People with PCOS who are too fat to defend themselves or run away are fun to abuse. I like to take a spoon, heat it up until it's glowing hot, then place it on the skin while they're asleep. The reaction when they wake up after the 25th time of being burned by a redhot piece of metal is amazing. You can literally piecemeal their mental stability down to complete insanity, then leave them in their own homes helpless and alone. :DDDDDDDDDD
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
I linked to 4 separate studies from hospital systems in different states in the US that showed pitbulls are ICKY. Was told that the sources were biased. Literally links to medical journals. The issue is a couple of those same studies had been linked in a anti-pitbull website, so of course they can't be trusted.
There was the study from a sociologist at Brown university about autism and transgenders that was peer reviewed by a research journal and reddit lost its collective shit about "bad sampling"
Oh, you linked to a peer reviewed study done by post docs at Harvard? Well the sample size is too small and correlation does not equal causation and they probably forgot to account for something that I just thought of in the 15 seconds I spent reading the abstract
If the source says something that reddit doesn’t agree with then it gets scrutinized to hell and back. If it is something they do agree with then it is considered an unassailable matter of fact.
I remember one time someone got mad on worldnews or something that a rightard posted like 10 primary source polls about Western Muslim attitudes. The person who argued against direct pdf links from Gallup and so forth didn't counter the sources, but said that his interlocutor PROBABLY got them from a bigoted site like religionofpeace.com.
What do you mean the sky is blue? I'm gonna need a source for that sweaty. Look out my window? Fuck you lmao the onus of proof is on the one making wild claims, how about you give me a source instead of telling me to look out my window.
I pray every day that someone does that to me in person so I can open hand smack them in the mouth and enjoy the terrified “oh no this is real life” look on their face.
Everyone likes to pretend they’re some fucking scientist who only get their opinions from FACTS and LOGIC. “Bias? Ha, not me m’lady. I don’t even believe in God cause I worship the almighty FACTS and LOGIC.” Back in my retarded days, I used to make an effort to source shit, but it becomes a laughably retarded effort because no matter who it was, they always dismiss shit that is inconvenient with some made up logical fallacy they read about on Wikipedia.
If you want to be master of these retards, get a STEM degree and pretend like you’re a researcher. You could tell them obviously retarded shit like men aren’t stronger than women or communist Russia was actually a good place to live and they’d probably quote you to their friends and preface every sentence with “well my friend who is a scientist says....”
People are obsessed with logical fallacies, but they should really look up the term “thought-stopping cliche”
TBF European immigration has a worldwide impact. Europe and the USA/Canada are the pillars of the world. The worse they get, the worse the world gets. Immigrants usually don't improve things (just ask the Native Americans), so it's right to be concerned.
lol Europe's a continent full of irrelevant dying countries clinging to their glory days, we should only care about their politics for drama and so we can smugly say "I told you so" when they inevitably start fighting each other again over the narcissism of small differences.
Europe isn't really a pillar of the world any longer. Germany matters but China is by far the 2nd most important country to the US now. Their GDP is the only one close to the US and obviously they have 1.4 billion people.
GDP isn't everything, though. Europe is civilized. Only North America, Europe, Australia and the islands around it, and a couple countries in Asia are also civilized. Ergo I think it's important we preserve Europe.
Everyone on that continent with two braincells to rub together and a functioning spine moved out over the course of the last 200 years, why exactly should we be invested in making sure the preening, self-important morons still there don't sudoku their countries via mass migration?
Because then that's a whole continent of civilization that gets wiped out. There aren't a lot of civilized countries in the world, preserving the few there are is important, just for civilization's sake.
It's been my experience backpacking Europe twice like a good Millennial that Canadians like to talk to you about American politics. They always have helpful policy suggestions.
I made the mistake of looking at some of the sources claims by that idiot on some gun control thread I think it was. None of the shit she sourced actually even claimed what she said it did, or KIND of claimed what she said, but then the overall message of the source actually refuted the argument she was making.
Poppincream pretty much googles the argument they are making, takes the first few news sources that pop up, and posts and cites them. No one bothers to actually fact check and look into the sources she links to.
thing with poppinkream is that he just lists a series of events and spams a bunch of links, and lets people fill in the blanks to think they're somehow connected. morons eat it up
I think that's pretty awful on all fronts. If you have properly sourced info that goes counter to what is being argued, you have a civic duty to educate people about the facts surrounding the opposing view.
Imagine taking reddit seriously enough where you throw around sentences like “civic duty to educate.” Reddit is serious fucking business and definitely not a shitposting forum for shitty memes, mentally ill chapos, Qultists, boomers and cat gifs.
