Are you genuinely mentally challenged? Please use whatever little brain cells you have left after your glue huffing addiction to think a little bit before posting something as stupid as this again. Thanks and have a nice evening.
I’m always amazed how few people know about Gamergate. It’s not only the key to understanding so many violent harassment campaigns going on today, it’s lots of the same people angry about the same stuff using the same playbook.
I dunno, you grab the boys and you fuck around on the sands. It's like Inferno Boy near Vegas or whatever. Might have been too early since the last shindig, or maybe the party was dragging itself a bit.
The Germans came into a really safe sector where nothing was happening and then burned alive 100 civilians to punish them for stealing gasoline. But yeah, it's those damn drone strikes by the US that turned everyone against us!
The German psyche has been fucked since ww2. We (the rest of the world) should really encourage them to get the fuck over it already. If the current unprecedented 1st world peace proves to be permanent, that means there might be no more major wars to create new narratives. I don’t think we should spend the next thousand years or whatever stuck with echoes of “Germany monsters, France surrender,” etc.
I think France trying to dispell that image is partly why they've been so forward leaning in military interventions (like Libya, Mali, those airstrikes on Syria) lately, same as Germany being almost pathologically un-militaristic. You're right, ww2 is becoming a stale meme.
Europe actually started doing that recently after Daddys endless bitching and the US started whinging about it because they were buying from European manufacturers.
Yeah, because Trump is a mongoloid. Any general, anyone with any relevant level of education on the subject will tell you NATO is a massive net gain to the united states.
If every other member of NATO paid exactly 0 dollars it'd still be a net gain to the united states.
You can bet your ass US command was cringing at Trump.
Because it allows the US to have bases all over the world. It allows the US to store military equipment, again, all over the world.
It gives the US the ability to be anywhere in the world pretty quickly.
It gives the US influence and soft power over many other countries.
Let me put this into perspective for you.
Do you think Albania is in NATO because they have the ability to do anything in the event of a major war?
Do you think Estonia is?
No, they're there for other reasons. Everyone knew that in the event a war with the soviet union broke out, the US would be doing 95% of the actual fighting. NATO is full of countries with no relevant military power, countries that wouldn't be able to join the US in pretty much any war.
NATO is absurdly valuable to the US. And not because these countries can provide any relevant military force, it's about geopolitics, influence, and access to bases in pretty much every strategically valuable country on the planet.
I'd support this, if only for the dramatic screeching internet Europoors will engage in when the necessity of finally having to pay for their own defense results in either cuts or massive tax hikes to fund those welfare programs they're so smug about.
It's hilarious when dumb asses make this argument. I get it's rightoid orthodoxy to claim the only reason Europe is 30 years ahead of the US socially is that they don't "fund their defense" but no, that isn't it.
It's because they don't have to deal with dumb ass evangelicals that think social safety nets are socialism.
Europe could fully fund a military and still maintain all of their social safety nets. The US is just hilariously incompetent and has a conservative problem.
Nobody claimed it would be NATO. Are you drunk? Try not to piss on your keyboard. If you think any European nation would cede that kind of sovereignty then you’re delusional. Like I said, a military alliance is feasible an actual European army is a retarded idea.
You said it would not be NATO. I responded that nobody ever stated it would be NATO. How would a military alliance structure transfer to an actual unified army, what political body would it answer to? The European Parliament? As for why Europe wouldn’t be capable of it, it’s because European countries would not cede that kind of sovereignty to a political body they don’t have control over. This might be new to you, but many European countries take their independence very seriously. A unified European army has always been a europhile pipe dream. Put down the bottle and go to bed.
You said it would not be NATO. I responded that nobody ever stated it would be NATO.
You're actually trolling. I stopped reading here. Let me run this down for you to prove my point you're a moron.
yangpede -3 points an hour ago
There's no reason why there couldn't be a central European army, as in a unified army funded/supplied by European member states.
I say this.
You say this:
]ashleychudd 5 points an hour ago
Who would it answer to?
I say:
–]yangpede 1 point an hour ago
I'm guessing it could work in the way NATO currently works. Why is Europe not capable of this?
You then respond:
ashleychudd 6 points an hour ago
NATO is a military alliance not a unified army. I literally said a military alliance could work.
I never said it would be NATO. I said it would have leadership that is similar. Again, I have no idea if this is you just being a seriously dumb person or just being so desperate to come at me you'll make terrible, weird arguments to justify your hate boner. You have seriously problems, get help.
