Steven Pinker is SEETHING and in Peak COPE as his connection with Epstein has been exposed.

95  2019-07-13 by DrunkDeity

56 comments

I can only confidently guarantee that the prostitute you end up making tender love to (lol) will shower longer than she usually does after your 5 shameful minutes of disappointing her

Snapshots:

  1. Steven Pinker is SEETHING and in Pe... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Good. Pinker is the biggest threat to radical centrism.

Imagine if he get's investigated. I wonder how many people Epstein will try to take down with him.

Ideally all of them and then some extras that had nothing to do with it for the lulz.

LiterallyWhoPill me on this guy and why he hates centrists.

The guy people will think you like if you say you’re a radical centrist.

Steven Pinker is basically a pseudo intellectual, psychologist and linguist, and popular science "author". He's pretty much a shitty cosmopolitan elitist that likes writing about "how everything is getting better", which is fuel to both the far left and right.

Extremists outraged at man who says things aren't that bad

smart people annoyed by man who acts like a retard

don't bring your personal problems into this

This but ironically

We're annoyed by you but I wouldn't call us smart

"how everything is getting better", which is** fuel to both the far left and right.**

whut

Seriouspost: just finished his book on violence and loved it and am curious what's wrong with it.

In his defense: No, it's not a scientifically rigorous work, but it's not intended for that purpose. It's not an academic study, and some small details might be wrong. But even with some wrong details, "violence has declined" is a "sky is blue" tier statement. The real value of the book is in its power to convince you of this very thoroughly.

Would you say he is Malcolm Gladwell adjacent?

He's nothing like Malcolm Gladwell

Gladwell is worse

Gladwell is the dude who wrote a hasty book report on one of Pinker's book he didn't read.

Pinker is a little annoying, but he's several orders of magnitude less bad than Gladwell

If anyone ever calls me that, I will shoot him and then myself

How about Chuck Klosterman perpendicular?

You submit opinion articles to the New York Times

mod him

Seriouspost: just finished his book on violence and loved it and am curious what's wrong with it.

In his defense: No, it's not a scientifically rigorous work, but it's not intended for that purpose. It's not an academic study, and some small details might be wrong. But even with some wrong details, "violence has declined" is a "sky is blue" tier statement. The real value of the book is in its power to convince you of this very thoroughly, not to be perfectly accurate cause that's for autists

The guy might be an obnoxious cunt IRL or something but I really loved that book tbh so lmk what's so bad about the dude or his books

The World's Most Annoying Man

tl;dr he's the reddit of intellectuals

>Current Affairs

Robinson is a contender for that title, himself.

Lol he sounds huffy as fuck in that article. So mad lmao

Imagine writing a multi-page cope because somebody said your leftoid politics are retarded and irrational, thereby proving them exactly correct.

Robinson authoring an article with that title surely opened up a rift within the space-irony continuum that split our reality from the prime reality. It explains a lot.

That's long

Why do you read that garbo rag?

I don't see how he's a threat to centrism - doesn't he boost it?

He collected a tonne of data on violence and general societal badness and showed that the world's is generally getting better, not worse. That's something extremists hate to hear because they need you to believe that the sky is about to collapse.

Leftists hate him because he showed rape has gone down and is much less common today, and that there's a massive hysteria surrounding it and it's alleged causes (like "rape is about power not sex." Which was accepted uncritically in academic circles despite there being no evidence for it). Too he showed that non-state societies are far more violent than state societies. Leftists hate hearing this because "muh noble peaceful savages."

I guess rightists might hate him because he showed that violent crime and homicide are also down too.

It was a popular science book, his data didn't even go through peer review

there's plenty of disagreement.

By communist blowhards with 'theory', not so much evidence.

So you would say he's an expert on rape 🤔

White male, so yeah.

Leftists hate him because he showed rape has gone down and is much less common today, and that there's a massive hysteria surrounding it and it's alleged causes (like "rape is about power not sex." Which was accepted uncritically in academic circles despite there being no evidence for it). Too he showed that non-state societies are far more violent than state societies. Leftists hate hearing this because "muh noble peaceful savages."

Based as fuck. Based beyond reproach.

> he showed that non-state societies are far more violent than state societies

He did? Where?

Is moderate centrism the biggest threat to radical centrism?

Anything that has the effect of controlled op is controlled op.

centrist purity testing certainly is

That guy in the middle in the picture... LMAO

Physicists all look like perverts

You mean Lawrence "Incest is ok as long as you use contraception" Krauss?

30 seconds of reading that dudes twitter and i already wanna puke.

The thread is filled with dramatards brushing off suggestions of minimum moral behaviour with

Oh the old "I would have done what is right!" fallacy.

lmao the cope is real

The people in the replies complaining about cancel culture are the real warriors. He's not getting heat for saying the n word in 1978, he's implicated in a global pedophile ring that raped children on a private island lmao

this is nice comment

Nice

Epstein, Pinker, Dershowitz... what do they all have in common? These shifty sneaky dangerous mayos really need to be stopped

Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker is that guy. He thinks many people are very unreasonable, and makes sweeping claims about their irrationality and moral imbecility, but often doesn’t bother to listen to what they actually say. While insisting for page upon page on the necessity of rationality, he irrationally caricatures and mocks ideas he hasn’t tried to understand. Then, when the people who believe those ideas become upset, he sees this as further proof of their emotion-driven thinking, and becomes even more convinced that he is right.

Literally pizzashill

Then, when the people who believe those ideas become upset, he sees this as further proof of their emotion-driven thinking, and becomes even more convinced that he is right.

Emotiondrivencels fragility 101 lmao

I always knew Pinker was a pedo somehow

Imagine if Epstein starts mentioning also some of the British Tory Party members. I don't know what is it about rich men that love children so much.

Seething about Steven Pinker

How and why?

https://i.warosu.org/data/lit/img/0107/49/1519454043412.png

​

Anglo intellectualism, not even once.