That...makes some sense if the ruling mullahs want to buy more time against the rising discontent by indirectly offing one of their worst offenders, relieving pressure and inciting classic anti-Murica hate at the same time.
The media always call it rockets when it's a middle eastern country launching an attack to make it seem less sophisticated. These aren't the rockets that have been lobbed at Israel in the past, they're guided missiles.
They have less than 100 of these Fateh-110 launchers. It's a weird flex when the US alone has more than 100 launchers of the far more sophisticated Tomahawk missiles within range of Iran at any one time. This is why the first night of invasion in Iraq 2003 looked like this: https://youtu.be/b_VyhURH1yY
That's just cruise missiles raining down, launched from already existing sources in the region. We never sent any extra missile ordinance. This will be Tehran if it kicks off.
Because the atrocities just stopped after the revolution, and there weren't massacres against 100,000s of people... Ah, religious fanatical communism... Bit of an oxymoron though.
I mean after seeing some of the pics I'd re-enlist if I could liberate some of them Persian cuties from their hijabs. I can even get them a skirt that says "Sergeant Daddy's Little Girl" 😋😋😋
Was a disappointment, the camera cuts away as he drops then back to the dead body. We're bombing the shit out of Iraq for months hunting this guy and we don't even get a neck snap... The mob wants their blood lust sated!
That's just cruise missiles raining down, launched from already existing sources in the region. We never sent any extra missile ordinance. This will be Tehran if it kicks off.
LMAO, they'll survive it. Will our numerous aircraft carriers packed into the gulf survive it?
I assume so, I've only ever landed on a carrier twice, but they're pretty high up off the water. Those glorified machine gun mounted speed boats that comprise their navy, cannot do any damage to a carrier.
Iran's anti-ship missiles are not currently sophisticated enough to counter US aircraft carrier antimissile tech. I know you're gimmick posting, but I just hate when people get military tech wrong.
Because they're just not as advanced as our tomahawks. To bulls eye with a missile you can't fuck up a single maneuver with a missile that's travelling really fast, like at least 100mph. Our tomahawks are perfect. Their shitty Russian made Wal-Mart missiles over/under burn all the time and suck. They're more likely to hit another one of their generals than injure a US soldier.
there is a reason these guys never set foot in a real cockpit
The Doritos dust from their fingers would clog up and destroy the electronic instruments of a F-35. In contrary to that, the xbox controller to steer a drone doesn't have this problem.
Though in context that's perfect a lot of the time for ME politics, where the optics are far more important than results. They need to 'respond', but that response doesn't ideally need to actually piss off the US, because that would result in a hugely asymmetric response.
Yes but I'm putting my faith in Dementia Daddy and praying for the Tomahawk-powered leveling of Tehran. Camera tech has really improved since Opening Day in Iraq and that footage is gonna look really cool.
Why the fuck would you level of a city with Tomahawks. If you want to commit an atrocity just use nuclear missiles retard. Literally all of your Tomahawks would be like a bee sting to Iran. Germany and Japan withstood years of firebombing that killed hundreds of thousands, Iran can withstand this shit. Americans are bloodthirsty animals, you want a war just for entertainment because Americans are psychopaths. 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷
I feel like you're larping, but you're Watermark, so maybe you're actually that retarded. Regardless, WW2 Germany and Japan were far more powerful nations than modern Iran, and the USA's tech wasn't as advanced back then. A nuke would be spicy, but our tech is so good that we can take out their military without turning an entire city to glass.
Just one of those shitty anti-ship missile has to hit one of those aircraft carriers packed into the gulf, then you get to call the Persian Gulf your home for all eternity bruh. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Iran will survive literally all your cruise missiles.
You're really overestimating the capability of 2005 Russian engineering, compared to an enormous carrier that could probably withstand up to 10 of them. Newer carriers are wider with automatic bulkheads. Not to mention carriers are sort of irrelevant with all the air fields we have to work from, I mean Navy pilots? They're too busy banging each other to fly more than a couple a day.
On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Iran will survive literally all your cruise missiles.
Because no matter how much a pounding it takes, it will still be a shit hole? No doubt, but that's what the nukes are for.
