The 9/11 Vore Conspiracy argues that the twin towers were not hit by planes externally. Instead, planes were built inside the towers, and continually inflated which eventually caused a collapse.
The anonymous theorist, reviewing footage of the 9/11 attack, stops the footage numerous times to point out "weak zones" of the town that gave in as a response to the increasing weight of the internal aircraft.
He highlights areas in the footage that portray people and objects being violently thrown out of the windows with force, as well as small billows of steam and fire, happening at the lower floor levels of one of the towers.
"Look at this shit. You're telling me there's just random ass explosions going on? Down here? We ain't even remotely close to where the plane collided. Bull fucking horse shit.'
The theorist explains that the planes were built by "crazed U.S. government scientists who watched too much Doctor Who, it was like that of a real life TARDIS experiment".
"They built these massive towers, for what? Business? Hell nah, have you seen the economy pre-9/11? It was shit. We didn't have the money nor energy for no goddamn tower of that size, and definitely not two."
We asked why the experiment would take place in the middle of a city as crowded as NYC. The theorist responded:
"It's hidden in plain sight. NYC's got all the resources in the world, right at your disposal. Nah, seriously man, look at these streets, there's a fuckin' garbage pile up just down the road. You know what kind of technology you can find in these piles? There's some fuckin' money to be made. Plus you get to make a nationwide scare if your experiment fucks up, and publicity means more money. They had all to gain and nothing to lose."
The theorist explains that any and all footage taken inside the Twin Towers pre-9/11 was simply simulated, props, or illusion. Footage of NYC recorded in a position respective to which the twin towers overlooked, was created via a clever series of mirrors originally sourcing from the "432 Park Avenue" building.
The theorist claims that any and all footage of the planes are "so fake, it's laughable", he states: "Nobody saw any planes... not in real life. Outside of what the TV stations would tell you, not a single soul saw an actual, physical plane hit the buildings. Hell, you could ask everyone in New York today, you won't find a single person who saw a plane."
It's okay sweaty keep shoveling buttered croissants into your hoggish maw just don't pay attention to your body falling apart it's just you finally being HEALTHY!!! 😍😍😍
No way man I'm gonna literally shovel food into my face all day every day until the thought of it disgusts me, that way I'll stop eating that food and thus be healthier than you "dieters" with your "willpower" and "restraint."
Unlike most arrrrrr slash dramatards I'm actually extremely active and need to stay fit to do well in my (gasp) job. I just like dunking on dumb idiots that don't know how to do research or think critically.
I do love the vitriol of "Hey, don't eat shit and you'll be healthier and thinner" is met with. Shows colours true haha.
Just don't eat food, you'd be shocked at how fast you lose weight. When you do eat food skipping fast burned carbs/sugar is ideal because fiber and protein keeps the hunger away longer but either way just not eating is the key.
How could you possibly lose weight by not restricting your calorie intake to below your expenditure? If you're consuming more than you expend, you put on weight. If you consume less than you expend, you lose weight. It's not complicated at all. Obviously there's other aspects of nutrition that matter for overall health, but weight loss is entirely dependent on caloric restriction. If I'm trying to lose weight, I eat less. If I'm trying to gain weight, I eat more. The only reason people gain more weight after a diet is because they're weak willed fat fucks with no self discipline, who are incapable of sticking to their goals.
How could you possibly lose weight by not restricting your calorie intake to below your expenditure?
The point is to eat more satiating stuff and/or on a schedule that makes it easier to deal with hunger. You don't restrict your calorie intake by sheer exertion of willpower (which statistically doesn't work), you restrict your calorie intake by making your body want less calories.
Citation needed. I once looked into efficiency of various interventions to limit weight gain caused by that antipsychotic notorious for causing weight gain, and nothing really worked though some things worked less than others.
So it's more like at least 20% of the people don't have to restrict their calorie intake by sheer exertion of willpower, than have especially strong willpowers.
If giving you a particular chemical is makes you gain 20 pounds in a month while reporting that you're exerting exactly the same amount of willpower on not overeating, and which you promptly lose after ceasing the treatment, then that very strongly suggests that there are two separate parts to weight gain: some sort of a set point your organism aims for when maintaining weight via hunger and satiety, and the ability to consciously override this mechanism. If this happens to most people then the role of the latter is not as important as the former.
