i wasn't doxxed, but i don't enjoy reddit as much as i used to. it feels like an addiction or a distraction at the moment and it's surprisingly sad how often i am noticing myself think "oh you should take a picture of this and share it" or "that's a funny story you should post this", i don't seem to enjoy doing things for the sake of it any more and rather it's me trying to get reactions out of people, whether that's disgust or laughter. last month i challenged myself to take a week off reddit because i noticed i was on it too much, i lasted 2 days and then started coming back on now, so recently i just thought fuck it i need to be able to go more than 2 days without going on here, that's not healthy. i was going to write something more in depth but i really just need to stop coming on here for a while, i said a month to myself so i'll go for that. the more time i spend on reddit, the less time i spend doing other things and it's not worth it for me. i see people spending so much time on social media and said i never wanted to be like them but i have become like that. so ill probably make a blog/video/something in a few weeks just to talk about it properly because i think a lot of people will be in similar positions and won't be aware of it or willing to try and change.

there's a lot on my mind at the moment so i just need to step back and think about what i should do now.

Snapshots:

1. Daddy tries some of this 4d chess s... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Daddy is such a moron. The dems are well on their way to self imploding but he just can’t help himself. The dems biggest hurdle for 2020 is going to be each other and daddies twitter dumps ironically play almost no part in it. Whenever I see these guys talking about racism I’m reminded of the Spider-Man pointing at Spider-Man meme.

How are the dems "are their way to self-imploding."

Stepping over homeless Americans to give immigrants health insurance, proposing decriminalizing border crossings and giving them insurance as a solution to the border problem, the ‘I’m not a racist you’re a racist’ public twitter spats become more frequent. Also moving too far left to be accessible to a large portion of middle America, there was a poll about the prominent faces of the party that didn’t look too promising either. I’m sure the list will grow in the next year or so as we get closer and daddy

That poll is a white pill.

Socialism was viewed favorably by 18% of the voters and unfavorably by 69%.

Capitalism was 56% favorable; 32% unfavorable.

Do I see room in there for the third position?

Well either the means of production are owned privately or socially. I suppose the only 3rd option is that the means of production are owned by nobody and we have to put our hammers and laptops into a large pit.

This seems like the most centrist option

Some kind of... anti-tech revolution you say??

THE INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION

the means of production are owned by nobody and we have to put our hammers and laptops into a large pit

Or what if we just don't have any means of production in the first place? What if we just make nothing.

We make things now?

Mercantilism gang represent!

Unironically yes.

​

Syncretic politics has worked very well here in Australia. Capitalism and Socialism can reconciliate.

This is just a list of things you don't though, it's not empirical data or any analysis showing the party was "imploding."

Especially considering they're coming off one of the largest midterm victories in recent history.

If by middle America you mean rurals, maybe, but rurals aren't relevant and the DNC doesn't need to their vote to win.

Oh, hello Ms. Clinton! How is the presidency going?

Rurals have been voting Republican for years dude. Voter turnout being low does not = rurals.

but rurals aren't relevant and the DNC doesn't need to their vote to win.

They lost several core blue states from the rural vote.

Literally not a single one of those states was "blue" in the sense idiots thought they were.

Republicans had been registering gains in them for years. The "myth of the blue wall" is up there with the myth of the red wall:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/there-is-no-blue-wall/

Clinton lost those states due to poor voter turnout. She lost by 80 thousand votes total in 3 states. It had nothing to do with rurals.

Core as in "We'll lose the election without them and they've been Dem for a few decades"

But they weren't core and the DNC doesn't need them to win elections anymore.

A midwestern strategy is probably still the best one currently, but a sunbelt strategy is perfectly viable.

Furthermore, rurals in those states have been voting Repulican for years, the reason she lost those states by razor thin margins was due to lower than expected voter turnout.

Eh, I would say Pennsylvania is still very important.

Maybe, but PA is unlikely to go red again, rurals or no rurals.

Like keep in mind that many of the people that switched to Trump in those states were just taking a chance, they were captured by white cultural grievance politics but a lot of them have already gone back democrat.

He's got a -9 net approval in PA. There's no way he beats Biden there.

Michigan is even worse, he's' got a -15.

https://morningconsult.com/tracking-trump/

Big soccer mom energy lol

But props on you for calling out every dem candidate for simultaneously saying “Medicare for all means Medicare for illegal immigrants only, no homeless people.”

