Literally protesting something she doesn’t understand
Does she really think CO2 levels would change in less than a year? I’m real retarded, sir, but even I know that CO2 levels would take, like, hella long to change dramatically
That’s like saying that efforts to stop global warming aren’t working because it was super hot this summer
She’s just been raised by her panicked libs telling her the world will end if the wrong guy gets office. If you were raised by her parents you’d think the same way, her emotions are probably legit and as week all know emotions are more important that logic, especially for us dramanaughtz.
Oh yeah, super tragic. I feel really bad for her. Puppet for powerful people to take advantage of, and personify, zoomer hysteria. She also just happens to be a mentally disabled child. This whole thing is probably stressing her tf out. Sad!
That is how CO2 levels work - if we up and stopped emitting any CO2 immediately, after six months you'd see the ppm stop rising - and likely see a drop.
The natural carbon cycle still has some wiggle room - the yearly tonnage in the atmosphere is growing by less than what we're outputting. If we stopped releasing CO2 at all, that extra absorption capacity would start bringing down the totals, and put the planet back on the path toward the next glaciation.
Her statement is still naive, but due to economics, not science. And more likely, she meant that she is frustrated that the CO2 levels are still rising at the same pace.
You’re way more educated in this category than me so I’ll let you knowledge-cuck me
I still think she’s woefully underprepared to discuss this in the way that she does. She’s mostly making pathos appeals that only make twitter activists emotional
I can guarantee that Greta Thunburg will be socially irrelevant in 6 months. Hopefully her and her friend go watch a good old fashioned movie like papa Trump told her
Based Greta will always be the times person of the year 2019 and those millions of followers in social media aren't going anywhere so she is set for life
Translation: "With this Time shit we've squeezed about as much out of this tard as we can. Time to start grooming the next kid you're not allowed to criticize."
If we take an objective and realistic assessment of its impact, we would unfortunately find that it had no impact at all.
Thing is though, its quite ridiculous to place that standard of genuine change on one person's shoulders in the first place.
I do wonder if she thought she would change the game, as if nobody had tried before.
At the end of the day, she didn't really get people talking about climate change, she got people talking about Greta - which hopefully wasn't her motive.
Those that do talk about it post Greta, and credit her, they were already doing it before.
The best part about the "climate change debate", from my point of view at least, is that no matter who is taking political action for or against, they're having no impact. The scientists keep going no matter what, and if they need money, they'll get it - no doubt.
It's also funny to me people believe the whole species has to contribute to the solution, thats never been the case for any struggle, progress always moves on the backs of the few, not the many.
Unless the approach is purely mitigation, but if that's the solution we were doomed from the start.
The final solution to the issue lay in carbon capture and geo-engineering. A sort of man-made climate eugenics.
I do wonder if she thought she would change the game, as if nobody had tried before.
That's what every 16-year old thinks, even the ones who aren't legit retarded like her.
The final solution to the issue lay in carbon capture and geo-engineering. A sort of man-made climate eugenics.
Yeah, if we're gonna solve this, we're gonna solve it by doing more, not by having self-control. Humans are a lot better at finding technological solutions to problems than they are at just restraining themselves and not causing problems.
39 comments
7 ManBearFridge 2019-12-14
This person is too boring to watch a video of her.
But inquiring minds need to know, is she dating Barron?
5 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2019-12-14
We could only wish
5 SmoothBeetle 2019-12-14
Please be Baron Trump, please be Baron Trump
7 YourLocalMonarchist 2019-12-14
that would be fucking amazing.
everyone would be pissed off
4 MoistLanguage 2019-12-14
Manlets on suicide watch
7 big_papa_stiffy 2019-12-14
this is clearly photoshopped to make him look smaller
3 Slump_o 2019-12-14
mog machine
2 Giulio-Cesare 2019-12-14
Fucking pathetic.
1 MoistLanguage 2019-12-14
The Chosen One
1 TrailerParkRide 2019-12-14
Here's an actual recent photo of Barron
5 yeetsaucepeteross 2019-12-14
Literally protesting something she doesn’t understand
Does she really think CO2 levels would change in less than a year? I’m real retarded, sir, but even I know that CO2 levels would take, like, hella long to change dramatically
That’s like saying that efforts to stop global warming aren’t working because it was super hot this summer
7 Norway313 2019-12-14
Her parents brainwashed her, and exploited her for fame. It's fucking sad
6 throwaway_at_ 2019-12-14
She’s just been raised by her panicked libs telling her the world will end if the wrong guy gets office. If you were raised by her parents you’d think the same way, her emotions are probably legit and as week all know emotions are more important that logic, especially for us dramanaughtz.
2 yeetsaucepeteross 2019-12-14
Oh yeah, super tragic. I feel really bad for her. Puppet for powerful people to take advantage of, and personify, zoomer hysteria. She also just happens to be a mentally disabled child. This whole thing is probably stressing her tf out. Sad!
