I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
Because YouTube realized the less reliable data available to the public, the less it had to deal with people realizing its algorithms facilitate softcore child porn.
hot take. algorithms promote similar content, softcore child pornography pretty fucking hard to eliminate, since context is the only separation between say a young girls gymnastics routine and some fuckin creeps spank bank material.
banning all content feature under 13s is probably the best bet, but like Coca cola you gotta get em young.
Tru but some people just scroll down pretty far and can be, on my Facebook I made my account like 55 yo but again Iโm not saying this is the reason just trying to be optimistic
It used to be the same on every video of some teenage girl dancing or whatever showing herself in some way. And no it wasn't dads helping their daughters or some fake account age because stuff like makeup tutorials would have viewer age ranges as you'd expect.
Also the girls were probably well aware of who was watching and just didn't care because suddenly they were receiving attention. Go to youtube now and there are channels everywhere of some underage girl doing weird fetishy shit with absolutely creepy comments underneath each video but hey free attention.
57 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-06-11
I am not sure which is more cringey, the litany of erroneous assumptions you splayed out or the act of calling upon the student archetype with the intent of derision. Anti-intellectualism, check. src
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 error404brain 2019-06-11
S E N T I M E N T S
1 McFluff_TheCrimeCat 2019-06-11
I'm going to choose to believe it's dads trying to help their daughters. ๐
1 MzCherryBlossom 2019-06-11
I hope so.
1 Pinksister 2019-06-11
Yeah, I'm sure that's it.
1 GattsuCascade 2019-06-11
Totally. Helping them... adjust their bras correctly. And honey, those panties are way too inappropriate to wear to school!
1 VanillaReign 2019-06-11
Whatever helps you sleep at night ๐ค
1 BeingofUniverse 2019-06-11
I do agree that it's probably dads of teenage girls.
1 CthuIhuhoop 2019-06-11
I emphasize with your cope
1 BeingofUniverse 2019-06-11
Think about it a little bit harder.
1 Psyman2 2019-06-11
Don't overestimate r/Drama. We're retarded.
1 BeingofUniverse 2019-06-11
Ok then, I was implying daddy was a pervert, happy?
1 CthuIhuhoop 2019-06-11
I don't like thinking. only feeling, sweaty.
1 SpiceAndEvNice 2019-06-11
This is some SRD level posting. This shit is hilarious. Sick and ew and everything but hilarious.
1 RichEvansSexbot 2019-06-11
Dads who happen to write for Ars Technica
1 charming_tatum 2019-06-11
Most pedophilia is kept within the family so you're probably right
1 stripperjnasty 2019-06-11
Lol good luck with that
1 5000yearoldragon 2019-06-11
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2019-06-11
When did they remove that feature?
1 elephantofdoom 2019-06-11
Because YouTube realized the less reliable data available to the public, the less it had to deal with people realizing its algorithms facilitate softcore child porn.
1 oPLABleC 2019-06-11
hot take. algorithms promote similar content, softcore child pornography pretty fucking hard to eliminate, since context is the only separation between say a young girls gymnastics routine and some fuckin creeps spank bank material.
banning all content feature under 13s is probably the best bet, but like Coca cola you gotta get em young.
1 CaptainCruden 2019-06-11
You should look up the definition of soft core porn. Either way hope this isnโt true and just a bunch of kids who put in the wrong birthdays.
1 old_grumpy_grandpa 2019-06-11
Google makes money off of collecting data and then using it to deliver ads, and the data loses value the more it's shared.
1 MetaReplyGirl 2019-06-11
You're trying to pass off a 2 year old meme...shameful
1 error404brain 2019-06-11
holy fuck what is that cancerous page, ahahaha.
1 Jidi_Isle 2019-06-11
Still relevant though ๐
1 ModPiracy_Fantoski 2019-06-11
Flair checks out.
1 XhotwheelsloverX 2019-06-11
The video was from 2011 you retard
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-06-11
that means she's probably legal by now
1 stripperjnasty 2019-06-11
๐๐๐๐
1 Cosmic___Viper 2019-06-11
Iโm not saying this is the reason but it could be some younger kids who when they made their account they lied about their age.
1 suckeroni 2019-06-11
Theyโd make themselves like 20 not a senior citizen
1 tramasa 2019-06-11
I doubt they do the math, they just pick a year from the scroll down.
1 The_White_Light 2019-06-11
I always pretended to be born in 1969 because 69 ayy lmao
1 wellhellotherefellas 2019-06-11
When I was 10, I said my age was 50.
1 lickedTators 2019-06-11
See, I told the FBI you were 50 too but they still arrested me
1 wellhellotherefellas 2019-06-11
I'll help you out of jail
1 PM_ME_UR_SUSPICIONS 2019-06-11
I tell people I'm ten years older than I actually am to enjoy their astonished praise about how youthful I am. It's fun.
1 bussylmao 2019-06-11
I always made myself as old as possible
1 JohnStuart_Shill 2019-06-11
you think a kid is going to do the mental math to make you 20?
Nah, scroll to the bottom and click the last year
1 dramanot 2019-06-11
Then why are they also lying about their gender and why are the adult age groups the only ones doing it?
1 OnionBits 2019-06-11
COPE harder Puritan, these old men want themselves some CUNNY
1 RichEvansSexbot 2019-06-11
I was born on January 1st, 1900 and you cannot prove otherwise
1 ronkemus 2019-06-11
Steam has no problem believing that I am 119 years old.
1 Cosmic___Viper 2019-06-11
Tru but some people just scroll down pretty far and can be, on my Facebook I made my account like 55 yo but again Iโm not saying this is the reason just trying to be optimistic
1 DongleYourFongles 2019-06-11
Oh my god, the poor girl doesn't even know...
1 EtecaEteca 2019-06-11
Beep
1 EtecaEteca 2019-06-11
Sp
1 fuckedupridiculant 2019-06-11
It used to be the same on every video of some teenage girl dancing or whatever showing herself in some way. And no it wasn't dads helping their daughters or some fake account age because stuff like makeup tutorials would have viewer age ranges as you'd expect.
Also the girls were probably well aware of who was watching and just didn't care because suddenly they were receiving attention. Go to youtube now and there are channels everywhere of some underage girl doing weird fetishy shit with absolutely creepy comments underneath each video but hey free attention.
1 ashzeppelin98 2019-06-11
How much I miss this YouTube layout.
1 fibreartistic 2019-06-11
Oh
Oh
Oh god no
1 5000yearoldragon 2019-06-11
Imagine being super woke and going to your high paying google job not being evil all the while helping the cartels traffic children
1 herpaderp336699 2019-06-11
Imagine the employee discounts.
1 error404brain 2019-06-11
They just help their parents trafficing their children, which is based and NAP pilled.
1 CaptainCruden 2019-06-11
I mean my google account says it 250 something but that doesnโt mean itโs true.
1 Zanzivius 2019-06-11
Okie
1 [deleted] 2019-06-11
[removed]