whenever someone is clearly doing a troll post you will get one of the mods or just some jackass saying "LMAO THIS IS BAIT!! HA HA HA" like they are in on the joke.
imagine you are watching a movie and some asshole yells out spoilers. it ruins the total performance. just shut the fuck up, like a good retard, and enjoy the show. dont be such an idiot and scream like you and the writers are on the same level because you are not. it is art.
i have literally seen countless posts where bait is ruined because some faggot points out it is bait so they can feel internet savvy. i am actually very angry.
The problem with your retard take is that there is upwards of 400 million people in South America. Taking in fugees is only a short term solution to a long term problem.
America isn't obliged to take in these refugees. However, since they did install like 50 dictatorships in South America, causing poverty, destruction and chaos, I think that Americais obliged to restore peace and stability in South America, so that the problem doesn't continue.
Its not so much "take in fugees" as "extremely expensive concentration camps that completely ruin your reputation while doing little good for you economically is a bad idea"
Has there ever been peace and stability in South America? I tried reading a bit of their history and they seem to have an insane amount of interstate conflicts for New World nations. It seems like ever since they got free of Spain they have just been fighting pointless wars with each other or fighting pointless civil wars between generalissimo #1 and generalissimo #2. Brazil/Argentina/Chile are still fine but the rest?
I know very little about the history of South America, only that the CIA toppled relatively safe and secure nations to install dictators who were obviously not helpful.
Though, I would probably respond with yes to that question, simply because I can hear someone asking it about the Middle East. And the Middle East has not always been unstable nor full of war. Not until the Great Game and other European intervention in the region.
Fucking lmao. When? During the IE invasions of Iraq? Or perhaps the Assyrian Empire and it's state built on constant punitive wars against subjects? Then perhaps the Persian Empire, wracked by civil war every succession? Diadochi period? Seleucid-Parthian wars? Roman-Sassanid wars? Sassanid-Arab wars? The Jewish uprising against Rome? The Ummayad-Abbassid war? Seljuk-Fatimid war? Mongol invasions? Ottoman wars of conquest? Ottoman-Persian wars?
When did this mythical time of peace and stability exist in the ME? Their entire political history is a succession of empires, thanks to their terrain. If anything, European influence prevented the Ottomans from getting raped by Muhammad Ali, an event that would have fractured their political landscape and started another blood soaked struggle for power. Sorry for serious posting.
And there were many individual countries, such as Afghanistan which was going well till RU decided to invade. Its hard to talk about a continent as a whole, because even continents like Europe were never stable until now. WW2 was not that long ago.
Ah yes, the glorious period when the majority of the population of the ME had to pay an extra tax to not be killed for practicing their faith, had to submit to the totally neutral judgement of Islamic clerics in any legal issue against Muslims and had to live as second class citizens in their own country while their rich culture and history was erased and replaced by that of nomadic savages(Except for Persia). Or perhaps life was peaceful for the millions of castrated Africans in the plantations of Iraq? Incidentally, both Caliphates lasted for around a hundred years, and as can be expected the transition of power after said reign wasn't very peaceful.
Lol @ Afghans being peaceful. They were probably the largest group of Asian mercs after Turks and just like the latter, this was because their country was innately a violent place where violent men were created.
had to pay an extra tax to not be killed for practicing their faith
Everyone had to pay a tax. You're acting as if Muslims didn't pay Zakat, which was the equivalent of the Jizya at the time.
had to submit to the totally neutral judgement of Islamic clerics in any legal issue against Muslims
I said it was stable. Not that it was Just. Also, the people who lived in these areas, ie the Jews were treated better than they were in Europe. So clearly, it wasn't as bad as you frame it to be.
had to live as second class citizens in their own country while their rich culture and history was erased and replaced by that of nomadic savages(Except for Persia)
Low tier bait
Or perhaps life was peaceful for the millions of castrated Africans in the plantations of Iraq?
Again. I said stable. You're acting as if many civilisations didn't build their empires off a subjected class.
In South Asia, for example, seizure of dhimmi families upon their failure to pay annual jizya was one of the two significant sources of slaves sold in the slave markets of Delhi Sultanate and Mughal era.
Definitely the same as just any other taxation
Jews
Were Abrahamics and Europe was barbaric too in this time period so there really isn't any point in comparing with it. Compare with China and India.
Low tier bait
Really? So Arabs named Mohammad and Ali always inhabited Iraq, Syria, Levant, Egypt etc? It was the largest example of cultural genocide in history though it'll never be treated as such.
