I don't know what he expected. YouTube is quite clear that they don't want explicit sexual content on their platform, yet he insisted on producing furrry catboy content.
The good thing about this community, is it’s still based on consent, as no one is fattened against their will. In a way it’s admirable seeing these women do this to themselves, as it shows a real dedication to work against the grain of society and become the sizes they do.
Political channels automatically have much lower monetization due to being an inherently controversial. His monthly pay was probably about 700 a month on ad revenue. He was basically a wagie before patreon styled pay.
wrong, barely anybody donates on those gay d-live streams, nobody wants to donate "bits" or "ninjaginis" you faggot, he won't make anywhere near as much money, this is a big blow
Non controversial channels still make a shitton of money one of my best friend runs a nightcore channel and she makes 60k$ a year uploading sped up music
aspiring artists reach out to her for a promotion she makes their music nightcore and uploads it if she finds it good enough,they get a promotion and they waiver their right for monetization on the uploaded video similar to the way suicidesheep does it
her youtube channel is called Chino if you want to take a look at it
Not the youtube ads you moron. He never activated those. He dedicates 2 hours everyday for reading superchats. He made most of his money from live donations a.k.a superchats
now i'm even more mad. how much of a brainlet do you have to be to willingly donate money to a short hispanic twink? fucking youtube always meddling in the darwinistic process
47 comments
6 devotedrat17 2020-01-10
tfw you have been a public alt right figurehead for ages but get banned as soon as people find out you're a fag.
5 rocinantebabieca 2020-01-10
We truly do live in a society
1 Comrade_Natalie 2020-01-10
And that's a good thing!
3 TheColdTurtle 2020-01-10
Guess YouTube really does hate gay people
2 wm20123 2020-01-10
I don't know what he expected. YouTube is quite clear that they don't want explicit sexual content on their platform, yet he insisted on producing furrry catboy content.
1 gandhitheblue 2020-01-10
And it seems as though, he lived his life like a candle in the wind...
1 randomination 2020-01-10
tfw you're afraid of immigrants taking your job as a youtuber but then they actually do
5 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
The catty smug snarky vindictiveness of chapocels in the other subs that this has been posted in is pathetic tbh, bunch of vultures
2 SWIMsfriend 2020-01-10
and then they wonder why they aren't allowed to control anything, those faggots go mad with power if you let them be a mod
1 -M-o-X- 2020-01-10
how you gonna just say it and not link to delicious smug and seethe
1 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
literally click other discussions
2 trexmundi 2020-01-10
Who is this loser and why should I care?
4 whenweriiide 2020-01-10
He's an aut-right zoomer manlet so you shouldn't care at all
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-01-10
For real the next constitutional amendment should just edit the 14th at the end with "except manlets"
2 too_much_choice 2020-01-10
Mexican leading a white nationalist movement or something, I don't pay that much attention though.
1 denuvo_sucks 2020-01-10
Hes a lover of catboys
1 cielxyuriplisetsky 2020-01-10
tbh who doesn't love catboys?
1 Pewkie 2020-01-10
He is an alt right fuck who, no joke, manually added himself to the Wikipedia page for Alt right figureheads.
2 MrGoodieMob 2020-01-10
Youtube is just a lele ponsi scheme 😎
1 SnapshillBot 2020-01-10
The good thing about this community, is it’s still based on consent, as no one is fattened against their will. In a way it’s admirable seeing these women do this to themselves, as it shows a real dedication to work against the grain of society and become the sizes they do.
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 [deleted] 2020-01-10
[deleted]
1 FearOfBees 2020-01-10
Youtube makes you like no money anyway. It's all that newproject2 subscribestar patreon money
4 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
wrong, retard
1 FearOfBees 2020-01-10
Political channels automatically have much lower monetization due to being an inherently controversial. His monthly pay was probably about 700 a month on ad revenue. He was basically a wagie before patreon styled pay.
1 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
retard he was getting 3k a night in superchats you fucking boomer
2 FearOfBees 2020-01-10
... and how does that effect what I said. Superchats are not ad revenue. He can literally just go to dlive. You can do whatever you want over there.
2 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
just admit you didn't know he got superchats you retard, his superchats won't work now, he's been demonetized
1 FearOfBees 2020-01-10
I specifically said ad revenue. Superchats don't matter, they're on dlive. He can send out when he's streaming using youtube.
1 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
wrong, barely anybody donates on those gay d-live streams, nobody wants to donate "bits" or "ninjaginis" you faggot, he won't make anywhere near as much money, this is a big blow
1 simplicity3000 2020-01-10
for you
1 Babajang 2020-01-10
Good, time for that little phaggot to grow up.
1 DankMemester2865 2020-01-10
What is streamlabs? 🤔
1 Volkstrummer 2020-01-10
something he was banned from a year ago
1 [deleted] 2020-01-10
[removed]
1 Iwanttobefree27 2020-01-10
Non controversial channels still make a shitton of money one of my best friend runs a nightcore channel and she makes 60k$ a year uploading sped up music
1 Moist__nuggets 2020-01-10
Why do zoomers have to have a million '-core' genres for their shit music?
1 CLOSE_ENOUGH 2020-01-10
How does she get around copyright issues
1 Iwanttobefree27 2020-01-10
aspiring artists reach out to her for a promotion she makes their music nightcore and uploads it if she finds it good enough,they get a promotion and they waiver their right for monetization on the uploaded video similar to the way suicidesheep does it
her youtube channel is called Chino if you want to take a look at it
1 [deleted] 2020-01-10
[removed]
1 [deleted] 2020-01-10
[removed]
1 dramasexual 2020-01-10
I'm genuinely surprised this nigger wasnt demonetized already tbh
1 Iwanttobefree27 2020-01-10
whos this
1 wafflesrawsome 2020-01-10
damn, how will nick "catboy genius" fuentes ever recover? those 5 cents per video could have changed lives! 😭
1 moggedbyall 2020-01-10
Not the youtube ads you moron. He never activated those. He dedicates 2 hours everyday for reading superchats. He made most of his money from live donations a.k.a superchats
1 wafflesrawsome 2020-01-10
now i'm even more mad. how much of a brainlet do you have to be to willingly donate money to a short hispanic twink? fucking youtube always meddling in the darwinistic process
1 moggedbyall 2020-01-10
What has short/Hispanic or twink gotta do with his content?
1 Lehk 2020-01-10
demonotized for being gay?
​
not cool, youtube