Iβve lived with my ex for over a year iβm already resigned to being the hermit crab equivalent of a man. I have nothing to lose cept this bitch i already hate which makes me incredibly dangerous π¦
Yes. Me too. The only way society can progress is when western countries adopt a more holistic approach to living, such as Iraq and the great people of Native America. Fucking dogs would be a good first step, and we are already making great progress in the colonizer-femoid community.
White people brought horses to the Americaβs like the brought Nigs. If the Natives were too dumb to invent them then how did they have sex with them?
He's bullshitting about the 2spirit nonsense like every other tumblr refugee who discovered the term, but horses actually evolved in North America before moving to Eurasia over the Bering land bridge, and were probably hunted to extinction by would-be natives coming the other way over the land bridge.
Calling someone a two-spirit is the Native-American way to say "no homo." Basically all other third-gender classifications are also an excuse to fuck someone in the butt without being accused of being gay.
I have my own degenerate fetishes, thankfully none of them illegal, that I'll never reveal to another soul even under torture. I'm sure pedos can do the same, if they do no one ever need know that they are pedos.
Not a right to exist, according to a good bit of folk. And by some state laws regarding mandatory reporting it can be a bitch and a half for them to seek help for their degenerate bent.
Glad we agree that you shouldn't touch kids, weird that you mention it out of left field though.
Well, in California, they don't have a right to seek assistance for their mental illness, because of how mandatory reporting regarding children works over there. Even if they haven't offended, disclosing their inclinations to a therapist is enough to mandate that they report.
These laws that are meant to protect children, by making mandatory reporting so broad, is preventing pedos from getting therapy to get over the time they were touched by Uncle Bob and maybe stop getting a stiffie at the park.
Second, I've been fucking busy because I'm not a Troon communist. Therefore I have a functional relationship with my parents so I picked them up from their airport after their vacation and went to my fucking job afterwards. Give me a fucking minute before I read your regurgitated shit force-fed to you by the Pro-PRC quasi-effort post someone posted in the reddit commiesphere that turned you all into bootlickers of Authoritarian Sino-Nationalists because they have red flags and constantly claim "THIS IS JUST LIKE LENIN'S N.E.P.". You're not even people, people have individual thoughts and beliefs and you guys don't, I can only stomach hearing the same cookie cutter tranny Commy sino fetishism so many fucking times.
As I've said before fucking a girl in the ass or getting a blowjob from a girl isn't gay so as long as you're not getting pegged or something troids are certified straight.
Def not like those fucking mongs you'd know that if you read the fucking messages.
Lol does that mean you live with your parents? You're the one calling me a loser. Also just because I'm a trad wife rn doesn't mean I don't have stuff to do.
Also I don't have unique opinions? I'm a Dengist basically Nazbol who's racist against Anglos and Pollocks. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Realistically the only thing the USSR did was Stalin's social model which after it faded the USSR died. That's why Stalin is still the most popular leader of Russia in Russia today.
Def not like those fucking mongs you'd know that if you read the fucking messages.
Even troons have to incessantly nag about how they're "not like other girls" πππ
Lol does that mean you live with your parents? You're the one calling me a loser.
I'm gonna blow your fuckin melon here, but socially functional people typically have a healthy relationship with their families and, if they live nearby, will sacrifice their time to help those around them. For someone who is supposed to be a communist it's fucking mind boggling you cannot understand the concept of altruistically giving up your time and labor for the sake of helping other people, you have to assume they're fucking hobos living with mommy and daddy.
Also just because I'm a trad wife unemployed and poor rn doesn't mean I don't have stuff to do
Left without comment
That's why Stalin is still the most popular leader of Russia in Russia today.
Holy fuck, imagine being this retarded. Here's from an interview with, you know, an actual historian and probably the greatest Stalin expert in the world:
When asked whether his biography coincided with the Russian narrative of Stalin, Kotkin explained that there is not one βRussian narrative of Stalin.β
βThereβs the regime Stalin and the popular understanding of Stalin,β he said. βThey donβt fully coincide.β
For political convenience, Kotkin said, the regime of current Russian president Vladimir Putin has whitewashed Stalin. Stalin was not an anti-capitalist, or even Communist. Stalin was the leader that made Russia an international power.
βHe's not a man who engages in gratuitous mayhem, murdering everyone in sight,β said Kotkin, β[The Putin regime] instead paints him as the great leader, the statesman, the great arbiter of world affairs, the victor of World War II, the man who presided over the spoils of the war with Roosevelt and Churchill.β
Kotkin describes Russiaβs popular understanding of Stalin as ambivalent. Russians have accepted that Stalin might have killed and imprisoned many of his own people, but his victories have outweighed his disturbing record.
βPeople think βHe killed my grandfatherβ or βHe imprisoned my grandmother,ββ said Kotkin. βYou could go on. Many, many people alive today β their families were affected by Stalinβs terror, deportations, famines.β
Unlike the clean, patriotic version of Stalin presented by the Russian government, societyβs version accepts his acts as a necessary evil. According to a Russian poll conducted last June, Russians consider Stalin βthe most outstandingβ figure in world history. The Russian literary figure Alexander Pushkin is tied for second with Vladimir Putin.
Now, this is a quote from an interview with an actual historian. I'd actually suggest you, you know, read his fucking book or something but at least if you're not willing to read a book at least read an interview or watch a lecture instead of larping up what Redditors told you.
Russian's view him favorably due to a mixture of Russian nationalism for making the USSR a superpower, the fact Stalin was in power when WWII was won, and because they viewed him as a necessary evil, not because he was a communist.
Lol that's fair I just spend most of my time on the internet arguing with the exact people you're talking about so being lumped in with them fucking hurts me. Also I'm pretty sure that's like the third time you complained that I acted like a woman. I'll take the vaguely sexist comments as a compliment though
That's also fair. I can't help the fact that I was abandoned at 15 for being trans and talking to my other family members about my stepdads abuse. I like community but have despised my family for a long time.
Not unemployed I just haven't been put on the schedule yet and spot with the poor.
It's almost like the reason he's still popular is because of his impact on the social structure and pan-nationalism which is exactly what I praised him for lol I noted in my last message that I just liked Stalin for that.
Lol that's fair I just spend most of my time on the internet arguing
Imagine if you spent 1/10th of that time reading academic articles and university published books on the subjects you are so retardedly passionate about πππ
Also I'm pretty sure that's like the third time you complained that I acted like a woman. I'll take the vaguely sexist comments as a compliment though
Imagine coming into a community built around the idea of bullying eachother for fun and getting upset you're being bullied. Unironically nobody cares you're trans.
t's almost like the reason he's still popular is because of his impact on the social structure and pan-nationalism which is exactly what I praised him for lol I noted in my last message that I just liked Stalin for that
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
Nobody in Russia gives a shit about the social structure Stalin made, they care about the accomplishments that are (often falsely) attributed to him. That said, imagine being such a meme of a human being your praise for Stalin is the fact he was "pan-nationalist" i.e. someone who annexed other countries and shoved socialist propaganda and Russian chauvinism π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£πππππππππ
I read do spend a rather large amount of time reading books, editorials and academic articles primarily on the Chinese economy.
