at least Ted is not a narcissistic attention whore, he just wanted to live in his small cabin in a forest, he started to send bombs only after developers started to build lame suburbs close by
We need to seriously consider the idea that someoneās pronouns voice is an integral part of their identity, of their reality, of their personāand that stealing that pronoun voice is a genuinely criminal act, regardless (perhaps) of intent.
Again, not the same. I donāt agree with āimprison people without knowing intent,ā but heās right that copying someoneās voice can have some intensely nefarious consequences. Without the opportunity to see someone directly (ie a telephone call) the only way to tell who someone is is with their voice. An identity thief grabbing pronouns or sexuality aināt gonna do shit. I feel like youāre being intentionally disingenuous to dunk on lobster daddy rather than see he has a point (albeit the wrong conclusions)
Iām not even a Peterson fan but if you literally read a few sentences later heās talking about the inevitability of not being able to trust someone without speaking to them directly. I disagree with the flowery meaning of āidentityā but as far as using voice to masquerade as someone else itās a legitimate and quite terrifying thing
Idk, I can sympathise with that. Faking somebody's voice is akin to faking somebody signature, especially since recording can be used as evidence in court. It's not really "free speech" issue.
But like, fuck making laws about AI. They are useless. Genie is outside the bottle and laws can't really stop it. This is a thing that in theory everybody who has access to computer can do. It doesn't require specialised tools and you can't outlaw centrain computation.
But like, fuck making laws about AI. They are useless. Genie is outside the bottle and laws can't really stop it.
Ban gamers and gaming accessories, boom, problem solved.
(Btw, it never stops blowing my mind that what's shaping to be the most important technology of the first half of the 21st century came from gamers wanting more colorful triangles in their games)
(Btw, it never stops blowing my mind that what's shaping to be the most important technology of the first half of the 21st century came from gamers wanting more colorful triangles in their games)
Wait, that's can't possibly be true.
Thereafter research stagnated following Minsky and Papert (1969),[19] who discovered that basic perceptrons were incapable of processing the exclusive-or circuit and that computers lacked sufficient power to process useful neural networks.
In 1992, max-pooling was introduced to help with least shift invariance and tolerance to deformation to aid in 3D object recognition.[20][21][22] Schmidhuber adopted a multi-level hierarchy of networks (1992) pre-trained one level at a time by unsupervised learning and fine-tuned by backpropagation.[23]
I meant more the fact that these days mainstream graphics cards have 200+ times more processing power than comparable CPUs and are flexible enough to support the kind of computations AI requires.
None of the modern AI advances would have been possible without that cheap power at people's disposal, especially because you can't do research if to see that some modification of an algorithm works you have to wait a year instead of a day or two.
And we wouldn't have graphics cards that can do any computations whatsoever if not for g-mers (or more precisely their parents) paying for more and better textured triangles for the past 20 years.
Eeeeeeh, large scale vector computing was already needed for aerodynamic research, so I wouldn't blame it entirely on the g*ymer if that was the only thing.
In an alternate reality where the Gamer Question had been solved by the end of the 20th century serious guys doing aerodynamics and nuclear warhead detonation simulations continue building big supercomputers from ordinary CPUs, showing steadily increasing performance year after year, and nobody has a clue that they can actually do a couple of hundred times better (per dollar) with their current transistor technology.
68 comments
1 BussyShillBot 2019-08-23
YAWN
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
1 SnapshillBot 2019-08-23
You probably don't get bussy because you're the type of guy who fucking nails his dick to a board
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 KaaraRaven 2019-08-23
Nice try Kermit, no-one's buying this excuse.
1 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2019-08-23
Pretty Ted-Pilled tbh.
1 jubbergun 2019-08-23
Uncle Ted
Doctor Lobster
Two ends of the same
HORSESHOE
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-23
Both are deranged conservatives with messiah complexes
1 Tytos_Lannister 2019-08-23
at least Ted is not a narcissistic attention whore, he just wanted to live in his small cabin in a forest, he started to send bombs only after developers started to build lame suburbs close by
1 Warbring3r 2019-08-23
Imagine downvoting Saint Ted
1 namebame 2019-08-23
Ted was not a conservatives.
