This might come as a shock to you, but I do not care about your opinions, your ignorance or failure to comprehend the research, or what you believe. The only thing I care about, and I can not stress this enough, is what the empirical research says. And it says you are wrong.
Your personal opinion? worth as much as a pile of dog shit on the sidewalk to me. That is the absolute extent to which I care about what you think. This is where I stopped reading. I do not entertain the economic illiteracy of far leftists or far right-wing tards.
Both are equally misinformed on average, both are failures.
And then when you find yourself in a different argument with him and you already know how racist and sexist he is (takes one to know one ayyyylmao), he pretends he's not because he's that addicted to "winning" internet arguments.
It's become to eerily similar to how Goebbels and Hitler described the Jew.
I'm honestly convinced you're trolling with that libel shit. Only in the most tortured reading possible can you claim your argument makes any sense in the context of what I was saying.
I honestly think you just didn't read anything, tried to sound smart, lost, and are now doubling down on it.
The NYT knowingly publishing false and damaging things about DJT is libel, is not protected by the 1A, but practically, is a too expensive and drawn-out endeavor to pursue realistically.
If you really want to rub on your Trump hate boner this morning, go after his bullshit flag burning idea in regards to trashing the 1A, but acting like the NYT is immune from committing libel is some Reddit-tier legal counsel.
The NYT knowingly publishing false and damaging things about DJT is libel, is not protected by the 1A, but practically, is a too expensive and drawn-out endeavor to pursue realistically.
When did the NYT publish false things about DJT, knowingly?
If you really want to rub on your Trump hate boner this morning, go after his bullshit flag burning idea in regards to trashing the 1A, but acting like the NYT is immune from committing libel is some Reddit-tier legal counsel.
Nobody ever said NYT was immune to libel, are you actually just illiterate?
I was going to explain how trial isn’t going to happen because Trump hasn’t even filed charges over it (to my knowledge) but frankly, this is exhausting and a perfect example of why my profession charges in incremental billable hours.
There will be no trial because Trump knows he has not a leg to stand on, which is why he's constantly reeing about libel laws.
Honestly, my good man bussy, this would have been over had you just admitted I was right and not tried to argue with me when it's just very blatant I'm right.
So if they were willing to after the daily mail, it's pretty obvious they'll go after someone if they think they can prove actual malice. They want nothing to do with the NYT, because they know the NYT will bend them right over.
How are you going to link a news article to a case that demonstrates the exact opposite of what you’ve been screeching about for 12 hours? Really dude?
He lost the argument. He has bias for black people he doesn’t go to the hood at night. He won’t loan his xbox to a black friend. He knows that. He realizes it’s only human experience that causes blacks to not trust other blacks. He just had to save face anywhere he could by ending the conversation by calling me coon face.
Imagine looking in the mirror to attempt to convince yourself your the cool kids while simultaneously being on the side of white 40 year old Karen’s that tattle to managers when the low paid workers don’t do what mommy wants.
Yeah no, that's not the impression of that discussion that I got out of it. You guys apparently don't like people that use bug words or type a lot because it confuses you and/or your lazy, and it reveals how pathetic you rightiods are.
I mean you're shaking his cage beautifully there, but if your argument was that the NYTs high powered lawyers on retainer allowed the paper to print libelous materials on anyone, let alone in the most covered person in the US, who threatens litigation as his main tool, is Daddy-O-Vison 8000 with Platinum GIGAcope preinstalled.
I don’t think it’s up to their lawyers to decide what to print or not, but what I’m saying is that libel isn’t protected under the 1A, and that Mr Pizza esq is doing everything in his power to demonstrate that he didn’t understand this until he went on his Wikipedia-spree.
To my knowledge daddy hasn’t filed charges against the NYT over libel, so it’s not like P’s understanding of malice would even apply yet.
Pizzashill's right about some things, but the way he sperg posts about them is so insufferable, I find myself disagreeing out of pure spite. Also his inability to take even the tamest criticism borders on psychotic.