Fuck man, I don't know. Ask someone from the Navy. I don't know how many of our carriers are the newer kind and how many aren't. I landed a Raptor on a carrier on two occasions, I'm not an expert on carriers, I know some things, that's it.
I was just curious because it's like a huge deal for China to have even two (ofc somehow Italy has one). Is it because they're so sophisticated or so expensive or so what? No asking you to answer, but our carrier supremacy is even more disproportionate than our military supremacy as a whole—I'm puzzled as to why.
It's power projection, the ability to launch multiple squadrons of aircraft on mission anywhere on the planet. Say the entire Middle East erupted in war, we'd quickly lose our air fields because we just don't have the ground power in the region to hold them against that size of force, in order to win any ground invasion with minimized casualties we need air superiority, to deny the enemy any aerial ability, so they can only engage us on the ground, while our troops are protected from the air.
Without airfields, carriers allow us to regain that air superiority and begin pushing into enemy territory, regaining air fields, so the air force can come back into play, and take pressure off the Naval fighters.
The sinking of Japan's carriers at the Battle of Midway is pretty much how the US gained the upper hand in the pacific, while Japan's carriers were in operation, the pacific assaults could never have happened, well, not without insane losses to allied forces.
They cost $13 billion a piece and the development cost $37 billion. That's just a drop in the bucket for China, though it's not accounting for the cost to maintain them. The planes to go with them add to the cost substantially, though. I suppose part of why China might not have/want more is that China doesn't really go to war with Middle East shitholes. The only wars China would get involved in involve NATO (mainly due to South Korea and the USA's involvement in their affairs), and aircraft carriers don't mean a whole lot when it's basically World War 3 between nuclear powers. So basically, China doesn't need to project power anywhere expect North Korea, which is their neighbor anyway.
Carriers are all about power projection. Unless you want to be able to project significant power far from your borders you don't need them. Helicopter carriers capable of operating significant rotary air wings and vtol/STOVL fighters are coming back into Vogue with the f-35 as a cheaper option tho. (Iirc what Italy operates is a helicopter carrier). It's worth saying that a carrier is also a national prestige thing. The royal navy doesn't really need or want a catapult carrier compared to a cheaper f-35b based alternative but it boosts the national pp.
The things that Hamas use are glorified fireworks, these were the real deal. And LMAO at rocket meaning "less sophisticated", like is the Saturn V rocket unsophisticated? Stupid wannabe imperialist victim logic, you always do this, the media is always against you when at the same time it's cheerleading war nonstop 24/7.
Wait, do you think i'm Iranian you dumb assuming shit? I'm from Canadian. I'm not a victim of them calling ballistic missiles rockets. That's wrong and dumb, and you're dumb for defending it and assuming my position when i was stating facts about the media. Go home you stupid imperialist.
Definitely the natsec state isn't lying to you this time bro! All the fake news you are reading about Iran is totally real this time! Soleimani literally killed a billion people with his own two hands, all Americans! Trump said so and his generals too, and the president and the military has never lied before, so it's totally trustworthy! Just swallow the lies hook and sinker lmao!
They want their defense contractor profits, time to buy some Lockheed stock! Northrop up like 15% in a week man, what is that annualized? Like a payday loan off the backs of the American people.
In 2006, at the height of the bloodshed in Iraq, Soleimani took a break from managing Asaib and its sister groups in order to supervise another Iranian proxy, Hezbollah, in its escalating war with Israel. During his absence, U.S. commanders in the Green Zone noted a sharp decline in casualties across the country. Upon his return from Lebanon, Soleimani wrote to U.S. commanders, “I hope you have been enjoying the peace and quiet in Baghdad. I’ve been busy in Beirut!”
The Greeks and the Persians both spent a fuck of a lot of time proving that they were very much not the same people. It's Anatolians and Greeks who were pretty much the same. (They still are, but neither the Turks nor the Greeks want to admit that)
Just accept he's started a new war and embrace the bombs that are going to drop and bring this sub into a decade of growth and prosperity. The 20s will be good for drama.
Yes but he was a young man during the height of the Cold War. He should be plenty scared straight if the Bert the Turtle programming did its job right.
This caused a mod of /r/TooCuteForPorn, /r/theratio & /r/SnowWhites to make a pinned post and start banning republicans? That's pretty funny, but the janny locked the post and deleted comments before things had time to escalate.