You're acting as if many civilisations didn't build their empires off a subjected class.
The castration was unique to Arabs and the sheer scale of the slave trade run by Islamic empires dwarved any else, which mandated constant predatory raids into neighbouring infidel territory(Anatolia, Med shoreline of Europe, India, Slavlands and so on)
Being obliged by the UN to do something is more insignificant than Daddys two scoop ordeal.
You see, unless the US has signed, ratified and enacted this treaty as law, they have no obligation to take in these refugees.
AND even if they've done that, they can enter a reservation in regards to the law, meaning that it no longer applies to them. Not to mention just change the law.
AND, you seem to forget that nobodys going to hold the US to account if they don't comply with these international law. Who do you think funds the UN?
AND, you seem to be forgetting about State sovereignty:
People working harder for less isn't a good thing, you literal retarded cunt. By that metric slavery must be great because they work even harder and for even less again!
I may have misread your post because your first line is surely a joke?
by your retarded metric free trade that resulted in third world countries raising their standards massively due to them mostly being a option of "working harder for less" was a bad thing.
I couldn't care less about what happens in third world countries.
Look at how well it obviously worked (lol), considering the conversation at hand and this post in general I would say you are a mental invalid for suggesting what you are.
you are a mental invalid for suggesting the same thing that has lead to unforeseen levels of global prosperity and not disagreeing with every economist ever
of course, having insular economies like retarded commies and mercantilists never goes horribly wrong. All the economists since adam smith were wrong and you are obviously right with your galaxy brain takes.
I guarantee you aren't talking about free trade though, because if it actually were free trade these shitholes would be fresh out of luck. Would they trade their expertise in building huts with human feces? lol.
The free trade you're talking about is essentially foreign aid. America gains nothing from dealing with shit hole nations and loses a lot.
The first response is literally that something that happened over a century ago proves that your point is invalid and you need to rethink your political stance
I'm sure the Native Americans were consistently posting on Twitter #LetThemIn when the Mayflower descended on Massachusetts.
Thankfully, they were history proved them right. The illegal immigrants and Native Americans then cohabited in peace and harmony for the next 400 years.
People commenting that Trumps retarded for saying blatant common sense... what exactly is retarded about a country enforcing borders and what exactly is this obvious alternative thats not so retarded???
not destroying a continent in a retarded prohibition war that was literally started to "own the blacks and hippies" so that you dont have a constant stream of refugees from your shitstirring would be a start.
Liberalism only allows openness it has no patience for the logical or mathematical it only bleeds for the passions of the disenfranchised the babies the children the Muslims
B-BUT THEY HAVE NO CHOICE! THEY ARE FLEEING TERRIBLE VIOLENCE AND WAR!
Yep, just like that South American man and his daughter who washed up dead onshore after trying to illegally swim into the country... oh wait. They interviewed his family back in South America who said that he had a well-paying job and a nice place to live, but decided to flee to the U.S. because... he was tired of living with his mom. Such violence, such war, truly there is no better option than to let them all in 😤😤😤
105 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-07-04
whenever someone is clearly doing a troll post you will get one of the mods or just some jackass saying "LMAO THIS IS BAIT!! HA HA HA" like they are in on the joke.
imagine you are watching a movie and some asshole yells out spoilers. it ruins the total performance. just shut the fuck up, like a good retard, and enjoy the show. dont be such an idiot and scream like you and the writers are on the same level because you are not. it is art.
i have literally seen countless posts where bait is ruined because some faggot points out it is bait so they can feel internet savvy. i am actually very angry.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 yangpede 2019-07-04
Show me one other country where a learning disabled man can make it to the highest office.
That's the American dream in action.
1 Cleverly_Clearly 2019-07-04
The first retarded US president. Finally, a man that represents the people!
1 newcomer_ts 2019-07-04
Ukraine just did it.
Every ME country.
UK, don't get me started. They have TV shows dating back to 50's how retarded their PM's are.
Australia, you really think they can elect someone who's not retarded?
You just jealous Trump is the bestest of them all.
1 KanyeetWeebs 2019-07-04
Australians are really something else. Imagine shitting on Burgers over Commonwealth-Convicts. They hate our freedom.
1 SnappyIsMyWaifu 2019-07-04
They named a swimming centre after a guy who drowned...
1 KanyeetWeebs 2019-07-04
They lost a war to Emu.
1 SnappyIsMyWaifu 2019-07-04
The war of emu aggression.