Im a brainlet but it seriously took me like ten minutes to figure out that libel argument. I think pizza is probably correct, but he is using libel informally, which is what i think seattle bussy is focusing on for some reason. Lawyer autism maybe.
It doesn't matter what the arguement is about, or who is right. Pizza will literally never let someone have the last word, and he will never admit he is wrong. He erodes people's spirit with his unhinged rants. When youre finally tired of reading his incredibly long posts and stop responding, he will claim it as another internet argument won. His system is completely unbeatable, because he has more time and autism than whoever he's talking to. He is the avatar of keyboard warriors everywhere. Their Patron saint.
He ironically reminds me of the right wing 40 year olds I knew when I was 18 and working retail. They listened to talk radio and just knew the exact way to fix every problem in America. From energy policy to complex legal arguments about commerce, they knew EVERYTHING. They not only knew enough on all these wide-ranging and difficult topics, but they were incredibly sure of themselves, to the point of dismissing even mild doubts about their ideas as delusional brainwashed retardation.
It never seemed to enter their heads that a top 1% knowledgeable and persuasive person like they considered themselves to be would probably be doing better on nearly all fronts in life than they were. Especially because one thing that almost all these people have in common is they have any number of personality/social disorders and an incredibly chaotic personal life. For them, I think having all these "answers" about infrastructure reform in Wyoming (or whatever new kick they were on) gives them some morsel of power/control/understanding about the world that they can't muster over their own lives.
It never seemed to enter their heads that a top 1% knowledgeable and persuasive person like they considered themselves to be would probably be doing better on nearly all fronts in life than they were.
that's definitely pizzashill lol. dude comes on here with long, thousand-word seriousposts about how we need to fix domestic oil gauging and random shit like that
but anyone intelligent enough to solve problems that complex should not even visit this subreddit, much less be here 24/7 like he is.
What I’m saying is if you look at the lineage of your people they have dark kinky hair and large eyebrow ridge because of the many many generations they were enslaved and inner bred with blacks. I mean it’s obvious we are essentially the same race.
The Mongoloid is actually stemming from the step of Asia. It comes from the term Mongolian. The Mongolians leader ghenghis kahn raped almost a million women many modern day Greeks actually were also succumb to the mass of invading forces. Similar to the moor years. To this day 60% of Asians come from ghenghis Kahn. You can see it in their flat faces and high ridge flat cone shape in the back of their head. Very similar to your facial structure.
Do you know what the term biased means? It doesn't mean that black people don't have higher crime rates, it means that black people are treated differently by the justice system
I'd like to buy some apples.
Sure, but buying apple depends if you are willing to buy oranges, too.
Can you imagine how smart blacks would be if whites just let them read during the 400 years of slavery? We’d have minority report computers and black invented flying space cars. All we got was peanut butter sandwiches instead.
107 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-06-17
This might come as a shock to you, but I do not care about your opinions, your ignorance or failure to comprehend the research, or what you believe. The only thing I care about, and I can not stress this enough, is what the empirical research says. And it says you are wrong.
Your personal opinion? worth as much as a pile of dog shit on the sidewalk to me. That is the absolute extent to which I care about what you think. This is where I stopped reading. I do not entertain the economic illiteracy of far leftists or far right-wing tards.
Both are equally misinformed on average, both are failures.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
He’s so racist against black people. The moment I told him I was half black he kept calling me dumb nigger
1 voice_of_ukraine 2019-06-17
is he wrong though? 🤔🤔🤔
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
you’re certainly dumb
1 pok8 2019-06-17
which half?
1 BernieMadeoffSanders 2019-06-17
a broken clock...
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-06-17
Dude he was calling you dumb because you admitted to being part mayo
1 eva_remastered 2019-06-17
and sexist.
And then when you find yourself in a different argument with him and you already know how racist and sexist he is (takes one to know one ayyyylmao), he pretends he's not because he's that addicted to "winning" internet arguments.
It's become to eerily similar to how Goebbels and Hitler described the Jew.
