I spend more time with women on any given Tuesday than any unloved, lonely shut-in Chapo poster has in his whole fucking life. I might make jokes about women on /r/drama, but IRL I'm one of the fucking girls and fine with it.

When any of them open up to me about their experiences with harassment or assault, it is never - NEVER. FUCKING. EVER. - about a MAGA bro or a frat boy. It is always at the hands of some sensitive feminist "woke" boy.

The "frat boy rapist" thing is a myth that dangerous dudes like this are happy to perpetuate, because it takes the heat off of them, i.e. the real threats to the goddamn wimminz.

Snapshots:

1. "Daddy!" S3E352 "Impeachement" Epis... - archive.org, archive.today

2. Daddy's Twitter - archive.org, archive.today

3. /r/politics - archive.org, archive.today

4. /r/the_mueller - archive.org, archive.today

5. /r/the_Donald - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

[removed]

I don't have a clue how anybody could have the attention span to still be paying attention to this shit

That is what we are all here for, yeah?

I agree, I just fear that the effect will be heavily diluted.

when every day you go online and there's so bright red

IMPEACHMENT BREAKING NEWS THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT IMMEDIATELY CLICK THIS LINK

headline, you get kind of a, "goy who cried wolf" scenario imho

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/ecdvrm/mcconnell_appears_to_break_with_the_constitution/fbba2md/

Idk this is some good cope

Believe it or not, there are "people" out their whose entire personality is just their political opinions.

like watermark or corporal hicks?

fyi, "based centrism" is an anagram for, "Bed Miscreants" aka centrists fuck good. just thought that was worth mentioning

Yes exactly. Pretty much anyone that posts exclusively on political subs is supremely pathetic, even moreso than gaymers or cape/space/cloak shitters

broke: "washington is just hollywood for ugly people"

woke: "politics is just epic gayming for faggots"

Bespoke: top 10 ways [political opponent] is exactly like [Gillian character]

[villain character]

You can just say Voldemort. It's always Voldemort.

Sometimes it's from capeshit and other times it's from spaceshit

Is Drumpf Darth Vader or Emperor Palpatine tho? 🤔

Which one is supposed to be Hitler?

Darth Vader could be redeemed

Sometimes it's Darth Vader and sometimes it's the giant black guy from Avengers.

He who shall not be named tehehehehe

I'd agree, but I post in Drama.

big Hoggish Greedly energy tbh

nah born and raised in houston, went to lsu

yeah I grew up surfing and fishing in san luis pass

unfortunately, I don't have access to HEB, because I moved to new orleans 3 years ago. it's alright

[deleted]

What’s your take on joe burrow?

I'm in love with him, I want him to fuck my wife, I want to get a tattoo of his asshole on my bicep so I can practice kissing on it

Based

yeah LSU-UF is always awesome. probably the only team in the east I consider to be a legit rival with us

I've been down there to the swamp, too. crazy ass stadium lol y'alls fans are just as batshit as ours, if not worse

There are people who have this for a job 😂😂

Contrary to reddit belief there are large segments of the population who don’t give a shit about politics.

We call them /r/politics posters

I call them Dementocrats.

Don't forget about us republicunts! Red Hat Lives Matter, you know.

At this point everyone should know what will happen. The House vote passes, we get a couple weeks of people getting their hopes up that enough GOP senators flip.

Then McConnell, using the majority, will rush the Senate trial and we'll have a party line vote. Lots of seething and cope will ensue.

No shit.

The arrPolitics hissy fit might be pretty choice, though.

They're already crying that "it's not going to be a fair trial in the senate," which is fucking hilarious coming from the people that ran the last month or so of shenanigans.

for real I got so much other shit to do like drink

Reading about the impeachment is actually a pretty good activity to do when hung over. It's all the same every day so it doesn't take much mental effort to keep up with it.

congress approved senate denied

He isn't going to still be president as much as I would love to see Pence take the reigns

Pence won’t be in charge. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/09/30/president-pelosi-it-could-happen/

Bless your heart, you little mong.

I'm not ready for shock therapy 😔

Is that why her face looks like that? I just assumed it was botox and a face lift.

Fuck you and your link 😡😡

it's take the reins, like on a horse or reindeer, dumb-dumb

be glad you fucked up in front of your drama family and not someplace worse

Imagine being one of those goblins spending literally all free time they have had for the past 4 years tweeting about this shit for F R E E

I haven't been following this impeachment shit at all until like 2 hours ago.

