You didn't even read it, did you? You just disregarded it because it doesn't fit your world view. You are pathetic, scum of the earth. People present you with scientifically backed evidence showing how the world really is and you disregard it because it is brought to your attention by a group of people you find inferior to you.
In some languages it's a common word used to refer to a friend. You seem to have a real hard on for hating on leftism according to your comment history. Idiot.
Now, can you please enlighten me about your meme ideology? At what point do the guillotines come out? Where are the trans cutie threads on r/Anarchism? Do you feel emasculated by Chapo?
​
All these questions are put forward to you, AnarchyBreadBoy. Ironic, seeing as how bread and boot is all you'll be eating come the revolution.
Anarchism is against hierarchy, you dumb twat.
The guillotines come out when we have gathered the rich together. Anarchism subreddit is more for serious conversations and discussions so no trans cutie thread, sorry. And no I don't feel emasculated by chapo. I'm a huge chapo fan.
Hierarchy is not human nature. There are Alot of companies that work as cooperatives and it works great. Just because you can't imagine not having your bosses cock down your throat, doesn't mean its not possible. Bosses are an unnecessary thing.
The typical ignorant "human nature" comment. Try and use your brain a little more if you're gonna try and sound smart.
Because bosses are people with money. Currently poor workers have no choice but to sell their labor to capitalists. We need to work towards it starting with unions and workers taking over their workplaces. Sadly we still live in a capitalist society where rich people own the means of production. That doesn't mean there is no other way.
Btw saying that is dumb. That's like saying "if not having concentration camps is moral, then why don't governments disband them? Hurr durr".
Maybe if you just use your brain a tiny tiny bit more, you can see and imagine a world where you don't lick boots 24/7.
The cooperatives? Uhhhh by using their money together? Take motion twin for example. The studio that made the dead cells game. Everyone is equal there. No bosses. Everyone collectively decided on how to make the game. Everyone from the janitor to the programmer is paid the same salary. Everyone owns equal part of the studio.
Have you tried applying that model to a group of over 100? Literally any mode of governance works in a small group of <100 people due to being under Dunbar's number. Larger co-ops have agreed-upon hierarchies and also have no problem with hiring lower-rung contractors.
Alot of coders love programming free and open source software. So using coders is working against your argument. Free and open source software is one of the biggest communist things I can think of.
I never said traditional corporations don't work. I'm saying that these are almost always bad for the employees and good for the owners and shareholders.
I use OpenOffice myself and there's just no comparison between it and Microsoft Word, the lines literally blur into each other if I work too long. For stuff like Excel, it's much worse of course, word processor is quiet simple in comparison. Programmers are probably the professional group with the largest amount of down time, most of them are in maintenance related stuff that barely requires 20% of their official work hours. Yet, they can't put together one product that is as professional as the ones Microsoft makes.
So don't be an employee? The shareholders are paid for the capital they put at risk, if you put an equivalent capital up at the same risk you can become a shareholder too.
Why wouldn't an owner like me fire all of the bosses and save payroll, enriching my Jewish self even further while laughing at the poors even more than I currently do?
There are Alot of companies that work as cooperatives and it works great.
They all have "bosses", I think you are confusing managers (which are also wage laborers) and shareholders. Understandable, given your age and inexperience.
At Mondragon, there are agreed-upon wage ratios between executive work and field or factory work which earns a minimum wage. These ratios range from 3:1 to 9:1 in different cooperatives and average 5:1. That is, the general manager of an average Mondragon cooperative earns no more than 5 times as much as the theoretical minimum wage paid in their cooperative.
Oh I didn't know that. That's really cool. But there are also Alot of cooperatives, most smaller though to be fair, that have their own salary system where people are even more equal.
But to say EVERY cooperative has bosses is a little ridiculous.
For instance, your bull will always be valued by your wife more than you. This is a hierarchy of competence, whether the revolution has occurred or not.
Bruh the most cooperative businesses have the strongest hierarchies. I was in one, a few people followd the completely unofficial leader without question just cuz he was competent. They did things on their own too ofc but one guy set course. Idiot
It's kind of dumb to call me an idiot, while you yourself are making an incredibly dumb argument.
A leader does not equal a boss. If people collectively vote for somebody to take lead, that is fine. Everyone would still have the same power but to make decisions easier, they have 1 person lead the way.
Again, a leader does not equal a boss.
If its justified, its oke. Bosses are not justifiable. It's the same a kid having parents. It's a justifiable hierarchy.
Like I said, there is a big difference between a boss and a leader
Yeah exactly. We have to admit that while we produce ALOT under capitalism, we produce a shit load of junk. We overproduce food and throw almost half of it away. We pump out a ton of plastic crap that is destroying our oceans. We are ordered to work harder and more every year to keep profits high.
It's not a good system. People are dying because they can't afford healthcare and rent and school etc.
