Zoomer argues with rightoid zoomer for twelve straight hours.

22  2019-09-08 by Ghdust2

10 comments

do not comment or vote in linked threads

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

womp womp

Snapshots:

  1. Zoomer argues with rightoid zoomer ... - archive.org, archive.today, removeddit.com

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

Do you have a source do you have a source for this, nigga just look around you.

Do you have a source on that? Source? A source. I need a source. Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered. You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence. Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. You still haven't provided me a valid source yet. Nope, still haven't. I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

How dare they care about reality?

arguing with libs on reddit is the worst, at least chapos would just bully you.

You may not like it, but this is what peak cope looks like

They are complaining about sources but then links a trannypoints (contrapoints) video as a source lmao.

(contrapoints)

Apparently a respected expert on every single field, except on trans issues. Canceled!

I can't understand anything or they jerking or not!!!!!!