202 comments
1 AnnArchist 2020-01-07
daddy speaks
2 high_side 2020-01-07
Why not post the quote?
1 lickedTators 2020-01-07
Sounds like he's backing down like a little bitch
7 AnnArchist 2020-01-07
I'd bet smart money that he says that the Iranians agreed to a peace deal overnight, knowing that theyd missed these shots
Iranians probably planned the assassination of their own guy.
7 Shitposting_Skeleton 2020-01-07
That...makes some sense if the ruling mullahs want to buy more time against the rising discontent by indirectly offing one of their worst offenders, relieving pressure and inciting classic anti-Murica hate at the same time.
9 AnnArchist 2020-01-07
esp w 0 american casualties
4 dootwthesickness_II 2020-01-07
Eugene Gu's kind words soothed Daddy's tempestuous heart.
2 UKIP_Warrior 2020-01-07
Just like his fist did to his ex wife's face.
172 BussyShillBot 2020-01-07
YOU ARE ALL ALREADY DEAD 💀💀. YOU JUST DONT KNOW 🤔 IT YET.
WE OUTNUMBER YOU. WE REMEMBER YOU. NO 😣 ONE 1️⃣ HAS FORGOTTEN. NO 😣 ONE 1️⃣ HAS FORGIVEN.
Enjoy the time ⌚ you have 🈶 left 👈. JUSTICE 👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️ IS 🈶 COMING. Tick ✅✅ tock.
Outlines:
I am a bot for posting Outline.com links. github / Contact for info or issues
81 WineDine69stein 2020-01-07
Oh god oh fuck
62 byobombs 2020-01-07
INSHALLAH!!!
58 TheBraverButthole 2020-01-07
OH FUCK SNAPPY
STAY BACK
IM WARNING YOU SNAPPY
39 inactive_directory 2020-01-07
well that’s ominous
35 Mrrheas 2020-01-07
ok Wtf
34 yourkenyanprince 2020-01-07
Mashallah! They’re already hacking burger technology
26 fingerpaintswithpoop 2020-01-07
MOM COME GET ME I’M SCARED
12 TheBraverButthole 2020-01-07
Snappy has made us all orphans.
It was always too late.
21 _Dullahan 2020-01-07
DUDE SENTIENT LMAO
19 AlecOzzyHillPitas 2020-01-07
SEDIMENT
10 Burnnoticelover 2020-01-07
I read about the Iranian cyberattacks but this is beyond.
1 MotorButterscotch 2020-01-07
Oh god oh fuck
9 AnnArchist 2020-01-07
its sentient
9 bullyard 2020-01-07
sedementary
8 DirtyAussieThrowAway 2020-01-07
this is getting juicy
6 MotorButterscotch 2020-01-07
Resurrect dead on planet Jupiter
6 WhaIeBones 2020-01-07
https://media.giphy.com/media/XNPX5Y3vRIQKY/giphy.gif
5 MoreSpikes 2020-01-07
I need to report this to my FSO
3 gigachad420 2020-01-07
Sediment.
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[deleted]
1 Axehead88 2020-01-07
Yeah, this didn't age well...
51 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2020-01-07
That’s a pretty big air base. I hope they didn’t blow up the green mountain coffee.
27 Redactor0 2020-01-07
Do those rockets ever actually hit anything?
49 illusionofthefree 2020-01-07
The media always call it rockets when it's a middle eastern country launching an attack to make it seem less sophisticated. These aren't the rockets that have been lobbed at Israel in the past, they're guided missiles.
39 CampRape 2020-01-07
They have less than 100 of these Fateh-110 launchers. It's a weird flex when the US alone has more than 100 launchers of the far more sophisticated Tomahawk missiles within range of Iran at any one time. This is why the first night of invasion in Iraq 2003 looked like this: https://youtu.be/b_VyhURH1yY
That's just cruise missiles raining down, launched from already existing sources in the region. We never sent any extra missile ordinance. This will be Tehran if it kicks off.
22 Tzar-Romulus 2020-01-07
I don't wanna bomb Persians. Their country is white than America. 😾
12 CampRape 2020-01-07
Make Iran 1970s Iran again!
