And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.
Look you retards, when the posts here are basically the same thing every single day and the bot has like 3 different phrases, of course they are going to match up a lot. You idiots post links to anything that matches up with your gay ass drama buzzwords. I don’t get how the circlejerk of regulars don’t get bored of this place but I guess that is because of their incredibly low mental capacity. How many times can you say “dude bussy lmao” without wanted to blow your brains out?
It can't be illegal if I get away with it. Also makes me smart.
I left a flock of rappers dead and buried
A verse from me is like eleven birds
I did the math, it’s like 2000 dollars every word
I’m on the verge, I’ll beat the charge
I killed some niggas and I walked away from it
Then I observe, just how you curve
And told them niggas that they gotta wait for it
“I know-I know you in high demand”
I’m balling on a pussy nigga like Juwanna Mann
I’m drowning all inside the pussy like I never swam
Ayy, fuck your IG, I put somethin’ on your sonogram
I’m the man, ayy, ayy
Did you know that if you took away just 2.8 million votes in California, Hillary Clinton would have still won the popular vote anyway? That's pretty impressive right, take away 2.8 million votes in the state with the most Americans and she still comes out on top.
Also, if you took 2.8 million votes in California from Trump, he would have lost by 6 million votes, instead of 3 million. I just feel like that's an important statistic because apparently taking away Californian votes from people is a thing, I don't see why it should just go one way.
People who live in California should not be allowed to vote the same way that people who are convicted of a felony aren't allowed to vote. If you move to a new state after ten years you can petition the court to have your civil liberties restored.
Imagine delegating the whole illegal immigrant issue to the states. As in, the Federal Government allows individual states to issue a kind of state-issued visas based on whatever requirements they want, but the people with those visas are only allowed to work and reside in the issuing state and whatever other probably democratic states that mutually agreed to respect each others' visas. Also of course the "soil" part of citizenship for children must go, at least for the people on those visas. But all the while they can apply for Federal citizenship as usual.
Speak truthfully: do you think that this is an awesome idea because then Commifornia etc would be able to suck in the entire population of Nigeria and Honduras if they wanted, bringing untold prosperity for everyone and leaving bigoted states to bite the dust? Or does this idea make you uncomfortable somehow, because now we are not in the same boat and if open borders turn out to be a bad idea this will only affect the people who pretended to think that it is a good idea and nobody else would have to bail them out?
Nobody is uncomfortable by your retarded hypothetical because a vast majority of people aren't a massive fucking asshole like you.
The problem with the right wing mindset is that they think that everyone is a disgusting little wretch like them but doesn't want to admit it. No one would want to take the entire country down with it if they made a bad decision.
That's like saying would you be more likely to do a coin toss and if you win you win 500 but if you lose you lose 500 if everybody else in the country also lost the 500 dollars if you lost.
Before you off and call me a liberal the problem with the liberal mindset is that they think either everyone is evil but then or they're the only evil ones. You see them as dishonest and hiding their evil which and avid neoliberal is.
I actually moved into a dilapidated old mansion in the outskirts of town where my fiance and I still get a really good deal because we work on other parts of the house. We sold our car and bought two little shitty cars and we both got a promotion at work. We still struggle but we always will because the class and location we are at.
We are either saving to move to Charlotte, A suburb of Tokyo my uncle lives or to Shenzhen where some of my family lives or do Aliyah to Israel so we can do humanitarian work in Gaza.
If you want a realistic answer it's because it would make the US have to shift it's entire framework and each state would have to have closed borders with each other which would cause massive tension between states and probably end with the dissolution of the union.
Not even European countries have closed borders between them
each state would have to have closed borders with each other
No, why? You only want to catch violators eventually just like today, so I see three differences between that and the current system: first, state governments and organizations in immigrant-unfriendly states would work together with ICE, second, its efforts would be focused on the those states instead of immigrant-friendly states where everyone actively sabotages them, and third, the number of illegal immigrants would drop sharply because why take that risk, while legal-but-not-naturalized immigrants would be much easier to track.
My "to each their own" proposal, with everyone agreeing that immigrants violating the agreement are criminals and should be punished (and are found and punished effectively), would result in much lower tension between states than the current situation where everyone tries to set the policy for everyone else and some places openly defy the current law.
Nah, I'm pretty sure that that's just your brain suddenly switching from the politicking to the reality-based mode of thinking and not liking the position that it talked itself into at all.