I literally am saying the exact opposite. I was saying I was flattered at how you were bullying me and that it was infact very validating.
They still uphold Stalin's social structure and the majority parties on the left right and center push Soviet social structures and Soviet traditionalism.
imagine being such a meme of a human being your praise for Stalin is the fact he was "pan-nationalist" i.e. someone who annexed other countries and shoved socialist propaganda and Russian chauvinism
Unironically a good thing. The world is built off the back of empire and Stalin did it well
I read do spend a rather large amount of time reading books, editorials and academic articles primarily on the Chinese economy.
So you should be in the loop on how their model is already running out of steam despite the fact that they're not even close to becoming a developed country, they have a massive demographic problem that's gonna skull-fuck them in the next decade, income inquality is some of the highest in the world, and they lack the economic strength to ever reasonably develop the kind of military needed for long-range power projection? π€
majority parties on the left right and center push Soviet social structures and Soviet traditionalism.
There is only one major political party in Russia, lmfao imagine thinking that Russia in any way close to being even a bourgeois democracy π€£π€£π€£
Unironically a good thing. The world is built off the back of empire and Stalin did it well
Unironically I can fucking understand why your boyfriend went from fashy to 'commy'. All you did was make him from a boot-licking, authoritarian state worshipping useful idiot with a white coat of paint into a boot-licking, authoritarian state worshipping useful idiot with a red coat of paint π€£π€£π€£ Witness the fucking magic of Shenis
China passed the US in GDP(PPP) in like 2014 and is above a basically all European nations in the East and the Balkans. If you count the GDP per capita in cities ei a large part of China it's well into the developed nation category. As well as as per capita disposable income is measurably higher than Romania and are essentially equal to Hungary and Poland all three "developed nations". China's economy "failing" is western speculation and China's GDP growth of 6.6% is staggering compared to other countries at it's level of development.
Imagine just eating western narrative like it's candy. No Russian candidate has disappeared and one journo had a heart attack that the west blamed on the government.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assembly_(Russia) here's the Wikipedia article on the Duma.
It makes sense the United Russia has a choke hold because it's essentially a right leaning social democratic party that saved the country from Yeltsin and Putin is still a very popular leader.
Imagine not understanding how media bias works. Major pubs in the us still send all articles to the state apartment to be approved here and the people who own the media also own the politicians in western nations so their media is just as censored as China's. The rulers of the country censor the media in both. What else makes China "authoritarian"? The "social credit system"? The one that was a more lax version of how credit works in the west?
Also income inequality is balanced out in China due to the fact that billionaires often don't last long and whenever they fuck up they get their resources nationalized and get the wall so it's fine. China keeps capitalist as little rats to boost the economy and nothing more.
Note this is a longpost. If you're too lazy to read it all than at least read to the part where I teach you what Marxism is in its most basic form because you're clearly fucking clueless on it, champ. I'll put a little marker there for you.
China passed the US in GDP(PPP)
No shit, having 1.4 billion people means you can be shitass poor overall and still have a large GDP. It doesn't change the fact that they cannot afford the decades-long project of building and training a massive Navy (the key to long-rage power projection) while still maintaining a massive defensive landforce (as China still needs to protect its massive boarders, an extremely expensive task that the US doesn't need to do). China also has one ally and it's North fucking Korea lmao, China cannot ever hope to have the power projeciton of the US.
Eastern Europe is shit, checkmate π
Jesus fuck, that's retarded. Nobody ever claimed goddamn Romania, a country that has unironically legalized direct bribery, to be a good growth model lmao.
per capita disposable income
Per capita is literally just one small indicator of quality of life, and an insanely poor one at that. Stick to PPP, GINI coefficients and the Human Development index. Oh, and BTW:
Basically, don't compare Poland and China favorably you dense troon lmao, you look retarded. Cherry picking one aspect of their economy that favors China isn't a great accomplishment when you refuse to look at everything else lol.
Russia still democracy wikipedia say so
When I link historians and you link wikipedia I'm going to just say do fucking better and I'll consider what you have to say. It wasn't the trans shit that made your parents disown you, it was your lack of fucking citations.
Major pubs in the us still send all articles to the state apartment to be approved here
Nigger, what? π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
The one that was a more lax version of how credit works in the west?
Jesus fuck, imagine not even understanding that there is not 'one' social credit system and that there were literally a metric shitton of pilot programs where each one had different metrics for measuring social credit as well as different punishments for not being a good little Sino-Drone πππ don't worry, outside of the fact your trans you would otherwise have an excellent social credit score no matter where you go, they love bootlickers over there.
China keeps capitalist as little rats to boost the economy and nothing more.
SKIP TO HERE IF YOU'RE LAZY
OK, so this is actually where it gets difficult because I'm about to do something so anathema to internet communists that it may make you finally join the 40% once and for all: we're gonna talk THEORY π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±
So, since I have no fucking clue how little you know about Marxist theory (I'm assuming virtually nothing) we are going to start with some basic ass terms. This is gonna be simplified as fuck because you're an internet communist so you genuinely don't know anything about your self-professed ideology and need kind-hearted neoliberals like me to explain it for you.
Means of production: things that are used to produce goods and services (farmland, minerals, tools, machines)
Relations of production: How you relate to the means of production, typically divided into bourgeoisie (owns means of production) and proletariat (works for the bourgeoisie)
Base: A society's means of production and relations of production. The base DETERMINES the superstructure
Superstructure: Art, culture, family structure, politics, legal systems the superstructure INFLUENCES but CANNOT DETERMINE the base. The superstructure will ALWAYS be subordinate to the base
The base and superstructure are probably the two most important aspect of Marxism. We're keeping shit simple here so we won't go over shit like historical materialism and dialectics, but suffice to say history has a pattern where the material conditions of society (the base) gets to the point where the class that controls the base is overthrown by the class below them. Marxism posits that the final overthrow of capitalism will be the proletariat overthrowing the bourgeoisie. The Chinese Communist Party had intended on overthrowing the bourgeoisie (in fact, it meant to do it twice, once through their actual revolution and again through the cultural revolution, which was intended to remove lingering bourgeois thoughts and feelings from the society) and you can argue they sort of succeeded. Kind of.
The problem was the Dengist reforms that reintroduced capitalist elements to the society, and those elements have expanded greatly since. You can point out that the economy is still largely state-dominated/influenced, that they are just doing a neo-NEP policy to increase their means of production, that they sometimes prosecute/kill billionaires, etc.
The problem is that you CANNOT reject the fact that the RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION HAVE NOW BECOME CAPITALIST IN NATURE. This is ESSENTIAL for a Marxist analysis of contemporary China. It doesn't matter if the state owns the means of production if wage labor (and thus exploitation of workers) is still how workers relate to the means of production, as per Engels himself.