53 comments
1 AutoModerator 2019-06-20
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SnapshillBot 2019-06-20
People with PCOS who are too fat to defend themselves or run away are fun to abuse. I like to take a spoon, heat it up until it's glowing hot, then place it on the skin while they're asleep. The reaction when they wake up after the 25th time of being burned by a redhot piece of metal is amazing. You can literally piecemeal their mental stability down to complete insanity, then leave them in their own homes helpless and alone. :DDDDDDDDDD
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 ExtremeNutFlavor 2019-06-20
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
1 _dude_jussy_lmao_ 2019-06-20
T H I S
1 newcomer_ts 2019-06-20
What's the sauce of this pasta?
1 donkquadroon 2019-06-20
MDE
1 big_papa_stiffy 2019-06-20
its like feeding kids foods they think they dont like lmao
1 SideFumbling 2019-06-20
>when u put peas and broccoli in the mac n cheese
1 Peytons_5head 2019-06-20
Sorry, this is wrong. It should go:
Source? I need a source?
Oh, that source is biased.
1 nybbas 2019-06-20
I linked to 4 separate studies from hospital systems in different states in the US that showed pitbulls are ICKY. Was told that the sources were biased. Literally links to medical journals. The issue is a couple of those same studies had been linked in a anti-pitbull website, so of course they can't be trusted.
1 Peytons_5head 2019-06-20
There was the study from a sociologist at Brown university about autism and transgenders that was peer reviewed by a research journal and reddit lost its collective shit about "bad sampling"
Like okay you spergs (literally) know better
1 nsfwcelebnsfw 2019-06-20
Oh, you linked to a peer reviewed study done by post docs at Harvard? Well the sample size is too small and correlation does not equal causation and they probably forgot to account for something that I just thought of in the 15 seconds I spent reading the abstract
1 -SaltineAmerican- 2019-06-20
If the source says something that reddit doesn’t agree with then it gets scrutinized to hell and back. If it is something they do agree with then it is considered an unassailable matter of fact.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-06-20
I remember one time someone got mad on worldnews or something that a rightard posted like 10 primary source polls about Western Muslim attitudes. The person who argued against direct pdf links from Gallup and so forth didn't counter the sources, but said that his interlocutor PROBABLY got them from a bigoted site like religionofpeace.com.
1 allendrio 2019-06-20
thats because 90% of the time DDF do actually manage to link a source its yournewswire
1 ScroblertMoblert 2019-06-20
What do you mean the sky is blue? I'm gonna need a source for that sweaty. Look out my window? Fuck you lmao the onus of proof is on the one making wild claims, how about you give me a source instead of telling me to look out my window.
1 loli_esports 2019-06-20
WHERE ARE THE PROOFS?
1 newcomer_ts 2019-06-20
and
... are probably the most retarded counter arguments on Reddit and anyone using those should be banned or jailed.
I'm only surprised the other guy had patience to indulge a psycho.
1 _dude_jussy_lmao_ 2019-06-20
can you imagine if we let pizzashill loose on the rest of reddit. master debaters wouldnt know what hit them!!
1 UhmThatsAYikesSweaty 2019-06-20
please find him and make him do this
pls
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2019-06-20
Are you a debatelet? Of course the onus is on the person making the claims. Otherwise you're getting into "not my job to educate you" territory.
1 newcomer_ts 2019-06-20
You have some cite for that?
You couldn't find tiniest straw to build that man?
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2019-06-20
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burdenof_proof(philosophy)
1 amanrobbedofhisdrama 2019-06-20
You’re retarded. Prove me wrong faggot
1 newcomer_ts 2019-06-20
Circular logic there, bud...
1 GeauxHouston22 2019-06-20
hol up playa watch the way you talk about my boy bean shapiro
1 donkquadroon 2019-06-20
I pray every day that someone does that to me in person so I can open hand smack them in the mouth and enjoy the terrified “oh no this is real life” look on their face.
1 MiltonFriedmanisbae1 2019-06-20
Everyone likes to pretend they’re some fucking scientist who only get their opinions from FACTS and LOGIC. “Bias? Ha, not me m’lady. I don’t even believe in God cause I worship the almighty FACTS and LOGIC.” Back in my retarded days, I used to make an effort to source shit, but it becomes a laughably retarded effort because no matter who it was, they always dismiss shit that is inconvenient with some made up logical fallacy they read about on Wikipedia.