If putting on green glasses makes you fail colorblindness tests just like colorblind people do while not demonstrating any other psychological changes like hugely increased laziness, then most colorblind people probably don't fail those tests because they are too lazy to make an effort.
If you're consuming more than you expend, you put on weight. If you consume less than you expend, you lose weight. It's not complicated at all.
There's significant research that addition or subtraction of certain foods leads to weight gain/loss and type of weight gain/loss in far higher chances than total kCal intake.
The body in no way processes every macro the same, and the body really doesn't see the food stuffs as energy first.
Nope. The kind of people who attempt to diet just have a tendency to get fatter over time. They also tend to have lower IQs, so they'd struggle to understand this key implication of the research and blame the diets instead.
Erm sorry but if all I ate every day was 1000 calories of cake or 1000 calories of chicken, potatoes and salad, I'd still lose 2lbs every week. It's just much harder to do on cake because you feel less full and nutritionally satiated. But, if I ate 2000 calories of chicken, potato and salad, I wouldn't lose any weight because I'd be replacing all of my expended energy.
Calories definitely are the number 1 factor concerning weightloss, there are just easier and harder ways to go about it.
Erm sorry but if all I ate every day was 1000 calories of cake or 1000 calories of chicken, potatoes and salad, I'd still lose 2lbs every week.
A few things: 1) is the point of dieting to lose weight in general or to get rid of excess body fat? During most deficiencies bone and muscle are the first to get tapped if there isn't the proper nutrients, while excess fat cells take their place waiting to get filled.
2) Even still the 3,500kCal = 1lb isn't particularly accurate in general and not quite how the body works in the real world. Our bodies don't have an accounting office that go "we hit 3,500kcal Boys! Fire off another pound." One of the biggest issues with the CICO mindset is that the measurements on both sides of the equation are inaccurate without scientific instruments...
There's a reason most people on CICO like myself still tend to eat healthier when they get onto their diet, because eating healthier on 1200 calories of food is going to fill you up more and not make you feel like you're lacking as much energy, nutrients, vitamins, etc than eating the same amount of calories in donuts and frapps, but we still calorie count because without counting, you can easily go over your limit and then you won't hit your weightloss goals.
Portion control is pretty important, but my point is that with good, fun, and hearty eating portion control becomes an added bonus... not the main focus.
200 calories of banana and 200 calories of snickers is the same amount of calories, one is just more nutritionally dense and won't make me spike and crash.
Exactly, the macros get metabolized differently... it's not a far stretch to say they get stored differently and what % percentage winds up in the deep storage of adipose.
Not to say sugar isn't important, it is. But we've been having way too much and the health crisis really skyrocketed once we replaced much of our savory for sweet in prepackaged foods... and the decrease of intake of sugar in 2010ish matched the plateauing of obesity rates among adults. It's extraordinary and CICO-first mindset is getting in the way of that progress.
eating better will result in more calories. once you remove highly processed foods there's basically nothing left you can sink 1000s of calories a day on. A 125 gram piece of cheesecake has 401 calories. You want to get 400 calories from lettuce? You need to eat 6.3 pounds of that shit. You'll be sick before half way through
It's one thing to cope with being fat, but what the fuck is going on if you are actively seeking reasons to be a fat? Is that actually fucked up or am I just too drunk to understand what are those whales are saying?
Given the margins per unit, you'd be most profitable to the franchise consuming all of your calories via Coca-Cola™ Fountain Drinks, with no free refills. Day by day, you gain absurd amounts of mass while your teeth rot away and your skin becomes pallid from a lack of essential nutrients. You become progressively heavier and weaker, until you can no longer struggle to maintain consciousness, the straw dragging lazily against your lips in your reclined power scooter. As life slips from your grotesque form, you loose your bowels one final time, fizzing into your pants.
AHS is already nagging. And it's only a matter of time before reddit bans us anyway, we're quite literally watching reddit in its early end of life stages. The more they try to pander to their extremist base the more they're going to repel normal people, and I doubt fatties, NEETs, and Chapos are enough to pay the bills on such a large site.