This is why China cannot be Marxist from a Marxist perspective, China has a capitalist relation to production and, by extension, a capitalist base. Base determines superstructure which means that if you have a capitalist base it will determine your superstructure. Since your superstructure includes your political system than it is impossible to have a capitalist base and proletarian political system as capitalist bases produce capitalist political institutions.
This is what Lenin and Stalin understood. There is a reason the NEP was a temporary retreat from socialism and it is the same reason that Stalin was unrelentingly cruel when smashing what he considered Kulaks: the NEP was a temporary reintroduction of a capitalist relation to production in the countryside. Since it was limited to only a certain part of the country it could temporarily exist and not threaten the socialist relations of production in the cities, but if they allowed it to exist for too long it would end in a capitalist counter-revolution because the base determines the superstructure. Stalin had to remove what capitalist elements that existed within the total base of the USSR with such severity because he needed to ensure it could never reemerge.
Now China has made NEP look like a kid selling lemonade on the street corner in terms of the scale of reintroducing capitalist relations of production into their economy and you are now trying to argue that they are still a proletarian state because you've never fucking read theory.
I just effort-post explained to them what Marxism is because they're fucking clueless, if you want to read it go ahead. For how ridiculously retarded Marxism is it is nevertheless a very interesting and nuanced ideology.
Note this is a longpost. If you're too lazy to read it all than at least read to the part where I teach you what Marxism is in its most basic form because you're clearly fucking clueless on it, champ. I'll put a little marker there for you.
China passed the US in GDP(PPP)
No shit, having 1.4 billion people means you can be shitass poor overall and still have a large GDP. It doesn't change the fact that they cannot afford the decades-long project of building and training a massive Navy (the key to long-rage power projection) while still maintaining a massive defensive landforce (as China still needs to protect its massive boarders, an extremely expensive task that the US doesn't need to do). China also has one ally and it's North fucking Korea lmao, China cannot ever hope to have the power projeciton of the US.
Eastern Europe is shit, checkmate π
Jesus fuck, that's retarded. Nobody ever claimed goddamn Romania, a country that has unironically legalized direct bribery, to be a good growth model lmao.
per capita disposable income
Per capita is literally just one small indicator of quality of life, and an insanely poor one at that. Stick to PPP, GINI coefficients and the Human Development index. Oh, and BTW:
Basically, don't compare Poland and China favorably you dense troon lmao, you look retarded. Cherry picking one aspect of their economy that favors China isn't a great accomplishment when you refuse to look at everything else lol.
Russia still democracy wikipedia say so
When I link historians and you link wikipedia I'm going to just say do fucking better and I'll consider what you have to say. It wasn't the trans shit that made your parents disown you, it was your lack of fucking citations.
Major pubs in the us still send all articles to the state apartment to be approved here
Nigger, what? π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
The one that was a more lax version of how credit works in the west?
Jesus fuck, imagine not even understanding that there is not 'one' social credit system and that there were literally a metric shitton of pilot programs where each one had different metrics for measuring social credit as well as different punishments for not being a good little Sino-Drone πππ don't worry, outside of the fact your trans you would otherwise have an excellent social credit score no matter where you go, they love bootlickers over there.
China keeps capitalist as little rats to boost the economy and nothing more.
SKIP TO HERE IF YOU'RE LAZY
OK, so this is actually where it gets difficult because I'm about to do something so anathema to internet communists that it may make you finally join the 40% once and for all: we're gonna talk THEORY π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±
Because I don't know precisely how little you know about Marxist theory (I'm assuming virtually nothing) we are going to start with some basic ass terms. This is gonna be simplified as fuck because you're an internet communist, therefore you genuinely don't know anything about your self-professed ideology and need kind-hearted neoliberals like me to explain it for you.
Means of production: things that are used to produce goods and services (farmland, minerals, tools, machines)
Relations of production: How you relate to the means of production, typically divided into bourgeoisie (owns means of production) and proletariat (works for the bourgeoisie)
Base: A society's means of production and relations of production. The base DETERMINES the superstructure
Superstructure: Art, culture, family structure, politics, legal systems the superstructure INFLUENCES but CANNOT DETERMINE the base. The superstructure will ALWAYS be subordinate to the base
The base and superstructure are probably the two most important aspect of Marxism. We're keeping shit simple here so we won't go over shit like historical materialism and dialectics, but suffice to say history has a pattern where the material conditions of society (the base) gets to the point where the class that controls the base is overthrown by the class below them. Marxism posits that the final overthrow of capitalism will be the proletariat overthrowing the bourgeoisie. The Chinese Communist Party had intended on overthrowing the bourgeoisie (in fact, it meant to do it twice, once through their actual revolution and again through the cultural revolution, which was intended to remove lingering bourgeois thoughts and feelings from the society) and you can argue they sort of succeeded. Kind of.
The problem was the Dengist reforms that reintroduced capitalist elements to the society, and those elements have expanded greatly since. You can point out that the economy is still largely state-dominated/influenced, that they are just doing a neo-NEP policy to increase their means of production, that they sometimes prosecute/kill billionaires, etc.
The problem is that you CANNOT reject the fact that the RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION HAVE NOW BECOME CAPITALIST IN NATURE. This is ESSENTIAL for a Marxist analysis of contemporary China. It doesn't matter if the state owns the means of production if wage labor (and thus exploitation of workers) is still how workers relate to the means of production, as per Engels himself.
This is why China cannot be Marxist from a Marxist perspective, China has a capitalist relation to production and, by extension, a capitalist base. Base determines superstructure which means that if you have a capitalist base it will determine your superstructure. Since your superstructure includes your political system than it is impossible to have a capitalist base and proletarian political system as capitalist bases produce capitalist political institutions.
This is what Lenin and Stalin understood. There is a reason the NEP was a temporary retreat from socialism and it is the same reason that Stalin was unrelentingly cruel when smashing what he considered Kulaks: the NEP was a temporary reintroduction of a capitalist relation to production in the countryside. Since it was limited to only a certain part of the country it could temporarily exist and not threaten the socialist relations of production in the cities, but if they allowed it to exist for too long it would end in a capitalist counter-revolution because the base determines the superstructure. Stalin had to remove what capitalist elements that existed within the total base of the USSR with such severity because he needed to ensure it could never reemerge.
Now China has made NEP look like a kid selling lemonade on the street corner in terms of the scale of reintroducing capitalist relations of production into their economy and you are now trying to argue that they are still a proletarian state because you've never fucking read theory.
Yeah, but socialism is when the proletarians are working 12 hour days, six days a week, earning $1/h. Meanwhile, the owner of the company (this is not the worker) is a billionaire.
Labor unions are borderline illegal, GDP is now 70% produced by the private sector and growing by the day. Welfare is lower than the (also communist) United States).