​
He hated conservatives because they worship capitalism and modern technology
1 DepravedMutant 2019-08-23
I happen to think Rap God is an amazing piece of work"
Oh shut up dude
2 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2019-08-23
You have no comprehension skills.
1 DepravedMutant 2019-08-23
Huh???
2 DerekSavageCoolCuck 2019-08-23
Did you reply to the wrong comment, I'm genuinely confused. Rap god is awful though i agree.
1 DepravedMutant 2019-08-23
Lol yeah sorry
1 Mayos_side 2019-08-23
Yeah that made me picture him with some earbuds in, sitting in his chair at home while cross-legged, with a serious face on.
1 DepravedMutant 2019-08-23
"Simply...incredible..."
1 Mayos_side 2019-08-23
"Elevator music... I mean, WOW. He got it."
1 rsrfy 2019-08-23
he thought about it logically and realized the only thing more cucked than having a daughter is everyone being able to make you say anything
1 hi_0 2019-08-23
The /tv/ threads are great for hearing Kermit read bane copypastas
1 i_Chapo-d_my_pants 2019-08-23
an example thread for the lazy.
this image paired with this audio might be the most creative thing i've seen done with this so far.
1 amanrobbedofhisdrama 2019-08-23
Why is this so funny
1 General_Insomnia 2019-08-23
When free speech benefits you š
When free speech doesn't benefit you š®
1 CCAlkie 2019-08-23
This is exactly why Peterson became Memerson. If you're gonna talk the talk you better walk the walk.
1 dagoldenpan 2019-08-23
I ran the yell
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-23
She cried more more more
1 LostMaterial0 2019-08-23
Wash ur penis bucko
1 Ingelri 2019-08-23
[Fraudulent impersonation/identity theft is free speech](C0BalQprbnlBP8AMbmSdoQgBCEIAQhCAEIQgBCEIAQhCAEIQgBCEIAQhCAEIQgBCEIAQhCAEIQgBCEIAQhCAEIQgBCEIAQhCAEIQgBCEIAQhCAf)
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-08-23
Might as well ban photoshop
1 Ingelri 2019-08-23
True. It'll prob be fine
1 label_and_libel 2019-08-23
It's already illegal to use photoshop to commit fraud
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-23
When idpol doesn't benefit you: ššš¤®š¤®
When idpol benefits you:
1 ThousandQueerReich 2019-08-23
Based.
1 bbw_gw_ 2019-08-23
When idpol benefits r/drama: dude bussy lmao
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-23
Same as when it doesn't tbh
1 Ill_Regal 2019-08-23
Those arenāt the same but go off king
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-23
lobstercels out
1 Ill_Regal 2019-08-23
Again, not the same. I donāt agree with āimprison people without knowing intent,ā but heās right that copying someoneās voice can have some intensely nefarious consequences. Without the opportunity to see someone directly (ie a telephone call) the only way to tell who someone is is with their voice. An identity thief grabbing pronouns or sexuality aināt gonna do shit. I feel like youāre being intentionally disingenuous to dunk on lobster daddy rather than see he has a point (albeit the wrong conclusions)
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-23
lobstercels š“š“š“
He's clearly referring to psychological concerns rather than legal ones in this quote.
1 Ill_Regal 2019-08-23
Iām not even a Peterson fan but if you literally read a few sentences later heās talking about the inevitability of not being able to trust someone without speaking to them directly. I disagree with the flowery meaning of āidentityā but as far as using voice to masquerade as someone else itās a legitimate and quite terrifying thing
1 Mayos_side 2019-08-23
Vampires have been betting away with it for years.
1 1OneTwo 2019-08-23
Oh stfu. At least think before you use that semen infused gamer keyboard
1 Mayos_side 2019-08-23
Nobody would be here if they took this advice.