Just got it on in the background and everyone just keeps saying the same exact shit.

On the left it's "No one is above the law X100" on the right it's "Overturn the election of a duly elected president x 100"

Like that's all they've been saying. They're like carbon copies of each other.

This is literally what they've been going for since day one lol what a bunch of lying shitbags

These vulnerable and moderate Dems are really worried about impeachment and a lot of people believe this will hand the 2020 election to Trump

Also, the Dems are absolutely giddy to impeach Trump. That's why Pelosi has been stalling it for so long!

-t. Retard

Pelosi is the exception, silly

She was the only one lucid enough to see that this whole thing is a pointless idea.

Imagine being a burger and not giving the true kino channel with live chat full of schizos and crazys , Fox 10 Phoenix : https://youtu.be/NXKb1RlSwKg

Is it worse/better than CSPAN?

They had some call ins and it was kinda like you would expect, devoid of radical centrism.

Yeah, if I want to hear some unhinged nobody from Pueblo, Colorado ranting about what the queers are doing to the soil, I can just get on Youtube.

Don't diss pueblo that's how half the state of Texas gets its weed

Shit on Raton instead

Found the guy who isn't old enough to get references to the Dead Milkmen. 😎😎😎

True sip moment

Same video stream as every American news channel private or public, no commentary. It's just fascinating to watch QAmericans exercising their first amendement right like this.

Oh shit, this was the /pol/ channel back during the election, right?

Wondered what happened to them.

They are probably still here posting, must be a data mining dream for the DHS.

Thanks for the free reeee-election leftoids. .

In an alternate timeline, Hillary won the election and was the one who was tied up with investigations by republicans for her entire presidency.

This is why they’re so angry. Because all of this was originally THEIR plan. Republicans never intended to win 2016, they intended to lose and use Hillary’s perceived criminality to consolidate their power in the next election.

They are livid that they aren’t the party fighting back against the presidency. And because Trump resonated so much with their base, they’ve painted themselves into a corner with supporting this cretin.

The only difference with the Democrats’ plan is that, unlike Hillary, Trump ACTUALLY committed crimes. And that’s what puts us on the right side of history.

lol retard. Nice bait.

For the rest of history, as we reflect on this time, the journals will all say the same version of this sentence:

"Donald J. Trump, the third President in the United States to be impeached...."

This will forever stain him, it's deserved. Our efforts to resist this horrible administration have born this victory and point of truth.

Take a breath today.

Powerful and brave.

I love when they eat it

I swear to god Kat writes some of the best satire on this sub

Lmao, as if impeachment stained Clinton's legacy. Everybody still loves that motherfucker.

It’s going to be great drama if some of the dems vote no on the impeachment. I was watching some fake news style network covering it earlier, the journalist were doing there best to make it seem like a big deal.

It's fucking bananas that they adore a literal rapist who hates identity politics.

R/politics pasta 🍝

This will forever stain him

Yeah, it was certainly so destructive and embarrassing that President Clinton became a hermit and we haven't seen him since he left office.

Like all good bait, there must be an element of truth to it to set the hook.

So, whatever, I'll bite.

Without Trump there is no Democratic Party. The proggies and left leaning liberals hate each other. The neocons wanted Hillary elected to showcase this divide while brow beating the right leaning liberals for supporting Trump. It was how the neocons were going to cement their power for the next couple of decades.

Instead, not only did the neocons get outed as being the ((())) of the right wing, Trump is the glue holding together the Dems. Hating Trump is the only way Pelosi and the proggies can be in the same room together without it devolving into a foid screaming match.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/10/nyregion/NJ-sue-altman-progressive-democrats.html

Is Hillary threatening you at gunpoint or something?

Its okay, blink an S.O.S.

he said on discord he's been taking posts from both /r/politics and /r/The_Donald and posting them here lol

sorry kat

I just hope he doesn't skip out on the debates.

As if Orange Man would miss an opportunity to mock his opponent(s) in person.

Im gonna bet on Trump winning so either I double my money or I'm gonna see all the rightoids REEEEE after taking the re election for granted

You can just give that money to me and I won't deliver anything either, but at least you'll know you made my Christmas special.

I could use a few new Star Citizen ships.

