Little bit of column a, little bit of column b. You could amack together a board of models for the donkies and toothless obese 50 year old white trash for the Trumpers and it would be just as accurate.
It's scientifically proven that young women are considered more attractive.
or are you going to say that since more men are Trump supporters than not, that must mean that more Trump supporters are attractive than not?
No, because the distribution isn't the same. Democrats win women by a much larger margin than Republicans win men by. Take the 2018 midterms for example:
Physical attraction is not subjective. It's biological. Saying it's subjective is like peak normie cope.
There are certain non-physical traits that can make you seem more physically attractive than you are to a partner, though. But this doesn't erase biological attraction.
I have a girlfriend. The fact you're here claiming physical attraction is subjective basically puts you on par with those land-whales that claim they're beautiful.
This is just outright science denial at this point.
lmao nigga if this is science denial then you having a girlfriend is a statistical anomaly cuz there's no way anyone would ever find your FAS baby face and flabby body attractive.
just for a chance to come at me.
this is the most desperate anyone has ever been to be tough on the internet rofl
You said that most attractive women are liberal because most women are liberal. It really isn't any less stupid than what he said, which is kind of the point of the analogy.
First of all, what's attractive isn't really for you to decide so this is a retarded argument to get into to begin with.
Second, you could have pointed out something like age, health, or other factors between left and right-wingers. You're doing that now but only after it became obvious how untenable your original stance was.
I am as baffled at the retardation of your original comment as you are at his.
In case you still do not get it: the fact that there is more of something in sample A does not, on its own, mean that sample A is a better yield than sample B. It's okay to be wrong.
You said that most attractive women are liberal because most women are liberal. It really isn't any less stupid than what he said, which is kind of the point of the analogy.
What he said was, in fact, retarded. Speed limits have nothing to do with attraction levels dude. One is genetic, one is simply set by humans.
If 80% of women between the ages of 20 and 25 are liberal, and we know age is a huge deciding factor in how attractive a woman is, then it is correct to say "most attractive women would be liberal."
First of all, what's attractive isn't really for you to decide so this is a retarded argument to get into to begin with.
Attraction is not subjective. There are physical traits that are invariably attractive because attraction is genetic. Being young, for example, is a massive increase to how attractive a woman is. Younger women are almost invariably going to be more attractive. Almost like men are biologically programmed to be attracted to women within peak fertile years. Funny how that works, isn't it?
The fact you people are so desperate to come at me you'll just keep getting bent over like this is just insane to me.
Wait until he learns gay people and asexuals exist.
This has no fucking relevance to anything I've said. attraction is still genetic, just because outliers exist and groups that deviate from the norm exist doesn't mean attraction is not genetic.
It is pretty funny that you have a big head about 20-post-deep threads that no one else will even read. At least I am not under the illusion that I am impressing anyone.
Attraction being genetic and attraction being objective are not the same thing. At all. To say otherwise would mean genetic variation is not a thing.
Now, I have a 100% honest question for you. Some people like obese fucks, some guys only like muscular women, some only like skinny women. Or tall girls. Or short girls. Some people watch fucking grandma porn and some want to fuck kids. How on earth do you explain this? How can there be these variations in who people find attractive if it's objective?
I don't know how else to explain this to you mean. outliers exist. There are people, that due to some underlying factor, have a weird fetish that leads them to value, for example, some obese person more than the traditional "attractive woman."
But this is not even close to the norm. If we were to conduct a paper finding what the "ideal" male/female face/body is, it certainly wouldn't be an obese face/body. And that's exactly what we have done. We have a general idea what the "ideal" female face/body is in terms of physical attractiveness.
There are caveats, of course. Certain social factors can influence how attractive you find someone. And indeed, humans are programmed for exactly. If you love someone, you're going to find them more attractive than they actually are. Where do you think the phrase "blinded by love" comes from?
But that's not what this discussion was about. This discussion was about obvious physical attraction. The kind you'd see on a dating website or something.
There are people, that due to some underlying factor, have a weird fetish that leads them to value, for example, some obese person more than the traditional "attractive woman."
or autistic NEETs that spend all their time spergposting on drama subreddits.
No, it literally doesn't. It reveals you to not be very intelligent.