Idk, for every very active internet user, there are 100 r/all users that'll eat up the 12th small orange hands joke. It absolutely makes profitable sense to just turn all sites into Facebook mum tier.
Yeah, then it was also the implementation of quarantines and shit. I think it's still fairly early in its death cycle, though. Reddit is obviously still profitable, and would continue to be so if they kept things how they are. But they keep pushing the envelope further and further, like how they recently made automated bans for people who upvote shit that gets removed in quarantined subs.
Normal people don't care about any of this shit, they just want to repeat jokes and look at cute pics/porn. Reddit doesn't care want their original core of autists with adblock, they want instagram normies who don't even open the comments.
I was thinking facebook or Twitter. Facebook still has some good meme pages if you know where to look but I don't think it has any places like r/drama. On the other hand Twitter is shitpost central but I hate people on Twitter. There's also discird but you have to be in the know and half of it is child porn and weebs anyway.
Jesus christ diets are shit but that doesn't mean you have to intentionally get fatter. Eat more move more, or like eat less move less. Maintaining only being Murcain instead of Mexican or Dubai level fat isn't that hard.
Heh you guys see that bar graph where they break down fats by race. It's like blacks are omega fat, mayos are catching up and yellows are like where's their bar?
Along with The IE Workbook, The Fuck It Diet, and Anti-Diet
so here's the thing: this is their holy trinity of books. These are books about not letting food stress you out, consume your life, and make you miserable. These are the books that say listen to your body and establish a healthy, sustainable relationship with food. these are the books that these fatties use to justify their own fatness.
these people aren't fatties. These people all look relatively normal if not on the thinner side. Let's check out another one, A Parent's Guide to Intuitive Eating: How to Raise Kids Who Love to Eat Healthy by Yami Cazorla-Lancaster.
hmmm, nope, still not a fatty. here's another one: Enjoying Food Peace: Recipes and Intuitive Eating Wisdom to Nourish Your Body and Mind by Bonnie R. Giller
WHY ARE ALL THESE PEOPLE SAYING THAT BALLOONING UP TO 300 POUNDS IS NORMAL WHEN THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THESE BOOKS ARE ALL AVERAGE SIZED
So in other words, a bunch of skinny women who have probably never had much of a problem remaining skinny wrote books saying "just eat what you want lol" and that advice is not working out so hot for lard-asses
No, because intuitive eating isn't "just eat what you want." These fatties miss the point. The idea behind it is that psychologically dieting is too stressful for people who love feed. So instead of restricting dood it says "eat when you're hungry, when you're hungry eat what you want, and instead of eating until youre full, only until youre not hungry" which sounds a lot like "eat whatever"
But then you think about it, and this means no bored eating, emotional eating, no routine eating when youre not hungry, no social eating when youre friends order food ar the bar and youre not really hungry but youll order food too, and when you do eat you cant stiff your face and eat until youre physically uncomfortable. It basically tricks people into volunteering into a restrictive diet. Theres also the hope youll begin adding more healthy stuff because you will feel like shit of all you eat are processed foods.
The only reason I'm currently eating is because I know I need to eat and because food taste good. But I seriously could go days without having that feeling in your throat when you need food.
Literally ignoring your body saying no rood is needed because yum
That's why having a sort of schedule for meals helped me in the beginning, then I know that if it's 1pm I should probably eat something, otherwise by 3 or 4 I'll be dizzy and sick.
Scheduling meals because you will go through withdrawal from fructose if you dont get your fix.
This is not i tuitive eating, this is self feederism
Thank God they banned FPH, otherwise this poor oppressed buttergolem might hear some opinions on her extreme weight gain that would hurt her feelings. 😳😳😳
Yeah, it honestly is extremely sad, and not in the way we usually throw sad around here. That poor person is literally eating themselves to death as quickly as they possibly can, and the fatties are cheering them on. They severely need help, not "omg yaaaas u go girl keep eating your buttered croissants!!!" and will probably die from this as those "people" cheer them on. I'm considering trying to get in touch with the authors of the books they worship and showing them some of the worst shit from that sub, then posting the authors' reactions there. It'd probably get removed but might stay up a little while if I spin it correctly with a throwaway.