1 Alicesnakebae 2019-06-17
He's not wrong about you bud
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
He’s on a real “lawyer” kick today, here he is making a claim and coping hard when called out on it
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
I'm honestly convinced you're trolling with that libel shit. Only in the most tortured reading possible can you claim your argument makes any sense in the context of what I was saying.
I honestly think you just didn't read anything, tried to sound smart, lost, and are now doubling down on it.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
The NYT knowingly publishing false and damaging things about DJT is libel, is not protected by the 1A, but practically, is a too expensive and drawn-out endeavor to pursue realistically.
If you really want to rub on your Trump hate boner this morning, go after his bullshit flag burning idea in regards to trashing the 1A, but acting like the NYT is immune from committing libel is some Reddit-tier legal counsel.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
When did the NYT publish false things about DJT, knowingly?
Nobody ever said NYT was immune to libel, are you actually just illiterate?
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
Considering it hasn’t gone to trial yet, it’s not like you can say either way
Now, it’s Monday dude. Time to go out and get money and better yourself
1 [deleted] 2019-06-17
[deleted]
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
It won't go to trial, that's why Trump was "looking at the 1st amendment."
They were under the impression they could change the 1st amendment and "open up libel laws" meaning remove actual malice standard.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
I was going to explain how trial isn’t going to happen because Trump hasn’t even filed charges over it (to my knowledge) but frankly, this is exhausting and a perfect example of why my profession charges in incremental billable hours.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
There will be no trial because Trump knows he has not a leg to stand on, which is why he's constantly reeing about libel laws.
Honestly, my good man bussy, this would have been over had you just admitted I was right and not tried to argue with me when it's just very blatant I'm right.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
I honestly have no words, Pizza. Take care.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
Use your brain bussy, you're a smart guy.
Trump constantly rees about libel laws.
Trump admin talks about going after the 1st amendment to open up libel laws and remove actual malice standards.
Trump isn't trying to sue them. When they've sued other people: https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/04/12/523581249/melania-trump-and-the-daily-mail-settle-libel-lawsuits
So if they were willing to after the daily mail, it's pretty obvious they'll go after someone if they think they can prove actual malice. They want nothing to do with the NYT, because they know the NYT will bend them right over.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
How are you going to link a news article to a case that demonstrates the exact opposite of what you’ve been screeching about for 12 hours? Really dude?
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
I'm honestly confused here, what exactly do you think my argument was?
1 oPLABleC 2019-06-17
fuckin hell dude do you ever post less than a novel?
1 BernieMadeoffSanders 2019-06-17
TL;DR
1 oscarfacegamble 2019-06-17
Can you address the racially inferior comment you made though? Were you just using their own arguments against them or?
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-06-17
The guy admitted to being part mayo and thus is racially inferior due to that mayo heritage. At least I assume that's what pizza was going for.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Oh he wasn’t scroll up
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-06-17
Disappointing. I thought pizza was redpilled on the mayo question.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
When debating who’s more racist. You take the side of the white guy who loves blacks over the black guy that loves whites?
And you are surprised when the white guy says this.
Sounds like you actually paid attention in gender African studies class at clown college.
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-06-17
I wouldn't be gloating too much if I were you. You managed to come out of that argument looking more retarded than pizzashill lol
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Yeah it’s super fun to be all pro black male from moms basement in your gated community
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
He lost the argument. He has bias for black people he doesn’t go to the hood at night. He won’t loan his xbox to a black friend. He knows that. He realizes it’s only human experience that causes blacks to not trust other blacks. He just had to save face anywhere he could by ending the conversation by calling me coon face.
1 Matues49 2019-06-17
shoo, CAnimal
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
Back to CTH
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Imagine looking in the mirror to attempt to convince yourself your the cool kids while simultaneously being on the side of white 40 year old Karen’s that tattle to managers when the low paid workers don’t do what mommy wants.