3 big_papa_stiffy 2019-12-14
shes swedish and her parents are also swedish
1 Redactor0 2019-12-14
I may disagree with you about a lot of things, but at least we can agree on not being Swedish. 🤮🤮🤮
2 UKIP_Warrior 2019-12-14
Erm Sweaty don't you know this 16 year old girl has read and understand several peer-reviewed scientific papers?!?!?
2 Giulio-Cesare 2019-12-14
I can't take her seriously because she doesn't say shit about China.
1 kermit_was_wrong 2019-12-14
I don't even understand the argument you're trying to make here.
3 yeetsaucepeteross 2019-12-14
She’s saying she’s disheartened that she’s been protesting for 6 months and the global CO2 levels haven’t dropped
I’m saying that that’s definitely not how global CO2 levels work (major changes don’t happen in 6 months)
So the fact she’s the TPOY and the face of climate change protesting and doesn’t know how CO2 levels work is ironic.
Obviously it’s not her fault, she’s a kid. But her puppeteers should inform her better
3 kermit_was_wrong 2019-12-14
That is how CO2 levels work - if we up and stopped emitting any CO2 immediately, after six months you'd see the ppm stop rising - and likely see a drop.
The natural carbon cycle still has some wiggle room - the yearly tonnage in the atmosphere is growing by less than what we're outputting. If we stopped releasing CO2 at all, that extra absorption capacity would start bringing down the totals, and put the planet back on the path toward the next glaciation.
Her statement is still naive, but due to economics, not science. And more likely, she meant that she is frustrated that the CO2 levels are still rising at the same pace.
4 yeetsaucepeteross 2019-12-14
You’re way more educated in this category than me so I’ll let you knowledge-cuck me
I still think she’s woefully underprepared to discuss this in the way that she does. She’s mostly making pathos appeals that only make twitter activists emotional
5 Norway313 2019-12-14
I can guarantee that Greta Thunburg will be socially irrelevant in 6 months. Hopefully her and her friend go watch a good old fashioned movie like papa Trump told her
3 d-amazo 2019-12-14
she's barely relevant now. only reddit has a clue who she is.
1 Thereal14words 2019-12-14
my normie coworkers know who she is -.-
1 Redactor0 2019-12-14
She's a product of the old-school 1990s 2-minute soundbyte on cable TV culture. I think she's probably getting more attention that way than online.
2 throwaway_999912 2019-12-14
Based Greta will always be the times person of the year 2019 and those millions of followers in social media aren't going anywhere so she is set for life
1 pvijay187 2019-12-14
The only time I hear about her is when righties sperg out at a child lol
5 FagglePuss 2019-12-14
Translation: "With this Time shit we've squeezed about as much out of this tard as we can. Time to start grooming the next kid you're not allowed to criticize."
1 Giulio-Cesare 2019-12-14
The return of the Hogg.
1 tHeSiD 2019-12-14
I am amazed they could squeeze this much..
4 Dramacel69 2019-12-14
She started a discussion, and 👏 that's 👏 what 👏 matters👏
2 big_papa_stiffy 2019-12-14
a break from what lol all she did was go on free holidays
2 dontfreezethefish 2019-12-14
typical swed
1 SnapshillBot 2019-12-14
Buzzword is, itself, a buzzword now.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 Wraith_GraveSpell 2019-12-14
That's not Justin Roiland!. Wheres my Pickle Rick REEEEEEE
1 NMJ87 2019-12-14
Her whole saga has been such a strange thing.
If we take an objective and realistic assessment of its impact, we would unfortunately find that it had no impact at all.
Thing is though, its quite ridiculous to place that standard of genuine change on one person's shoulders in the first place.
I do wonder if she thought she would change the game, as if nobody had tried before.
At the end of the day, she didn't really get people talking about climate change, she got people talking about Greta - which hopefully wasn't her motive.
Those that do talk about it post Greta, and credit her, they were already doing it before.
The best part about the "climate change debate", from my point of view at least, is that no matter who is taking political action for or against, they're having no impact. The scientists keep going no matter what, and if they need money, they'll get it - no doubt.
It's also funny to me people believe the whole species has to contribute to the solution, thats never been the case for any struggle, progress always moves on the backs of the few, not the many.
Unless the approach is purely mitigation, but if that's the solution we were doomed from the start.
The final solution to the issue lay in carbon capture and geo-engineering. A sort of man-made climate eugenics.
1 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2019-12-14
I disagree.
1 Redactor0 2019-12-14
That's what every 16-year old thinks, even the ones who aren't legit retarded like her.
Yeah, if we're gonna solve this, we're gonna solve it by doing more, not by having self-control. Humans are a lot better at finding technological solutions to problems than they are at just restraining themselves and not causing problems.