Also, China has gulags, but only for Muslims. Clearly, China is more socialisty than you are willing to admit. A money-less, classless, nonbigoted society where the workers own the means of production. Try visiting and asking a party member if China is communist, if you want to go right to the source.
Also income inequality is balanced out in China due to the fact that billionaires often don't last long and whenever they fuck up they get their resources nationalized and get the wall so it's fine
China has more billionaires than any other country and worse inequality than the United States.
"don't worry slave, we stole a billionaires money two years ago and used to to develop facial recognition to oppress you even more. You are welcome. We hope you are enjoying your workers paradise."
lol. Have you ever been. I lived in Shenzhen, it's hilarious. The workers are literal slaves for gorillionaires, working for pennies. Where are you getting your propaganda from? Try talking to someone in the working class from China.
I have close friends and step family in china. Your personal anecdote is definitely more reliable than hard economic data. I've also explained the income equality
The hard economic data all says China has worse income inequality than the US. Sorry dude, my anecdote was just backing up the reality. China is currently the most based and redpilled country on the planet. COPE
Again it has one of the highest real wage increases and minimum wage increases in the entire world couples with rigid and we'll enforced labor laws. The Chinese government has lifted 35k out of poverty a day for 5 years straight and has European living standards in more of it population than exist in most European countries. I've explained this before billionaires don't last long in china if they fuck up once they get executed and have their assets nationalized having billionaires isn't that bad when they just farm foreign investment that the government will eventually nationalize
The Chinese government has lifted 35k out of poverty a day for 5 years straight
This shouldn't be surprising with hyper-capitalism for almost 40 years now.
has European living standards in more of it population than exist in most European countries.
lol
I've explained this before billionaires don't last long in china if they fuck up once they get executed
Dude, I love China what china is doing. You don't have to sell me on it. Unfortunately, the only thing they get executed for is going against the CCP, not employing near slave labor with shit working conditions.
farm foreign investment that the government will eventually nationalize
It's always fun to see the folks plant stories. to shit on others political beliefs. Believe nothing of what you read and half of what you see. It's an easy lesson. I learned it when I was 4. Why would horse fucking be a political issue, when it's almost universally shunned (although there are a lot of lonely farmers, and many helpless sheep).
Try neutrally parsing all the words of the arguments that faggotry isnt degenerate and tell me it cant be used for everything humping related.
FFS the supreme court gay marriage decision came down to something like "people have a (((right))) to (((love))) who they want without judgement or discrimination".
Yup I knew what tweet it was gonna be before opening. This made it to a Facebook group Iβm in, itβs 100% a psyop I would guess itβs probably some 4chan retard
170 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-08-18
Iβve lived with my ex for over a year iβm already resigned to being the hermit crab equivalent of a man. I have nothing to lose cept this bitch i already hate which makes me incredibly dangerous π¦
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 NeoSupaZupa 2019-08-18
People have taken larking to a whole new level. I hope. For if these people actually believe this BS, that asteroid cannot come soon enough.
1 Zozbot 2019-08-18
zoz
1 Zozbot 2019-08-18
zle
1 Zozbot 2019-08-18
zozzle
1 rsrfy 2019-08-18
may the asteroid strike suddenly and without mercy, just as Zozbot π
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
I can't quite say if he actually believes this and isn't being intellectually dishonest, but his whole profile is genuine.
1 NeoSupaZupa 2019-08-18
Those the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. The world will need more lunatic asylums if this Twitterer is genuine.
1 charming_tatum 2019-08-18
Elsewhere in his twitter he admits to being a celibate zoo(phile?) and claims he is ostracised because of that
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
Yeah. He even says "Anti-zoos" are alt right Lmao.
1 trexmundi 2019-08-18
Review of the account history and immediate community appears to indicate that this is genuine. You may act accordingly.
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
π
1 Moist__nuggets 2019-08-18
Look, I'm going to fuck my dog and then chop my dick off. You're a bigot if aren't in full support of me.
1 songthatendstheworld 2019-08-18
Just put your dick in the sharp end.
1 Ingelri 2019-08-18
I'm so embarrased, I wish everyone else was dead.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
Yes. Me too. The only way society can progress is when western countries adopt a more holistic approach to living, such as Iraq and the great people of Native America. Fucking dogs would be a good first step, and we are already making great progress in the colonizer-femoid community.
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-18
It's funny because it's ridiculously racist and ignorant to say native americans' culture = furry culture.
Also I like how the most recent post on his Twitter is about being in an abusive relationship
1 Some_Khajiit 2019-08-18
I was honestly sad to find out the asteroid wasn't going to hit us.
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
What's up with the downvotes? π€
1 fakeandgay-bot 2019-08-18
It's the furry apologists.
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
The cleansing can't come soon enough
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
CAutist
OUT OUT OUT
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
Show me my CA posts, you mong.
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2019-08-18
I'd page our residents CAfugee Wrangler to take care of that for the two of you but the badmins hate us
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
You probably have that tards phone number tattooed in your asshole so why don't you give xer a call?
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2019-08-18
I keep my bussy clean, that includes ink. You're asking the wrong sperg
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
I would if they didn't get Shoah'd
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
Shit excuse. Start digging.
1 fakeandgay-bot 2019-08-18
What's worst: Being a CAfugee or being active in cringetopia?
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
CAfugee. No doubt.
1 CantWakeUpJPG 2019-08-18
CAfugee.
1 Habahz 2019-08-18
Being both
1 Cookiedoughjunkie 2019-08-18
Are you saying all furries are Jews?
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
No?
1 Qwikskoupa69 2019-08-18
Are you retarded?
1 Cookiedoughjunkie 2019-08-18
Sorry, is it all Jews are furries?
1 drake_irl 2019-08-18
If i got a time machine i would save the first nations people and instead implement a furry final solution
1 SnickersRey 2019-08-18
White people brought horses to the Americaβs like the brought Nigs. If the Natives were too dumb to invent them then how did they have sex with them?
1 Papastump90 2019-08-18
πππ
1 Kellere31 2019-08-18
What do you mean they didnt had genetic laboratories in the 15th century yet? Fucking savages.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
You make the two smallest buffalo fuck. In a few hundred years, boom. There's a horse, and maybe even a mule or a donkey.
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
I guess they fucked alpacas?
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-08-18
I hear they don't swallow though.
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[removed]
1 ConcreteAddictedCity 2019-08-18
Test
1 reebokpumps 2019-08-18
You sound like a faggot
1 CarlosSpcyWeiner 2019-08-18
DONT πFUCK π HORSES π IF π YOU π DIDNT π INVENT π THEM π
1 Ultrashitposter 2019-08-18
But horses werent around in North America until the Europeans introduced them.
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
Didn't know about that, man. Makes sense that horses are also shipped into America like mayo horse girls
1 itoucheditforacookie 2019-08-18
And camels are shipped to Africa
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
This is a chicken or the egg question.
