/r/drama was part of my shift rightward. There are a lot of rightoids in there doing the lords work, showing people to the light. Ironic rightoid posting can still red-pill people. And good drama is still good drama, whether it's chapotards sperging out over ableism in the revolution or the Donald Defense Force sperging out about NPCs. Drama is one of the few places where actual fascists and actual leftists clash on a daily basis, and it's pretty entertaining.
I'm currently banned for circumventing the custom subreddit style at /r/drama though.
TFW you loot and rob every 3rd world country for money and make them permanent shitholes, then people end up leaving said shitholes and coming in your country as a result of your collective actions
No shit Canada didn't do it, and not every white person is responsible. I'm speaking in regards to the collective identity these race warriors insist on representing, where if they deserve personal credit for inventing greek philosophy, then they also must deserve credit for raping the planet. This is in the image that you posted. I thought white people could read?
lol. I know you think actually sat there and thought you were smart and got me for coming up with this list, comparing countries designated for looting resources and slaves, setting up repressive local puppets vs countries where the Bitish themselves settled and built societies with liberal values. But in your opioid addled brain, certain race countries = poor, certain race countries = rich, the correlation is race alone and history doesn't matter, snorts a line of fentanyl off of a Dale Earnhardt commemorative NASCAR plate. How high is your Oxycontin prescription dosage Dylan?
Is that the best you can come up with? White people aren't sending their best. They're fragile, they're drug addicts, and some I assume won't shoot up their school or workplace because their favorite video game series features a character that doesn't look like them.
Great Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807. They banned the ownership of slaves in 1838.
Dates of British Control:
Kenya (1920-1963)
Sudan (1899-1956)
Nigeria (arguably from 1914-1960)
Sierra Leone (1808-1961)
I'll ignore the Muslim ones because you mostly think this about slaves. As you should be able to tell, at the times these areas were colonies of Great Britain they were not being looted for slaves. Also, for each of these, they took on the British parliamentary system. They also were settled at similar rates as Hong Kong and Singapore so they should have had similar exposure to British values. You can't claim racism either, because I doubt the brits had a whole lot of respect for the Asians.
My point is that this thing isn't black and white and claiming that colonialism was bad because of MUH SLAVERY is just sloppy and ignorant. Some countries turned colonialism into an opportunity to become international trade centers and developed economies while others squandered it with corruption, violence, ignorance, and general ooga-booga shit. It is a pure coincidence that the countries that made the most of it are predominately inhabited by whites and asians and the ones that were too stupid to make anything of it were mostly black.
I mean I slavery wasn't the only thing I mentioned, assuming you're literate(big assumption for the inbreds) I most certainly did not make it about "muh slaves". I mean we all (should know) that there wasn't slavery in the 1800s and 1900's, so I can't see how you come to this comment without focusing specifically on the slavery so you could "win". As for your original comment, you very obviously made this about race. I'm not sure if you're just pretending and expecting me to go along with it, or you're just so high that you don't remember the comment you just wrote making it pretty clear that it boils down to race. I'm not going to pretend that you didn't choose the original words that you chose though just because you might want to go back on it now.
A feature of all settler societies during the colonial period was the ability to obtain a disproportionate share in land ownership.[42] Kenya was no exception, with the first settlers arriving in 1902 as part of Governor Charles Eliot's plan to have a settler economy pay for the Uganda Railway.[43][44] The success of this settler economy would depend heavily on the availability of land, labour and capital,[45] and so, over the next three decades, the colonial government and settlers consolidated their control over Kenyan land, and 'encouraged' native Kenyans to become wage labourers.
Wow, sounds like a great start to a country's development. What a bunch of lazy niggers for not pulling themselves by their boot straps and reaching a vikangz level of development despite colonial powers taking all the resources and pitting ethnic groups against each other. It must be their inferior monkey genes. Funny enough this is said to to be why South America has so many problems because the Iberians came in for the sole purpose of looting and didn't give a fuck. Hence why even master race Argentinians who killed and deported all the shitskins have failed to produce a first world country even with their pure white skin, and Colombia too to a slightly less white degree. Is this the best white people got? Can we get a race realist that is only 50% retarded please?
Your quote is definitely supporting my argument more than it is yours. The British came in and essentially gave them an economy to work with and the Kenyans couldn't do shit with it once the British left.
Also, I don't know if you realize it or not but Argentina has the 2nd highest development index in Latin america (which is higher than a handful of countries in Europe) and is a G-20 member country. It is also considered safer to travel to than most of Europe at the moment (due to terrorism caused by eurocuck immigration policies). Maybe keeping the country white wasn't such a bad idea after all.
17 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-06-26
/r/drama was part of my shift rightward. There are a lot of rightoids in there doing the lords work, showing people to the light. Ironic rightoid posting can still red-pill people. And good drama is still good drama, whether it's chapotards sperging out over ableism in the revolution or the Donald Defense Force sperging out about NPCs. Drama is one of the few places where actual fascists and actual leftists clash on a daily basis, and it's pretty entertaining.