👏👏👏

Seethe harder bootlicker 🥾

Do you have a source on that?

Source?

A source. I need a source.

Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

Do you have a degree in that field?

A college degree? In that field?

Then your arguments are invalid.

No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation.

CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

Nope, still haven't.

I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

Cope more

How did it taste?

Yes, when people make claims it's good to challenge them on said claims and ask for some evidence in support of them.

I get this was a copypasta, and I get you're fairly stupid, but asking someone which metric they're using to reach a conclusion doesn't fit.

We don't use no commie metric.

Comparing congressional and presidential approval ratings is utterly retarded.

Yeah Daddy is 100% giving them a common enemy to unify against.

You'd think so, but dems seem more interested in virtue-signalling and dragging each other down to prove how ideologically pure they are, than they care about winning elections. Or maybe they truly live in such a filter-bubble that they truly dont understand how they appear to everyone outside their cult.

Ceterum censeo industrial revolution delendam est

The biggest problems the dems have is infighting in the pull towards Socialist populism. They unironically have candidates being forced to argue for lax borders + a welfare state, anyone with half a brain knows this won't win a general election. I don't think for a second that Trump masterminded this with those tweets lmao but forcing them to bring freshman progressive retards into the spotlight isn't helping the dems. They want a united moderate left not a united far left.

Dawg I think at this point they just want a united something. I’m sure neither wing wants anything to do with the other, but come election time they’ll look back and lust for a time when they were only calling each other racist.

This is like shitting your pants so your parents have to stop fighting and clean you up while you make fun of them for smelling your shit. If he loses 2020 it's going to be because he doesn't know when to shut his fucking mouth.

hot

imagine wanting him to win, jesus christ

he's not even good at what he said he'd do

but he's good at drama

In the current political climate a slab of tofu would create drama if you put it in the oval office

That slab of tofu is a fucking commie propped up by the Democrats to destroy America.

Sounds like good drama to me.

He's literally the best drama since 9/11.

Yeah Its going to be hard to find a Democratic candidate bad enough for me to vote for daddy but watching the liberals as of late who knows.

Yeah but I've grown fond of his antics and retarded tweets.

Imagine a post-Trump world. It just seems to empty.

Imagine not putting money on the stock market with trump in office.

Jesus it’s like you people hate money

pretty specific scenario, man.

It made sense in my head.

I got what you were going for bro, no worries

Lol, thanks man.

If he wins, we get to witness perhaps the greatest meltdown in modern history.

If he loses, we get to witness a bunch of Q boomers mentally break down and potentially go postal.

Either way, it'll be interesting.

🤬

I wish I was a designated blue check daddy responder 😔

It sounds like an easy job. I wonder what hill gets paid?

dunno but I want in

Ryan Hill is prolly a room full of soiboiz and essjaydubbleyous working overtime

This makes it sound like he was actually talking about AOC in that original tweet. But I suppose it doesn’t actually matter even if he had said he wasn’t everyone who thought he was wouldn’t believe him.

I'll never get over the Twitter replies, like fucking why?

They’ve always seemed weird to me. They’re all literal-who’s with blue checkmarks that, as far as I can tell, only claim to fame is being at the top of Daddy’s tweets.

Imagine how lost all of these people would be. They hate Trump, but they require him to have their careers.

And people say daddy isn't a job creator😤😤

Daddy's been on a Twitter binge

Like a Bond villain explaining their plan before actually seeing it through, only if the villain were a retarded senior care escapee and Bond was a woketard blue check mark.

Burn this entire sphere until the surface is but glass.

My theory is that he's slipped so far into the throes of dementia that his mind has moved onto another plane of existence and he's now operating at a level we can no longer comprehend.

Simultaneously retarded and genius, his useless 3d body can no longer keep up with his dimensionally displaced mind.

Like an earthworm that's been given all of the knowledge of time and space and is trying as hard as it can to communicate what it's learned to us in vain.

“The four progressives” are absolutely kicking your lying racist as* during their press conference. 👏🏽👏🏽

Did... did she just censor the word ass???

they are endorsing hate of israel

Wtf i love dems now.

if only their was a party that hated Isreal Palestine and Guatemala now that would be a party for me.

He understands that this strategy doesn't work if you yell it out to the world right?