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[deleted]
1 THOT-AUDITOR 2019-08-18
He's bullshitting about the 2spirit nonsense like every other tumblr refugee who discovered the term, but horses actually evolved in North America before moving to Eurasia over the Bering land bridge, and were probably hunted to extinction by would-be natives coming the other way over the land bridge.
1 trexmundi 2019-08-18
2spirit is also a term that was invented by a mayo in the 1990s based on the work of an earlier mayo in the 1970s.
1 Wopitikitotengo 2019-08-18
Source? I hate to ask but it's my least favourite troid/furfag cope and I'd like to back it ip
1 Fortizen 2019-08-18
The term two-spirit was created in 1990 at the Indigenous lesbian and gay international gathering in Winnipeg, and "specifically chosen to distinguish and distance Native American/First Nations people from non-Native peoples."
Day of the rake can't come soon enough
1 CommissarCletus 2019-08-18
Whatβs 2spirit?
1 addictedidol 2019-08-18
1 dongas420 2019-08-18
Calling someone a two-spirit is the Native-American way to say "no homo." Basically all other third-gender classifications are also an excuse to fuck someone in the butt without being accused of being gay.
1 rDramaWorstsubreddit 2019-08-18
So its a special sexuality only for native americans? All of them or just the northern ones?
1 Fortizen 2019-08-18
White people term for indigenous crossdressers
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[removed]
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-08-18
Wow, horses lived in Siberia too. I really want to go to pre Holocene Siberia/Beringia, they seem like really cool places.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
Rip goats. π
1 onafriday 2019-08-18
This is what happens when you nuke your grey matter with a cocktail of Ritalin and adderall from youth.
This is a scorching hot amphetamine-fueled schizo take.
1 wizdumb337 2019-08-18
Bring back bullying!
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
Bullying couldn't have saved this guy. He probably should be institutionalized.
1 Feanorfanclub 2019-08-18
Amazing how some people get so woke that if we treat their nonsense as true it reads like an argument for imperialism, not against
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-18
As they say, one man's modus ponens in another man's modus tollens βπ¨βπ
1 The_Pandemonium 2019-08-18
1 TrailerParkRide 2019-08-18
Also this part where a less-degenerate furfag mocks him and he doesn't get it.
1 ServantLix 2019-08-18
To be honest. I don't get it either.
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-18
Be thankful
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
Furfag infighting
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
> tfw you fight for the rights of gay people and then all the child molestors and dog fuckers pile on so now you are stuck defending them too unless you want your proggressive friends to label you as a bigot because the house of cards oppression pyramid you have been building
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
I think the fight is for pedo rights, not child molester rights.
Because, you know, child molesters have previously hurt chill'uns by definition. And pedos are just sad and weird but haven't necessarily hurt anyone.
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
You are right and that actually makes it even worse.
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
X to doubt
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
Doubt what?
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
Doubt it's worse. Unless you're really suggesting kiddler diddlers deserve acceptance more than libertarians.
1 CapeshitterCOPE 2019-08-18
Pedo cope. Pedope of you will
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[removed]
1 Sasanka_Of_Gauda 2019-08-18
I have my own degenerate fetishes, thankfully none of them illegal, that I'll never reveal to another soul even under torture. I'm sure pedos can do the same, if they do no one ever need know that they are pedos.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
They already have rights retard. Kiddie diddling isn't a human right.
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
Not a right to exist, according to a good bit of folk. And by some state laws regarding mandatory reporting it can be a bitch and a half for them to seek help for their degenerate bent.
Glad we agree that you shouldn't touch kids, weird that you mention it out of left field though.
1 Happypumkin 2019-08-18
What rights don't they have
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
Well, in California, they don't have a right to seek assistance for their mental illness, because of how mandatory reporting regarding children works over there. Even if they haven't offended, disclosing their inclinations to a therapist is enough to mandate that they report.
These laws that are meant to protect children, by making mandatory reporting so broad, is preventing pedos from getting therapy to get over the time they were touched by Uncle Bob and maybe stop getting a stiffie at the park.
1 Happypumkin 2019-08-18
That doesn't mean they can't seek assistance they still can do that though π€
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
That is an incredible barrier and social cost to care that has been erected for no benefit though.
1 Happypumkin 2019-08-18
But they can still do it no?
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
I'd argue no, that makes it inaccessible.
1 LeEbinBost 2019-08-18
The furfag has "bruh" as one of his pronouns
1 CapeshitterCOPE 2019-08-18
My pronouns are Zim/Dib/GIR
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2019-08-18
This is that guy at Walmart that huffs freon and raids farms in a crusade to fuck every animal of every gender
1 VicisSubsisto 2019-08-18
Why are there so many farms and animals in your Walmart?
1 FrostBittenSalsa 2019-08-18
Why aren't there any in yours?
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
Horses were reintroduced to North America only after colonists arrived with them. First Nation peoples probably fucked deer or something.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
They fucked the American horses to excinctation.
1 CommissarCletus 2019-08-18
whatβs First Nation?
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-18
The people descended from the populations that settled in America before European colonialism.
1 boyoyoyoyong 2019-08-18
The internet was supposed to bring knowledge to the masses instead its a place where the mentally ill can congregate
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
That's a liberal if I've ever seen one don't group that shit in with me.
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
yeah, shut the fuck up and own up, commie. He's an ancom like you too.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
Wow. Even worse.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
Ancoms are retarded. At least a stalinist society could function. Anarcho-communism would dissolve into Mad Max World almost instantaneously.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
Agreed
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
You're my new favorite retard π€π€π€
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
Respond to my wall of text faggot
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
First of as a Rational Skepticβ’ Radical CentristΒ©, I have scientific evidence to show that me being willing to fuck troons doesn't make me gay so my anti-faggot firewall is even higher than Daddy Poohbears anti-Western firewall.
Second, I've been fucking busy because I'm not a Troon communist. Therefore I have a functional relationship with my parents so I picked them up from their airport after their vacation and went to my fucking job afterwards. Give me a fucking minute before I read your regurgitated shit force-fed to you by the Pro-PRC quasi-effort post someone posted in the reddit commiesphere that turned you all into bootlickers of Authoritarian Sino-Nationalists because they have red flags and constantly claim "THIS IS JUST LIKE LENIN'S N.E.P.". You're not even people, people have individual thoughts and beliefs and you guys don't, I can only stomach hearing the same cookie cutter tranny Commy sino fetishism so many fucking times.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
As I've said before fucking a girl in the ass or getting a blowjob from a girl isn't gay so as long as you're not getting pegged or something troids are certified straight.
Def not like those fucking mongs you'd know that if you read the fucking messages.
Lol does that mean you live with your parents? You're the one calling me a loser. Also just because I'm a trad wife rn doesn't mean I don't have stuff to do.