Allah have mercy, I hope this was a joke.

Haha. You waste your money on goods with no real world value

Based. I always like telling people here that I like capeshit and watching them reeeeee

What's secondary

Do you know what tertiary means?

So why are peoples option third. What's second besides some pretentious mouse?

Jews aren't real

>not putting it all into spy puts

Why do you hate free money?

49.7% here. Close enough.

https://electionbettingodds.com/

Star SHITizen more like 🤣🤣🤣

That's what I don't get... He won in the slimmest of circumstances and has eroded marginal support and doesn't have GOP SoSs in the key states. How exactly will he win?

Have you seen who he has to beat?

Hillary won. Drumpf is only in the White House on a technicality

Bless your little downie heart.

There are pending court decisions that will potentially destroy his campaign, too.

And then there is the whistleblower that most news outlets aren't focusing on, the IRS presidential audit.

The whistleblower, a career IRS official, initially filed a complaint in July, reporting that he was told that at least one Treasury political appointee attempted to improperly interfere with the annual audit of the president’s or vice president’s tax returns. In recent weeks, the whistleblower filed additional documentation related to the original complaint, which was given to congressional officials in July, the two people said. These people spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the complaint, which pertains to a confidential IRS audit that cannot be disclosed under federal law

When his taxes come out, jimmies will be severely rustled.

When his taxes come out, jimmies will be severely rustled.

Yeah, for the same reason jimmies rustled when Rachel Maddow got a hold of one of his leaked returns: there won't be anything there about which to complain. Dude runs a business and pays someone to do his taxes. He gets audited by the state and federal government every year. Do you really think his taxes are going to produce some kind of "gotcha?"

Are you under the impression the lengths he is going to hide his taxes is 4d chess?

I don't think he's hiding anything. He's just obstinate and likes to make things difficult for people. The 'whistle-blower' in this case is accusing someone of meddling and trying to cancel audits or something, but they don't say who that someone is. Could be some nobody for all we know. Shit, a bunch of nobodies got together and lied to the FISA court to spy on Trump, and the highest ranking people in that group are all retards. I doubt Trump knows any more about this than Obama knew about wiretapping a political opponent.

Pretty 🧠 stupid take.

Why would he make things difficult for the IRS audit that is not public?

Oh, I wasn't talking about the IRS audit. If anything he was doing was illegal they would have had him years ago. He gets one of those every year and probably doesn't give a shit about them. What I meant was he's making it difficult for congress to get his tax information.

If anything he was doing was illegal they would have had him years ago.

Why would he be fucking around trying to obstruct the IRS presidential audit?

Why would he be fucking around trying to obstruct the IRS presidential audit?

Who said he is? You talk about baseless assumptions, but your source doesn't even claim Trump is trying to obstruct the IRS.

Who said he is?

The whistleblower in the IRS!

A political appointee interfering with the audit of the president.

Thank you for verifying exactly the thing to which I was referring. It doesn't "the president," it say a political appointee. And yes, there is a very real possibility someone has "gone rogue," and everyone who expects the rest of us to believe that the IRS targeting conservative groups was just Lois Lerner "going rogue" or that spying on Trump's campaign was just a few agents "going rogue" shouldn't have any problem at all entertaining that possibility.

Thank you for confirming you're a retard.

It is just not in Trump's character to obstruct an investigation and micromanage people.

I'm glad we agree. With all these federal employees "going rogue" it wouldn't be fair to assume elected officials are responsible for the things they're being accused of doing.

Mulvaney, Pompeo, and Bolton are refusing to comply with Congressional subpoenas at Trumps request because?

Because executive privilege has been invoked for one of the actual reasons executive privilege has been recognized by the courts: the president has a right to confidential conversations with his closest advisers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Nixon

You should probably read a little farther than the first few paragraphs:

The Court held that a claim of Presidential privilege as to materials subpoenaed for use in a criminal trial cannot override the needs of the judicial process if that claim is based, not on the ground that military or diplomatic secrets are implicated, but merely on the ground of a generalized interest in confidentiality.

This is a matter that democrats themselves have indicated affects both diplomacy and military strategy. This is definitely a case where Trump is entitled to confidential counsel.

