You caught me. You flat-out caught me. It's time to come clean.
Let me tell you a little bit about how I go through my day, which is also how literally every other moderator goes through theirs.
I wake up in my dingy, unwashed bed (which is covered with suspicious stains), then immediately scream for my mother to come downstairs and tell me that I’m a special boy. Once I feel sufficiently better than everyone else, I log in to Reddit, where I go through all of the top-secret communiques that I receive from whichever political party you personally dislike. Having accepted my marching orders, I motivate myself by going to town on my own backside with an anime-style figurine; a doll which looks vaguely like the world leader you most abhor. Then it’s time to get to work.
Pushing a narrative which irritates you – yes, specifically you – is obviously my first priority… but if a totalitarian regime which controls another country, religious group, or corporation has sent me enough money, I take whatever steps I can to promote or censor anything that’s even tangentially related to what they’ve highlighted for me. If the entity in question also happens to have a very small minority stake in Reddit (or if one of the site’s executives has rumored ties to their organization), then I make sure to publicly fellate them whilst simultaneously denying their influence. The more sucking that I do, the more cash I receive!
Mind you, I don’t actually spend any of that loot, because moving out of my parents’ basement would mean that I wouldn’t get that crack-of-noon ego-stroking anymore. No, rather than using those ill-gotten gains to improve my lot in life, I sculpt them into life-size (and anatomically correct) sculptures – using copious amounts of my own neck-sweat as glue – of the various public figures whose actions or perspectives anger you.
Anyway, once I’ve made certain that my corrupt overlords are pleased, I start looking for ways that I can ruin individual users’ days. Randomly removing posts (and then pretending that they were in violation of some invisible rules) is the only way that I can become aroused, after all, and I need to stand at my full, massive two inches if I’m going to be able to reach myself past all of my stomach fat. Having come to attention, I put on my self-pleasure hat – which is a trilby, of course – and start banning people who disagree with my opinions.
Those opinions having been carefully structured to go against yours, of course.
It’s time for a break by that point, so I spend an hour or three lecturing my waifu body-pillow about a given social trend that makes people (again, specifically you) upset. She’ll usually offer some kind of counterargument, which means that I need to throw an impotent tantrum. Whenever that happens, my only solace comes by way of somehow abusing my awesome Internet powers, typically while gorging myself on junk food, soda, and heaping handfuls of straight-up lard. Don’t ask me how that abuse actually manifests, though, because I’ll silence all of the remarkably insightful questions that you send my way. The thing is, I’ve never heard any of them before... and since my hidden masters haven’t told me how to respond, my only option is to screech at my computer monitor as I wildly flail around.
Those eight seconds of exertion tend to bring me pretty close to unconsciousness, so I have to completely ignore the communities that I govern for a while, thereby allowing a multitude of posts and comments to go through unchecked. Fortunately, they’re only ever submissions which you (once more, specifically you) find distasteful, so it still counts as a victory. At the same time, though, if you try to submit anything – especially if it’s entirely adherent to those invisible rules that I mentioned earlier – I’ll wheeze my way back into a semi-upright position for just long enough to mete out another completely unwarranted ban.
Finally, once all of that is done, I kill myself, frequently by dying in a fire. Getting the suggestion to do so dozens (or even hundreds) of times a day just proves to be too much for my utterly unfathomable intellect to handle, so I eventually succumb to the sweet embrace of death.
Besides, it’s the only way that I can get to sleep at night.
TL;DR: You don’t need to read this, because you’ve already decided that you know it all.
I've talked to poors who don't even know that their welfare benefits come from taxpayer dollars, they just think it just comes from "the state." People are dumber than you think.
same thats why I call my self Pro-Death, I think that after the baby is born the moid should get to decide if he wants to abort it (or the foid if she has regrets)
I'm not pro-life, I'm anti-women's choice. Hormonal birth control and no fault divorce + spousal and child support have been a disaster for the human race.
