Dramatards try their hand at copyright law

1  2019-12-24 by newsmachineplus

22 comments

Most of the default subs are run by bots and shills.

Social media is the Matrix. Look into the ties between big tech and DARPA. The content is curated and contextualized to create a certain response in the public mind. Look up the original definition of Cybernetics.

You are human livestock and the internet is your digital enclosure. And like all good farmers, they have to make sure the herd gets their vaccines or it could mean disaster for the farm!

It’s not individuals who just love vaccines making these gay pro vax memes. Someone is being paid to do it by some shitty organization likely with ties to the Rockefellers and the Vanderbilts or whatever.

Snapshots:

  1. Dramatards try their hand at copyri... - archive.org, archive.today

I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers

I spent 10 minutes of my life trying to teach a Drama regular that he doesn't have to pay for something that's free, AMA.

Royalty-Free isn't the same thing as Creative Commons licensing.

You two should continue this delightful sparring of the brightest minds until you reach the child depth cap of a comment chain.

Hodor probably got cucked buying royalty free music, which made him so aggressively wrong

I used to do music clearance for years so I know what I'm talking about.

You dont seem to know fuck all about copyright though. πŸ€”πŸ€”πŸ€”

Except I do. Royalty-Free doesn't mean "free use." All it means is that the artist currently doesn't collect royalties whenever their music is publicly played or used in other mediums. The retard I was arguing with confused royalty-free with "free use" under the Creative Commons license. If something is free use then you have the right to use it however you want without any repercussions. This isn't the same for music that is released by the artist without royalties. In both cases you don't own the music but you can become demonetized if the music is royalty-free and not for free use. Online media streaming made media rights management confusing for awhile but it's gotten more clear and concise over time.

The dude you spent an hour arguing with was just suggesting to use CC licensed music you fucking absolute aspergers child. Which is entirely solid advice.

Your ass being a RIAA glownigger you couldn't even understand or allow someone to not pay for shitty soundcloud beats.

All thats required is a some contract or license allowing usage for free in perpituity.

Your ass being a RIAA glownigger

Delete your real-life account

All thats required is some contract or license allowing usage for free in perpituity.

*perpetuity

No shit. You can't just use "royalty free" listed music from a YouTube video list and think you're good to go on your video and expect it to be okay to use in perpetuity.

No shit youtubers are fucking retards who never bothered looking up basic copyright law despite making content on the internet and constantly utililizing fair use.

But also whoever at youtube who decided to use royalty free music instead of actual free licensed music is probably rubbing his hands together below his long nose right now.

Oh well. C'est la vie.

Shut the fuck up you wannabe social influencer faggot.

Best way to win any argument

They hated me because I spoke the truth.

Lol you literally went "I'm not gonna enact the labour...."

I know this shit and I’m not going to waste my time going through the details of it for you.

β€œNot my job to educate you” lol

no posting a pic of alligator clips on your balls is the best way to win an internet argument

πŸ˜΄πŸ˜΄πŸ˜΄πŸ˜΄πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€πŸ’€

lol what a retard

Looks like the immigration controls are finally kicking in and we are starting to get all these lawyers and rocket engineers.

So you two argued for hours because he thinks all royalty-free music is released under one specific license he’s familiar with? You could have told him.

Its seems you can't tell him shit.