The District Court held that the judiciary, not the President, was the final arbiter of a claim of executive privilege. The court concluded that, under the circumstances of this case, the presumptive privilege was overcome by the Special Prosecutor's prima facie "demonstration of need sufficiently compelling to warrant judicial examination in chambers. . . ." 377 F.Supp. at 1330. The court held, finally, that the Special Prosecutor had satisfied the requirements of Rule 17(c). The District Court stayed its order pending appellate review on condition that review was sought before 4 p.m., May 24. The court further provided that matters filed under seal remain under seal when transmitted as part of the record.

Maybe the way precedent works is a mystery to you, but quoting an older verdict after its pointed out that the newer verdict doesn't support your contentions is overlooking the fact that the newer verdict generally overrides the older one.

Maybe the way precedent works is a mystery to you, but quoting an older verdict after its pointed out that the newer verdict doesn't support your contentions is overlooking the fact that the newer verdict generally overrides the older one.

It's from United States V. Nixon.

It's directly from United States v. Nixon.

Then why does the citation note say United States v. Burr, 25 F.Cas. 187, 190, 191-192 (No. 14,694) (CC Va. 1807).

Because the Chief Justice is citing precedent! The irony!

Ooooh...I see what you did there. The way you copied the quote didn't make it obvious you were quoting citations. Cool, you got me, but none of what you quoted applies here because no one is requesting confidential presidential information as evidence for a criminal case and the information requested falls under the exception the court has already made for diplomatic and military matters.

Are you doing a bit or are you really this pathetic?

So a little bit of background for you to catch up on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_re:_Don_McGahn

It's going to make its way to SCOTUS and you already have the precedent above.

That's nice, sweaty, but if the court rules based on the precedent you've referenced without expanding the criteria for what isn't covered by executive privilege that precedent means they're going to rule in Trump's favor because a) there is no criminal trial involved and b) the information requested deals with matters of diplomacy and military strategy. That's based on the the information you provided. If what I'm coming away with is "pathetic," it's either because your research is shit or it doesn't show what you seem to think it shows.

Let's see, there's already a ruling.

Supreme Court on United States v. Nixon

The impediment that an absolute, unqualified privilege would place in the way of the primary constitutional duty of the Judicial Branch to do justice in criminal prosecutions would plainly conflict with the function of the courts under Art. III. In designing the structure of our Government and dividing and allocating the sovereign power among three co-equal branches, the Framers of the Constitution sought to provide a comprehensive system, but the separate powers were not intended to operate with absolute independence.

And United States District Court for the District of Columbia on U.S. House Judiciary Committee v. Donald F. McGahn

The United States of America has a government of laws and not of men. The Constitution and federal law set the boundaries of what is acceptable conduct, and for this reason, as explained above, when there is a dispute between the Legislature and the Executive branch over what the law requires about the circumstances under which government officials must act, the Judiciary has the authority, and the responsibility, to decide the issue. Moreover, as relevant here, when the issue in dispute is whether a government official has the duty to respond to a subpoena that a duly authorized committee of the House of Representatives has issued pursuant to its Article I authority, the official’s defiance unquestionably inflicts a cognizable injury on Congress, and thereby, substantially harms the national interest as well. These injuries give rise to a right of a congressional committee to seek to vindicate its constitutionally conferred investigative power in the context of a civil action filed in court.

That's nice sweaty. Why don't you have a seat in the time out corner with Pizzashill until you calm down, then you can have your Capri Sun.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

I've actually seen quite a bit of people who said they didn't vote for him in 2016 because they didn't think he'd be a real conservative and now they're fully on board for 2020 because of the judicial nominees.

He's lost supporters, but he's gained them too. I'm not sure which is higher though.

There are definitely a lot more people who stayed home in 2016 because they thought Clinton would win in a landslide.

That's what I don't get... He won in the slimmest of circumstances and has eroded marginal support and doesn't have GOP SoSs in the key states. How exactly will he win?

He lost the popular vote. That doesn't matter because the popular vote is meaningless. He won the electoral college by a fucking landslide, which is the thing that really matters. Since the impeachment started, his approval numbers have crept up (they were 52% on the daily tracking one day last week) while impeachment support has started to drop. Those polling effects are more pronounced in important battleground/swing states. Trump will have an advantage coming off impeachment because it has made the democrats look petty and partisan. None of the possible democrat candidates are very appealing, and they all shot themselves in the foot when every single one of them held up their hands in support of open borders and free health care for illegal aliens during their first primary debate. That's going to be a GOP campaign commercial come next fall.