4 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Ah numerous atrocities against the Iranian people, but at least there's some cute girls in skirts in small sections of the capital!
8 CampRape 2020-01-07
Because the atrocities just stopped after the revolution, and there weren't massacres against 100,000s of people... Ah, religious fanatical communism... Bit of an oxymoron though.
3 forseti911 2020-01-07
Watermark is currently going through a Persiaboo phase right now.
Unfortunately this won't make them like fat pajeets on adderall.
3 IHeartCommyMommy 2020-01-07
I mean after seeing some of the pics I'd re-enlist if I could liberate some of them Persian cuties from their hijabs. I can even get them a skirt that says "Sergeant Daddy's Little Girl" 😋😋😋
3 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
Probably not the best idea to let the US run this show then.
2 2Cordial2Calamity 2020-01-07
eww
2 hmunkey 2020-01-07
Also then the Israelis and Saudis win. And I don’t want that.
1 UKIP_Warrior 2020-01-07
Tell them to start acting like it, then.
11 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
Can't wait, tbh. I wanna see the Ayatollah get Ghadaffi'd. 🦅🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲
7 CampRape 2020-01-07
I'd have a Saddam hanging personally, pay per view that shit, get some of that tax money back.
4 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
That would work too. Mostly I just like the part where the dictator gets dragged out of a hole.
8 CampRape 2020-01-07
That look in their eyes too. Total look of devastation that hiding in a small cubby hole just didn't work, and all that discomfort was for nothing.
2 watermark1917 2020-01-07
How did it turn out for you in these instances?
3 CampRape 2020-01-07
Was a disappointment, the camera cuts away as he drops then back to the dead body. We're bombing the shit out of Iraq for months hunting this guy and we don't even get a neck snap... The mob wants their blood lust sated!
1 MulanMcNugget 2020-01-07
I dunno Gaddafi got "sodomized with a bayonet on video.
1 watermark1917 2020-01-07
I hope this all turns out for you just as well as it did in that case. 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷
3 SandorClegane_AMA 2020-01-07
Rightoid Drama commenter believes Raytheon CGI TV 'footage.'
7 CampRape 2020-01-07
With them pixels, I could have believed it was CGI made in Iraq.
-1 watermark1917 2020-01-07
LMAO, they'll survive it. Will our numerous aircraft carriers packed into the gulf survive it?
7 CampRape 2020-01-07
I assume so, I've only ever landed on a carrier twice, but they're pretty high up off the water. Those glorified machine gun mounted speed boats that comprise their navy, cannot do any damage to a carrier.
4 totally_not_ac3 2020-01-07
Iran's anti-ship missiles are not currently sophisticated enough to counter US aircraft carrier antimissile tech. I know you're gimmick posting, but I just hate when people get military tech wrong.
6 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[deleted]
15 CampRape 2020-01-07
Because they're just not as advanced as our tomahawks. To bulls eye with a missile you can't fuck up a single maneuver with a missile that's travelling really fast, like at least 100mph. Our tomahawks are perfect. Their shitty Russian made Wal-Mart missiles over/under burn all the time and suck. They're more likely to hit another one of their generals than injure a US soldier.
13 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
They better be for a price of $1.5 million per piece.
9 CampRape 2020-01-07
Oh for sure, and those hi-def feeds of the bad guys being blown up from them. Worth every penny.
7 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
Not if you talk about the costs of the PTSD treatment for our video game trained drone and missile pilots.
7 CampRape 2020-01-07
I was an actual pilot, there is a reason these guys never set foot in a real cockpit, let me tell you.
11 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
The Doritos dust from their fingers would clog up and destroy the electronic instruments of a F-35. In contrary to that, the xbox controller to steer a drone doesn't have this problem.
3 CampRape 2020-01-07
The Air Force wouldn't let us have Doritos, they'd have to settle for cheese balls.
5 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
Kinda pathetic with that kind of military budget. We had Doritos in the CAF.
3 CampRape 2020-01-07
Not a budget thing, they ban some really weird shit. Wait until you see military pets being walked in the pet areas with all their paperwork attached.
3 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
Probably some pissed off general that banned Doritos for whatever reason.