1 oscarfacegamble 2019-06-17
Yeah no, that's not the impression of that discussion that I got out of it. You guys apparently don't like people that use bug words or type a lot because it confuses you and/or your lazy, and it reveals how pathetic you rightiods are.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-06-17
I mean you're shaking his cage beautifully there, but if your argument was that the NYTs high powered lawyers on retainer allowed the paper to print libelous materials on anyone, let alone in the most covered person in the US, who threatens litigation as his main tool, is Daddy-O-Vison 8000 with Platinum GIGAcope preinstalled.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
I don’t think it’s up to their lawyers to decide what to print or not, but what I’m saying is that libel isn’t protected under the 1A, and that Mr Pizza esq is doing everything in his power to demonstrate that he didn’t understand this until he went on his Wikipedia-spree.
To my knowledge daddy hasn’t filed charges against the NYT over libel, so it’s not like P’s understanding of malice would even apply yet.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-06-17
Haha fair play then
1 TheDarthJeb 2019-06-17
Pizzashill's right about some things, but the way he sperg posts about them is so insufferable, I find myself disagreeing out of pure spite. Also his inability to take even the tamest criticism borders on psychotic.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-17
He’s pretty pathetic tbh. I’ve met other “men” like him. In a sane society they’d be hunted down.
1 NathansFamousDogpill 2019-06-17
Im a brainlet but it seriously took me like ten minutes to figure out that libel argument. I think pizza is probably correct, but he is using libel informally, which is what i think seattle bussy is focusing on for some reason. Lawyer autism maybe.
1 TheDarthJeb 2019-06-17
It doesn't matter what the arguement is about, or who is right. Pizza will literally never let someone have the last word, and he will never admit he is wrong. He erodes people's spirit with his unhinged rants. When youre finally tired of reading his incredibly long posts and stop responding, he will claim it as another internet argument won. His system is completely unbeatable, because he has more time and autism than whoever he's talking to. He is the avatar of keyboard warriors everywhere. Their Patron saint.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
I admit I'm wrong when I'm wrong. I'm just not wrong that often.
1 Matues49 2019-06-17
Based
1 BernieMadeoffSanders 2019-06-17
And notwrong-pilled
1 ShieldmaidenMathilda 2019-06-17
*never. I love u pizza 😘😘😘
Give me ur baby 😍😛😛
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
Pojo has dibs, sorry.
1 ShieldmaidenMathilda 2019-06-17
Yang-senpai 😭😭😭
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
when arguing with le enlightened ethno nationalists it’s not hard to be right. Even an autist like pizza can btfo rightards
1 TheDarthJeb 2019-06-17
Completely agree. I was speaking in more general terms, like the topic of foids.
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
those were simpler times when foids were pizzas most heated debate topic 😢
1 eva_remastered 2019-06-17
cope
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
you again
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-17
Succinct and accurate-pilled
1 BernieMadeoffSanders 2019-06-17
Considering he's on /r/drama that's really saying something too
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-06-17
I'd describe it as Hurculean, in fact. He's truly the Padashah to our Vizyers in that department.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-06-17
He ironically reminds me of the right wing 40 year olds I knew when I was 18 and working retail. They listened to talk radio and just knew the exact way to fix every problem in America. From energy policy to complex legal arguments about commerce, they knew EVERYTHING. They not only knew enough on all these wide-ranging and difficult topics, but they were incredibly sure of themselves, to the point of dismissing even mild doubts about their ideas as delusional brainwashed retardation.
It never seemed to enter their heads that a top 1% knowledgeable and persuasive person like they considered themselves to be would probably be doing better on nearly all fronts in life than they were. Especially because one thing that almost all these people have in common is they have any number of personality/social disorders and an incredibly chaotic personal life. For them, I think having all these "answers" about infrastructure reform in Wyoming (or whatever new kick they were on) gives them some morsel of power/control/understanding about the world that they can't muster over their own lives.