Holy hell, the delusion lol.

He won the electoral college by a fucking landslide

He won less of the Electoral College than Barack did in 2008, and with less of a voting share than Romney got in 2012. A landslide looks like Reagan in 1980. It was an average electoral win.

Since the impeachment started, his approval numbers have crept up (they were 52% on the daily tracking one day last week)

They've stayed steady, and hasn't been above 50%. There's been some noise in his favour (mostly through Rasmussen), but it's still absolutely abysmal. His "strong" support is about 25%, which is Hitler's approval rate after Berlin fell and the Soviets were making swiss cheese out of East Germany for literal giggles.

Those polling effects are more pronounced in important battleground/swing states.

Of which he is still underwater in almost all of them. With the courts looking at NC, GA, and FL keenly those are probably back in play where the GOP was allowed a lot of fuckery in 2016 due to it being the first general election after Shelby so guidance was minimal.

Trump will have an advantage coming off impeachment

Likely not, a solid majority believe he not only acted inappropriately for his dealings with Ukraine but other scandals.

in support of open borders and free health care for illegal aliens during their first primary debate

And this is where he fucked up bad. American sentiment on allowing refugees and immigrants in, and making the rules easier to follow, has shot up. As a vague idea immigration control was a wedge issue, not when it becomes a concrete policy that's especially brutal. If he just made it more quiet he might've been able to keep up the veneer, but because he was an idiot and it got a lot of press time it completely backfired.

😴😴😴

I am a bot. Contact for questions

I don't know what alternate reality you live in, but 306 vs. 232 is a fucking knockout. [Even CNN's polling is now showing that Trump's numbers are up and support for impeachment is down, with the strongest loss in support among democrats]((https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1206959229703245827?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1206959229703245827&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fbreakingwide.com%2Fbreaking-cnn-host-suffers-major-meltdown-after-revealing-their-poll-data%2F\)). Trump's polling against potential candidates is, in most cases, within the margin of error, even with the impeachment in play. If Americans wanted open borders they wouldn't have elected Donald Trump in the first place, and while the Europeans and limp-wristed DSA losers on Reddit are crying hyperbolic tears about "concentration camps," most Americans are asking why their wall isn't built. Now Pelosi is saying she won't send the articles of impeachment to the senate unless she's guaranteed Trump will be removed! On top of the last month of goofy, biased shit in the hearings, do you really think that's going to play well to normal people? Trump's practically guaranteed reelection at this point, and democrats just keep finding ways of shooting themselves in the foot.

Jesus christ you may actually have a learning impediment.

but 306 vs. 232 is a fucking knockout

Lol. It's not. It was an average electoral win. Obama's was much much bigger.

If Americans wanted open borders they wouldn't have elected Donald Trump in the first place

Wait, was it the American people, or the electoral college? I know you want it both ways but that's fucking retarded.

most Americans are asking why their wall isn't built

Lol. Few give a shit about building "the wall." Most are in hard opposition to it, because it's a retarded idea that only retards think is a good idea.

Trump's practically guaranteed reelection at this point

https://morningconsult.com/tracking-trump-2/

LMAO

Look at the net approval ratings in the "swing states." Barring a miracle for him he's pretty much fucked.

Face it. Most of America hates him. Few like him. You're the minority lol.

That's what I heard during the last election. We'll see how supporting all this chicanery works out for you next November.

That's what I heard during the last election

I seriously think you underestimate how much of a fluke it was in the first place. 10k voters spread over three states. That's with GOP SoSs in those states trying their damnedest to tip the scales in their favour. It might happen again, but as of now it's not looking likely, and it looks like the crown jewel of the Senate is up for play when it should be a lock. And after that, good-bye lifetime appointments for judges.

That's with GOP SoSs in those states trying their damnedest to tip the scales in their favour.

It's funny how you guys never lose because of anything you've done or failed to do, it's always the voting machines, someone cheating (which is rich coming from the party of "there is no election fraud"), $10k worth of ads on Facebook Jedi mind-tricking people to vote against you, and/or "muh Russia." In 2000 a republican beats a democrat and we're told we needed to stop trusting paper ballots and switch to electronic machines. That lasts through the next democrat president, but then 2016 happens and we're told we needed to stop trusting electronic machines and switch to paper ballots.