Speed limits are set by humans based on various factors.
Attraction is genetic.
Let me explain why my argument works.
If we know, let's say, 5% of women fall into the high tiers of attractiveness, and 80% of women are democrats, we know that most attractive women will be democrats.
Likewise, because democrats overwhelmingly win women between the ages of let's say 18-28, which are peak fertile years, and we know women are most attractive during these years, it's correct to say most attractive women are democrats.
Your comparison makes no sense in the context of mine. It reveals you to be a moron.
I honestly think you people are just incapable of admitting you're wrong.
Like the fact a person that thought speed limits and roads were comparable to genetics is just such overwhelming evidence of incompetence it's not even worth really engaging you.
I didn't point out that your conclusion is wrong, I pointed out that your argument has an embarrassing gaping hole.
I really don't care whether the conclusion is right or wrong. In my experience most attractive women don't care about politics anyway.
And you still seem to not even understand what that gigantic hole is. You're not even disagreeing with me on it, you can't even address it, because you don't understand it. That's how dumb you are.
This isn't a denial of science, it's a you don't know what you're talking about thing.
The "study" you linked is riddled with absurd flaws.
For example, it's only looking at political candidates, not the general population. Political candidates are more attractive than the general population on average (for obvious reasons.)
It's also looking at multiple countries."right-wing" means different things based on cultural and regional context.
In the context of the united states, Republican voters simply care more about looks than democratic voters do:
The researchers found that Republican voters care more about appearance than Democratic voters do, but only if the voters don't have much information about the candidates and have to rely largely on appearance — in city-level elections, for example.
Caring more about looks in a primary than democrats do doesn't mean Republicans, on average, are more attractive. Hope you learned something today.
TL;DR. Try this one on for size. For the illiterate amongst us, it says the sexiest and strongest men are all conservative. Really activates the almonds, doesnt it?
If muscles were what actually mattered in terms of physical attraction, you might have a point, but they don't, as incels and gymcels are well aware of.
Just remember, all the actually good looking conservative women are rich and are never gonna touch your penis 😏 Have fun with the trailer park fent addict tho.
115 comments
1 AutoModerator 2019-11-18
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 capthazelwoodsflask 2019-11-18
I can't quite tell if that cope or delusion on their part.
1 -M-o-X- 2019-11-18
Little bit of column a, little bit of column b. You could amack together a board of models for the donkies and toothless obese 50 year old white trash for the Trumpers and it would be just as accurate.
1 capthazelwoodsflask 2019-11-18
I just like how they think they have a chance with any of them, top or bottom row.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
they totally have all that sex with those ladies though you guys.
1 kurwamacja 2019-11-18
Why would any self respecting male even look at the general direction of a gussy when twinks and trannies exist?
1 Alicesnakebae 2019-11-18
Fear of a welcoming bussy clearly
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
Not being a deluded incel.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
not as if you'd understand what that's like.
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
OK incel.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
Bravely going for "no u" twice in a row, the mark of the truly
dementeddedicated retard.Will he go for the trifecta, or will he just continue failing to have sex?
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
is this fentanyl
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
No, it's a failure to show where I was wrong or contradictory in any way, due to you being a drooling cretin who is never going to procreate.
Pretty simple stuff really.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
guys are we certain that pol isn't just pizza on an alt because boy howdy are they super similar, it's really eerie
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
Why compare me to him instead of the literally thousands of people in your life who have called you a sexless moron?
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
that's some weird projection but ok.
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
And there it is.
PS: I'm extremely successful financially, socially, and sexually, sorry if your seething envy makes that a problem for you.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
are you still talking
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
What's wrong, has your limited attention span as a very stupid person inevitably run dry?
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
how little effort can i put into my responses to make you keep going, pizza
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
No, u.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
boy, obsessively trying to get the last word in is definitely not looking good if you don't want to be ousted as pizzashill.
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
No, u.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
reply again, puppet.
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
No, u.
1 BlooCheckmark 2019-11-18
He's pizzashill
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
You're now one of three people I've blocked on Reddit.
1 poorace 2019-11-18
Not sure what's disgusts me more, your cringe posts or ethnic background
1 RIPGeorgeHarrison 2019-11-18
Unironically every invictus_risen comeback ever.
