Lmao plebbitors believe they’re very smart for knowing the rules of chess

21  2019-07-30 by Slump_o

24 comments

do not comment or vote in linked threads

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

People with PCOS who are too fat to defend themselves or run away are fun to abuse. I like to take a spoon, heat it up until it's glowing hot, then place it on the skin while they're asleep. The reaction when they wake up after the 25th time of being burned by a redhot piece of metal is amazing. You can literally piecemeal their mental stability down to complete insanity, then leave them in their own homes helpless and alone. :DDDDDDDDDD

Snapshots:

  1. Lmao plebbitors believe they’re ver... - archive.org, archive.today, removeddit.com

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Only nerds play chess

Ya but when you’re world class status like magnus Carlsen you’re at least a badass nerd

Chess is based. You use all the pieces to serve your own best interest and you let the foid think she's in control when ultimately the only thing that matters is the Chad King.

The king is the stay at home dad who lets his foid do all the work until he dumps her in the end and and moves up to the middle. Truly a game for patricians.

Or promotes a pawn to a younger, more attractive queen.

The virgin chess vs the chad poker

wrong

Chess is fun if you're evenly matched with whoever you're playing

True patricians play go, chess is for slavs

Wow. I remember when dankmemes wasn’t rarditted. F.

See, now you're just making shit up.

Okay, pretty Reddit, but not straight-up pun chains. If there were I didn’t see em anyway.

I mean, you don't have to talk about chess in the first place, but if you're going to, why be wilfully ignorant about it? The rules ain't hard.

In that diagram, yes there should be Kings, but if you're playing some weird game where it's just about taking all the other guy's pieces, Black is dead lost. White promotes unless Black gives the knight for the pawn, and if White promotes, it's a trivial task for a queen to round up a knight on an empty board. But eh. Hardly the mark of a genius to work that out.

I have no idea what you’re talking about. What happens is knight trades for pawn and then white mates with rook and king.

There aren't any kings in the diagram. That's what the argument was about.

O. They probably didn’t want to put stuff that they couldn’t label

Maybe.

There was once a fun game between Emanuel Lasker and Edward Lasker in which the latter reached an ending with Rook and Pawn against the former's Knight, and bizarrely, thanks to the position of the Kings, there was no way to win. Rough luck on Ed. Lasker, who wasn't in the same class as his distant relative and could have used the win.

...I mean "dude bussy lmao", of course.

Who cares about that nerd, Botvinnik is bae

Is anyone here even going to pretend they’re FIDE?

i’m a boniFIDE gamer

based