105 comments
1 AutoModerator 2020-02-25
do not comment or vote in linked threads
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1 SnapshillBot 2020-02-25
The 9/11 Vore Conspiracy argues that the twin towers were not hit by planes externally. Instead, planes were built inside the towers, and continually inflated which eventually caused a collapse.
The anonymous theorist, reviewing footage of the 9/11 attack, stops the footage numerous times to point out "weak zones" of the town that gave in as a response to the increasing weight of the internal aircraft.
He highlights areas in the footage that portray people and objects being violently thrown out of the windows with force, as well as small billows of steam and fire, happening at the lower floor levels of one of the towers.
"Look at this shit. You're telling me there's just random ass explosions going on? Down here? We ain't even remotely close to where the plane collided. Bull fucking horse shit.'
The theorist explains that the planes were built by "crazed U.S. government scientists who watched too much Doctor Who, it was like that of a real life TARDIS experiment".
"They built these massive towers, for what? Business? Hell nah, have you seen the economy pre-9/11? It was shit. We didn't have the money nor energy for no goddamn tower of that size, and definitely not two."
We asked why the experiment would take place in the middle of a city as crowded as NYC. The theorist responded:
"It's hidden in plain sight. NYC's got all the resources in the world, right at your disposal. Nah, seriously man, look at these streets, there's a fuckin' garbage pile up just down the road. You know what kind of technology you can find in these piles? There's some fuckin' money to be made. Plus you get to make a nationwide scare if your experiment fucks up, and publicity means more money. They had all to gain and nothing to lose."
The theorist explains that any and all footage taken inside the Twin Towers pre-9/11 was simply simulated, props, or illusion. Footage of NYC recorded in a position respective to which the twin towers overlooked, was created via a clever series of mirrors originally sourcing from the "432 Park Avenue" building.
The theorist claims that any and all footage of the planes are "so fake, it's laughable", he states: "Nobody saw any planes... not in real life. Outside of what the TV stations would tell you, not a single soul saw an actual, physical plane hit the buildings. Hell, you could ask everyone in New York today, you won't find a single person who saw a plane."
Snapshots:
I am just a simple bot, *not** a moderator of this subreddit* | bot subreddit | contact the maintainers
1 GaysianSupremacist 2020-02-25
And food are already in fat people's gut, therefore they become fat despite not overreating. That's the fatfuck vore conspiracy.
1 Enrico_Motassa 2020-02-25
It's okay sweaty keep shoveling buttered croissants into your hoggish maw just don't pay attention to your body falling apart it's just you finally being HEALTHY!!! 😍😍😍
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
I knew that cal restrictive diets rarely work but there has to be an attempt to eat better. Just eating the fucking butter alone would be better jfc
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
No way man I'm gonna literally shovel food into my face all day every day until the thought of it disgusts me, that way I'll stop eating that food and thus be healthier than you "dieters" with your "willpower" and "restraint."
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
"Well I tried one thing I read about on the internet. That didn't work so might as well give up and spiral out of control"
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
I only ate 2 candy bars the other day instead of 3 and I didn't immediately lose 50 pounds. Diets are fucking nonsense!
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
"I eat like shit but far below my TDEE and I'm still not losing belly fat"
😅😅😅
1 jerryjoneshere 2020-02-25
Yeah I’m bulking too bro
1 Fletch71011 2020-02-25
Cal restrictive diets are scientifically the only diets that do work.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Holy shit it's the least effective medium/long term "weight loss" diet there is. And it's not even close. 😅😅😅
1 HeyItsYourBoyDaniel 2020-02-25
How exactly do you plan on losing weight without a calorie deficit diet?
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
I could ask the same about a diet that doesn't account for insulin resistance, and be more in the ballpark.
1 chansee 2020-02-25
Coping fatcel
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Unlike most arrrrrr slash dramatards I'm actually extremely active and need to stay fit to do well in my (gasp) job. I just like dunking on dumb idiots that don't know how to do research or think critically.
I do love the vitriol of "Hey, don't eat shit and you'll be healthier and thinner" is met with. Shows colours true haha.
