Big brain political strategists debate if kids should vote or maybe only landowners. Are re-education camps a viable option for men under 25?

1  2020-02-02 by MoistLanguage

51 comments

do not comment or vote in linked threads

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

"14 year olds should vote because they technically sort of pay taxes and like 1% of them have jobs"

šŸ¤£šŸ¤£šŸ¤£

Redditors are subhuman

To vote you should have to be at least 25 and a net taxpayer. Then you have to pass a 50 question civics test at the polls on election day.

This but unironically

letā€™s also take away the voting age from people with depression, anxiety, ADHD, internet moderators or any other sort of mental illness while were at it

who knows if they even care about the future?

Only black, Sunni Muslims should get a vote

sunni

by allah you people are dogs

Shiites worship two gods - Allah, and Abu Bakr

Everyone except Alb*nians gets to vote

The left seems to be so afraid of these limits but I'm pretty sure if they applied them they would win a lot more, more educated people are voting left. And I'm not left wing myself

Only landowning men with children should be able to vote.

Landowners only.

The only sensible choice

Itā€™s what the founders of this country intended. Cause they were smart and knew poorcels should never vote.

Why?

Why would you want poor people who donā€™t own land to vote šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚. How dumb can you be. Poor people are only going to vote to give themselves more free shit.

In some places, plenty of poor people own land. In some places, plenty of rich people do not own land. Rich people vote/lobby to give themselves ā€œfree shitā€ all the time, in the form of bailouts and subsidies.

How are you this not-fun?

seriousposters smh

All serious posters are confirmed Russian trolls.

Poor cel cope. You must be a Russian agent trying to sow hate and discontent in this country.

I am not calling for the disenfranchising of huge blocks of the country, a plan which, if put in place, would inspire secessionism and violence across the country, exactly what a ā€œRussian agent trying to sow hate and discontentā€ would want.

I can't believe how quickly I stopped reading this comment. You have a real talent for writing in a way that makes people stop giving a shit

Heā€™s an actual autist. You canā€™t expect him to sense the sarcasm from a simple ā€œLandowners only.ā€, because heā€™s mentally unable too lmao

Yeah I just skip the comment and assume it's boring when I see bagofhammers. I'm more likely to read a watermark longpost

Snappy ^

Nah. Russians want power to the poors. Something that should never happen.

In the sense of poor people making militias and going to war with the U.S. government after being disenfranchised?

You just said yourself many poors own land. Probably in rural areas so they arenā€™t gonna be upset. They can still vote! The poor blacks down vote anyhow so they arenā€™t gonna give a shit.

Many land-owning rural poor people would sympathize with other poor people being stripped of the right to vote, especially when they almost all have relatives who live in cities, and some rural poor people do not own land. Even excluding (for whatever reason) the urban poor, there would still be a large amount of people against the disenfranchisement.

Lmao Imagine thinking rural poors give a fuck or respect urban poor and vice versa

Lmao Imagine thinking rural poors give a fuck or respect urban poor and vice versa

For someone who just accused me of being a Russian agent trying to sow division, you seem to really like the idea that everyone hates everyone else.

I do lmao thatā€™s cause I am a real American. Russian trolls arenā€™t allowed to do this.

In other words, itā€™s okay to work for the Russian agenda, as long as you are an American and not a Russian? Why is that?

you should only be able to vote if you are above a certain tax threshold. this would weed out all the stupid people

Thatā€™s fair also. If you donā€™t pay property tax or income tax above a certain amount no vote for you.

That is better than turning over the treasury to the masses.

Fine, for an extra tax, urbanfags with money can vote to, r u happy libral?

Male land owners only.

The male restriction is implied by the landowner restriction

Yes of course.

What if you own shares in a corporation that owns land, like a co-op?

I'm sure glad that Redditors debating complex topics like voting, political economy and ethics. Considering they have exceptional knowledge in pol. sci., econ, philosophy, cognitive science and all related topics they surely will arrive at correct conclusions with sound reasoning.

sort sciences just like their noodles, low test

this kills the NEET

It's like nobody has watched Logan's run.

idk what a movie about a town being taken over by aliens and some alcoholics going on a beer run has anything to do with the voting age

just cus it stars br*ts doesnā€™t make it relevant

The radical centrist option is obviously to give everyone 1/2 a vote.