1 cuckadoodlewho 2019-07-04
For the people of the people by the people
1 smokeyphil 2019-07-04
Spackers one and all.
1 -9069x- 2019-07-04
Pizzashill making his ambitions clear.
1 CJ_from_Grove_St 2019-07-04
Why aren't you President then retard?
1 kermit_was_wrong 2019-07-04
He's not retarded enough. Not smart enough either.
1 shitpersonality 2019-07-04
Age, retard.
1 ReddneckwithaD 2019-07-04
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
This, but unironically
boomer daddy has a point
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
Maybe boomers shouldnt have destroyed everything south of the border with the war on art students recreational supplies.
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
K.
I am not a bot. Contact for questions.
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
you are supposed to bait me with some derisive reply.
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
now you’re moving from radical centrism to central radicalism
bad place to be
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
dont tell me what to do fucker
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
😔
1 JustLions 2019-07-04
Fuck you, central radicalism is where all the hepcats are at.
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
The problem with your retard take is that there is upwards of 400 million people in South America. Taking in fugees is only a short term solution to a long term problem.
America isn't obliged to take in these refugees. However, since they did install like 50 dictatorships in South America, causing poverty, destruction and chaos, I think that Americais obliged to restore peace and stability in South America, so that the problem doesn't continue.
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
Its not so much "take in fugees" as "extremely expensive concentration camps that completely ruin your reputation while doing little good for you economically is a bad idea"
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
ikr. He should just turn them back.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-07-04
Lol those camps exist in plenty of other countries. Australia has fucking prison islands where refugees are excited to.
1 911roofer 2019-07-04
China harvest the men's organs and sells the women as sex slaves.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-07-04
Has there ever been peace and stability in South America? I tried reading a bit of their history and they seem to have an insane amount of interstate conflicts for New World nations. It seems like ever since they got free of Spain they have just been fighting pointless wars with each other or fighting pointless civil wars between generalissimo #1 and generalissimo #2. Brazil/Argentina/Chile are still fine but the rest?
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
I know very little about the history of South America, only that the CIA toppled relatively safe and secure nations to install dictators who were obviously not helpful.
Though, I would probably respond with yes to that question, simply because I can hear someone asking it about the Middle East. And the Middle East has not always been unstable nor full of war. Not until the Great Game and other European intervention in the region.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-07-04
Fucking lmao. When? During the IE invasions of Iraq? Or perhaps the Assyrian Empire and it's state built on constant punitive wars against subjects? Then perhaps the Persian Empire, wracked by civil war every succession? Diadochi period? Seleucid-Parthian wars? Roman-Sassanid wars? Sassanid-Arab wars? The Jewish uprising against Rome? The Ummayad-Abbassid war? Seljuk-Fatimid war? Mongol invasions? Ottoman wars of conquest? Ottoman-Persian wars?
When did this mythical time of peace and stability exist in the ME? Their entire political history is a succession of empires, thanks to their terrain. If anything, European influence prevented the Ottomans from getting raped by Muhammad Ali, an event that would have fractured their political landscape and started another blood soaked struggle for power. Sorry for serious posting.
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
Ummayad Caliphate and Abbasid Caliphate.
And there were many individual countries, such as Afghanistan which was going well till RU decided to invade. Its hard to talk about a continent as a whole, because even continents like Europe were never stable until now. WW2 was not that long ago.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-07-04
Ah yes, the glorious period when the majority of the population of the ME had to pay an extra tax to not be killed for practicing their faith, had to submit to the totally neutral judgement of Islamic clerics in any legal issue against Muslims and had to live as second class citizens in their own country while their rich culture and history was erased and replaced by that of nomadic savages(Except for Persia). Or perhaps life was peaceful for the millions of castrated Africans in the plantations of Iraq? Incidentally, both Caliphates lasted for around a hundred years, and as can be expected the transition of power after said reign wasn't very peaceful.
Lol @ Afghans being peaceful. They were probably the largest group of Asian mercs after Turks and just like the latter, this was because their country was innately a violent place where violent men were created.
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
Everyone had to pay a tax. You're acting as if Muslims didn't pay Zakat, which was the equivalent of the Jizya at the time.
I said it was stable. Not that it was Just. Also, the people who lived in these areas, ie the Jews were treated better than they were in Europe. So clearly, it wasn't as bad as you frame it to be.
Low tier bait
Again. I said stable. You're acting as if many civilisations didn't build their empires off a subjected class.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-07-04
Definitely the same as just any other taxation
Were Abrahamics and Europe was barbaric too in this time period so there really isn't any point in comparing with it. Compare with China and India.