1 IraqiLobster 2019-11-18
Expecting better is a waste of time, I won’t hold my breath
1 kurwamacja 2019-11-18
dude pol lmao
1 pol__invictus__risen 2019-11-18
Have sex with a woman, incel.
1 kurwamacja 2019-11-18
dude pol lmao
1 Seattle_Bussy_Lmao 2019-11-18
Well there’s your answer
1 kurwamacja 2019-11-18
fair enough
1 Stenwalden 2019-11-18
Jerking off to their facebook pics counts, right?
1 YaBoyStevieF 2019-11-18
A little peek behind the curtain here
1 lifts_throwawayFC 2019-11-18
😅😰😢😭
1 darth_stroyer 2019-11-18
boomercel
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
I like how trumptards pretend liberal women are all ugly or something.
Statistically, most women are liberals, meaning most attractive women are liberals.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
that's not how statistics work you fucking moron.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
If most women are liberals, then most attractive women will be liberals when looking at the general population.
This is even more true considering the vast majority of young women are liberals, and young women are far more likely to be attractive than old women.
So yes, it quite literally is.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
this is literally just you assuming that since most liberal women are younger, they're automatically more attractive.
again, that's not how statistics work you dipshit.
or are you going to say that since more men are Trump supporters than not, that must mean that more Trump supporters are attractive than not?
so, by your totally intelligent statistical analysis, Trump supporters are more attractive than liberal men.
retard.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
That's not me assuming anything, it's called objective reality.
https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/22/men-regardless-age-will-always-attracted-women-early-20s-8718590/
It's scientifically proven that young women are considered more attractive.
No, because the distribution isn't the same. Democrats win women by a much larger margin than Republicans win men by. Take the 2018 midterms for example:
Repubs won men by about 4 points. Democrats won women by 19 points.
And young men are also far more likely to be liberals.
No, see above.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
stopped reading right here. lmao you think something as subjective as physical attractiveness can be scientifically proven
have sex, incel.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Oh my god, you're actually retarded.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
so you think that every single person on the planet all agrees on what makes someone attractive?
do you know what "subjective" means
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Physical attraction is not subjective. It's biological. Saying it's subjective is like peak normie cope.
There are certain non-physical traits that can make you seem more physically attractive than you are to a partner, though. But this doesn't erase biological attraction.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
I have a girlfriend. The fact you're here claiming physical attraction is subjective basically puts you on par with those land-whales that claim they're beautiful.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
ftfy
yes that's right, there is literally zero point between "not everyone finds the same people attractive" and "ALL women are beautiful, even landwhales"
your autism is showing. aggressively.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
I actually can't believe a guy here is coming at me, claiming physical attraction is subjective lmao.
I guess we're on twox now.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
A U T I S M
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
You're actually beyond mentally ill.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
This is just outright science denial at this point.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
lmao nigga if this is science denial then you having a girlfriend is a statistical anomaly cuz there's no way anyone would ever find your FAS baby face and flabby body attractive.
this is the most desperate anyone has ever been to be tough on the internet rofl
1 Stenwalden 2019-11-18
Did you two fuck yet?
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
no i'm starting to think this negging strategy isn't gonna work 😔
1 ReddneckwithaD 2019-11-18
Lmao shitting on pol and PS in a single thread? Thats honestly centrist as fuck, godbless
1 simplicity3000 2019-11-18
the reasoning capability of a legume
no wonder you're a radlib
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
This is actually such a braindead false equivalence I'm shocked you even typed it.
1 200iqBigBrain 2019-11-18
you can always tell when pizzashill knows he's lost because he starts trying to drop witty one-liners instead of typing paragraphs of bullshit
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Do you unironically not see why that was retarded?
1 200iqBigBrain 2019-11-18
You said that most attractive women are liberal because most women are liberal. It really isn't any less stupid than what he said, which is kind of the point of the analogy.
First of all, what's attractive isn't really for you to decide so this is a retarded argument to get into to begin with.
Second, you could have pointed out something like age, health, or other factors between left and right-wingers. You're doing that now but only after it became obvious how untenable your original stance was.
I am as baffled at the retardation of your original comment as you are at his.
