Are you back to hating women again?

Did he ever stop

Never, I guess

“Hatred of women” and “pizzashill” are pretty much synonymous it seems

Automod should have a filter where any time someone posts “misogynist” it corrects it to “pizzashill” lmao

This is the truest thing I think you've ever said. I'm a little in awe.

Trans ally COPE! I may not be the biggest feminist, but foids>troids any day

it is statistically proven (by me) that only 0.03 percent of troids are at the same standard as foids.

We need to carve out C(hildren)GTOW from MGTOW

A downvote from a commie is the equivalent of an upvote from someone with braincells. So thanks, man.

Snapshots:

1. Do not buy into the anti-tranny age... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

[removed]

This but unironically

[removed]

Neither was I

That's mostly black on black crime as far as I know, so it's weird that you of all people address it to us of all people.

[removed]

It's black cis-men murdering black trans-women. Why would a mayo tranner come to mayo moids and ask not to do that boggles the mind: we literally already don't and we can't do anything about blacks who do because that would be racist, and you're not in any danger anyway.

[removed]

I'll think about it.

They're murdered at a lower rate than non trans women so everyone has stopped

So far, There have been 18 transgender deaths in the USA. That's statistically nothing.

Sounds like a cope of a man who accepted only Yanivs of this world can handle his high stake hobbies of preaching neoliberal talking points in 4chan retirement home to own rightoids and playing WoW.

Aight, lemme guess - since we're posting on /r/Drama which is for some reason a venue for you to preach the correct views™, you want me to write something you can nitpick and akshually about.

Let's try it then - a neoliberal is moderately socially liberal proponent of free markets, globalization (and linked with that - international institutions) and open borders. Neoliberal sees free flow of people, goods and services across national borders as inherent good that should be defended and faciliated. Socially wise, neoliberal supports emancipation of minorities, LGBT rights and opposes traditionalism, and nationalism (which he sees as a threat to lib democracy and global market).

I'm p sure this definition is sometimes wrong and not nearly detailed enough but the comment is already waaaaaay too long so have fun with it.

Ur a nigger

I find it extremely funny how you akshually'd so hard you posted literal non-sequitur to the question at hand.

From the article: "First, neoliberalism is employed asymmetrically across ideological divides: it is used frequently by those who are critical of free markets, but rarely by those who view marketization more positively. In part, proponents avoid the term because neoliberalism has come to signify a radical form of market fundamentalism with which no one wants to be associated."

Gee, it's almost like fascists, to use your favourite political ideology to smear people with, are doing literally exactly the same and so you have barely any parties calling themselves fascist. Doesn't make the word "fascist" meaningless.

Furthermore, the fact there is one article positing that neoliberalism is a vague, politically charged term that has changed its meaning over time does not mean is not a useful descriptor for some political stances. You didn't even tell me how my definitions is wrong or anything - you just posted an article I'm pretty sure you didn't read beyond abstract, because you're used to discussing with retarded r*ghtoids who get intimated by the sole appearance of academic link.

So, let's check if I can substantiate my claims:

"From the start, however, there have been at least two main strands of neo-liberalism, echoing the dominant strands of classical liberalism in the nineteenth century. There is a laissez-faire strand – the belief that the best policy is to allow markets to operate with as few impediments as possible – and there is a social market strand – which believes that for the free market to reach its full potential the state has to be active in creating and sustaining the institutions which make that possible. Bothstrands give priority to the market within social relations, and both imply an active state. But in the first case the role of the state is primarily to remove obstacles to the way in which markets function, while inthe second the state also has the role and responsibility to intervene tocreate the right kind of institutional setting within which markets canfunction. This second strand of neo-liberalism legitimates a wide range of state intervention – from the encouragement of structural adjustment, social capital and good governance in developing economies, towelfare safety nets, to investment in human capital, to environmental protection, to corporate social responsibility, even to limited forms of redistribution. By contrast, the laissez-faire strand is much more hardheaded and mean-minded. It is instinctively averse to interventions in markets, believing that such interventions do more harm than good,and that the outcomes of markets left to themselves are almost always benign, or at least as benign as it is possible for outcomes to be in an imperfect world." - The Neoliberal Revolution: Forging the Market State (ed. R. Robison), page 22