Really? So Arabs named Mohammad and Ali always inhabited Iraq, Syria, Levant, Egypt etc? It was the largest example of cultural genocide in history though it'll never be treated as such.
The castration was unique to Arabs and the sheer scale of the slave trade run by Islamic empires dwarved any else, which mandated constant predatory raids into neighbouring infidel territory(Anatolia, Med shoreline of Europe, India, Slavlands and so on)
1 mayofoidNPC 2019-07-04
eh it wasnt the wests fault their empires collapsed
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-07-04
Hmmm
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
The Middle East is inclusive sweaty.
1 JustLions 2019-07-04
Dude, Brazil is most definitely not fine. The violence, poverty, and corruption are pretty nuts.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-07-04
Everything's comparative. Ghana is decent compared to Liberia or Ivory Coast, Brazil is decent compared to Venezuela or Honduras.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-07-04
Lmao nigga wat? 😂😂😂
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
Being obliged by the UN to do something is more insignificant than Daddys two scoop ordeal.
You see, unless the US has signed, ratified and enacted this treaty as law, they have no obligation to take in these refugees.
AND even if they've done that, they can enter a reservation in regards to the law, meaning that it no longer applies to them. Not to mention just change the law.
AND, you seem to forget that nobodys going to hold the US to account if they don't comply with these international law. Who do you think funds the UN?
AND, you seem to be forgetting about State sovereignty:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-07-04
Lmao, imagine thinking the ability to ignore your obligations makes them not obligations 😂
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-07-04
Well yes, according to State Sovereignty, the ability to ignore obligations makes them not obligations.
1 theboywhocriedcuck 2019-07-04
People working harder for less isn't a good thing, you literal retarded cunt. By that metric slavery must be great because they work even harder and for even less again!
I may have misread your post because your first line is surely a joke?
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
by your retarded metric free trade that resulted in third world countries raising their standards massively due to them mostly being a option of "working harder for less" was a bad thing.
1 theboywhocriedcuck 2019-07-04
I couldn't care less about what happens in third world countries.
Look at how well it obviously worked (lol), considering the conversation at hand and this post in general I would say you are a mental invalid for suggesting what you are.
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
of course, having insular economies like retarded commies and mercantilists never goes horribly wrong. All the economists since adam smith were wrong and you are obviously right with your galaxy brain takes.
1 theboywhocriedcuck 2019-07-04
Hard to decipher much meaning from this really.
I guarantee you aren't talking about free trade though, because if it actually were free trade these shitholes would be fresh out of luck. Would they trade their expertise in building huts with human feces? lol.
The free trade you're talking about is essentially foreign aid. America gains nothing from dealing with shit hole nations and loses a lot.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-07-04
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
It unironically is and if you think otherwise you are just brainwashed by click bait media, you know why those sweat shops are so full? because the other option was often nearly starving on substinence farming. https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/international/sweatshops-make-poor-people-better-off
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-07-04
Shit the fuck up neolib. You offer a false dichotomy. Other options exist than neocolonialism.
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
no there isnt chapocel / nazicel, worship the almighty free markets throbbing economic growth.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-07-04
Using the biggest military in the world to back coups isn't "free market".
1 shitpersonality 2019-07-04
You have to house and feed slaves. They became more expensive than hiring people around the industrial revolution.
1 _bobsacamano 2019-07-04
You make it sound like they were commie paradises before big mean america got involved. They were always street shitting dumps run by dictators.
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
You make it sound like they didnt overthrow people who werent even communist just suspected of being "communist leaning"
1 _bobsacamano 2019-07-04
So you think these countries were rich before the us got involved?
1 Genuinetruthseeker 2019-07-04
Seeking asylum is legal.
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
fencehopping isnt
1 Genuinetruthseeker 2019-07-04
That's not what's happening. Legal asylum seekers are in the camps
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
and they'll be deported same as the rest
I see no problems here
1 Genuinetruthseeker 2019-07-04
That's not the point. You lied and I corrected you
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2019-07-04
I never lied
How is fencehopping not illegal
1 mayofoidNPC 2019-07-04
proof
1 VegetableMarketing7 2019-07-04
🐨Seek 🐨deez 🐨nuts 🐨bitxh🐨
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-07-04
See, this is what I mean. I don’t care about my personal politics, how can I not make fun of this guy? The raw seethe just keeps flowing.
1 Pinksister 2019-07-04
Everyone makes fun of him, that's the boring side. R/policicalhumor type shit.