Also I don't have unique opinions? I'm a Dengist basically Nazbol who's racist against Anglos and Pollocks. I've said it before and I'll say it again. Realistically the only thing the USSR did was Stalin's social model which after it faded the USSR died. That's why Stalin is still the most popular leader of Russia in Russia today.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
Even troons have to incessantly nag about how they're "not like other girls" πππ
I'm gonna blow your fuckin melon here, but socially functional people typically have a healthy relationship with their families and, if they live nearby, will sacrifice their time to help those around them. For someone who is supposed to be a communist it's fucking mind boggling you cannot understand the concept of altruistically giving up your time and labor for the sake of helping other people, you have to assume they're fucking hobos living with mommy and daddy.
Left without comment
Holy fuck, imagine being this retarded. Here's from an interview with, you know, an actual historian and probably the greatest Stalin expert in the world:
Now, this is a quote from an interview with an actual historian. I'd actually suggest you, you know, read his fucking book or something but at least if you're not willing to read a book at least read an interview or watch a lecture instead of larping up what Redditors told you.
Russian's view him favorably due to a mixture of Russian nationalism for making the USSR a superpower, the fact Stalin was in power when WWII was won, and because they viewed him as a necessary evil, not because he was a communist.
1 LongPostBot 2019-08-18
No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
Lol that's fair I just spend most of my time on the internet arguing with the exact people you're talking about so being lumped in with them fucking hurts me. Also I'm pretty sure that's like the third time you complained that I acted like a woman. I'll take the vaguely sexist comments as a compliment though
That's also fair. I can't help the fact that I was abandoned at 15 for being trans and talking to my other family members about my stepdads abuse. I like community but have despised my family for a long time.
Not unemployed I just haven't been put on the schedule yet and spot with the poor.
It's almost like the reason he's still popular is because of his impact on the social structure and pan-nationalism which is exactly what I praised him for lol I noted in my last message that I just liked Stalin for that.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
Imagine if you spent 1/10th of that time reading academic articles and university published books on the subjects you are so retardedly passionate about πππ
Imagine coming into a community built around the idea of bullying eachother for fun and getting upset you're being bullied. Unironically nobody cares you're trans.
π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
Nobody in Russia gives a shit about the social structure Stalin made, they care about the accomplishments that are (often falsely) attributed to him. That said, imagine being such a meme of a human being your praise for Stalin is the fact he was "pan-nationalist" i.e. someone who annexed other countries and shoved socialist propaganda and Russian chauvinism π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£πππππππππ
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
I read do spend a rather large amount of time reading books, editorials and academic articles primarily on the Chinese economy.
I literally am saying the exact opposite. I was saying I was flattered at how you were bullying me and that it was infact very validating.
They still uphold Stalin's social structure and the majority parties on the left right and center push Soviet social structures and Soviet traditionalism.
Unironically a good thing. The world is built off the back of empire and Stalin did it well
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
So you should be in the loop on how their model is already running out of steam despite the fact that they're not even close to becoming a developed country, they have a massive demographic problem that's gonna skull-fuck them in the next decade, income inquality is some of the highest in the world, and they lack the economic strength to ever reasonably develop the kind of military needed for long-range power projection? π€
There is only one major political party in Russia, lmfao imagine thinking that Russia in any way close to being even a bourgeois democracy π€£π€£π€£
Unironically I can fucking understand why your boyfriend went from fashy to 'commy'. All you did was make him from a boot-licking, authoritarian state worshipping useful idiot with a white coat of paint into a boot-licking, authoritarian state worshipping useful idiot with a red coat of paint π€£π€£π€£ Witness the fucking magic of Shenis
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
China passed the US in GDP(PPP) in like 2014 and is above a basically all European nations in the East and the Balkans. If you count the GDP per capita in cities ei a large part of China it's well into the developed nation category. As well as as per capita disposable income is measurably higher than Romania and are essentially equal to Hungary and Poland all three "developed nations". China's economy "failing" is western speculation and China's GDP growth of 6.6% is staggering compared to other countries at it's level of development.
Imagine just eating western narrative like it's candy. No Russian candidate has disappeared and one journo had a heart attack that the west blamed on the government. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Assembly_(Russia) here's the Wikipedia article on the Duma. It makes sense the United Russia has a choke hold because it's essentially a right leaning social democratic party that saved the country from Yeltsin and Putin is still a very popular leader.
Imagine not understanding how media bias works. Major pubs in the us still send all articles to the state apartment to be approved here and the people who own the media also own the politicians in western nations so their media is just as censored as China's. The rulers of the country censor the media in both. What else makes China "authoritarian"? The "social credit system"? The one that was a more lax version of how credit works in the west?
Also income inequality is balanced out in China due to the fact that billionaires often don't last long and whenever they fuck up they get their resources nationalized and get the wall so it's fine. China keeps capitalist as little rats to boost the economy and nothing more.
1 LongPostBot 2019-08-18
Mommy is soooo proud of you, sweaty. Let's put this sperg out up on the fridge with all your other failures.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
Note this is a longpost. If you're too lazy to read it all than at least read to the part where I teach you what Marxism is in its most basic form because you're clearly fucking clueless on it, champ. I'll put a little marker there for you.
No shit, having 1.4 billion people means you can be shitass poor overall and still have a large GDP. It doesn't change the fact that they cannot afford the decades-long project of building and training a massive Navy (the key to long-rage power projection) while still maintaining a massive defensive landforce (as China still needs to protect its massive boarders, an extremely expensive task that the US doesn't need to do). China also has one ally and it's North fucking Korea lmao, China cannot ever hope to have the power projeciton of the US.
Jesus fuck, that's retarded. Nobody ever claimed goddamn Romania, a country that has unironically legalized direct bribery, to be a good growth model lmao.
Per capita is literally just one small indicator of quality of life, and an insanely poor one at that. Stick to PPP, GINI coefficients and the Human Development index. Oh, and BTW:
Poland: $32,350 per capita PPP / 30.8 and lowering GINI / [0.865 HDI](hdr.undp.org/en/composite/HDI)
China: $18,200 Per capita PPP / 38.6 and lowering GINI / .752 HDI
Basically, don't compare Poland and China favorably you dense troon lmao, you look retarded. Cherry picking one aspect of their economy that favors China isn't a great accomplishment when you refuse to look at everything else lol.
When I link historians and you link wikipedia I'm going to just say do fucking better and I'll consider what you have to say. It wasn't the trans shit that made your parents disown you, it was your lack of fucking citations.
Nigger, what? π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
Jesus fuck, imagine not even understanding that there is not 'one' social credit system and that there were literally a metric shitton of pilot programs where each one had different metrics for measuring social credit as well as different punishments for not being a good little Sino-Drone πππ don't worry, outside of the fact your trans you would otherwise have an excellent social credit score no matter where you go, they love bootlickers over there.
SKIP TO HERE IF YOU'RE LAZY
OK, so this is actually where it gets difficult because I'm about to do something so anathema to internet communists that it may make you finally join the 40% once and for all: we're gonna talk THEORY π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±
So, since I have no fucking clue how little you know about Marxist theory (I'm assuming virtually nothing) we are going to start with some basic ass terms. This is gonna be simplified as fuck because you're an internet communist so you genuinely don't know anything about your self-professed ideology and need kind-hearted neoliberals like me to explain it for you.