5 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
His wife ran off with a Frito Lay rep
5 watermark1917 2020-01-07
I fucked your gf while you were away
7 jaredschaffer27 2020-01-07
Wow a sneakily subterfuging leftist who is proud of flouting all social norms? Well I never.
6 CampRape 2020-01-07
My wife is 7 years younger than me, so for the majority of time I was "away" you were pedo.
1 IHeartCommyMommy 2020-01-07
What'd you fly on? Osprey crew chief here.
1 CampRape 2020-01-07
Raptor.
1 AntiLuke 2020-01-07
I work for someone that did that when he was active duty. Softest handshake ever.
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[removed]
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[removed]
4 duckraul2 2020-01-07
Though in context that's perfect a lot of the time for ME politics, where the optics are far more important than results. They need to 'respond', but that response doesn't ideally need to actually piss off the US, because that would result in a hugely asymmetric response.
5 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
Yes but I'm putting my faith in Dementia Daddy and praying for the Tomahawk-powered leveling of Tehran. Camera tech has really improved since Opening Day in Iraq and that footage is gonna look really cool.
-4 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Why the fuck would you level of a city with Tomahawks. If you want to commit an atrocity just use nuclear missiles retard. Literally all of your Tomahawks would be like a bee sting to Iran. Germany and Japan withstood years of firebombing that killed hundreds of thousands, Iran can withstand this shit. Americans are bloodthirsty animals, you want a war just for entertainment because Americans are psychopaths. 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷
7 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
💅
2 Throwaway90120120910 2020-01-07
I feel like you're larping, but you're Watermark, so maybe you're actually that retarded. Regardless, WW2 Germany and Japan were far more powerful nations than modern Iran, and the USA's tech wasn't as advanced back then. A nuke would be spicy, but our tech is so good that we can take out their military without turning an entire city to glass.
2 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Just one of those shitty anti-ship missile has to hit one of those aircraft carriers packed into the gulf, then you get to call the Persian Gulf your home for all eternity bruh. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure Iran will survive literally all your cruise missiles.
8 CampRape 2020-01-07
You're really overestimating the capability of 2005 Russian engineering, compared to an enormous carrier that could probably withstand up to 10 of them. Newer carriers are wider with automatic bulkheads. Not to mention carriers are sort of irrelevant with all the air fields we have to work from, I mean Navy pilots? They're too busy banging each other to fly more than a couple a day.
Because no matter how much a pounding it takes, it will still be a shit hole? No doubt, but that's what the nukes are for.
1 preserved_fish 2020-01-07
So we have like 10-11 carriers, right? What do you mean by "newer" here? Like from the 90s and beyond?
1 CampRape 2020-01-07
Fuck man, I don't know. Ask someone from the Navy. I don't know how many of our carriers are the newer kind and how many aren't. I landed a Raptor on a carrier on two occasions, I'm not an expert on carriers, I know some things, that's it.
1 preserved_fish 2020-01-07
I was just curious because it's like a huge deal for China to have even two (ofc somehow Italy has one). Is it because they're so sophisticated or so expensive or so what? No asking you to answer, but our carrier supremacy is even more disproportionate than our military supremacy as a whole—I'm puzzled as to why.
2 CampRape 2020-01-07
It's power projection, the ability to launch multiple squadrons of aircraft on mission anywhere on the planet. Say the entire Middle East erupted in war, we'd quickly lose our air fields because we just don't have the ground power in the region to hold them against that size of force, in order to win any ground invasion with minimized casualties we need air superiority, to deny the enemy any aerial ability, so they can only engage us on the ground, while our troops are protected from the air.
Without airfields, carriers allow us to regain that air superiority and begin pushing into enemy territory, regaining air fields, so the air force can come back into play, and take pressure off the Naval fighters.
The sinking of Japan's carriers at the Battle of Midway is pretty much how the US gained the upper hand in the pacific, while Japan's carriers were in operation, the pacific assaults could never have happened, well, not without insane losses to allied forces.
1 preserved_fish 2020-01-07
I get all that. Sea lanes, wartime and peacetime.
I'm just surprised nobody else can afford it, I guess, especially these days.