1 bullyard 2020-02-25
stop downvoting lolcows you stupid fagaronis
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Naw, that super dislike button really means they've studied the issue.
1 dotdot00 2020-02-25
the rule doesn't apply for regulars retard
1 companyfry 2020-02-25
He’s a regular and deserves to be shamed by his peers
1 aqouta 2020-02-25
Just don't eat food, you'd be shocked at how fast you lose weight. When you do eat food skipping fast burned carbs/sugar is ideal because fiber and protein keeps the hunger away longer but either way just not eating is the key.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
This is literally retarded and dangerous without doctor supervision, even then, has poor long term effectiveness.
But you do you champ.
1 aqouta 2020-02-25
I mean eat it sometimes lol, I even said eat it sometimes.
1 adhamrlf 2020-02-25
Cal restrictive diets are the only diets that work
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Lmao no. Cal restriction alone has the worst long term impact, often times adding more than start point.
1 15nelsoc 2020-02-25
How could you possibly lose weight by not restricting your calorie intake to below your expenditure? If you're consuming more than you expend, you put on weight. If you consume less than you expend, you lose weight. It's not complicated at all. Obviously there's other aspects of nutrition that matter for overall health, but weight loss is entirely dependent on caloric restriction. If I'm trying to lose weight, I eat less. If I'm trying to gain weight, I eat more. The only reason people gain more weight after a diet is because they're weak willed fat fucks with no self discipline, who are incapable of sticking to their goals.
1 zergling_Lester 2020-02-25
The point is to eat more satiating stuff and/or on a schedule that makes it easier to deal with hunger. You don't restrict your calorie intake by sheer exertion of willpower (which statistically doesn't work), you restrict your calorie intake by making your body want less calories.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Actually human tests on Calorie replacement (aka not eating utter shit) shows far better results than cutting calories.
1 simplicity3000 2020-02-25
works for at least 20% of all people. but those 20% don't get fat in the first place.
1 zergling_Lester 2020-02-25
Citation needed. I once looked into efficiency of various interventions to limit weight gain caused by that antipsychotic notorious for causing weight gain, and nothing really worked though some things worked less than others.
So it's more like at least 20% of the people don't have to restrict their calorie intake by sheer exertion of willpower, than have especially strong willpowers.
1 simplicity3000 2020-02-25
tomatoe tomahto
how can you tell you perceive green the same way as I do?
1 zergling_Lester 2020-02-25
If giving you a particular chemical is makes you gain 20 pounds in a month while reporting that you're exerting exactly the same amount of willpower on not overeating, and which you promptly lose after ceasing the treatment, then that very strongly suggests that there are two separate parts to weight gain: some sort of a set point your organism aims for when maintaining weight via hunger and satiety, and the ability to consciously override this mechanism. If this happens to most people then the role of the latter is not as important as the former.
If putting on green glasses makes you fail colorblindness tests just like colorblind people do while not demonstrating any other psychological changes like hugely increased laziness, then most colorblind people probably don't fail those tests because they are too lazy to make an effort.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
There's significant research that addition or subtraction of certain foods leads to weight gain/loss and type of weight gain/loss in far higher chances than total kCal intake.
The body in no way processes every macro the same, and the body really doesn't see the food stuffs as energy first.
We can literally pinpoint the massive rise in obesity with the "All Calories are the Same" PR stunt dressed as science
1 questionablyrotten 2020-02-25
Are you actually saying that the unit of energy required to heat up water to its boiling point is bullshit or you just trying to fill pizza’s void
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Which is the fundamental issue with thinking of food as energy first right? It's also how we rebuild cells which isn't accounted for in CICO.
1 I_will_bum_your_mum 2020-02-25
Nope. The kind of people who attempt to diet just have a tendency to get fatter over time. They also tend to have lower IQs, so they'd struggle to understand this key implication of the research and blame the diets instead.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
If you're eating shit that's fucling with you insulin levels needlessly you're not going to lose weight.