Looks like my identification of neoliberalism with free market is 100% correct. Can neoliberalism can be argued as incorporating LGBT emancipation in its specific global capitalist framework, like I mentioned? Why yes, it can, espesially in Europe: "Neoliberal state administrations (...) include same sex couples in their welfare policy. Responsibility for social care is delegated from the state to so called "rainbow families”. Long before gay marriage was achieved in Germany, homosexual relationships had already been acknowledged by the state when alimony had to be paid to the jobless partner. As a result, neoliberalism's neo-familiarisation includes also gay men and lesbians into its notion of family. This may be considered as an historical break with the former fordist isolation of queer individuals from their families of origin." "Various scholars, such as Donald Lowe (1995), have argued that in so called late capitalism sexuality has been transformed from constituting a sexual identity to representing a sexual lifestyle. By consequence, sexuality is now figuring as an individual consumer choice at the free market of lifestyles. This very consumerist perspective creates a strong bias for the white male middle class experience." http://www.interalia.org.pl/en/artykuly/2007_2/06_neoliberalism_and_its_homophobic_discontents_1.htm

Now, I COULD obviously check if neoliberalism and nationalism are compatible (protip: they aren't) but you are sufficiently dabbed on already.

Point is, being pseudointellectual in 4chan retirement home and basing your self-value on it makes you a moron, especially if you think posting muh academic articles is enough because you're used to arguing with retarded r*ghtoids. But who gaze into the abyss... becomes a retard himself it seems. :⁾

Wow, sounds like you got owned and repeat retarded shit you already said even tho I showed you I can easily back up my definition.

Sounds like you got owned bruh like a pseud you are lmao

Quite literally you repeat the same dumb shit with no quotations since you are unable to actually engage with academic literature, you're just used to argue with people even dumber than you.

If neoliberalism is a buzzword then so is fascism, because both are quite contested descriptors. Doesn't mean you can't define it.

you did was simply link it to a bunch of things you do not like.

Literal projection. All of those things are perfectly in line with practice of neoliberalism since 90s and you can't even point out which ones are out of place because you literally aren't able to and try to hide this with smug akshualling.

As I said: it is the mark of an absurdly stupid person.

Yes, I'm sure people analyzing the processes by which global capitalism of at least last three decades operates are definitly stupider than you, prof. Dunning-Kruger. 😏

The fact you think a bunch of social scientists and gender studies majors have any authority to define neoliberalism is even more hilarious. The fact you literally can't prove em wrong on any account is funnier imho. Also I do wonder, what kind of scientist could describe political landscape of last few decades if not social scientists. I know, it should be a WoW NEET.

Firstly, and most fundamentally, neoliberalism has proliferated well beyond its conceptual crib in political economy, and has as a result, become stretched to the point where widespread concerns have been raised about its viability and relevance. Secondly, this critical concern has resulted in attempts to either purify the concept with reference to its original ideational essence, or to reconceptualise it with respect to a more complex actually existing ontology.

So it sounds like neoliberalism as a concept got misused. It does not mean it's useless as a descriptor like you constantly try to act - it means it was very successful to the point of dilution as a term. Furthermore the idea that we should akshually go for pure economics in that case is p laughable, seeing how neoliberalism refers mainly to the political movement which certain sets of policies so again, saying that neoliberalism is not economics-wise sound is no shit moment, seeing how its a political phenomenon.

Now, I find it extremely funny that you think that if some academics think that way it is surely like that all across the academia and there are no disagreements and other researchers that dont use the term. For example, the book I cited was written by professor of political economy and I fail to see why I shouldn't trust him with usage of the term since it's literally what he was an expert in.

In other words, again - you post an article excerpt and you don't engage with it at all bc you're literally too stupid to think for yourself and use other "legitimate" view points for narcisstic sense of superiority over certain people.

Bc youre a retard lmao

No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

Figures you're a fan of the 'mouthfeel'.

...you have enlightened me.

I love trans women!!

I met this lady in Hollywood

She had green hair but damn she looked good

I took her to my house because she was fine

But she whipped out a dick that was bigger than mine

Troids are superior to foids. Fact.

mtf troids are double gay, ftm gaytroids are the ideal partner.

[removed]

nah trannys are just fuckn mental that's all, its fucked that we have to accept this bull shit, the worlds going mad. if i wanted to get a knob put on me my family would rightly take me to a mental hospital and find out what the real problem was instead of parsing me as brave

[deleted]