Means of production: things that are used to produce goods and services (farmland, minerals, tools, machines)
Relations of production: How you relate to the means of production, typically divided into bourgeoisie (owns means of production) and proletariat (works for the bourgeoisie)
Base: A society's means of production and relations of production. The base DETERMINES the superstructure
Superstructure: Art, culture, family structure, politics, legal systems the superstructure INFLUENCES but CANNOT DETERMINE the base. The superstructure will ALWAYS be subordinate to the base
The base and superstructure are probably the two most important aspect of Marxism. We're keeping shit simple here so we won't go over shit like historical materialism and dialectics, but suffice to say history has a pattern where the material conditions of society (the base) gets to the point where the class that controls the base is overthrown by the class below them. Marxism posits that the final overthrow of capitalism will be the proletariat overthrowing the bourgeoisie. The Chinese Communist Party had intended on overthrowing the bourgeoisie (in fact, it meant to do it twice, once through their actual revolution and again through the cultural revolution, which was intended to remove lingering bourgeois thoughts and feelings from the society) and you can argue they sort of succeeded. Kind of.
The problem was the Dengist reforms that reintroduced capitalist elements to the society, and those elements have expanded greatly since. You can point out that the economy is still largely state-dominated/influenced, that they are just doing a neo-NEP policy to increase their means of production, that they sometimes prosecute/kill billionaires, etc.
The problem is that you CANNOT reject the fact that the RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION HAVE NOW BECOME CAPITALIST IN NATURE. This is ESSENTIAL for a Marxist analysis of contemporary China. It doesn't matter if the state owns the means of production if wage labor (and thus exploitation of workers) is still how workers relate to the means of production, as per Engels himself.
This is why China cannot be Marxist from a Marxist perspective, China has a capitalist relation to production and, by extension, a capitalist base. Base determines superstructure which means that if you have a capitalist base it will determine your superstructure. Since your superstructure includes your political system than it is impossible to have a capitalist base and proletarian political system as capitalist bases produce capitalist political institutions.
This is what Lenin and Stalin understood. There is a reason the NEP was a temporary retreat from socialism and it is the same reason that Stalin was unrelentingly cruel when smashing what he considered Kulaks: the NEP was a temporary reintroduction of a capitalist relation to production in the countryside. Since it was limited to only a certain part of the country it could temporarily exist and not threaten the socialist relations of production in the cities, but if they allowed it to exist for too long it would end in a capitalist counter-revolution because the base determines the superstructure. Stalin had to remove what capitalist elements that existed within the total base of the USSR with such severity because he needed to ensure it could never reemerge.
Now China has made NEP look like a kid selling lemonade on the street corner in terms of the scale of reintroducing capitalist relations of production into their economy and you are now trying to argue that they are still a proletarian state because you've never fucking read theory.
1 LongPostBot 2019-08-18
I don't have enough spoons to read this shit
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 Stenwalden 2019-08-18
So which one of you won?
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
I just effort-post explained to them what Marxism is because they're fucking clueless, if you want to read it go ahead. For how ridiculously retarded Marxism is it is nevertheless a very interesting and nuanced ideology.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-18
Note this is a longpost. If you're too lazy to read it all than at least read to the part where I teach you what Marxism is in its most basic form because you're clearly fucking clueless on it, champ. I'll put a little marker there for you.
No shit, having 1.4 billion people means you can be shitass poor overall and still have a large GDP. It doesn't change the fact that they cannot afford the decades-long project of building and training a massive Navy (the key to long-rage power projection) while still maintaining a massive defensive landforce (as China still needs to protect its massive boarders, an extremely expensive task that the US doesn't need to do). China also has one ally and it's North fucking Korea lmao, China cannot ever hope to have the power projeciton of the US.
Jesus fuck, that's retarded. Nobody ever claimed goddamn Romania, a country that has unironically legalized direct bribery, to be a good growth model lmao.
Per capita is literally just one small indicator of quality of life, and an insanely poor one at that. Stick to PPP, GINI coefficients and the Human Development index. Oh, and BTW:
Poland: $32,350 per capita PPP / 30.8 and lowering GINI / [0.865 HDI](hdr.undp.org/en/composite/HDI)
China: $18,200 Per capita PPP / 38.6 and lowering GINI / .752 HDI
Basically, don't compare Poland and China favorably you dense troon lmao, you look retarded. Cherry picking one aspect of their economy that favors China isn't a great accomplishment when you refuse to look at everything else lol.
When I link historians and you link wikipedia I'm going to just say do fucking better and I'll consider what you have to say. It wasn't the trans shit that made your parents disown you, it was your lack of fucking citations.
Nigger, what? π€£π€£π€£π€£π€£
Jesus fuck, imagine not even understanding that there is not 'one' social credit system and that there were literally a metric shitton of pilot programs where each one had different metrics for measuring social credit as well as different punishments for not being a good little Sino-Drone πππ don't worry, outside of the fact your trans you would otherwise have an excellent social credit score no matter where you go, they love bootlickers over there.
SKIP TO HERE IF YOU'RE LAZY
OK, so this is actually where it gets difficult because I'm about to do something so anathema to internet communists that it may make you finally join the 40% once and for all: we're gonna talk THEORY π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±π±
Because I don't know precisely how little you know about Marxist theory (I'm assuming virtually nothing) we are going to start with some basic ass terms. This is gonna be simplified as fuck because you're an internet communist, therefore you genuinely don't know anything about your self-professed ideology and need kind-hearted neoliberals like me to explain it for you.
Means of production: things that are used to produce goods and services (farmland, minerals, tools, machines)
Relations of production: How you relate to the means of production, typically divided into bourgeoisie (owns means of production) and proletariat (works for the bourgeoisie)
Base: A society's means of production and relations of production. The base DETERMINES the superstructure
Superstructure: Art, culture, family structure, politics, legal systems the superstructure INFLUENCES but CANNOT DETERMINE the base. The superstructure will ALWAYS be subordinate to the base
The base and superstructure are probably the two most important aspect of Marxism. We're keeping shit simple here so we won't go over shit like historical materialism and dialectics, but suffice to say history has a pattern where the material conditions of society (the base) gets to the point where the class that controls the base is overthrown by the class below them. Marxism posits that the final overthrow of capitalism will be the proletariat overthrowing the bourgeoisie. The Chinese Communist Party had intended on overthrowing the bourgeoisie (in fact, it meant to do it twice, once through their actual revolution and again through the cultural revolution, which was intended to remove lingering bourgeois thoughts and feelings from the society) and you can argue they sort of succeeded. Kind of.
The problem was the Dengist reforms that reintroduced capitalist elements to the society, and those elements have expanded greatly since. You can point out that the economy is still largely state-dominated/influenced, that they are just doing a neo-NEP policy to increase their means of production, that they sometimes prosecute/kill billionaires, etc.