1 21778798236731283942 2019-07-04
I want to say something funny but I don't know how to top this 🤔
1 Cat_Waffles 2019-07-04
bruh
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-07-04
Actually made me laugh. Good find
1 KanyeetWeebs 2019-07-04
The shit she does for free. Hoes mad(x24)
1 Ingelri 2019-07-04
I remember when I was 3 and decided to walk across the country and jump the fence
1 lolcows63 2019-07-04
True which is why it is critical to seperate them from their neglectful parents.
1 rocinantebabieca 2019-07-04
He has a point though
1 lolcows63 2019-07-04
True, what he needs to do for a power move is make the detained illegals build the wall.
1 Ubertroon 2019-07-04
The sentence alone is sending dopamine rushing into my head
1 BernieMadeoffSanders 2019-07-04
STOP I CAN ONLY GET SO HARD
1 Ardvarkeating101 2019-07-04
I mean, getting raped in a detention center is better than being shot in the head by a CIA installed dictator
1 theboywhocriedcuck 2019-07-04
The people that are raping them are in the same pool of hopeful refugees.. Let them in though!!
1 Genuinetruthseeker 2019-07-04
All White women have rape fantasies so yes we should let them in
1 theboywhocriedcuck 2019-07-04
They have fantasies of good looking men having slightly rough sex with them. I don't think they're too keen on these greasy beaner dicks raping them..
1 Genuinetruthseeker 2019-07-04
Nah they love that shit. You can't trust them. Bring them in, once they get raped a few times they'll learn to love it
1 simplicity3000 2019-07-04
mostly getting raped in the desert / tunnels before getting picked up by ICE
1 VegetableMarketing7 2019-07-04
In the Era of the Roman persecutions even those who looked upon christ in the flesh urged their followers to pray and obey the emperor.
A bad leader when above you should be cooperated with unto the well being of the state.
1 retardedjewboy420 2019-07-04
Butt chin faggot sends 72 angrily written tweets at mcdonald blumpfet
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
I hate him so fucking much because he ruins the chance of anyone actually managing to lay down some decent burns on him.
1 i_Chapo-d_my_pants 2019-07-04
😏 >!lol!<
1 TranzZnigglet 2019-07-04
Really looking forward to all the seeth
1 _bobsacamano 2019-07-04
LOL. You think boomer electricians in Ohio want to pay for illegals free healthcare?
1 BaldwinIVofJerusalem 2019-07-04
The first response is literally that something that happened over a century ago proves that your point is invalid and you need to rethink your political stance
1 Grundleberries 2019-07-04
I'm sure the Native Americans were consistently posting on Twitter #LetThemIn when the Mayflower descended on Massachusetts.
Thankfully, they were history proved them right. The illegal immigrants and Native Americans then cohabited in peace and harmony for the next 400 years.
1 Pepperglue 2019-07-04
Absolutely a dick move, but I love it so much.
1 Crypto-Shinobi 2019-07-04
People commenting that Trumps retarded for saying blatant common sense... what exactly is retarded about a country enforcing borders and what exactly is this obvious alternative thats not so retarded???
1 [deleted] 2019-07-04
[deleted]
1 allendrio 2019-07-04
not destroying a continent in a retarded prohibition war that was literally started to "own the blacks and hippies" so that you dont have a constant stream of refugees from your shitstirring would be a start.
1 CirqueDuFuder 2019-07-04
Very progressive and humanitarian
1 Claphandsgetbanned 2019-07-04
The real crime is not using third world slaves as much as possible when you think about it.
1 TranzZnigglet 2019-07-04
Yeah but only use them in their countries
1 Gaben38 2019-07-04
Fuck borders and shiet.
1 collectijism 2019-07-04
Liberalism only allows openness it has no patience for the logical or mathematical it only bleeds for the passions of the disenfranchised the babies the children the Muslims
1 theboywhocriedcuck 2019-07-04
Sounds good to me.. much like how I won't illegally cross their border, so I won't get camped either.
1 nomad1c 2019-07-04
i love that he clearly wrote this for no other reason than to piss people off
1 HammerSpamAtlantic 2019-07-04
Yep, just like that South American man and his daughter who washed up dead onshore after trying to illegally swim into the country... oh wait. They interviewed his family back in South America who said that he had a well-paying job and a nice place to live, but decided to flee to the U.S. because... he was tired of living with his mom. Such violence, such war, truly there is no better option than to let them all in 😤😤😤
1 mayofoidNPC 2019-07-04
gee cant imagine why thats happening