If you want to be master of these retards, get a STEM degree and pretend like you’re a researcher. You could tell them obviously retarded shit like men aren’t stronger than women or communist Russia was actually a good place to live and they’d probably quote you to their friends and preface every sentence with “well my friend who is a scientist says....”
People are obsessed with logical fallacies, but they should really look up the term “thought-stopping cliche”
1 diggity_md 2019-06-20
I gave up good faith argumentation a long while ago and replaced it with Ram Ranch lyrics and Billy Herrington quotes
1 LaptopEnforcer 2019-06-20
18 NAKED COWBOYS IN THE SHOWERS AT RAM RANCH
1 SideFumbling 2019-06-20
And here you go again with the tarted-up strumpet fallacy again! Ugh, I cannot stand you rightoids.
1 MiltonFriedmanisbae1 2019-06-20
Wow can you even see right through that boogie woogie toot n fruity argument?
1 loli_esports 2019-06-20
Why would you need a stem degree to say you're a scientist?
1 le_epic_xd_part_2 2019-06-20
I NEED A SOURCE FOR YOUR PERSONAL OPINION
1 EasySchmitty 2019-06-20
Pretty pathetic, on par with rightoids who obsess over European immigration policy.
1 ScroblertMoblert 2019-06-20
TBF European immigration has a worldwide impact. Europe and the USA/Canada are the pillars of the world. The worse they get, the worse the world gets. Immigrants usually don't improve things (just ask the Native Americans), so it's right to be concerned.
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-06-20
lol Europe's a continent full of irrelevant dying countries clinging to their glory days, we should only care about their politics for drama and so we can smugly say "I told you so" when they inevitably start fighting each other again over the narcissism of small differences.
1 Fletch71011 2019-06-20
Europe isn't really a pillar of the world any longer. Germany matters but China is by far the 2nd most important country to the US now. Their GDP is the only one close to the US and obviously they have 1.4 billion people.
1 ScroblertMoblert 2019-06-20
GDP isn't everything, though. Europe is civilized. Only North America, Europe, Australia and the islands around it, and a couple countries in Asia are also civilized. Ergo I think it's important we preserve Europe.
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-06-20
Everyone on that continent with two braincells to rub together and a functioning spine moved out over the course of the last 200 years, why exactly should we be invested in making sure the preening, self-important morons still there don't sudoku their countries via mass migration?
1 ScroblertMoblert 2019-06-20
Because then that's a whole continent of civilization that gets wiped out. There aren't a lot of civilized countries in the world, preserving the few there are is important, just for civilization's sake.
1 big_papa_stiffy 2019-06-20
better fill it with raping africans then its the only solution
1 911roofer 2019-06-20
Raping muslims. They're not all African.
1 big_papa_stiffy 2019-06-20
oh yeah cant forget those guys they really contribute their fair share
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-06-20
It's been my experience backpacking Europe twice like a good Millennial that Canadians like to talk to you about American politics. They always have helpful policy suggestions.
1 satanismyhomeboy 2019-06-20
I member when karma whores like I-RAPE-CATS got their karma from jokes about hatefucking your mom
How boring this site has become
1 ResistingDaddyDrumpf 2019-06-20
The popular page is just:
Blumpf
Blumpf
Made up story
Blumpf
Black guy doing something
Picture of my mom I want you to jerk off to
Blumpf
Gamer shit
Commie shit
Blumpf
Tweet about a “wholesome” story with the word “y’all” used somewhere
Capeshit news
Even more Blumpf
1 nybbas 2019-06-20
I made the mistake of looking at some of the sources claims by that idiot on some gun control thread I think it was. None of the shit she sourced actually even claimed what she said it did, or KIND of claimed what she said, but then the overall message of the source actually refuted the argument she was making.
Poppincream pretty much googles the argument they are making, takes the first few news sources that pop up, and posts and cites them. No one bothers to actually fact check and look into the sources she links to.
1 nomad1c 2019-06-20
thing with poppinkream is that he just lists a series of events and spams a bunch of links, and lets people fill in the blanks to think they're somehow connected. morons eat it up
1 Strictlybutters 2019-06-20
Imagine taking reddit seriously enough where you throw around sentences like “civic duty to educate.” Reddit is serious fucking business and definitely not a shitposting forum for shitty memes, mentally ill chapos, Qultists, boomers and cat gifs.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-06-20
They are shot on sight, I believe.
1 d-amazo 2019-06-20
lol that PoppinKREAM dude literally does nothing but post his own posts to a subreddit dedicated to the things he has already said
i think that's the more entertaining part of this.