AHS educatest rightoid on how revanchist theocratic wet dreams are actually woke

42  2019-06-24 by kaczynskireborn2

44 comments

do not comment or vote in linked threads

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

If you support free speech, you must support people pinging other users. It's completely legal speech. If you won't defend pinging as free speech because you or someone else finds it disgusting, then no speech that you or anyone else views as disgusting is safe.

if it is in fact on shaky legal ground it's reasonable to not want to be the case that establishes it as illegal.

It's not, The reddit admins are straight up lying to the ignorant (like yourself) to justify their prejudice. Pinging being protected speech has long since been estabilished, as it has undeniable artistic merit. The only time it's been included under any obscenity laws is when someone is being charged with possession of harassment, so the state can slap them with more charges. The courts have been very careful to not charge anyone for pinging, because they'd get their asses fucking annihilated by a higher court due to the firm precedence of pinging being completely legal speech. /r/Drama had nothing to worry about, this guy was just making shit up to fool people into thinking his censoring wasn't entirely personally motivated.

Snapshots:

  1. AHS educatest rightoid on how revan... - archive.org, archive.today, removeddit.com

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

my keyboard is sperging btw loweffortcels get the noose

In my dream, the muslims will become a united, unified superpower

Is that before or after one half kills the other half over whether it's haram to draw prophet muhamad (peas be upon him)

Its a dream for a reason.

Do you actually know anything about the medieval Muslim empires? They were unusually tolerant for the time. (Obviously not so tolerant as we would like, but it was the Middle Ages.)

Omg! That’s true kind stranger! Killing heretics and enslaving people is WOKE as FUCK! Wish I could give you gold, but supporting sex workers on snap chat is breddy expensive yo!

These people make me unironically want to go back to church

do it again nikephoros phocas, but this time do it on reddit

“Tolerant Muslim” is the “innocent Wehrmacht” of the libturd

Don't do my Ibadi buddies like that

tbf its the truth.

Jews were better off under the Muslims rather than the Christians during those times. No irony or sarcasm.

I believe it. I just get sick of the equivocating every time people darker than Greeks did a colonialism. It’s like that’s the only time they recognize any nuance.

True. They're always rushing to help those they deem in need, not realising its in of itself a racist act.

They merely turned infidels into third class citizens with less rights instead of outright murdering them.

SO WOKE

I mean when the Mussies took over India, they were pretty nice to the people there after all the destruction of conquest, freedom of religion was there, some of the kings are even kinda celebrated like Akbar.

Also hospitals and science and shit

Calling for a caliphate is absolutely not innocent in the modern context. It's like calling for a fourth reich. It's NOT referring to an empire from a millenia ago which was still horrific in itself (in either context). There was more than one Daniel

It's about as bad as calling for another crusade which I do all the time.

It depends tbh. My Sheikh has said there's nothing wrong with a calling a caliphate, and I'd have to agree depending on how you interpret it.

For example, if you interpreted it as the reuniting of the Middle East (which is majority Muslim), under a single banner, I would not call it a "fourth reich".

In fact, comparing it to the fourth reich is rather disingenuous.

The only way they'd regain Iberia would be through war. 🤔

I didn't know Iberia was apart of the middle east?

I was referring to the original quote.

And I was talking about how one interprets what a caliphate is.

The original quote is fucking retarded. Muslims should only rule over majority muslim countries, and that's it. Iberia is not subject to us anymore.

Muslims should only rule over majority muslim countries, and that's it.

I love how you see nothing wrong with this.

There's nothing wrong with Theocracy with some reforms.

Yes there is. If your reforms fix the following present day issues it wouldn't be Real Islam anymore:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_in_Islam

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_Islam

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_terrorism#History

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajm

And at that point your prophet (pbuh) would still be a pedophile warlord so you'd have to nix him as well. And you would then be beheaded for your crimes against Allah, inshallah.

LGBT I am rather not inclined to welcome mentally ill people as normal. women 90% of that page is positive stuff. There's like 10% which is actually condemning Rajm Idc. If you don't want to get stoned for adultery, maybe don't do it?

Though the reforms I'm proposing would get rid of the ways they gather evidence. 4 Witnesses are old and outdated. DNA technology and forensics is where its at.

I am rather not inclined to welcome mentally ill people as normal

This is a bussyloving safe space. Repent or get deus vulted.

90% of that page is positive stuff.

Which of stoning, raping, murdering for being raped, forcing to wear burqas do you consider positive?

If you don't want to get stoned for adultery, maybe don't do it?

This is some rich cope from goatfuckers. Don't be mad at your foid that you got cucked be mad at yourself for being such a cuck that she cucked you

DNA technology and forensics is where its at.

I love the juxtaposition between you knowing what modern day technology is and you being a caveman

Ok lol, now you're not even putting effort in.

I only respond to high effort bait posts. Try again sweaty.

Another loss for Islam.

Oh, and your terrorism claim is retarded.

In my life, I've never met anyone condoning terrorism.

Sharia law is terrorism.

When I call a caliphate I interpret it as me and the boys getting together for some brews on the weekend.

Also calling for the "liberation of oppressed [muslims]" is one of the most common war propaganda phrases in history.

This land hasn't been ruled by its "true" natives as far back as Roman times. It's always been conquered since. First it was the Romans, then it was the Germanic tribes, then it was the Muslims, then came the Christians. The "founding father" of my country who is widely celebrated here, Afonso Henriques, came from a French family

AHS provides a very woke and very cool take that can be used to justify the occupation of the West Bank

Next on AHS. Constantinople is actually rightful Christian clay! Here’s why!

"lol no one owns anything, all borders are arbitrary, Xinjiang part of Zhongguo glorious great peace nation"

I have been on reddit for about 40 days and I’m at the point of disbelief that these people are real.

AHS has been the biggest mind fuck of all time, somehow in less than a week of checking that place they have managed to make me not have a response to both a literal nazi and a incel. I don’t know why I ever came to this god forsaken site but it’s breathtaking how insane these people are.

Reddit is trying to gaslight you into shifting the overton window to the right so you end up dog whistling an orwellian imperialist state into power

It all makes sense now. Thanks for the wake up call

Huge Roman-boo

Aren't we calling them Caesa-boo's?

zoz

zle

zozzle

God, I fucking hate badunitedkingdom.

Fucking hate

hate

🤔🤔🤔