Pizza, I think the problem is that you are legitimately too stupid to understand the difference between a military alliance and a unified army. Now you’re projecting your own inability to understand or make even a coherent argument for a unified European army.
I think you're too stupid to comprehend what I said.
I know the difference between an alliance and a unified European army.
What I am suggesting, ok, and I will bold this for you so you can actually read it.
I am suggesting that the European Union, as an entity, as a singular entity, form a unified European military, a single military that answers to a European command made up of European member states, think in the way the federal government has a military in the united states.
I have no idea how much clearer I can make this for you. You are a profoundly stupid person.
You see Pizza, when we start discussing the nature of this unified army it ends up just becoming a military alliance. Why would this unified military exist? Would it replace all member state’s militaries? If it doesn’t then why would any member be funding two militaries? Especially when one of these militaries doesn’t work 100% for the country partially funding it. As for your second bolder point, if the political will does not exist then they are clearly not fully capable of accomplishing it. Your entire point about Europe’s need to form a single unified military to defend it has ended up showing just how fucking stupid you are.
Lol, who the fuck is the Centralized European Army gonna listen to? If Germany and majority of the EU wants to send rescue boats to a shithole in the middle east do you think Eastern Europeans would allow their soldiers there? Would the soldiers themselves willingly go? Logistics would need to be done on the allegiance of every individual soldier because national interest and the council interests would collide.
Oh I wish they do, so they can stop bitching at us about our military bases and blaming us for bombing their targets for them.
We should plop bases in countries that would be grateful to us, or are clear-headed enough to know it is in their best interest so they shut their mouth. Like Japan, Taiwan, and maybe some Eastern European countries like Poland.
“Yeah, John Bolton is absolutely a hawk. If it was up to him he’d take on the whole world at one time, okay? But that doesn't matter because I want both sides.”
You may not like it, but this is what radical centrism looks like.
The last time the Germans were giving any power was the Holocaust. The only good thing about the refugee crisis is the self-inflicted destruction of Germany. Humanity will no longer be threatened by the Teutonic menace.
Europeans have a shitfit once you turn the conversation to their countries. i remember this romanian guy was talking about american politics, one superchat mentioned gypises in his country, he sperged out for half an hour afterwards.
the US is the best country in the world because of the rest of them are legitimately shit. what's the next best country? according to libs its mexico. a country that elected a mexico Coca-cola executive because he was less corrupt than their usual assholes
i remember this romanian guy was talking about american politics, one superchat mentioned gypises in his country, he sperged out for half an hour afterwards.
Canada, and a lot of people love the Nordic countries. Australia is up there too. I've heard South Korea is pretty good, Japan has some big issues but at least it's not the type of shithole where you get your skin flayed off by cartel members. And arguably most of Europe is only a little worse than those.
They're just upset because he said it openly. I'm not really sure what over the last 250 years or so would give anyone the impression that the US really cares what europeans think.
It's almost like you have to spend money toward the common defense to have a say in these things. 🤔🤔🤔
European policy these last few decades has made it clear that they will shamelessly surrender to any demand made by Putin or Trump, no matter how much it tramples on their sovereignty.
Invade and annex a country that's protected under treaty.
Shoot down your plane and kill hundreds of civilians.
Tell you that you can't buy oil from a certain country because we don't like the hats they wear, even though there isn't even a war going on.
If eurotrash remain this spineless, it's only a matter of time before the US & Russia come to the obvious conclusion that we should form a cartel where we dominate the continent and divide the economic spoils between us.
Germany basically sudoku'd their nuclear infrastructure to buy Russian natural gas in exchange for access to the greater slav market, which is why Frau Merkel is conspicuously absent whenever Western European leaders go on a round of condemning whatever Putin did this week.
132 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-06-23
Are you genuinely mentally challenged? Please use whatever little brain cells you have left after your glue huffing addiction to think a little bit before posting something as stupid as this again. Thanks and have a nice evening.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2019-06-23
I’m always amazed how few people know about Gamergate. It’s not only the key to understanding so many violent harassment campaigns going on today, it’s lots of the same people angry about the same stuff using the same playbook.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 McFluff_TheCrimeCat 2019-06-23
He'll also be the first one crying thay out military allies don't want to be involved if he does start a war.
1 SideFumbling 2019-06-23
They don't get involved, anyway. Bunch of stingy fuckers.
1 Wheretheflowersgrew 2019-06-23
A bunch got involved in Afghanistan.