Being pro life is literally the hottest political button the Catholic Church has to push. How absolutely retarded do you have to be to not only gain employment from the church, but to actually think you have a leg to stand on in a lawsuit over your freeze peach from a privately funded school. Absolutely autistic 👌🏾
Depends on the state. Political views aren't protected by federal law but I believe some states have laws that protect people from discrimination based on political views, even private.
Huh thats interesting. But I’m talking about the first amendment, the one that implicitly says you can not be discriminated based on religious belief.
laws that protect people from discrimination based on political views
Eh pizza, that’s a tough case you’re up against. I think “constitutional right” would slam “inconsistent state-by-state laws that protect your political beliefs” in a court battle. But honestly, I don’t have the spoons to argue with you on this tonight.
But.. that was my point.. wouldn’t a fundamental constitutional right of freedom of religion, be infringed on by having to forcefully keep someone employed at a private, catholic school, who’s ideas are fundamentally against your religion?
That was a narrow ruling targeted at the commission in colorado. They didn't actually rule on anti-discrimination laws and freedom of speech, for example.
I doubt they'll lose tbh. The courts are many years behind society. For example, the entire reason sexual orientation is not a federally protected class is that the courts are under the impression sexual orientation isn't a trait someone is born with, like race or gender.
This is of course nonsense, and it is an objective fact that a gay person is born gay and not gay by choice. But the courts are scientifically illiterate so trying to convince them of this is pointless.
I dunno, I think religion was grandfathered in by the bill of rights lol. But I do agree with you the logic behind current think, and how so behind, socially, our current legal system is.
Freedom of religion is given under the 1st amendment though, which we've established only applies to the government infringing on your rights. I've never seen the court say private entities are under any obligation to respect your freedom of speech.
All of the teachers that I went to high school with are annoying as fuck on social media. Constant political posting, pretty much all social justicey.
Good piece of evidence against teaching being a real job, to be honest. I got my first actual professional job and have since had my social media locked down and bland as fuck. I think maybe they feel the need to constantly preach because they lack a stimulating, challenging career to derive their satisfaction from.
Wanting to continually broadcast your political beliefs and day-to-day minutiae to everybody that you know is insecure and childish. Go get a job that you won't be ashamed of when you turn 30.
You cannot commit injustice against a side that literally believes in violence as their ideology. Just like you can't commit injustice against a nazi, you can't commit injustice against pro-choicers(or anti-lifers). Anti-lifees literally believe in violence against a fetud so this firing was completely justified.
If you want teach in a catholic school then you need to abide by their rules of employment. Part of that is not being a muppet on FB by posting stuff that will get you fired. What the hell did she think would happen?
Although I’m surprised confession didn’t fix the problem. Maybe confession only works for the sex offenders.
82 comments
1 AutoModerator 2019-08-25
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SnapshillBot 2019-08-25
Damn, you know what?
You caught me. You flat-out caught me. It's time to come clean.
Let me tell you a little bit about how I go through my day, which is also how literally every other moderator goes through theirs.
I wake up in my dingy, unwashed bed (which is covered with suspicious stains), then immediately scream for my mother to come downstairs and tell me that I’m a special boy. Once I feel sufficiently better than everyone else, I log in to Reddit, where I go through all of the top-secret communiques that I receive from whichever political party you personally dislike. Having accepted my marching orders, I motivate myself by going to town on my own backside with an anime-style figurine; a doll which looks vaguely like the world leader you most abhor. Then it’s time to get to work.
Pushing a narrative which irritates you – yes, specifically you – is obviously my first priority… but if a totalitarian regime which controls another country, religious group, or corporation has sent me enough money, I take whatever steps I can to promote or censor anything that’s even tangentially related to what they’ve highlighted for me. If the entity in question also happens to have a very small minority stake in Reddit (or if one of the site’s executives has rumored ties to their organization), then I make sure to publicly fellate them whilst simultaneously denying their influence. The more sucking that I do, the more cash I receive!