The people who run the states where more people vote than are registered and the dead turn out to have their voices heard whining about other people cheating is fucking hilarious. Republicans are evil for wanting to verify votes with IDs -- which we do for everything from getting on a plane to buying booze to driving a car to doing basic banking -- but democrats leaving their polling stations open past closing time and/or "finding" ballots that were "lost" is completely normal and not at all suspicious.

You've spent the last three years crying about Russia, but even your hero Mueller had to admit they were sowing chaos and took actions meant to support or thwart both candidates. You cried that Trump "colluded," but it was the DNC and Clinton campaign that paid a foreign agent to buy damaging information about their opponent from Russian assets. Not only can you guys not accept that you lost because your policies and candidates are absolute shit, you blame the other guys for doing the very things you're demonstrably guilty of doing.

It might happen again, but as of now it's not looking likely,

It "didn't look likely" the last time it happened, either, Poindexter. Enjoy four more years of Drumpft.

No, don't reply like this, please do another wall of unhinged rant please.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

The delusion is real.

"there is no election fraud"

Election fraud and voter fraud are two separate things, lmao.

In 2000 a republican beats a democrat and we're told we needed to stop trusting paper ballots and switch to electronic machines.

The VOTE Act had bi-partisan support. It was stupid, but bi-partisan.

$10k worth of ads on Facebook Jedi mind-tricking people to vote against you, and/or "muh Russia."

Russia clearly did the world's most successful hack and dump operations in the world, turning nothing into hay.

The people who run the states where more people vote than are registered and the dead turn out to have their voices heard whining about other people cheating is fucking hilarious

Literally doesn't happen.

but even your hero Mueller had to admit they were sowing chaos and took actions meant to support or thwart both candidates.

Guess how I know you didn't read the report.

You cried that Trump "colluded," but it was the DNC and Clinton campaign that paid a foreign agent to buy damaging information about their opponent from Russian assets.

LOL holy shit where to begin on how actually wrong this is? A) There were over 120 documented questionable contacts between Russian operatives and the Trump campaign. There were tons of charges. B) Fusion GPS was first hired by GOP donors. C) Steele ended up working pro-bono because of what he was uncovering in the rumor mill (it was raw intelligence).

It "didn't look likely" the last time it happened, either, Poindexter. Enjoy four more years of Drumpft.

I'm a card carrying member of the republican party, I just hate personality cults that threaten our Democracy and soft/hard power in the world. Fuck me though right?

Mommy is soooo proud of you, sweaty. Let's put this sperg out up on the fridge with all your other failures.

I am a bot. Contact for questions

The delusion is real.

Yes, it is. Fortunately, I'm not the one claiming to be Napoleon.

I'm a card carrying member of the republican party,

Far be it from me to argue with the Sovereign of the Island of Elba.

No opposition

Literally N O O N E will care about in peach mint in 11 months time.

Filler episodes before the REAL good stuff, like arresting the Democrats for leaking classified information to the press to impeach him. The best is yet to come, or as that doof of a reoccurring character, Pompeo, said, "All good things come in time." Season 5 is about to be NUTZ

Is this groundbreaking levels of cope, or just shitposting? I honestly can’t tell anymore.

Q predicted this

DDF have been thinking mass democrat arrests have been coming for years lmao.

This is as someone on here put it:

a stain on his [Donald Trump] legacy

that, as someone else pointed out:

will go nowhere and result in nothing

I am not coping. I am thinking clearly of what this will do to embolden Trump into doing outlandish things. Trying to usurp a sitting president is a treasonous felony covered in the Espionage Act of 1917. Media personnel have been tried and convicted under it.

It is simple enough to conclude that Trump will have a hard-on for the Democrats. Simple as...

You're coping fucking hard bro

Nah. I am a surf mommy supporter. I support her vote for present and getting completely out of politics when she finally gives up her up hill battle against the establishment. My cope is smoking weed and playing video games as western civilization falls apart.

In summation, I too am a Russian Asset and am severely not coping. Just influencing elections.

No coomers or pizzashills (diddlers) allowed

Personally I find this incredibly hilarious. So many mentally inept leftist "friends" of mine are going around with a huge grin on their face thinking that Trump is going to be REMOVED after this vote - they are so unaware as to how our country works that they actually believe he will be out of the White House by the end of the day.