3 Throwaway90120120910 2020-01-07
They cost $13 billion a piece and the development cost $37 billion. That's just a drop in the bucket for China, though it's not accounting for the cost to maintain them. The planes to go with them add to the cost substantially, though. I suppose part of why China might not have/want more is that China doesn't really go to war with Middle East shitholes. The only wars China would get involved in involve NATO (mainly due to South Korea and the USA's involvement in their affairs), and aircraft carriers don't mean a whole lot when it's basically World War 3 between nuclear powers. So basically, China doesn't need to project power anywhere expect North Korea, which is their neighbor anyway.
1 Parkourwalrus 2020-01-07
Carriers are all about power projection. Unless you want to be able to project significant power far from your borders you don't need them. Helicopter carriers capable of operating significant rotary air wings and vtol/STOVL fighters are coming back into Vogue with the f-35 as a cheaper option tho. (Iirc what Italy operates is a helicopter carrier). It's worth saying that a carrier is also a national prestige thing. The royal navy doesn't really need or want a catapult carrier compared to a cheaper f-35b based alternative but it boosts the national pp.
12 reptilia987 2020-01-07
because Iranians are retarded
20 Whaddaulookinat 2020-01-07
Iranians are not to be trusted unless they have a solid Kia SUV with low miles that he could put you in today for less than you might think.
6 KingRuler07 2020-01-07
Didn't we just kill the dude that help defeat ISIS in Syria?
6 reptilia987 2020-01-07
I don’t know I don’t watch the news
3 oss_spy 2020-01-07
Who also fucked with our embassy
2 Tzar-Romulus 2020-01-07
Based and 300pilled
2 Whaddaulookinat 2020-01-07
Other than tomahawks most artillery misses in an order of about 10%
-3 watermark1917 2020-01-07
The things that Hamas use are glorified fireworks, these were the real deal. And LMAO at rocket meaning "less sophisticated", like is the Saturn V rocket unsophisticated? Stupid wannabe imperialist victim logic, you always do this, the media is always against you when at the same time it's cheerleading war nonstop 24/7.
8 totally_not_ac3 2020-01-07
Calm down watermark, you're gimmick posting too much. You're gonna give yourself carpal tunnel.
1 illusionofthefree 2020-01-07
Wait, do you think i'm Iranian you dumb assuming shit? I'm from Canadian. I'm not a victim of them calling ballistic missiles rockets. That's wrong and dumb, and you're dumb for defending it and assuming my position when i was stating facts about the media. Go home you stupid imperialist.
3 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2020-01-07
When I was there we dealt with mortars so I don’t know
4 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Definitely the natsec state isn't lying to you this time bro! All the fake news you are reading about Iran is totally real this time! Soleimani literally killed a billion people with his own two hands, all Americans! Trump said so and his generals too, and the president and the military has never lied before, so it's totally trustworthy! Just swallow the lies hook and sinker lmao!
They want their defense contractor profits, time to buy some Lockheed stock! Northrop up like 15% in a week man, what is that annualized? Like a payday loan off the backs of the American people.
YANKEE GO HOME
5 kermit_was_wrong 2020-01-07
Nah, dude was pretty based.
1 bigfartguy 2020-01-07
this must be pizzashills alt
39 Lysis10 2020-01-07
Whenever I see pictures of arabs, I always assume that everyone in the pic is named Mohammed.
42 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2020-01-07
Iranians are Persian.
34 Lysis10 2020-01-07
Is there a difference? They are all the same to me in terrorland.
51 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
Persian women are hotter than Arab women.
4 watermark1917 2020-01-07
They're both pretty hot but Arab women tend to be in trash bags while Iranian women usually just a headcover
3 Lysis10 2020-01-07
Aren't they as hairy as the men?
29 Tzar-Romulus 2020-01-07
In Antiquity Persians were just weird desert Greeks. Now they have too much Arab admixture. Might as well not be a difference.
2 Elite_AI 2020-01-07
The Greeks and the Persians both spent a fuck of a lot of time proving that they were very much not the same people. It's Anatolians and Greeks who were pretty much the same. (They still are, but neither the Turks nor the Greeks want to admit that)
1 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Like there's even a lot of genetic difference between Greeks and Arabs lmao.
22 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2020-01-07
Persian ice cream is pretty good
6 Lysis10 2020-01-07
You are wise beyond your dilf years. Let’s see a dick pic.
