New Yorkers only care about the homeless when they camp out in front of their SoulCycles and cold press juice stores.

Biggie is trying to roll over in his grave but they built a cupcake shoppe over it.

Gentrification is good though

Tell that to Travis Bickle

Streaming is the dumbest thing to ever get popular that I hope this venture does as much damage as possible to the entire platform. I will support any and every cause to nuke all streaming platforms. It was a mistake to dabble in these dark arts, and it must be dealt with.

Snapshots:

1. In his never ending fools quest for... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Why do people think leaders can only focus on one thing at a time?

You see this with law enforcement a lot too. "why are they investigating this thing I don't care about and not this thing I do care about??" as if they can only investigate one thing at a time.

Because there isn't infinite time, you can do multiple things but if saving a tax dodging business is a priority then you are most certainly not spending enough time on bigger problems

What problems is he not responding to?

well according to the title homelessness and corruption, but littreally anything would probably be better than saving a business not paying taxes.

So if I go look into this right now, new york will have nothing happening in relation to corruption and the homeless?

He’s a communist with a colored wife and he cares more about illegal immigrants than the Hasidic population

The reason people are upset is because de Blasio is an absolute lazy shit bird

Wow, so he's a politician?

Sounds like Pritzker, the fat land-whale running Illinois

Harvard told me it's ok to discriminate against Asians because they have bad personalities.

It was actually kinda masterful how Cuomo absolutely cucked the shit or of de Blasio time and time again

Why do you think leaders shouldn't be criticized for tweeting out bullshit when there are real problems they seem to be ignoring?

If Trump tweeted this Pizza would be having a meltdown lmao.

I was hoping his "reading comprehension" would notice the link about leaders "tweeting out bullshit." I think it evaded him.

That poor guy starts drooling just seeing Trump's name on the screen. I almost feel sorry for him.

I'm not against the idea of being critical of these people. I'm against the fallacious idea that you can only do one thing at a time and that if someone tweets about one issue, it means they aren't doing anything about another issue.

Okay but unless you have like no other fucking issues to deal with, you shouldn’t be preoccupied with helping a fucking pizza place lmao

Pizza is a lot more important than the homeless scourge in NYC.

If pizza was so important to NYC you would think they would take the time and effort to engineer an edible slice.

suck my balls

Far preferable to eating NYC "pizza"

We don't have a homeless scourge. It's not the 80s or current SF.

its all ny has, you can't let them take it away.

I'm not against the idea of being critical of these people.

Could've fooled me.

Maybe if you can't read. I don't know.

> Politician makes a statement that he'd do "anything" to save a tax-evading business
> Constituents criticize this move
> Pizzashill: LeAdeRs CaN FoCUs oN MuLtIPlE tHiNgs
> Also Pizzashill: I'm not against the idea of being critical of politicians

OK bub.

I was mocking the fact people think he's capable of doing only one thing at a time.

So yes, you have poor reading comprehension. I wasn't mocking the simple act of being critical of him in general.

I was mocking the fact people think he's capable of doing only one thing at a time.

Yes, that is exactly what they think and not just a strawman you made. "Reading comprehension."

That is what they seem to be implying, that him tweeting about this means he's not doing other stuff as well.

Is that what your reading comprehension tells you? Because the saner option is, "A pizza place being shut down for tax evasion is a complete non-issue and you respond to it right away. Meanwhile, you are very slow to act on other issues in this city. That is a joke."

What issues is he not acting on?

Literally anything. Ask literally anybody in NYC how he's done anything for anyone ever.

Of course, he is either not acting on an issue, or he's already doing all he can and can devote his unlimited remaining time to do "anything" to save a tax cheat. How foolish I was to think that the mayor of NYC and his aids already have a full schedule, and devoting any time looking into how they can resolve this situation takes away time from other tasks.

It's not exactly hard to save a pizza place from a state tax bill dude, it's certainly a lot easier for them than coming up with a full solution to end corruption and homelessness overnight.

At some point you're going to have to admit you misread what I said.

I just made fun of you for your all-or-nothing false dilemma, and you double down on it. It's either "a full solution to end corruption and homelessness overnight" or he's doing nothing.

It wasn't a false dilemma. The people there are literally implying he can not save a pizza place and do other things at the same time.

What issues is he not acting on?
coming up with a full solution to end corruption and homelessness overnight
It wasn't a false dilemma.

You are as retarded as you look, which explains how you are taking away the wrong implication despite it being explained to you several times.