1 GeauxHouston22 2019-06-17
that's definitely pizzashill lol. dude comes on here with long, thousand-word seriousposts about how we need to fix domestic oil gauging and random shit like that
but anyone intelligent enough to solve problems that complex should not even visit this subreddit, much less be here 24/7 like he is.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
This is just outright false. I never even talk about things I don't understand, most certainly not stuff like that.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Just an FYI Greek people were enslaved by blacks (the moors) for a lot than 400 years.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
Last I checked, you're racially inferior and thus I do not have to listen to anything you say.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
We’re the same race
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
No, you are racially inferior to myself.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
We’re both part black though.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
No.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
What I’m saying is if you look at the lineage of your people they have dark kinky hair and large eyebrow ridge because of the many many generations they were enslaved and inner bred with blacks. I mean it’s obvious we are essentially the same race.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
No. You're a mongrel.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
The Mongoloid is actually stemming from the step of Asia. It comes from the term Mongolian. The Mongolians leader ghenghis kahn raped almost a million women many modern day Greeks actually were also succumb to the mass of invading forces. Similar to the moor years. To this day 60% of Asians come from ghenghis Kahn. You can see it in their flat faces and high ridge flat cone shape in the back of their head. Very similar to your facial structure.
https://images.app.goo.gl/ZwYFKa8B9knTTuvJ6
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
I'm European bud, nice try.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Greeks are the niggers of Europe.
1 yangpede 2019-06-17
I'm not Greek.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
You have a distinct Southern European soft facial features.
1 ElonMuskarr 2019-06-17
Then why do you look so brown lol
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
He’s really mad about having that classic incel jaw line.
1 uniqueguy263 2019-06-17
So pizza’s a direct descendant of Genghis Khan? Apple fell far from the tree
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Everyone wonders why women like rape or why men like to rape I think it’s partially genetically attributed to ghenghis Kahn and Vikings
1 uniqueguy263 2019-06-17
I always knew you could embrace your inner Nazi
1 OwMyBenis 2019-06-17
I don't have a dog in this fight but..
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moors
The Moors were Arabs and the Turks (who are Asian) are the ones who enslaved/conquered the greeks.
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-06-17
No, that was very clearly the Moops.
1 Matues49 2019-06-17
Lots of unironic rightoids on r/Drama lately 👀 Did some containment sub get the hammer lately?
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-06-17
Drama has been festering an infection since mde got the boot. The jannies are powerless rite nao
1 SJCards 2019-06-17
Jannies rise up! ✊✊
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
you can tell because you meet half black le 50%ers arguing that white people are oppressed by the law
1 GeauxHouston22 2019-06-17
/> lately
oh sweaty
1 eva_remastered 2019-06-17
lol cry about it
1 Matues49 2019-06-17
rent-free
1 eva_remastered 2019-06-17
yes that is what me and my ideology pay to live in your head
1 Matues49 2019-06-17
😂😂😂
1 centrist_btw 2019-06-17
> u n i r o n i c / r / p o l i t i c s p o s t e r
1 MikeStoklasaBackup 2019-06-17
Horrifyingly based
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
right wingers must have brains less functional then the 70 iq Kenyans they love bitching about.
1 eva_remastered 2019-06-17
another cope
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
you’re a loser who attaches to meme ideologies because you have no sense of belonging. Your entire account is cope about that.
1 eva_remastered 2019-06-17
seethe
1 Slump_o 2019-06-17
😴😴😴
1 AHealthySenseofDread 2019-06-17
Have sex
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-06-17
wait, who out of those two is supposed to be the racist one?
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-06-17
Both and none
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
I’m not racist I told you I’m half black
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-06-17
That's what the none's for
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-06-17
Another mega argument
1 newcomer_ts 2019-06-17
I'd like to buy some apples.
Sure, but buying apple depends if you are willing to buy oranges, too.
But I don't want oranges.
Ok, no apples for you then.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Can you imagine how smart blacks would be if whites just let them read during the 400 years of slavery? We’d have minority report computers and black invented flying space cars. All we got was peanut butter sandwiches instead.
1 SJCards 2019-06-17
We're really blessed to have pizza amongst us in these dire moments sans pinging.
1 JustLions 2019-06-17
Stop fucking downvoting the lolcows. Pizzashill (yangpede) is a lolcow.
1 ChineseExecutionVan 2019-06-17
Pizzas a different breed the downvotes actually make him try harder. As long as he never gives up we are good.