1 -OrganisedChaos- 2019-06-23
It was pretty much everyone but the French.
1 SWIMsfriend 2019-06-23
the last time the french had any good french leaders in charge, gravity hadn't been discovered.
France is better off having someone else make their decisions
1 Wheretheflowersgrew 2019-06-23
French were involved.
1 -OrganisedChaos- 2019-06-23
Woops must have missed them on the list.
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
Its a hoax. The french werent involved.
1 capthazelwoodsflask 2019-06-23
Everyone was involved with Afghanistan at first. it was Iraq that everyone told us to piss off.
1 Wheretheflowersgrew 2019-06-23
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War
No France but still a lot of countries played at least a token role in that shit show.
1 ubermanwolf 2019-06-23
I dunno, you grab the boys and you fuck around on the sands. It's like Inferno Boy near Vegas or whatever. Might have been too early since the last shindig, or maybe the party was dragging itself a bit.
1 Redactor0 2019-06-23
The Germans came into a really safe sector where nothing was happening and then burned alive 100 civilians to punish them for stealing gasoline. But yeah, it's those damn drone strikes by the US that turned everyone against us!
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
Fuck off, germans have a history of burning people, it wasnt an offensive act.
1 Ingelri 2019-06-23
I will not tolerate hate speech against German traditions.
1 Wordshark 2019-06-23
What are you talking about?
1 BasedJebCel 2019-06-23
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.dw.com/en/reports-suggest-german-special-forces-involved-in-controversial-airstrike/a-5000027
1 Wordshark 2019-06-23
Damn
1 BasedJebCel 2019-06-23
It was fucked up but some of the German public overreacted in true post-war guilt style amd wanted the whole KSK disbanded over the incident
1 Wordshark 2019-06-23
The German psyche has been fucked since ww2. We (the rest of the world) should really encourage them to get the fuck over it already. If the current unprecedented 1st world peace proves to be permanent, that means there might be no more major wars to create new narratives. I don’t think we should spend the next thousand years or whatever stuck with echoes of “Germany monsters, France surrender,” etc.
1 BasedJebCel 2019-06-23
I think France trying to dispell that image is partly why they've been so forward leaning in military interventions (like Libya, Mali, those airstrikes on Syria) lately, same as Germany being almost pathologically un-militaristic. You're right, ww2 is becoming a stale meme.
1 SWIMsfriend 2019-06-23
remember when those fuckers attacked Libya and couldn't figure out a bombing run, so we sent a dozen high school dropouts to help them out.
And because of that they all blame the libya bullshit on us
1 MagicHoudini 2019-06-23
Everyone with half a brain knows it’s France fault, as usual.
The frogs absolutely SEETHE at the idea of not being a superpower.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2019-06-23
They did fuck some Chad separatists up though with minimal resources.
1 MagicHoudini 2019-06-23
Yeah but in the end they had to cry to their US daddy.
Also, in 2011 they stuck their nose openly both in Syria and in Lybia and look how that turned out.
1 DayyyTripper 2019-06-23
If there's one things Aussies are better at than shit posting, it's following Seppos into bumfuck warzones for tenuos reasons.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
Europe needs to build their own military and cut ties with the US.
The US is just not reliable anymore. A central European military would be on parity with the US military, too, providing a counter balance.
1 allendrio 2019-06-23
Europe actually started doing that recently after Daddys endless bitching and the US started whinging about it because they were buying from European manufacturers.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
Yeah, because Trump is a mongoloid. Any general, anyone with any relevant level of education on the subject will tell you NATO is a massive net gain to the united states.
If every other member of NATO paid exactly 0 dollars it'd still be a net gain to the united states.
You can bet your ass US command was cringing at Trump.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-06-23
How so?
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
Because it allows the US to have bases all over the world. It allows the US to store military equipment, again, all over the world.
It gives the US the ability to be anywhere in the world pretty quickly.
It gives the US influence and soft power over many other countries.
Let me put this into perspective for you.
Do you think Albania is in NATO because they have the ability to do anything in the event of a major war?
Do you think Estonia is?
No, they're there for other reasons. Everyone knew that in the event a war with the soviet union broke out, the US would be doing 95% of the actual fighting. NATO is full of countries with no relevant military power, countries that wouldn't be able to join the US in pretty much any war.
NATO is absurdly valuable to the US. And not because these countries can provide any relevant military force, it's about geopolitics, influence, and access to bases in pretty much every strategically valuable country on the planet.
