I need people to stop banning my lolis. That's all I need! Just let me be with my drawings. Let me enjoy cute happy anime lolis that are so full of love and affection. That let me forget about this horrible world and the shitty people in it. Is that so hard to ask for? Why are people so fucking hell bent on banning lolis? What do they or society gain? I don't like scary slasher movies about people murdering people(illegal BTW). But I don't call for them to be banned nor insult those that enjoy them. One of the few things in life that makes me happy. Little glimmers of joy in my shit life and they fucking ban it because they want to make an extra buck fron ad investors.

Maybe there's a reason why people want these pure, perfect maidens? Could it be that the real world is filled with darwinistic people? Filled with murder, drugs, deasise, genocide, virtue signalling, inequality, false politicians, false ronance, bullies, ect. Where everyone is out to push eachother down to get on top? Yea, no wonder people are so eager to want something better.

Is it really difficult for people to mind their own business? If you don't harm anyone, why ban it?

You know. What about GTA that glorifies crime and actually hurts people in the real world with predatory microtransactions? What about rape fantasies? What about guro? What about furry porn? What if she's canonlly legal age? What about girls that look mature but are underage(Ikkitousen, HSoTD)? What about all that incest porn on pornhub? That's illegal IRL but no one is harping to ban that. What about r/trees? A sub dedicated to glorifying marijuana but one problem...weed has been and still is illegal and classified as a class1 drug in the US. Or the sub that literally shows real kids being killed. Or all those propaganda and ad shilling? But no one bans that!

BUT BAN THE LOLIS!!!!!

IF. PEOPLE. JUST. STOPPED. BANNING. LOLIS. I'LL. BE. HAPPY

Snapshots:

1. Imagine SRDines but everyone has ta... - archive.org, archive.today, removeddit.com

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

There goes yang noticing things he isn't supposed to

I see evaporative cooling has hit SC as well.

t. unironic internet rationalist

Cope

That's pretty craven, but so is running to the drama mama and seetheposting about your interaction with jannies

So is everything you just said. Cringe.

😴😴😴

did you do this twice? 😬😬😬

Then these SRDine-adjacents have been living in your head for 2 weeks

You are sardine now and please deport yourself

That's pretty so craven

bruh

[removed]

im sorry im trying to remove it

Don't, leave it up to remind you of the shame.

what did peter theil do that is so bad?

He funded the lawsuit that ultimately bankrupted Gawker. For former employees, they're seething because they no longer have an outlet with zero standards for publishing that they could use to rile up witch hunts to act out their personal vendettas, and for people in that subreddit it's probably circles back to seething about gaymergate.

Of course Tits is there LMAO.

I mean, actually it's kinda surprising given the extreme niche nature of that sub. I guess just like when a person who is racist is also likely to be sexist and homophobic and hang out in respective subreddits, a certain type of person is going to subscribe to every scummy lefty sub.

He spends all day on Reddit. Of course he's subbed to every lefty sub

Why is it that when a wealthy people are able to excercise their rights, these people agitate to remove said right, instead of making accessible to the plebes?

They don't love the poor, they hate the rich.

Leftists may claim that their activism is motivated by compassion or by moral principles, and moral principle does play a role for the leftist of the oversocialized type. But compassion and moral principle cannot be the main motives for leftist activism. Hostility is too prominent a component of leftist behavior; so is the drive for power. Moreover, much leftist behavior is not rationally calcula- ted to be of benefit to the people whom the leftists claim to be trying to help. For example, if one believes that af- firmative action is good for black people, does it make sense to demand affirmative action in hostile or dogmatic terms? Obviously it would be more productive to take a diplomatic and conciliatory approach that would make at least verbal and symbolic concessions to white people who think that affirmative action discriminates against them. But leftist activists do not take such an approach because it would not satisfy their emotional needs. Helping black people is not their real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse for them to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. In doing so they actually harm black people, because the activists’ hostile attitude toward the white majority tends to intensify race hatred.

-Theodore Kaczynski

sorry for seriousposting

Never Apologies for Ted posting.