The problem is that you CANNOT reject the fact that the RELATIONS OF PRODUCTION HAVE NOW BECOME CAPITALIST IN NATURE. This is ESSENTIAL for a Marxist analysis of contemporary China. It doesn't matter if the state owns the means of production if wage labor (and thus exploitation of workers) is still how workers relate to the means of production, as per Engels himself.
This is why China cannot be Marxist from a Marxist perspective, China has a capitalist relation to production and, by extension, a capitalist base. Base determines superstructure which means that if you have a capitalist base it will determine your superstructure. Since your superstructure includes your political system than it is impossible to have a capitalist base and proletarian political system as capitalist bases produce capitalist political institutions.
This is what Lenin and Stalin understood. There is a reason the NEP was a temporary retreat from socialism and it is the same reason that Stalin was unrelentingly cruel when smashing what he considered Kulaks: the NEP was a temporary reintroduction of a capitalist relation to production in the countryside. Since it was limited to only a certain part of the country it could temporarily exist and not threaten the socialist relations of production in the cities, but if they allowed it to exist for too long it would end in a capitalist counter-revolution because the base determines the superstructure. Stalin had to remove what capitalist elements that existed within the total base of the USSR with such severity because he needed to ensure it could never reemerge.
Now China has made NEP look like a kid selling lemonade on the street corner in terms of the scale of reintroducing capitalist relations of production into their economy and you are now trying to argue that they are still a proletarian state because you've never fucking read theory.
1 LongPostBot 2019-08-18
Mommy is soooo proud of you, sweaty. Let's put this sperg out up on the fridge with all your other failures.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
Yeah, but socialism is when the proletarians are working 12 hour days, six days a week, earning $1/h. Meanwhile, the owner of the company (this is not the worker) is a billionaire.
Labor unions are borderline illegal, GDP is now 70% produced by the private sector and growing by the day. Welfare is lower than the (also communist) United States).
Also, China has gulags, but only for Muslims. Clearly, China is more socialisty than you are willing to admit. A money-less, classless, nonbigoted society where the workers own the means of production. Try visiting and asking a party member if China is communist, if you want to go right to the source.
Be better.
1 thrownoutofdodge 2019-08-18
^ illiterate retard
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
...and?
1 MikeHuntIsAnAsshole 2019-08-18
Honestly, after attempting to read all that, I understand the mental breakdown.
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
China has more billionaires than any other country and worse inequality than the United States.
"don't worry slave, we stole a billionaires money two years ago and used to to develop facial recognition to oppress you even more. You are welcome. We hope you are enjoying your workers paradise."
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
"Yeah but the propeganda told me China bad though"
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
12 hour days, 6 days a week.
Good.
Labor.
Laws. =)
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
https://www.cecc.gov/resources/legal-provisions/labor-law-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china
Idk where you got your info but it's really wrong
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
good shit from 1994 =)
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-45457224
One guy saying something who later stepped down due to the backlash is definitely indicative of the whole system
American billionaires don't say like that all the time trust me
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
Poor guy. What is he going to do with his 40 billion :(
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
Rampant inequality is based and red-pilled.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
Besides article 50 which was a standard at the time show this inequality
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2018-09-23/china-s-racing-to-the-top-in-income-inequality
lol. Have you ever been. I lived in Shenzhen, it's hilarious. The workers are literal slaves for gorillionaires, working for pennies. Where are you getting your propaganda from? Try talking to someone in the working class from China.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
I have close friends and step family in china. Your personal anecdote is definitely more reliable than hard economic data. I've also explained the income equality
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
The hard economic data all says China has worse income inequality than the US. Sorry dude, my anecdote was just backing up the reality. China is currently the most based and redpilled country on the planet. COPE
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-08-18
Again it has one of the highest real wage increases and minimum wage increases in the entire world couples with rigid and we'll enforced labor laws. The Chinese government has lifted 35k out of poverty a day for 5 years straight and has European living standards in more of it population than exist in most European countries. I've explained this before billionaires don't last long in china if they fuck up once they get executed and have their assets nationalized having billionaires isn't that bad when they just farm foreign investment that the government will eventually nationalize
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-18
This shouldn't be surprising with hyper-capitalism for almost 40 years now.
lol
Dude, I love China what china is doing. You don't have to sell me on it. Unfortunately, the only thing they get executed for is going against the CCP, not employing near slave labor with shit working conditions.
insert skeletonwaiting.jpg =)
1 HELLEREDDIT 2019-08-18
It's always fun to see the folks plant stories. to shit on others political beliefs. Believe nothing of what you read and half of what you see. It's an easy lesson. I learned it when I was 4. Why would horse fucking be a political issue, when it's almost universally shunned (although there are a lot of lonely farmers, and many helpless sheep).
1 Moist__nuggets 2019-08-18
Trannies emulating white women so well they've started fucking dogs. Well done.
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
I don't think he's a tran tbh.
1 Bumbo55 2019-08-18
At what point will the American so called left admit that these freaks are just mentally ill?
1 rDramaWorstsubreddit 2019-08-18
Try neutrally parsing all the words of the arguments that faggotry isnt degenerate and tell me it cant be used for everything humping related.
FFS the supreme court gay marriage decision came down to something like "people have a (((right))) to (((love))) who they want without judgement or discrimination".
1 ichi24 2019-08-18
You know what? I starting to believe those muslim were right
1 Pepperglue 2019-08-18
Furries are not people. CMV
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
Furries are people.
1 Pepperglue 2019-08-18
You sure they are not changlings?
1 Habahz 2019-08-18
Unfortunately for everyone they are. Furries included.
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-18
They're still people, just mentally ill.
1 DankSupremo 2019-08-18
Iβm going to sue you for showing me this
1 SuperGluedDick 2019-08-18
Furries are subhumans
1 PM_ME_UR_SEAHORSE 2019-08-18
Is this person Native?
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
Willing to bet that it's a pasty Mayo
1 PM_ME_UR_SEAHORSE 2019-08-18
Gross
1 rDramaWorstsubreddit 2019-08-18
Like liz warren
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[removed]
1 KARMA145 2019-08-18
The slippery slope from religious people was a real point after all. The Day of Judgmenet can't come soon enough.
1 JLDupreeIII 2019-08-18
get back to me in even years when this is normalized
1 jank_king20 2019-08-18
Yup I knew what tweet it was gonna be before opening. This made it to a Facebook group Iβm in, itβs 100% a psyop I would guess itβs probably some 4chan retard
1 BlacJeesus 2019-08-18
I wish, but this really isn't fake. The rest of his profile is genuine
1 VVeebtacular 2019-08-18
This dude has galaxy brain thinks
1 CryTheSly 2019-08-18
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[removed]
1 [deleted] 2019-08-18
[removed]
1 AlohaWarrior35 2019-08-18
This is why we need eugenics