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-06-23
I'd support this, if only for the dramatic screeching internet Europoors will engage in when the necessity of finally having to pay for their own defense results in either cuts or massive tax hikes to fund those welfare programs they're so smug about.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
It's hilarious when dumb asses make this argument. I get it's rightoid orthodoxy to claim the only reason Europe is 30 years ahead of the US socially is that they don't "fund their defense" but no, that isn't it.
It's because they don't have to deal with dumb ass evangelicals that think social safety nets are socialism.
Europe could fully fund a military and still maintain all of their social safety nets. The US is just hilariously incompetent and has a conservative problem.
1 PM_ME-YOUR-FANTASIES 2019-06-23
Arena strategy doesn't translate to geopolitics, pizzashill.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
Going to assume you have no idea what you're talking about given this reply and the fact it makes no sense in the context of anything I said.
1 PM_ME-YOUR-FANTASIES 2019-06-23
Who you are speaks more clearly than what you say.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-06-23
No. They couldn’t. Which is why they don’t.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
Yes, they could.
1 ComedicSans 2019-06-23
Imagine pretending that mayo Americans are people.
1 jaqqwam 2019-06-23
PizZa you got some good takes and bad takes
Todays takes are bad. Real bad. Take a break for a few days sweaty
1 Momruepari 2019-06-23
oh hey pizza
1 BriefSquirt 2019-06-23
>central european
​
lmao theyd be even more right wing than trump. cant wait
1 ItsSugar 2019-06-23
I think he meant centralized.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
A military alliance between European states would be feasible. You’re unironically retarded if you think there would be a “European” military.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
There's no reason why there couldn't be a central European army, as in a unified army funded/supplied by European member states.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
Who would it answer to?
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
I'm guessing it could work in the way NATO currently works. Why is Europe not capable of this?
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
NATO is a military alliance not a unified army. I literally said a military alliance could work.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-06-23
Oh shit. Did pizza still get owned without a wall of text and irrelevant sources?
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
He has a lazy eye. He was owned at birth.
1 AnnoyinTheGoyim 2019-06-23
He’s also under 6 foot and can’t grow facial hair.
1 Chapocel 2019-06-23
And his lumpen head is highly unattractive
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
Ok, and I didn't say it would be NATO, I said it would be lead like NATO, and consist of European countries.
There's no reason Europe could not form a unified military.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
Nobody claimed it would be NATO. Are you drunk? Try not to piss on your keyboard. If you think any European nation would cede that kind of sovereignty then you’re delusional. Like I said, a military alliance is feasible an actual European army is a retarded idea.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
What in the actual fuck are you talking about you illiterate clown.
Someone asked who said army would answer to or something, I said the leadership structure could work like NATO does.
You then responded with "that's an alliance!!"
I swear to god I'd be fucking amazed if you had an above 2nd grade reading level.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
You said it would not be NATO. I responded that nobody ever stated it would be NATO. How would a military alliance structure transfer to an actual unified army, what political body would it answer to? The European Parliament? As for why Europe wouldn’t be capable of it, it’s because European countries would not cede that kind of sovereignty to a political body they don’t have control over. This might be new to you, but many European countries take their independence very seriously. A unified European army has always been a europhile pipe dream. Put down the bottle and go to bed.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
You're actually trolling. I stopped reading here. Let me run this down for you to prove my point you're a moron.
I say this.
You say this:
I say:
You then respond:
I never said it would be NATO. I said it would have leadership that is similar. Again, I have no idea if this is you just being a seriously dumb person or just being so desperate to come at me you'll make terrible, weird arguments to justify your hate boner. You have seriously problems, get help.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
Pizza, I think the problem is that you are legitimately too stupid to understand the difference between a military alliance and a unified army. Now you’re projecting your own inability to understand or make even a coherent argument for a unified European army.
1 yangpede 2019-06-23
I think you're too stupid to comprehend what I said.
I know the difference between an alliance and a unified European army.
What I am suggesting, ok, and I will bold this for you so you can actually read it.
I am suggesting that the European Union, as an entity, as a singular entity, form a unified European military, a single military that answers to a European command made up of European member states, think in the way the federal government has a military in the united states.
I have no idea how much clearer I can make this for you. You are a profoundly stupid person.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
You see Pizza, when we start discussing the nature of this unified army it ends up just becoming a military alliance. Why would this unified military exist? Would it replace all member state’s militaries? If it doesn’t then why would any member be funding two militaries? Especially when one of these militaries doesn’t work 100% for the country partially funding it. As for your second bolder point, if the political will does not exist then they are clearly not fully capable of accomplishing it. Your entire point about Europe’s need to form a single unified military to defend it has ended up showing just how fucking stupid you are.