Alot of junk food like McDonald's is stuffed with preservatives to keep it on the shelf as long as possible. We are actively poisoning ourselves and the planet with bullshit just for the rich to become richer.
In Alot of companies, its the workers that manage everything. From sale to development and ordering stuff and putting it in the stores etc. Like with supermarkets. We don't really need bosses. No boss is justify able because no boss deserves 300 times more money than a worker.
I read the other day that wages of bosses have increased over the past decades with like 300-400% while worker wages have been stagnant. We are being fucked over and we thank them for it.
There will always be people bitching. I've learned to not care so much what others think of me. It's useless to try and satisfy everyone around me. As long as you don't harm others in the process, just be yourself. All of us like calling each other comrade and it doesn't hurt anyone. So I don't really care.
56 comments
1 AutoModerator 2019-08-15
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SnapshillBot 2019-08-15
You didn't even read it, did you? You just disregarded it because it doesn't fit your world view. You are pathetic, scum of the earth. People present you with scientifically backed evidence showing how the world really is and you disregard it because it is brought to your attention by a group of people you find inferior to you.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 3men1pencil 2019-08-15
>This could be any other group of people and we would have a problem:
>”Only shooting firefighters" "Only shooting gardeners" "Only shooting African Americans"
Wow, it’s almost like there’s a difference between cops and all those groups, retard
ACAB
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-15
Anyone who unironically says "comrade", should be barred from joining the gene pool.
1 YaBoyStevieF 2019-08-15
Implying they aren't already
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-15
Sorry, I meant barred from the "existing" pool.
1 YaBoyStevieF 2019-08-15
40% of them will be
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-15
Those are rookie numbers.
1 YaBoyStevieF 2019-08-15
True, that's an F. I expect an A
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
In some languages it's a common word used to refer to a friend. You seem to have a real hard on for hating on leftism according to your comment history. Idiot.
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-15
Listen, I hate both sides equally.
​
Now, can you please enlighten me about your meme ideology? At what point do the guillotines come out? Where are the trans cutie threads on r/Anarchism? Do you feel emasculated by Chapo?
​
All these questions are put forward to you, AnarchyBreadBoy. Ironic, seeing as how bread and boot is all you'll be eating come the revolution.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Anarchism is against hierarchy, you dumb twat. The guillotines come out when we have gathered the rich together. Anarchism subreddit is more for serious conversations and discussions so no trans cutie thread, sorry. And no I don't feel emasculated by chapo. I'm a huge chapo fan.
"muh both sides are bad 🤪"
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-15
Hierachies are inherent to the evolution of human society. To act as if you can "remove that" is laughable.
​
Even by guilloting the rich, hierachies will emerge once more. You're denying human nature at this point.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Hierarchy is not human nature. There are Alot of companies that work as cooperatives and it works great. Just because you can't imagine not having your bosses cock down your throat, doesn't mean its not possible. Bosses are an unnecessary thing.
The typical ignorant "human nature" comment. Try and use your brain a little more if you're gonna try and sound smart.
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-15
"bosses are an unneccessary thing"
​
If not having a boss is so productive, why don't companies disband them?
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Because bosses are people with money. Currently poor workers have no choice but to sell their labor to capitalists. We need to work towards it starting with unions and workers taking over their workplaces. Sadly we still live in a capitalist society where rich people own the means of production. That doesn't mean there is no other way.
Btw saying that is dumb. That's like saying "if not having concentration camps is moral, then why don't governments disband them? Hurr durr".
Maybe if you just use your brain a tiny tiny bit more, you can see and imagine a world where you don't lick boots 24/7.
1 Professor_Crunchwrap 2019-08-15
Imagine being poor lmao 🤣🤣🤣
1 swimisafuckingidiot 2019-08-15
I’m not anyone’s boss but I have plenty of money now. In school I was quite a few people’s boss but I was poor still. How is that possible?
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-08-15
How did they acquire the money?
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
The cooperatives? Uhhhh by using their money together? Take motion twin for example. The studio that made the dead cells game. Everyone is equal there. No bosses. Everyone collectively decided on how to make the game. Everyone from the janitor to the programmer is paid the same salary. Everyone owns equal part of the studio.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-08-15
Have you tried applying that model to a group of over 100? Literally any mode of governance works in a small group of <100 people due to being under Dunbar's number. Larger co-ops have agreed-upon hierarchies and also have no problem with hiring lower-rung contractors.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-08-15
Remind me again, if these models are so successful why are all three tech giants traditional corporations?
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Alot of coders love programming free and open source software. So using coders is working against your argument. Free and open source software is one of the biggest communist things I can think of.
I never said traditional corporations don't work. I'm saying that these are almost always bad for the employees and good for the owners and shareholders.
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-08-15
I use OpenOffice myself and there's just no comparison between it and Microsoft Word, the lines literally blur into each other if I work too long. For stuff like Excel, it's much worse of course, word processor is quiet simple in comparison. Programmers are probably the professional group with the largest amount of down time, most of them are in maintenance related stuff that barely requires 20% of their official work hours. Yet, they can't put together one product that is as professional as the ones Microsoft makes.