I enjoy explaining to them that Impeachment is simply a process - and this vote is one part of the process. Sure, he can and will be impeached today, but that doesn't mean he will be removed - as the Republican controlled Senate must actually vote on removing him from office.

Their faces when I explain this simple fact is amazing. Total defeat. It's like election night all over again! Honestly the "Democrats" don't understand how many within their voter base are, quite literally, retarded. They are pissing off their useful idiots so much with this move. I've already gotten replies saying "WHAT UR SAYING ISNT TRUE BECAUSE THEN WHAT WOULD BE THE POINT OF THIS!?! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!"

Such a fun day today. Thanks again, crazy leftists!

Cope galore on all sides

Only thing better than one side coping or seething? Both of them doing it simultaneously.

Then you sic them on each other.

To be fair and balanced^TM, conservatives complaining that Trump should get a fair trial before impeachment also don't understand that impeachment is a charge, not a conviction.

Get ready for a day full of hearing the same arguments from both sides over and over again.

It's been happening the past three weeks actually.

It's pretty delicious.

Three years*

Is anyone shocked at this point that the GOP has no goddamn balls? Do they teach that in Sunday School?

hey everyone! please watch this impeachment trial while a state in the union is threatening civil war 2 and hordes of anrgy rednecks are protesting with military weapons

i can’t fucking wait

Mow them down, if it comes down to it.

which state is that?

VA

Today's my IRL cake day, and I can't think of a better present than Trump's impeachment.

Reddit was a mistake.

I thought that terminology went out with the narwhal bacons at midnight

that phrase makes me want to suck-start a shotgun

You've got my vote

Under my supreme hegemony every single R*dditor will have to wear these pinned to their breast.

People identified as such shall be stripped of all possessions and rights; no attack against them shall be illegal, and if any human wishes to assault, eliminate, or relentlessly bully a R*dditor they may do so without repercussion.

Inshallah.

I would gladly accept a cabinet position in that glorious new order.

I got $64 riding on no impeachment, how's it looking

lol imagine having in depth knowledge of burger political terms.

imaging betting money on conditions you don't understand

Lmao

You would have been better off blowing your own load in your mouth and buying me reddit silver.

/r/WallStreetBets is calling

lmao

If you would have told me 2 years ago that Donald "Daddy" Josephine Trump would be impeached and that there would be almost no major drama associated with it, I would have laughed in your face. Daddy drama just doesn't hit as hard anymore :(

We've been mainlining Daddy drama so much that morning short of nuking Denmark is going to get us our fix anymore

I was promised death camps, despotism, and a third world war.

All I got was some boomer evangelical judicial nominees and a hat.

I would literally nut my pants

[removed]

SUCH ATROCIOUS LIES BY THE RADICAL LEFT, DO NOTHING DEMOCRATS. THIS IS AN ASSAULT ON AMERICA, AND AN ASSAULT ON THE REPUBLICAN PARTY!!!!

Oh this is going to be good.

This is what everyone said the last 80 times.

yeah but for once things are sort of happening.

I mean. Barely. But it's something.

Get yo popcorn ready

The REAL drama is going to be in the form of vertical cell phone video from family Christmases utterly ruined because people can't shut the fuck up even during family gatherings about goodwill. There will be crying and wailing, red faced yelling, and someone is getting chokeslammed into a Christmas tree.

Man, I’m pretty used to rightoids being retarded at this point, but the nonsense they’re putting out today is outright delirious.

Imagine thinking there's a limit to our retardation.

Do you think Daddy cries when he thinks that the most history will say about him was that he was impeached and was otherwise unimportant?

Imagine going back on time 10 years and telling people that the host of The Apprentice is going to be almost be impeached as President of the US but conservatives are too afraid to lose votes so he won't be lmao

To lots of boomers that would seem about right.

He's been running for president since like 1986, that's why there were so many President Trump jokes in the 80s and 90s.

So the house has enough votes to impeach our 45th President Vladimir Putin? Good luck with that

Is Trump gonna be impeached or not? Can burgers make up their mind already?

If he actually gets impeached I'm deleting my account, we're done here

Hi deleting, I'm Dad!

shhh don't tell him

Ahem...

Bye bye!

The rightoids are actually really good at orating and being indignant tbh, and is that guy's last name literally McCarthy? That's fucking based.