In case you still do not get it: the fact that there is more of something in sample A does not, on its own, mean that sample A is a better yield than sample B. It's okay to be wrong.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
What he said was, in fact, retarded. Speed limits have nothing to do with attraction levels dude. One is genetic, one is simply set by humans.
If 80% of women between the ages of 20 and 25 are liberal, and we know age is a huge deciding factor in how attractive a woman is, then it is correct to say "most attractive women would be liberal."
Attraction is not subjective. There are physical traits that are invariably attractive because attraction is genetic. Being young, for example, is a massive increase to how attractive a woman is. Younger women are almost invariably going to be more attractive. Almost like men are biologically programmed to be attracted to women within peak fertile years. Funny how that works, isn't it?
The fact you people are so desperate to come at me you'll just keep getting bent over like this is just insane to me.
1 200iqBigBrain 2019-11-18
Alright, you're just pulling my leg now. Good bait.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
This has no fucking relevance to anything I've said. attraction is still genetic, just because outliers exist and groups that deviate from the norm exist doesn't mean attraction is not genetic.
Being gay, for example, is likely genetic too.
1 200iqBigBrain 2019-11-18
It is pretty funny that you have a big head about 20-post-deep threads that no one else will even read. At least I am not under the illusion that I am impressing anyone.
Attraction being genetic and attraction being objective are not the same thing. At all. To say otherwise would mean genetic variation is not a thing.
Now, I have a 100% honest question for you. Some people like obese fucks, some guys only like muscular women, some only like skinny women. Or tall girls. Or short girls. Some people watch fucking grandma porn and some want to fuck kids. How on earth do you explain this? How can there be these variations in who people find attractive if it's objective?
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
I don't know how else to explain this to you mean. outliers exist. There are people, that due to some underlying factor, have a weird fetish that leads them to value, for example, some obese person more than the traditional "attractive woman."
But this is not even close to the norm. If we were to conduct a paper finding what the "ideal" male/female face/body is, it certainly wouldn't be an obese face/body. And that's exactly what we have done. We have a general idea what the "ideal" female face/body is in terms of physical attractiveness.
There are caveats, of course. Certain social factors can influence how attractive you find someone. And indeed, humans are programmed for exactly. If you love someone, you're going to find them more attractive than they actually are. Where do you think the phrase "blinded by love" comes from?
But that's not what this discussion was about. This discussion was about obvious physical attraction. The kind you'd see on a dating website or something.
1 d-amazo 2019-11-18
or autistic NEETs that spend all their time spergposting on drama subreddits.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
You looking to be rightoid #4 I beat down in this post?
1 simplicity3000 2019-11-18
no, it succinctly showcases the gaping hole in your "logic."
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
No, it literally doesn't. It reveals you to not be very intelligent.
Speed limits are set by humans based on various factors.
Attraction is genetic.
Let me explain why my argument works.
If we know, let's say, 5% of women fall into the high tiers of attractiveness, and 80% of women are democrats, we know that most attractive women will be democrats.
Likewise, because democrats overwhelmingly win women between the ages of let's say 18-28, which are peak fertile years, and we know women are most attractive during these years, it's correct to say most attractive women are democrats.
Your comparison makes no sense in the context of mine. It reveals you to be a moron.
1 simplicity3000 2019-11-18
you're not taking into account how ugly left wing women are
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Except statistically, most attractive women will be liberals.
1 simplicity3000 2019-11-18
except you're incapable of avoiding even basic statistical reasoning mistakes
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
I honestly think you people are just incapable of admitting you're wrong.
Like the fact a person that thought speed limits and roads were comparable to genetics is just such overwhelming evidence of incompetence it's not even worth really engaging you.
1 simplicity3000 2019-11-18
I didn't point out that your conclusion is wrong, I pointed out that your argument has an embarrassing gaping hole.
I really don't care whether the conclusion is right or wrong. In my experience most attractive women don't care about politics anyway.
And you still seem to not even understand what that gigantic hole is. You're not even disagreeing with me on it, you can't even address it, because you don't understand it. That's how dumb you are.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
But it doesn't. If it did, you wouldn't have used such an absurd and obvious false equivalence.
I did, and explained in detail why my argument was correct and yours was retarded.