2 HodorTheDoorHolder_ 2020-01-07
lol no
3 Lysis10 2020-01-07
Dammit.
13 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
Persians are cryptomayos and their people trend towards being good looking.
5 watermark1917 2020-01-07
These statements are contradictory.
5 ButtHuff 2020-01-07
Persian women shave their arms once a year as opposed to every six months.
2 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Ahhhhh my thick skull is made to parse a slight difference among brown people, the mental anguish this causes me
2 GenesisStryker 2020-01-07
There are a lot of persians named Muhammad
1 high_side 2020-01-07
That's like saying rednecks and hicks are the same because they're in burgerland.
2 Lysis10 2020-01-07
They're not the same too?
1 MotorButterscotch 2020-01-07
15 Tzar-Romulus 2020-01-07
Iranians aren't Arabs. 😾😾😾
7 azidd 2020-01-07
Many Muslims name their first-born son Muhammed or its localized derivatives like the Turkic 'Mehmet'.
That is why there are so many Muhammeds.
9 _-Drama_Llama-_ 2020-01-07
To be fair, isn't the name "John" still more popular, taking into consideration all the different spellings and localisation.
You probably know a few people named variations of John
39 ytwoketard 2020-01-07
John Mccain never got to enjoy this moment lmao
3 WhaIeBones 2020-01-07
Y’all sonsabitches killin’ Iranians without me?
38 AnnoysTheGoys 2020-01-07
All Zoomers register here for the draft
19 QuantumFreakonomics 2020-01-07
I am ready to die for Israel
9 AnnoysTheGoys 2020-01-07
This guy already pledged too
10 whenweriiide 2020-01-07
Topkek
18 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
The first ten registered zoomers will have the honor to serve the US in the MAGA drone squad with Barron Trump as leader.
35 Manchu_Fist 2020-01-07
Its over for sandcels.
18 Tzar-Romulus 2020-01-07
It's been over for Persiancels since the Arabs buttfucked them.
7 SpacemanSkiff 2020-01-07
It's been over for Persiancels since Alexander the Chad cucked them
22 FearOfBees 2020-01-07
Oh fuck it's happening
22 SJCards 2020-01-07
Zoomers, time to get your dab on.
19 DrunkenRecidivist 2020-01-07
Push the button daddy!!
17 MoistLanguage 2020-01-07
Not yet faggot. We need some foreplay first
2 ANewStart1190 2020-01-07
imagine thinking /drama/ knows what that is
15 InTheCongoWithaBongo 2020-01-07
The absolute state of worldnews commenters
39 Tzar-Romulus 2020-01-07
Retard think a first world country would drop a nuke in the 21st Century.
25 ImJustaBagofHammers 2020-01-07
Trump is mentally unstable, narcissistic, and sociopathic enough to want to do it, but I still don't think it will happen.
30 The_Reason_Pete_Wins 2020-01-07
I keep saying that and Daddy keeps proving me wrong.
4 Burnnoticelover 2020-01-07
Rebuttal: If he could nuke other countries on impulse, half the fucking world (and most of LA) would be gone by now.
3 The_Reason_Pete_Wins 2020-01-07
Hopefully Dementia Daddy can't remember the launch codes
10 FearOfBees 2020-01-07
Do you live in a bubble? This guy doesn't even want to blow up 100 people never mind 100,000.
14 WholesomeDrama 2020-01-07
Daddy of Peace dindu nuffin
18 FearOfBees 2020-01-07
HE'S A WAR MONGER
7 Barkasia 2020-01-07
HE IS A NANNY DADDY THAT
TODDLERGENERAL PROVOKED HIM10 FearOfBees 2020-01-07
4 RerolledANewAccount 2020-01-07
Don’t lie, you didn’t even know who this guy was until daddy drone striked him.
1 black_panther_sucks 2020-01-07
People didn’t know who hitler was until he orchestrated the greatest hoax of all time but that doesn’t mean he still wasn’t a faggy little painter
-2 Barkasia 2020-01-07
Yes, Daddy is.
Just accept he's started a new war and embrace the bombs that are going to drop and bring this sub into a decade of growth and prosperity. The 20s will be good for drama.