1 ubermanwolf 2019-06-23
Lol, who the fuck is the Centralized European Army gonna listen to? If Germany and majority of the EU wants to send rescue boats to a shithole in the middle east do you think Eastern Europeans would allow their soldiers there? Would the soldiers themselves willingly go? Logistics would need to be done on the allegiance of every individual soldier because national interest and the council interests would collide.
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
Europe is gay and retarded. NEXT!
1 Pepperglue 2019-06-23
Oh I wish they do, so they can stop bitching at us about our military bases and blaming us for bombing their targets for them.
We should plop bases in countries that would be grateful to us, or are clear-headed enough to know it is in their best interest so they shut their mouth. Like Japan, Taiwan, and maybe some Eastern European countries like Poland.
1 DoctorFahrenheit 2019-06-23
The only one worth a damn is the UK, and daddy likes them.
1 princess_y_fronts 2019-06-23
Imagine not wanting to see iran glassed.
1 Yung_N-Wah 2019-06-23
In’shallah brother
1 UnkillRebooted 2019-06-23
Can I get a "hell yeah" from my Saudi brothers?
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-06-23
1 Oh_hamburgers_ 2019-06-23
You may not like it, but this is what radical centrism looks like.
1 xlhat 2019-06-23
Daddy for Jannie ?
1 -Kite-Man- 2019-06-23
uh...duh?
1 xlhat 2019-06-23
Imagine, this place jannied only by Daddy AND Shatner.
1 -Kite-Man- 2019-06-23
the inevitable betrayal and fistfight over power would be epic
1 xlhat 2019-06-23
Exactly.
1 RichEvansSexbot 2019-06-23
There is no way Based God-Daddy would do anything for free
1 a_la_tour_abolie 2019-06-23
maybe we could work out some kind of branding deal
1 Mayos_side 2019-06-23
Donald Trump presents D R A M A
1 a_la_tour_abolie 2019-06-23
it's got a certain ring to it
1 DrunkenRecidivist 2019-06-23
I'd pay upwards of $4.99/month for that
1 swimisafuckingidiot 2019-06-23
isn't daddy being president for free?
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-06-23
idk do you really want the unwashed horde of Boomers who infest T_D to suddenly start posting here?
1 allendrio 2019-06-23
I dont think he has a single Dove in his admin so i have no fucking idea what he thinks the other side is, the jews?
1 Yung_N-Wah 2019-06-23
((( D O V E S )))
Day of the John Woo action sequence when
1 RecallRethuglicans 2019-06-23
The dove he listens to is Putin
1 mr_sams_anus_2 2019-06-23
Putin is an ostrich, not a dove.
1 RecallRethuglicans 2019-06-23
He’s a “dove” on attacking Iran and screwing up oil markets.
1 pm_me_ur_butthole420 2019-06-23
“The other side” is the notes he leaves for himself while he’s sundowning
1 allendrio 2019-06-23
Briger to Boomerbithia
1 Redactor0 2019-06-23
That would mean anyone who is sane who has a voice in this process, which at the moment I believe is the JCS.
1 SWIMsfriend 2019-06-23
This just in, if you don't like Trump. you don't like r/Drama
1 Redactor0 2019-06-23
This is like Carter's cabinet if Vance and Brzezinski and Carter were all retards.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
I remember telling my German friend that he only hated trump because his country was relegated to the kid’s table. The cope was great.
1 911roofer 2019-06-23
The last time the Germans were giving any power was the Holocaust. The only good thing about the refugee crisis is the self-inflicted destruction of Germany. Humanity will no longer be threatened by the Teutonic menace.
1 YHofSuburbia 2019-06-23
This but unironically but only if you include all of the Germanics, like the Anglo-Saxons and Nordics
1 DayyyTripper 2019-06-23
Don't forget the god damn Franks or Lombards.
You know what, Europe is too far gone, let's just clear em out and let the Syrians deal with it.
1 heretobefriends 2019-06-23
Build a wall around Europe, clone neanderthals, create a preserve, and finally atone for our sin.
1 jaqqwam 2019-06-23
Based and brave new world pilled
1 MagicHoudini 2019-06-23
Unironically white Americans are more Teutonic than anything else.