I can vividly imagine your ancestor 50,000 years ago, passionately arguing that we should go hunting up the river like the brave and wise chief M'Pemba proposes and not down like other cowardly and foolish chiefs say, then suddenly all whoa whoa hol up hol up when someone suggests that we should split then. Because really it was about mostly positioning the followers of M'Pemba as brave, and some things were said with an expectation that others will push back on them, and what if upriver actually sucks?
At least this one makes sense. Benny has been real off his rocker lately so a coherent comic makes me think the fent hasn't totally rotted away his frontal lobe.
44 comments
1 SnapshillBot 2019-09-25
And what's Spicer going to say, "Oh yeah, it's all legit!" First of all, he's not even one of the 10, and you can tell Trump wouldn't let him in on it. And second of all, if he did say that, it would just make tons of people bombard him with more questions about it, which he really knows nothing about. This is top level Military Intel at the highest level of Classified Clearance.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Rentokill_boy 2019-09-25
oh my god this is too much
1 seenten 2019-09-25
Dude sentient lmao
1 zhcyiDnein 2019-09-25
the fuck
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
Look you retards, when the posts here are basically the same thing every single day and the bot has like 3 different phrases, of course they are going to match up a lot. You idiots post links to anything that matches up with your gay ass drama buzzwords. I don’t get how the circlejerk of regulars don’t get bored of this place but I guess that is because of their incredibly low mental capacity. How many times can you say “dude bussy lmao” without wanted to blow your brains out?
1 wow___justwow 2019-09-25
choose your words carefully big guy, this is my wife you're talking about here
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
For you, lmao
1 DaySee 2019-09-25
Leave OUR wife alone!
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2019-09-25
I think it actually scans titles for keywords to determine what quote to put as well.
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
The above is a snappy quote as well btw.
1 Eternal_Mr_Bones 2019-09-25
He can't keep getting away with it
1 MotorButterscotch 2019-09-25
ಠ_ಠ
1 Rentokill_boy 2019-09-25
at this rate trump's trap won't spring until we're all dead
1 watermark1917 2019-09-25
I hope it's pretty soon then
1 PacificSpices 2019-09-25
This is borderline Qultist levels of cope.
1 Babybear_Dramabear 2019-09-25
Pretty sure Ben is a practicing qultist
1 Chapose 2019-09-25
Is the stick in der ground trump?
1 CantWakeUpJPG 2019-09-25
I guess you can stump the Trump.
😎 😎 😎
1 Shitposting_Skeleton 2019-09-25
...That trap will whiff if Pelosi just crouches down a little bit.
1 dootwthesickness_II 2019-09-25
Which she’d have to do in order to hit the button with that tiny mallet.
1 preserved_fish 2019-09-25
Pelosi looking pretty youthful here
1 watermark1917 2019-09-25
Hottie
1 zsfh 2019-09-25
Nice milkers.
1 newcomer_ts 2019-09-25
Ben may not function up there but down there... lmao
1 lickedTators 2019-09-25
Jokes on them, I was only pretending to do something illegal.
1 watermark1917 2019-09-25
It can't be illegal if I get away with it. Also makes me smart.
I left a flock of rappers dead and buried
A verse from me is like eleven birds
I did the math, it’s like 2000 dollars every word
I’m on the verge, I’ll beat the charge
I killed some niggas and I walked away from it
Then I observe, just how you curve
And told them niggas that they gotta wait for it
“I know-I know you in high demand”
I’m balling on a pussy nigga like Juwanna Mann
I’m drowning all inside the pussy like I never swam
Ayy, fuck your IG, I put somethin’ on your sonogram
I’m the man, ayy, ayy
1 watermark1917 2019-09-25
Did you know that if you took away just 2.8 million votes in California, Hillary Clinton would have still won the popular vote anyway? That's pretty impressive right, take away 2.8 million votes in the state with the most Americans and she still comes out on top.
Also, if you took 2.8 million votes in California from Trump, he would have lost by 6 million votes, instead of 3 million. I just feel like that's an important statistic because apparently taking away Californian votes from people is a thing, I don't see why it should just go one way.
1 trexmundi 2019-09-25
People who live in California should not be allowed to vote the same way that people who are convicted of a felony aren't allowed to vote. If you move to a new state after ten years you can petition the court to have your civil liberties restored.