3 TrailerParkRide 2020-01-07
Yes but he was a young man during the height of the Cold War. He should be plenty scared straight if the Bert the Turtle programming did its job right.
3 BernieMadeoffSanders 2020-01-07
C O P E
O
P
E
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[removed]
1 IncEptionStein 2020-01-07
Actually, he’s a very stable genius
13 HarryD52 2020-01-07
The first rule of Nuclear Diplomacy is that you never actually drop a nuke, but you should make everyone think that you might.
I don't think Trump knows shit about Nuclear Diplomacy but I 100% believe that that madman might drop a fat one if he feels like it.
6 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
He will just ask his uncle Dr. John Trump at the MIT for his take. Very good genes, very smart, very good.
9 ThinkingOnce 2020-01-07
I mean, the only reason right now that it won't happen is that some military dude says "No Mr. President, nuking Iran is not an option."
2 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Try to leave it off of the list of responses at least
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[deleted]
2 watermark1917 2020-01-07
Down with America 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷 🇮🇷
5 high_side 2020-01-07
What does Mexico have to do with it?
-1 NotAllGamers 2020-01-07
NOOOOO!!! YOU CAN'T BLAME TRUMP SUPPORTERS. NOT MY MAGATERINOS!
12 CampRape 2020-01-07
Finally! Time to send them back to the stone ages.
43 Whaddaulookinat 2020-01-07
Back?
19 CampRape 2020-01-07
I like the cut of your gib, soldier.
5 Whaddaulookinat 2020-01-07
What's a gib?
2 CampRape 2020-01-07
My autocorrect deciding that jib isn't a word and correcting it to gib.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-01-07
.. And you messed up the Simpson's line
1 CampRape 2020-01-07
Wouldn't have if I'd seen whatever episode of the Simpsons.
4 ImJustaBagofHammers 2020-01-07
Neolithic tribes did not launch ballistic missiles at each other.
8 watermark1917 2020-01-07
I will fuck your gf while your away
I'm too old and fat too get drafted but I'll be the only dick for miles, and I know military wives thirsty af
2 CampRape 2020-01-07
We have Skype and shit on base now you know.
15 ANewStart1190 2020-01-07
So you can watch yourself get cucked in the bed and chucked when youre dead?
3 CampRape 2020-01-07
That actually happened to an airman once, poor guy.
12 The_Great_I_Am_Not 2020-01-07
https://twitter.com/DEFCONWSALERTS/status/1214702385072877569
4 lickedTators 2020-01-07
11 JaromeDome 2020-01-07
I don't even know here to get actual news about this kind of shit anymore. All media is cucked, leftwing or rightwing.
3 high_side 2020-01-07
Woke level 9000 based and clownpilled.
7 SmoothBeetle 2020-01-07
I BELIEVE THAT WE WILL WIN!
I BELIEVE THAT WE WILL WIN!
I BELIEVE THAT WE WILL WIN!
2 high_side 2020-01-07
Because that chant normally works out.
7 FearOfBees 2020-01-07
lmao just warn your enemies
5 alphetaboss 2020-01-07
LMAO I hope this is true.
5 watermark1917 2020-01-07
There were Iraqi casualties actually, no American ones though.
6 BeneathWatchfulEyes 2020-01-07
Awww.
RIP Iran. You had a good run!
1 high_side 2020-01-07
Daddy is going to bed tho.
6 HoBoLoBro 2020-01-07
these sandniggas crazy 😮😮
6 AxelKillmurder 2020-01-07
This caused a mod of /r/TooCuteForPorn, /r/theratio & /r/SnowWhites to make a pinned post and start banning republicans? That's pretty funny, but the janny locked the post and deleted comments before things had time to escalate.
3 MG87 2020-01-07
What a shock
1 SnapshillBot 2020-01-07
Congratulations! I do not often downvote. You have earned mine.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 sad_boi_md 2020-01-07
Time to duck and cover, the bombs are coming down!
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[deleted]
1 [deleted] 2020-01-07
[deleted]
1 high_side 2020-01-07
Iran said they were done, Daddy brushed it off. This sounds like theatre.
... and then an airliner gets friendly fired. Ffs.
1 fbcc1233 2020-01-07
Lmao imagine unironically using jpost as a source 🤮