Mind you, I don’t actually spend any of that loot, because moving out of my parents’ basement would mean that I wouldn’t get that crack-of-noon ego-stroking anymore. No, rather than using those ill-gotten gains to improve my lot in life, I sculpt them into life-size (and anatomically correct) sculptures – using copious amounts of my own neck-sweat as glue – of the various public figures whose actions or perspectives anger you.
Anyway, once I’ve made certain that my corrupt overlords are pleased, I start looking for ways that I can ruin individual users’ days. Randomly removing posts (and then pretending that they were in violation of some invisible rules) is the only way that I can become aroused, after all, and I need to stand at my full, massive two inches if I’m going to be able to reach myself past all of my stomach fat. Having come to attention, I put on my self-pleasure hat – which is a trilby, of course – and start banning people who disagree with my opinions.
Those opinions having been carefully structured to go against yours, of course.
It’s time for a break by that point, so I spend an hour or three lecturing my waifu body-pillow about a given social trend that makes people (again, specifically you) upset. She’ll usually offer some kind of counterargument, which means that I need to throw an impotent tantrum. Whenever that happens, my only solace comes by way of somehow abusing my awesome Internet powers, typically while gorging myself on junk food, soda, and heaping handfuls of straight-up lard. Don’t ask me how that abuse actually manifests, though, because I’ll silence all of the remarkably insightful questions that you send my way. The thing is, I’ve never heard any of them before... and since my hidden masters haven’t told me how to respond, my only option is to screech at my computer monitor as I wildly flail around.
Those eight seconds of exertion tend to bring me pretty close to unconsciousness, so I have to completely ignore the communities that I govern for a while, thereby allowing a multitude of posts and comments to go through unchecked. Fortunately, they’re only ever submissions which you (once more, specifically you) find distasteful, so it still counts as a victory. At the same time, though, if you try to submit anything – especially if it’s entirely adherent to those invisible rules that I mentioned earlier – I’ll wheeze my way back into a semi-upright position for just long enough to mete out another completely unwarranted ban.
Finally, once all of that is done, I kill myself, frequently by dying in a fire. Getting the suggestion to do so dozens (or even hundreds) of times a day just proves to be too much for my utterly unfathomable intellect to handle, so I eventually succumb to the sweet embrace of death.
Besides, it’s the only way that I can get to sleep at night.
TL;DR: You don’t need to read this, because you’ve already decided that you know it all.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2019-08-25
No, you won't.
1 diarrheagram 2019-08-25
Anyone who thinks "free healthcare" is a thing has never paid taxes. Stalin would've gulaged these NEETs. 😤
1 Zero5urvivers 2019-08-25
Everyone knows that “free healthcare” means socialized healthcare
1 diarrheagram 2019-08-25
I've talked to poors who don't even know that their welfare benefits come from taxpayer dollars, they just think it just comes from "the state." People are dumber than you think.
1 Doctor-Pavel 2019-08-25
No one has to talk to you to know that you’re a fucking idiot 😂😂😂
1 diarrheagram 2019-08-25
Yeah but it helps. 🙂
1 GAMERFORDRUMPF 2019-08-25
Erm Sweaty don't you know that in Europe the doctors and pharmaceutical companies just work for free!?!?!
1 AugustinesBitchBoy 2019-08-25
Is it really that hard to understand that they’re against what they view as state sponsored murder? The argument is whether or not it’s murder.
IMO you should be able to kill babies six months out of the womb
1 papercrumbs 2019-08-25
Why not go full ancient Roman? The paterfamilias should be legally permitted to put to death any member of the household.
1 Mayos_side 2019-08-25
You're not really king of your castle if you can't strangle a woman.
1 papercrumbs 2019-08-25
I think that most of their marriage contracts precluded whim killing, so poor Romanii. Cucked by private contract.
1 600_lbs_of_sin 2019-08-25
now THAT'S libertarianism
1 Tzar-Romulus 2019-08-25
This but unironically
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-25
Then they should stop calling themselves pro-life and call themselves anti-abortion.