So don't be an employee? The shareholders are paid for the capital they put at risk, if you put an equivalent capital up at the same risk you can become a shareholder too.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-15
Why wouldn't an owner like me fire all of the bosses and save payroll, enriching my Jewish self even further while laughing at the poors even more than I currently do?
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Nice troll.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-15
Thank you kind gentle'xir. Mayhaps I bestow you a single lowly Reddit shekel for a bread boy 😍
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Please do daddy 😍
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-08-15
lol
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-15
They all have "bosses", I think you are confusing managers (which are also wage laborers) and shareholders. Understandable, given your age and inexperience.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Lol. They don't.
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-15
At Mondragon, there are agreed-upon wage ratios between executive work and field or factory work which earns a minimum wage. These ratios range from 3:1 to 9:1 in different cooperatives and average 5:1. That is, the general manager of an average Mondragon cooperative earns no more than 5 times as much as the theoretical minimum wage paid in their cooperative.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Oh I didn't know that. That's really cool. But there are also Alot of cooperatives, most smaller though to be fair, that have their own salary system where people are even more equal. But to say EVERY cooperative has bosses is a little ridiculous.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-15
Those co-ops have hierarchies within them lol.
For instance, your bull will always be valued by your wife more than you. This is a hierarchy of competence, whether the revolution has occurred or not.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Lol. I'm sorry your brain is to tiny to imagine a world where you aren't a sub.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-15
I have buttworms 😕
1 F_t_M_t_F 2019-08-15
Bruh the most cooperative businesses have the strongest hierarchies. I was in one, a few people followd the completely unofficial leader without question just cuz he was competent. They did things on their own too ofc but one guy set course. Idiot
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
It's kind of dumb to call me an idiot, while you yourself are making an incredibly dumb argument.
A leader does not equal a boss. If people collectively vote for somebody to take lead, that is fine. Everyone would still have the same power but to make decisions easier, they have 1 person lead the way. Again, a leader does not equal a boss.
1 F_t_M_t_F 2019-08-15
we're talking about hierarchies
leadership is a hierarchy
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
If its justified, its oke. Bosses are not justifiable. It's the same a kid having parents. It's a justifiable hierarchy. Like I said, there is a big difference between a boss and a leader
1 HogPostBot 2019-08-15
I mean I think McDonald's isn't justifies no because you have a boss but because you are producing absolute junk with no nutrients
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Yeah exactly. We have to admit that while we produce ALOT under capitalism, we produce a shit load of junk. We overproduce food and throw almost half of it away. We pump out a ton of plastic crap that is destroying our oceans. We are ordered to work harder and more every year to keep profits high. It's not a good system. People are dying because they can't afford healthcare and rent and school etc.
Alot of junk food like McDonald's is stuffed with preservatives to keep it on the shelf as long as possible. We are actively poisoning ourselves and the planet with bullshit just for the rich to become richer.
In Alot of companies, its the workers that manage everything. From sale to development and ordering stuff and putting it in the stores etc. Like with supermarkets. We don't really need bosses. No boss is justify able because no boss deserves 300 times more money than a worker.
I read the other day that wages of bosses have increased over the past decades with like 300-400% while worker wages have been stagnant. We are being fucked over and we thank them for it.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/aug/16/ceo-versus-worker-wage-american-companies-pay-gap-study-2018
1 HogPostBot 2019-08-15
Bro I want all industrial society to die
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
Amen. 🙇
1 Professor_Crunchwrap 2019-08-15
Imagine being poor lmao 🤣🤣🤣
1 MikeStoklasaBackup 2019-08-15
🤣🤣🤣
1 YaBoyStevieF 2019-08-15
Do you plan on switching to an ideology that doesn't suck ass, or do you expect to be a failure your entire life?
1 Woolgun 2019-08-15
Yes, and 99,9% of those who use it don't speak that language you LARPer.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
"hmmm... Nah, they must be roleplaying. No way I've been sucking my boss's cock all these years while another world was possible."
1 Woolgun 2019-08-15
Oh I don't know or care what kind of job you have, if you work in a coop good for you.
It's just that using words like comrade just makes you look like retards to every outsider.
1 AnarchyBreadBoy 2019-08-15
There will always be people bitching. I've learned to not care so much what others think of me. It's useless to try and satisfy everyone around me. As long as you don't harm others in the process, just be yourself. All of us like calling each other comrade and it doesn't hurt anyone. So I don't really care.
1 tonguelessnitch 2019-08-15
They really want to follow donaldo and chappys, I see.
1 newcomer_ts 2019-08-15
Holy shit!
It's not, you dumbass.
1 Kellere31 2019-08-15
Hey kiddos it's the left wing deathsquads here to take your shit and be hip. 😎
1 transgirltradwife 2019-08-15
its*