I'm currently banned for circumventing the custom subreddit style at /r/drama though.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Quietus42 2019-06-26
We can only hope. Inshallah.
1 Rentokill_boy 2019-06-26
yawns
1 OppaiDaisukiUwU 2019-06-26
Good, maybe that will finally solve recurring pedo problem
1 UnluckyFarm 2019-06-26
doesn't having more muslims around contribute to the pedo problem?
1 OppaiDaisukiUwU 2019-06-26
No?
Who will they rape after mayos go extinct?
1 DachauShowerRepair 2019-06-26
TFW you loot and rob every 3rd world country for money and make them permanent shitholes, then people end up leaving said shitholes and coming in your country as a result of your collective actions
1 TheGoldenWhale1995 2019-06-26
Technically that was the British, (and Yanks in the 21st century) but okay.
1 DachauShowerRepair 2019-06-26
No shit Canada didn't do it, and not every white person is responsible. I'm speaking in regards to the collective identity these race warriors insist on representing, where if they deserve personal credit for inventing greek philosophy, then they also must deserve credit for raping the planet. This is in the image that you posted. I thought white people could read?
1 sub2tine 2019-06-26
Technically kang regions subjected to heavier European colonisation experienced vastly higher standards of living but okay.
1 MonkeyButt19 2019-06-26
Okay well let's look at some of the former colonies of the British Empire.
Not shitholes: United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Singapore
Shitholes: Kenya, Sudan, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Palestine, Iraq
Do you notice any patterns?
1 DachauShowerRepair 2019-06-26
lol. I know you think actually sat there and thought you were smart and got me for coming up with this list, comparing countries designated for looting resources and slaves, setting up repressive local puppets vs countries where the Bitish themselves settled and built societies with liberal values. But in your opioid addled brain, certain race countries = poor, certain race countries = rich, the correlation is race alone and history doesn't matter, snorts a line of fentanyl off of a Dale Earnhardt commemorative NASCAR plate. How high is your Oxycontin prescription dosage Dylan?
Is that the best you can come up with? White people aren't sending their best. They're fragile, they're drug addicts, and some I assume won't shoot up their school or workplace because their favorite video game series features a character that doesn't look like them.
1 MonkeyButt19 2019-06-26
Great Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807. They banned the ownership of slaves in 1838.
Dates of British Control:
Kenya (1920-1963)
Sudan (1899-1956)
Nigeria (arguably from 1914-1960)
Sierra Leone (1808-1961)
I'll ignore the Muslim ones because you mostly think this about slaves. As you should be able to tell, at the times these areas were colonies of Great Britain they were not being looted for slaves. Also, for each of these, they took on the British parliamentary system. They also were settled at similar rates as Hong Kong and Singapore so they should have had similar exposure to British values. You can't claim racism either, because I doubt the brits had a whole lot of respect for the Asians.
My point is that this thing isn't black and white and claiming that colonialism was bad because of MUH SLAVERY is just sloppy and ignorant. Some countries turned colonialism into an opportunity to become international trade centers and developed economies while others squandered it with corruption, violence, ignorance, and general ooga-booga shit. It is a pure coincidence that the countries that made the most of it are predominately inhabited by whites and asians and the ones that were too stupid to make anything of it were mostly black.
1 LongPostBot 2019-06-26
All them words won't bring your pa back.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 DachauShowerRepair 2019-06-26
I mean I slavery wasn't the only thing I mentioned, assuming you're literate(big assumption for the inbreds) I most certainly did not make it about "muh slaves". I mean we all (should know) that there wasn't slavery in the 1800s and 1900's, so I can't see how you come to this comment without focusing specifically on the slavery so you could "win". As for your original comment, you very obviously made this about race. I'm not sure if you're just pretending and expecting me to go along with it, or you're just so high that you don't remember the comment you just wrote making it pretty clear that it boils down to race. I'm not going to pretend that you didn't choose the original words that you chose though just because you might want to go back on it now.
Wow, sounds like a great start to a country's development. What a bunch of lazy niggers for not pulling themselves by their boot straps and reaching a vikangz level of development despite colonial powers taking all the resources and pitting ethnic groups against each other. It must be their inferior monkey genes. Funny enough this is said to to be why South America has so many problems because the Iberians came in for the sole purpose of looting and didn't give a fuck. Hence why even master race Argentinians who killed and deported all the shitskins have failed to produce a first world country even with their pure white skin, and Colombia too to a slightly less white degree. Is this the best white people got? Can we get a race realist that is only 50% retarded please?
1 LongPostBot 2019-06-26
Your pulitzer's in the mail
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 MonkeyButt19 2019-06-26
Your quote is definitely supporting my argument more than it is yours. The British came in and essentially gave them an economy to work with and the Kenyans couldn't do shit with it once the British left.
Also, I don't know if you realize it or not but Argentina has the 2nd highest development index in Latin america (which is higher than a handful of countries in Europe) and is a G-20 member country. It is also considered safer to travel to than most of Europe at the moment (due to terrorism caused by eurocuck immigration policies). Maybe keeping the country white wasn't such a bad idea after all.