Thanks for reminding me of Thiel getting justice against Gawker, it's revenge porn in the purest form.

Being ultra online so much that you build your persona around being anti- another group of ultra online people is not better.

the primary difference between sneerclub and internet rationalists is that the latter takes themselves very seriously

Simply not true, sneerclub takes themselves very seriously, the mask of "humor" the hide their eternal seethe behind is so laughably thin. It's not internet rationalists that spent months /years constantly harrasing and trying to dox a blog writer. You can't do that and then pretend not to take yourself seriously.

It's not a humor subreddit, it's for low effort commentary on Very Smart keyboard warriors. Sometimes an effortposter slips thru the cracks but that is unavoidable. Drama has its fair share of political boomerposters, for instance

COPE

Sneer club takes itself super cereal lmao

"we just pretend to be retarded"

epic

that sub literally exists because they didn't like people talking about the culture war in /r/slatestarcodex. so they kept harassing the guy who writes the blog the sub was based on until he asked the sub to remove the culture war thread. it now exists in /r/TheMotte, but /r/sneerclub still exists to clutch their pearls at the audacity of people discussing things they disagree with

honestly it's filled with people who are probably some of the dumbest on reddit, but for some reason consider themselves super intelligent. it's fucking weird

nah it's just for making fun of extremely hardcore "rationalists" it ain't that deep lol

It was ostensibly about that at inception, but it's changed significantly since.

It’s full of extremely hardcore commies. Any circlejerkish sub that isn’t explicitly radical centrist goes to shit cmv

mentions /r/TheMotte on r/drama

SSSHHHHH

my bad

67.79 stupidpol

makes sense

44.74 bjj

huh, okay

77.91 asianbeauty

what

Yeah that's me

My wife? She’s Asian.

no, ultrashitposter is the asian beauty

45.12 brisbane

HOW GOOD IS QUEENSLAND!

10.67 yugioh

😎😎😎

that sub literally exists because they didn't like people talking about the culture war in /r/slatestarcodex.

What is this sub and blog about? What is r/Themotte about?

nothing

Non meme answer pls.

It's absolutely not a gathering place for neonazis and other members of the alt right to talk about how actually black people just have a lower iq than white people

(It is)

Themotte is a bunch of right-wing retards trying to act smart, sneerclub is a bunch of left-wing retards acting how they always act everywhere.

Themotte is basically a place where you can discuss whatever you want as long as you do not inte tionally shitstir. That includes being able to unironically advocate for nazi shit. Its intention and design isn't to be full of edgy nazi but any place that doesn't ban you for being an edgy nazi eventually attracts edgy nazis.

Although the edgy nazis aren't the majority and whenever they start talking they're usually told, politely, that their ideas are stupid and that they should probably have stopped at the clean your room bit. But they're not banned unless they react badly. And sneerclub absolutely seethes at the idea of having the ability to ban nazi retards and not Banning nazi retards.

So in short it's a place not specifically for debating unironic nazi retards, but none the less you can spend time debating unironic nazi retards. Otherwise like most rationalist spaces it's mostly filled with message capped posts about edging out some slight territorial differences between different left of center schools of thought.

Thanks so what's the slaterstarcodex about ? Discussing culture war stuff without Nazis?

Nah. It’s now a totally emasculated shadow of its former self. All culture war discussion is banned. Just banning nazis was never on the table because everyone there are autists obsessed with applying rules consistently. There’s an in depth explanation of what happened here: https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/02/22/rip-culture-war-thread/

It's a blog by someone who goes by "Scott Alexander". They're a medical doctor that writes long in depth essays about various subjects. https://slatestarcodex.com/about/

is this the neo red pill. bored at the moods I'm not reading all of that

The left are the very sane people that can look at Shapiro with his kippah and tell you he is a nazi. You know the educated, rational kind.

imagine being this retarded

Well he's not a Nazi. He's not particularly smart either though

Sneerclub is the group on reddit I would vote most likely to clear out whole rooms with their presence alone.

Psych 101? Try fortune cookie philosophy

there's a difference?

"our"

I’ve waited so long for rationalist drama to reach this sub. 👏👏👏