Too bad rightoids are pussies
1 oss_spy 2019-08-25
>calls rightoids pussies
>ignores noodle-armed antifa
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-25
What the fuck does antifa have to do with abortion
This is your brain on conservatism
1 oss_spy 2019-08-25
You're calling rightoids pussies when it's been shown that rightoids routinely beat the fuck out of leftoids. Are you retarded?
1 jank_king20 2019-08-25
Idk if he is but you should be used as the example to figure it out
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-25
https://mobile.twitter.com/ABC/status/1154500346141696015?s=20
Here are some leftoids beating the fuck out of a rightoid. Qed bitch
1 oss_spy 2019-08-25
>once
Wow, got me.
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-25
I like how you're so retarded you missed the joke.
1 TrumpsUsedBussy 2019-08-25
Those are just niggers tho, I don't think they even know how to spell "political alignment".
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-25
That's the fucking joke you brainlet
1 TrumpsUsedBussy 2019-08-25
Okay
1 GeauxHouston22 2019-08-25
LARP
1 DeweaponizedAutism 2019-08-25
This is some straight up grug logic lmfao. Do you realize how much of a low IQ drooling mouth-breather you sound like when you say stuff like this?
1 oss_spy 2019-08-25
Name a time when antifa beat nazis at a protest
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-25
fake news
1 lolcows63 2019-08-25
Well then the Left should stop calling themselves choice.
But unironically it should be pro or anit abortion, instead of all of the semantic wars that are retarded
1 lolcows63 2019-08-25
same thats why I call my self Pro-Death, I think that after the baby is born the moid should get to decide if he wants to abort it (or the foid if she has regrets)
1 papercrumbs 2019-08-25
I'm not pro-life, I'm anti-women's choice. Hormonal birth control and no fault divorce + spousal and child support have been a disaster for the human race.
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-08-25
The male partner should be allowed to force abortions, for equality.
1 BurgerLaowai 2019-08-25
Wait. They want condoms to require a prescription?
1 ashleychudd 2019-08-25
Justify what? It looks fine.
1 UnexpectedLizard 2019-08-25
God is against abortion because he has a more badass way of handling unwanted pregnancy.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
Being pro life is literally the hottest political button the Catholic Church has to push. How absolutely retarded do you have to be to not only gain employment from the church, but to actually think you have a leg to stand on in a lawsuit over your freeze peach from a privately funded school. Absolutely autistic 👌🏾
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
Depends on the state. Political views aren't protected by federal law but I believe some states have laws that protect people from discrimination based on political views, even private.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
Huh thats interesting. But I’m talking about the first amendment, the one that implicitly says you can not be discriminated based on religious belief.
Eh pizza, that’s a tough case you’re up against. I think “constitutional right” would slam “inconsistent state-by-state laws that protect your political beliefs” in a court battle. But honestly, I don’t have the spoons to argue with you on this tonight.
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
States have a lot of authority over employment laws as long as they don't violate federal law.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
But.. that was my point.. wouldn’t a fundamental constitutional right of freedom of religion, be infringed on by having to forcefully keep someone employed at a private, catholic school, who’s ideas are fundamentally against your religion?
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
I'd be pretty shocked if they managed to convince the court freedom of religion gives them the right to discriminate against anyone they want.
It's a very slippery slope.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
I mean look at the gay cake shop case.
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
That was a narrow ruling targeted at the commission in colorado. They didn't actually rule on anti-discrimination laws and freedom of speech, for example.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
Alright, I’ll bite. Say this did get to the Supreme Court, how do you think this will unravel?
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
I doubt they'll lose tbh. The courts are many years behind society. For example, the entire reason sexual orientation is not a federally protected class is that the courts are under the impression sexual orientation isn't a trait someone is born with, like race or gender.
This is of course nonsense, and it is an objective fact that a gay person is born gay and not gay by choice. But the courts are scientifically illiterate so trying to convince them of this is pointless.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
I agree. Good answer Pizza wow.
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
The whole thing doesn't make sense tbh. For example, religion is a protected class.
I have no idea how religion could be considered a protected class but not sexual orientation.
The short answer is of course, there are many religious people in the country, not that many gay people, especially during the civil rights era.