I'm not getting the wrong implication. You misread my comment, realized you didn't know what I said, and this is your cope attempt.

They were sperging at him over a bike lane being planned too slowly in that twitter chain. The bottom line is, you have no evidence him tweeting about a pizzaplace is somehow preventing him from doing other things. So why sperg at him for tweeting about a pizza place?

Here is what another poster said:

Because there isn't infinite time, you can do multiple things but if saving a tax dodging business is a priority then you are most certainly not spending enough time on bigger problems

You replied:

What problems is he not responding to?

And this is false dilemma. The mayor of a large city has his schedule completely packed, and the time he spends on different activities is a zero sum game. An hour spent on this is an hour not spent on another task.

You immediately take it to the all-or-nothing false dilemma: that hour either means he is spending no time on another task, or he must solve it completely. This is bullshit. I don't know what the mayor had to bump from his schedule to accommodate this, but anything takes a higher priority than saving a tax-dodging business.

It adds insult to injury if a group (such as bicyclists) had been lobbying the mayor's office without getting acknowledged for a while when the mayor tweets about a tax-dodging business the day after it gets shut down.

I don't care what that person said, I'm talking about the ttwitter chain. Look at some of the tweets:

More Replying to @NYCMayor are you sure this is what you should be doing right now

How is this not implying a tweet about a pizza place is somehow taking up his time when he could be doing something else?

Replying to @NYCMayor It took 15 New Yorkers getting killed on their bicycles for you to promise to do something. Weird what your office considers an emergency.

This right here? How do they know it took 15. What if they had something in the works after the first, and due to the fact it takes a while to plan these things he didn't say anything about it until they had a valid plan?

More 5 people got shot within last 24 hours. Brooklyn and Queens boroughs. Yes pizza is more important. He doesn’t even know anything about pizza. He doesn’t know anything at all.

What is he going to do about 5 people being shot in a city? What do they want him to say? This is also directly implying he cares more about pizza than murder because of a single tweet.

And this is false dilemma. The mayor of a large city has his schedule completely packed, and the time he spends on different activities is a zero sum game. An hour spent on this is an hour not spent on another task.

Frankly, I suspect you have no idea what you are talking about. He likely didn't even write this tweet, a staffer probably did. Let me explain how this really went.

"Can you guys send out a tweet about this pizza place and then start working on a solution?" He then tells someone on his staff to handle it. Do you think he's personally spending an hour at his desk coming up with a plan or something?

It adds insult to injury if a group (such as bicyclists) had been lobbying the mayor's office without getting acknowledged for a while when the mayor tweets about a tax-dodging business the day after it gets shut down.

Bicyclists are some of the most insufferable people on earth and I wouldn't directly deal with them either.

I've known more coherent downies.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

What if they had something in the works after the first, and due to the fact it takes a while to plan these things he didn't say anything about it until they had a valid plan?

Yet they tweet right away about a pizza shop! Just replace the pizza shop language with bicycle fatalities, and he would at least look like he cares. Are you still not getting it?

Frankly, I suspect you have no idea what you are talking about. He likely didn't even write this tweet, a staffer probably did. Let me explain how this really went.

I left out the "and his staff" in this post, although in my defense I mentioned them earlier when dunking on you.

How foolish I was to think that the mayor of NYC and his aids already have a full schedule

I think you have no idea what you are talking about since you think that the mayor's staff has infinite time. In case you aren't aware, the staff members are also super busy. If a staff member is spending 1 hour working out how to save a tax dodging business rather than doing almost anything else, that is time wasted.

Look, you can admit you didn't read what I said or you can keep claiming those people aren't delusional, I don't care.

I have more interesting arguments to handle. I'm content with how this went. Your inability to grasp these points is not my problem.

I'm not going to watch this cope fest anymore because you got called out on poor reading comprehension.

I know this is where you like to plant your flag and pretend you won your argument, but you got dunked on pretty hard you mong.

Says the guy with the lazy eye.

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

• [/r/drama] 🍕 Shill Shills for DeBlasio Daddy and makes some next level galaxy brain takes and strawmen.

 ^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)}

OMG STFU IM SO TIRED OF YOUR SHIT AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH SHUT UP!!!!!!!!

They have more than one person investigating open issues at a single-given ti-

You know what, you know fucking better don’t you?

Is this the place that bar stool gave their highest review yet to?

He probs wants to save it because underneath is one of Epstein and pedoesta’s child rape dungeons

https://politics.theonion.com/de-blasio-pac-spends-30-million-on-ads-urging-candidat-1834649740