1 SWIMsfriend 2019-06-23
Europeans have a shitfit once you turn the conversation to their countries. i remember this romanian guy was talking about american politics, one superchat mentioned gypises in his country, he sperged out for half an hour afterwards.
the US is the best country in the world because of the rest of them are legitimately shit. what's the next best country? according to libs its mexico. a country that elected a mexico Coca-cola executive because he was less corrupt than their usual assholes
1 Pepperglue 2019-06-23
I thought it's Canada. I have heard plenty wanted to flee to Canada, not the other direction.
1 DayyyTripper 2019-06-23
Libs like Canada because it is predominantly white, has completely secured borders and cruely opresses their indigenous population.
Really makes you 🤔
1 ubermanwolf 2019-06-23
Also dressing like a hipster is the natural look and they jail lobsters if they don't use your twitter pronouns.
1 ashleychudd 2019-06-23
It’s also full of losers.
1 AugustinesBitchBoy 2019-06-23
I thought it was because we had a twink prime minister
1 ManBearFridge 2019-06-23
Excuse me?
1 ComedicSans 2019-06-23
This is your brain on fentanyl.
1 sub2tine 2019-06-23
You talk to Vee?
1 ScroblertMoblert 2019-06-23
Canada, and a lot of people love the Nordic countries. Australia is up there too. I've heard South Korea is pretty good, Japan has some big issues but at least it's not the type of shithole where you get your skin flayed off by cartel members. And arguably most of Europe is only a little worse than those.
1 Pepe_von_Habsburg 2019-06-23
Australia is just America but with an Australian accent.
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
Germans are butthurt as fuck
1 jaqqwam 2019-06-23
Shouldnt have built that naval fleet and tripped the balance of power in the 1900s to 1914. Smh etetnal g*rmans
1 ubermanwolf 2019-06-23
YESSSSS ANGLOCIDE WHEEEEEEEEEEEN
1 KingRuler07 2019-06-23
"Be careful son, I'll sue you" -Trump
1 minerva_ATL 2019-06-23
They're just upset because he said it openly. I'm not really sure what over the last 250 years or so would give anyone the impression that the US really cares what europeans think.
1 Paul_R_Nelson_ 2019-06-23
Wait til the crucial stages of election time when EU sends you an economic shitstorm and names it Donald.
Probably partner up with China too. Get you fatso's back to Bush level stupidity.
1 Kaiser-romulus 2019-06-23
Yeah neither do I.
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
At least in europe people can say nigger with hard r cause no nigger is there to hear it.
1 Kaiser-romulus 2019-06-23
I can say it hear also, nigger.
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
Too bad this sub is full of mayos 🤢
1 Kaiser-romulus 2019-06-23
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cXxMIOX-qJA
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
1 tHeSiD 2019-06-23
All his talk sounds like it's coming from a dumbass in a comedy show lmao, why is it always like this?
1 Redactor0 2019-06-23
It's almost like you have to spend money toward the common defense to have a say in these things. 🤔🤔🤔
European policy these last few decades has made it clear that they will shamelessly surrender to any demand made by Putin or Trump, no matter how much it tramples on their sovereignty.
If eurotrash remain this spineless, it's only a matter of time before the US & Russia come to the obvious conclusion that we should form a cartel where we dominate the continent and divide the economic spoils between us.
1 MagicHoudini 2019-06-23
You really think Putin has any say on NATO countries? We’re the US bitches and we like it.
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-06-23
Germany basically sudoku'd their nuclear infrastructure to buy Russian natural gas in exchange for access to the greater slav market, which is why Frau Merkel is conspicuously absent whenever Western European leaders go on a round of condemning whatever Putin did this week.
1 MagicHoudini 2019-06-23
Same goes for Italy and eastern Europe. Doesn’t mean that Russia will ever dare to upset American influence on the continent.
The days of the USSR are far gone and Russia is a bitch on the international stage just as much as everyone else but the US and China.
1 MagicHoudini 2019-06-23
My comment was stupid, yes you are right. They can pull a little influence, but it is nothing comparable to what Russia was before.
They are still a bitch internationally.
1 Cocaine_and_regret 2019-06-23
Lmao burger logic, “if you don’t blow your whole budget on jets and tanks that rust in a lot somewhere, you’re spineless”
1 le_epic_xd_forever 2019-06-23
🥺
1 Benislet 2019-06-23
🤠
1 jaqqwam 2019-06-23
Be me
See lots of comments
Oh boy!
Half is just people shitposting against pizza yangpedes microwave warm takes
Fuck this. Im out. 😕😞