1 jaredschaffer27 2019-09-25
Survey says "based" with 76 votes.
1 dootwthesickness_II 2019-09-25
Yeah but since when do Chapos want America to have a qualified person leading it?
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
Listen guy, I have a serious question.
Imagine delegating the whole illegal immigrant issue to the states. As in, the Federal Government allows individual states to issue a kind of state-issued visas based on whatever requirements they want, but the people with those visas are only allowed to work and reside in the issuing state and whatever other probably democratic states that mutually agreed to respect each others' visas. Also of course the "soil" part of citizenship for children must go, at least for the people on those visas. But all the while they can apply for Federal citizenship as usual.
Speak truthfully: do you think that this is an awesome idea because then Commifornia etc would be able to suck in the entire population of Nigeria and Honduras if they wanted, bringing untold prosperity for everyone and leaving bigoted states to bite the dust? Or does this idea make you uncomfortable somehow, because now we are not in the same boat and if open borders turn out to be a bad idea this will only affect the people who pretended to think that it is a good idea and nobody else would have to bail them out?
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-09-25
Nobody is uncomfortable by your retarded hypothetical because a vast majority of people aren't a massive fucking asshole like you.
The problem with the right wing mindset is that they think that everyone is a disgusting little wretch like them but doesn't want to admit it. No one would want to take the entire country down with it if they made a bad decision.
That's like saying would you be more likely to do a coin toss and if you win you win 500 but if you lose you lose 500 if everybody else in the country also lost the 500 dollars if you lost.
Before you off and call me a liberal the problem with the liberal mindset is that they think either everyone is evil but then or they're the only evil ones. You see them as dishonest and hiding their evil which and avid neoliberal is.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2019-09-25
So, you start packing to move yet?
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-09-25
I actually moved into a dilapidated old mansion in the outskirts of town where my fiance and I still get a really good deal because we work on other parts of the house. We sold our car and bought two little shitty cars and we both got a promotion at work. We still struggle but we always will because the class and location we are at.
We are either saving to move to Charlotte, A suburb of Tokyo my uncle lives or to Shenzhen where some of my family lives or do Aliyah to Israel so we can do humanitarian work in Gaza.
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
Then why is it a hypothetical, exactly? Seems like a way more achievable compromise than trying to open borders on the federal level.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-09-25
If you want a realistic answer it's because it would make the US have to shift it's entire framework and each state would have to have closed borders with each other which would cause massive tension between states and probably end with the dissolution of the union.
Not even European countries have closed borders between them
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
No, why? You only want to catch violators eventually just like today, so I see three differences between that and the current system: first, state governments and organizations in immigrant-unfriendly states would work together with ICE, second, its efforts would be focused on the those states instead of immigrant-friendly states where everyone actively sabotages them, and third, the number of illegal immigrants would drop sharply because why take that risk, while legal-but-not-naturalized immigrants would be much easier to track.
1 xXAssBlaster69420Xx 2019-09-25
You still have immigrants moving between states which would cause tension anything that causes a lot of tension between states rn is a bad idea
1 zergling_Lester 2019-09-25
My "to each their own" proposal, with everyone agreeing that immigrants violating the agreement are criminals and should be punished (and are found and punished effectively), would result in much lower tension between states than the current situation where everyone tries to set the policy for everyone else and some places openly defy the current law.
Nah, I'm pretty sure that that's just your brain suddenly switching from the politicking to the reality-based mode of thinking and not liking the position that it talked itself into at all.
I can vividly imagine your ancestor 50,000 years ago, passionately arguing that we should go hunting up the river like the brave and wise chief M'Pemba proposes and not down like other cowardly and foolish chiefs say, then suddenly all whoa whoa hol up hol up when someone suggests that we should split then. Because really it was about mostly positioning the followers of M'Pemba as brave, and some things were said with an expectation that others will push back on them, and what if upriver actually sucks?
1 newcomer_ts 2019-09-25
What about Ukraine?
1 TruthPains 2019-09-25
We seriously need a list of Ben "clever title" Garrison names.
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-09-25
Take a peek through GHDusts history, he’s been posting new ones every day for months now lol
1 JustLions 2019-09-25
4 out of 7 words are "trap Trump."
1 Babybear_Dramabear 2019-09-25
At least this one makes sense. Benny has been real off his rocker lately so a coherent comic makes me think the fent hasn't totally rotted away his frontal lobe.