So the religious managed to get themselves on there, but not the gays.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
I dunno, I think religion was grandfathered in by the bill of rights lol. But I do agree with you the logic behind current think, and how so behind, socially, our current legal system is.
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
Freedom of religion is given under the 1st amendment though, which we've established only applies to the government infringing on your rights. I've never seen the court say private entities are under any obligation to respect your freedom of speech.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-08-25
Because there isn't a law against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation lol like read laws lmao
1 professorshillphd 2019-08-25
I'm not saying the laws don't exist, I'm saying their justification doesn't make any sense.
1 [deleted] 2019-08-25
[removed]
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2019-08-25
There was a Supreme Court case about this.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
You’re gunna have to TL;DR me on that sweaty
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2019-08-25
There's a summary on the first five pages.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
I’m sure there is, but I asked for a TL;DR retard
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2019-08-25
That is the TL;DR.
1 byobombs 2019-08-25
Where the fuck have you ever read a fucking 5 page TL;DR??
1 ImJustaBagofHammers 2019-08-25
Legal issues can be complex.
1 artemis_m_oswald 2019-08-25
Schools don't have rights you tard
Lol
1 Jeb4Pres2020 2019-08-25
All of the teachers that I went to high school with are annoying as fuck on social media. Constant political posting, pretty much all social justicey.
Good piece of evidence against teaching being a real job, to be honest. I got my first actual professional job and have since had my social media locked down and bland as fuck. I think maybe they feel the need to constantly preach because they lack a stimulating, challenging career to derive their satisfaction from.
1 ashleychudd 2019-08-25
Hanging the teachers is the first step towards fixing our education.
1 Jeb4Pres2020 2019-08-25
Why not expand it to all glasses-wearers, like the Chad Rouge?
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-08-25
Chankiri trees v2
1 TaysSecondGussy 2019-08-25
Pretty good praxis. The profs always get booty-blasted first after the revolution.
1 jank_king20 2019-08-25
Lol why are you bragging about being a boring cuck like it’s cool or something
1 Jeb4Pres2020 2019-08-25
Wanting to continually broadcast your political beliefs and day-to-day minutiae to everybody that you know is insecure and childish. Go get a job that you won't be ashamed of when you turn 30.
1 PoorlyRoundedSquare 2019-08-25
This isn't even bait, it's just a bare hook.
Fuck you, I want some bait.
1 5T48J6ff 2019-08-25
I use this logic but for anti-lifers, what now leftoids? Feeling scared yet hahahahahaha
1 5T48J6ff 2019-08-25
You cannot commit injustice against a side that literally believes in violence as their ideology. Just like you can't commit injustice against a nazi, you can't commit injustice against pro-choicers(or anti-lifers). Anti-lifees literally believe in violence against a fetud so this firing was completely justified.
1 FollowAllTheRules 2019-08-25
Ya but in their defense most fetuses grow up to be fags
1 Zero5urvivers 2019-08-25
Cope
1 BIknkbtKitNwniS 2019-08-25
The only good opinion on abortions is:
pro choice for everyone except retarded babies. Killing retarded babies would be ableist.
1 MzCherryBlossom 2019-08-25
If you want teach in a catholic school then you need to abide by their rules of employment. Part of that is not being a muppet on FB by posting stuff that will get you fired. What the hell did she think would happen?
Although I’m surprised confession didn’t fix the problem. Maybe confession only works for the sex offenders.
1 CruisinChelseaSteele 2019-08-25
I'll pray for you
1 MzCherryBlossom 2019-08-25
Thanks. Can I request 20 hail Mary’s hourly and just 1 our Father? I’m a total sinner. Pretty sure I’m gonna burn for eternity. So every little helps.
1 Feanorfanclub 2019-08-25
Wtf why is a Christian organization expecting Christian views
1 jank_king20 2019-08-25
I smell agendaposting. It smells like shit
1 leva549 2019-08-25
If you advocate free speech you are literally a nazi no exceptions yall.
1 2Manadeal2btw 2019-08-25
Private company : )