1 simplicity3000 2019-11-18
you're just too dumb too understand it
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
I believe in science
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
I get you're scientifically illiterate. Would you like me to explain the flaws and why this is retarded?
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
No u
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
This isn't a denial of science, it's a you don't know what you're talking about thing.
The "study" you linked is riddled with absurd flaws.
For example, it's only looking at political candidates, not the general population. Political candidates are more attractive than the general population on average (for obvious reasons.)
It's also looking at multiple countries."right-wing" means different things based on cultural and regional context.
In the context of the united states, Republican voters simply care more about looks than democratic voters do:
Caring more about looks in a primary than democrats do doesn't mean Republicans, on average, are more attractive. Hope you learned something today.
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
TL;DR. Try this one on for size. For the illiterate amongst us, it says the sexiest and strongest men are all conservative. Really activates the almonds, doesnt it?
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
If muscles were what actually mattered in terms of physical attraction, you might have a point, but they don't, as incels and gymcels are well aware of.
Translation: "I got bent over."
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
Then riddle me this- why are conservatives more happily married? I just keep hearing the sweet whispers of coping from you
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Because they're more likely to be religious.
The give away for that should be the fact it was democrats and independents.
This means even conservative independents are less likely to be happily married. The only difference between these groups is religious identification.
I'll keep bending you over all day friend.
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
Imagine rejecting Allah and thinking you're righteous. Yikes!
Are you outting yourself as a literal child? Double yikes!
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Ok rightoid.
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
Now the cope becomes the seethe. :p
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
"cope" also known as "dismantling rightoid bullshit."
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
seething
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
Ok rightoid.
1 FearOfBees 2019-11-18
Most women are centrists or rightoids. Centrists are like 35% of voters. Counting all liberals they are easily more ugly.
Also science on this was done years ago.
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
This is just outright false.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/120839/women-likely-democrats-regardless-age.aspx
1 FearOfBees 2019-11-18
So there are more liberals than centrists or righties? Did you even read my comment? You must be illiterate
1 ponzishill 2019-11-18
There are more liberal women than centrist or right-wing women, yes.
There aren't even that many "center" voters in the US, it's a bit of myth:
And if we break this down into young women then it's even more obvious.
1 200iqBigBrain 2019-11-18
Why are you so desperate to prove that you are a retard
1 Woolgun 2019-11-18
None of those grifting e-thots would ever even touch a redditor or other extremely online Daddy supporter, so let's have a REAL MAGA cuties thread 😍
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/11/05/us/politics/04dc-trumpwomen1/04dc-trumpwomen1-articleLarge-v2.jpg
https://images.dailykos.com/images/312850/large/04142016_115610_womentrump_8col.jpg?1476557895
https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/20161105_USP508.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/KuLovgL.jpg
https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/3631ffc/2147483647/resize/1160x%3E/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2Ffe%2F4f%2F3f435ab6496d86cc2000f2ceefcc%2F191031-women-for-trump-ap-773.jpg
1 FrenemyOfTheSheeple 2019-11-18
Old women are old, great insight! Upbewdeted xd
1 Woolgun 2019-11-18
lmao granny fucker
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
Keep on coping
1 Woolgun 2019-11-18
We can post studies at each other all day
Just remember, all the actually good looking conservative women are rich and are never gonna touch your penis 😏 Have fun with the trailer park fent addict tho.
1 JoeBidenTouchedMe 2019-11-18
Sounds like a whole lotta cope
1 AlveolarPressure 2019-11-18
The reality is that gussy is not interested in either side's extremely online wingnuts. That's why radical centrists get the best gussy/bussy 😎
1 Burnnoticelover 2019-11-18
So what I’m getting from this thread is that attractive people are more likely to have conserberal leanings.
1 [deleted] 2019-11-18
[removed]
1 black_panther_sucks 2019-11-18
Volcel if you wouldn’t fuck any one of those women
1 FearOfBees 2019-11-18
Literally gay
1 ironicshitpostr 2019-11-18
fag
1 AFellowCanadianGuy 2019-11-18
Don’t republicans have a much higher obesity problem than lefties?
As funny as the fat feminist memes are,there are a lot of fat aunt Betsy’s
1 Chapose 2019-11-18
Jesus this is cringe