeax 2019-06-05
Anarchists are against states not governments, which is an important distinction insofar as you could define a town council in New England congregating to decide democratically what is the best course of action for a particular piece of public land---no anarchist is against that ---they basically want to decrease everything down to that, ie, increase the level of "direct democracy" in society (usually also implicit in that is socializing production/property)
Either way have you ever actually read about primitive people or even the nomadic hunter gatherers that still exist today? They weren't and aren't particularly stratified (ie hierarchical) societies and concepts like land ownership are basically non existent. They're pretty "anarchist" with the exception of maybe things like punitive justice existing in them (exiling or murdering people who commit in group violence within each tribe) which anarchists tend to be against
1 drama_unbanned 2019-06-05
Bearded old guy with no jaw line visible, old dude who is fully grown and small child who is still growing
NOW LET'S SEE WHICH AGENDA IS BEING PUSHED HERE
1 Anatolianian 2019-06-05
Not fair, grandaddy might be hiding his weak chin with a beard.
1 Lee13412 2019-06-05
Beardfraud
1 MikeStoklasaBackup 2019-06-05
🤪🤪🤪
1 error404brain 2019-06-05
Get an upvote for being a based gaullist.
1 MikeStoklasaBackup 2019-06-05
Only good type of conservatism.
1 Wheretheflowersgrew 2019-06-05
This makes me feel good, but dont do one about small genitals and a patchy beard. Thanks
1 janniesRfags 2019-06-05
Chad grandpa vs virgin 3rd grader
1 headhq 2019-06-05
not being a chinlet feels nice
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2019-06-05
Grandaddy Chad vs the virgin grandchild.
1 Where_are_from_cel 2019-06-05
This is what happens when your Chadpa settles for a non-Stacey. Needs a side-by-side of the mothers too.
1 lickedTators 2019-06-05
Gramps just has a forward combover and hides it with the turban.
1 shamooooooooo 2019-06-05
You can't use a kid if your are trying to prove a point here hahaha masucline jawlines and chins come out during puberty.
1 error404brain 2019-06-05
Industrialist chinless C O P E
1 trilateral1 2019-06-05
if you see a guy with a beard/comb-over, 30% chance he's chinless/balding.
1 melanchtonisbomb 2019-06-05
Pol Pot was right.
1 dramasexual 2019-06-05
These homies need to mew
1 IncelDesiMastermind 2019-06-05
Incelvolution