1 diggity_md 2019-08-23
Have you cleaned your room?
1 spergling_drama_alt 2019-08-23
everybody knows that changing word to completely different word other proves something.
duh ššš
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-23
lobstercels seething
1 spergling_drama_alt 2019-08-23
have sex
1 chimpan_z 2019-08-23
okay
1 ChevalBlancBukowski 2019-08-23
I mean he's not wrong but isn't the cat already out of the bag re this tech
1 rocinantebabieca 2019-08-23
Why do people hate this guy again?
1 Jeremy0015 2019-08-23
He has lobster claws or something idk
1 e_n_t_r_o_p_y 2019-08-23
Who even knows. Progressives seem to hate everyone that isn't entirely aligned with their causes.
1 Osterion 2019-08-23
He's retarded
1 tastetherainbowmoth 2019-08-23
like your asshole?
1 Osterion 2019-08-23
daddy P would not approve of you muddling the discourse
1 Chubbmeister-CSGO 2019-08-23
Because he has an actual positive impact on young males who have problems with finding purpose in life.
Oh and he said forcing people to use your pronouns by law is an attack on free speech and from there the LGBTQ community starting seething.
1 thedavidcarney 2019-08-23
I'm making a video of him singing all star. He thinks I should be a felon.
1 acidoverbasic 2019-08-23
Too wordy, even for a Jungian.
1 spergling_drama_alt 2019-08-23
Idk, I can sympathise with that. Faking somebody's voice is akin to faking somebody signature, especially since recording can be used as evidence in court. It's not really "free speech" issue.
But like, fuck making laws about AI. They are useless. Genie is outside the bottle and laws can't really stop it. This is a thing that in theory everybody who has access to computer can do. It doesn't require specialised tools and you can't outlaw centrain computation.
We just have to live with it.
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-23
Ban gamers and gaming accessories, boom, problem solved.
(Btw, it never stops blowing my mind that what's shaping to be the most important technology of the first half of the 21st century came from gamers wanting more colorful triangles in their games)
1 spergling_drama_alt 2019-08-23
ahem can I have an attention, please?
FUCK GAYMERS
FUCK RIGHTOID
FUCK LEFTOID
FUCK POLITICS
FUCK JANNIES
and
FUCK YOU
2 zergling_Lester 2019-08-23
Nice spergling!
1 error404brain 2019-08-23
Wait, that's can't possibly be true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_neural_network#History
Holy fuck, lmao. This is incredible.
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-23
I meant more the fact that these days mainstream graphics cards have 200+ times more processing power than comparable CPUs and are flexible enough to support the kind of computations AI requires.
None of the modern AI advances would have been possible without that cheap power at people's disposal, especially because you can't do research if to see that some modification of an algorithm works you have to wait a year instead of a day or two.
And we wouldn't have graphics cards that can do any computations whatsoever if not for g-mers (or more precisely their parents) paying for more and better textured triangles for the past 20 years.
1 error404brain 2019-08-23
Eeeeeeh, large scale vector computing was already needed for aerodynamic research, so I wouldn't blame it entirely on the g*ymer if that was the only thing.
1 zergling_Lester 2019-08-23
I don't think you fully appreciate how fast they got, and how quickly: a single cheapest https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GeForce_20_series beats the fastest supercomputer in the world circa https://www.top500.org/list/2000/11/
In an alternate reality where the Gamer Question had been solved by the end of the 20th century serious guys doing aerodynamics and nuclear warhead detonation simulations continue building big supercomputers from ordinary CPUs, showing steadily increasing performance year after year, and nobody has a clue that they can actually do a couple of hundred times better (per dollar) with their current transistor technology.
1 error404brain 2019-08-23
Yeah, but that's moore law. But fair enough
1 [deleted] 2019-08-23
[removed]
1 majimagoro11 2019-08-23
If everything is untrustworthy the we can go back to treating the internet as it should be, a playground for autists.