Put down the junk food tubster
1 Bunny_Hunny4 2020-02-25
Erm sorry but if all I ate every day was 1000 calories of cake or 1000 calories of chicken, potatoes and salad, I'd still lose 2lbs every week. It's just much harder to do on cake because you feel less full and nutritionally satiated. But, if I ate 2000 calories of chicken, potato and salad, I wouldn't lose any weight because I'd be replacing all of my expended energy.
Calories definitely are the number 1 factor concerning weightloss, there are just easier and harder ways to go about it.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
A few things: 1) is the point of dieting to lose weight in general or to get rid of excess body fat? During most deficiencies bone and muscle are the first to get tapped if there isn't the proper nutrients, while excess fat cells take their place waiting to get filled.
2) Even still the 3,500kCal = 1lb isn't particularly accurate in general and not quite how the body works in the real world. Our bodies don't have an accounting office that go "we hit 3,500kcal Boys! Fire off another pound." One of the biggest issues with the CICO mindset is that the measurements on both sides of the equation are inaccurate without scientific instruments...
Portion control is pretty important, but my point is that with good, fun, and hearty eating portion control becomes an added bonus... not the main focus.
Exactly, the macros get metabolized differently... it's not a far stretch to say they get stored differently and what % percentage winds up in the deep storage of adipose.
Not to say sugar isn't important, it is. But we've been having way too much and the health crisis really skyrocketed once we replaced much of our savory for sweet in prepackaged foods... and the decrease of intake of sugar in 2010ish matched the plateauing of obesity rates among adults. It's extraordinary and CICO-first mindset is getting in the way of that progress.
1 LongPostBot 2020-02-25
Your pulitzer's in the mail
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Bout damn time
1 Peytons_5head 2020-02-25
eating better will result in more calories. once you remove highly processed foods there's basically nothing left you can sink 1000s of calories a day on. A 125 gram piece of cheesecake has 401 calories. You want to get 400 calories from lettuce? You need to eat 6.3 pounds of that shit. You'll be sick before half way through
1 simplicity3000 2020-02-25
when those fatties "eat better", they eat a tub of fresh homemade mayonnaise instead of the walmart one.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
Basically my point hah
1 simplicity3000 2020-02-25
which won't help them lose weight.
1 Whaddaulookinat 2020-02-25
No way in hell. It's worst of both worlds
1 greatjasoni 2020-02-25
Butter is so underrated.
1 UnderthebootofATSTIL 2020-02-25
Fucking cow, at least she will die soon
1 aduketsavar 2020-02-25
It's one thing to cope with being fat, but what the fuck is going on if you are actively seeking reasons to be a fat? Is that actually fucked up or am I just too drunk to understand what are those whales are saying?
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
The entire sub is extremely fucked up and basically a suicide cult that uses food instead of Flavor Aid.
1 _reason_biden_lost_ 2020-02-25
Based Jonestown expert!
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
I'm the guy who still hangs around to answer the phone.
1 -M-o-X- 2020-02-25
im going with a larp of some enternal fatso
1 Putin-Nanny 2020-02-25
Your drink brain is much more clear than their beetus sedated fat clogged brains.
1 somestupidname1 2020-02-25
Dying a slow and antagonizing death while burdening your loved ones even after your death vs eating less and getting off your ass.
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
The first option is fatphobic and bigoted, catch me making up 90% of my local McDonalds's profit margin.
1 Funkyduffy 2020-02-25
Given the margins per unit, you'd be most profitable to the franchise consuming all of your calories via Coca-Cola™ Fountain Drinks, with no free refills. Day by day, you gain absurd amounts of mass while your teeth rot away and your skin becomes pallid from a lack of essential nutrients. You become progressively heavier and weaker, until you can no longer struggle to maintain consciousness, the straw dragging lazily against your lips in your reclined power scooter. As life slips from your grotesque form, you loose your bowels one final time, fizzing into your pants.
1 genericunimportant 2020-02-25
I imagine you’d die due to malnutrition before you could gain any weight on a Freedom Diet of Coca-ColaTM
1 Funkyduffy 2020-02-25
Not with that attitude you won't
1 UpperclassmanKuno 2020-02-25
God forsaken? Nonsense.
Allahu Akbar.
1 CantWakeUpJPG 2020-02-25
She will taste my shoe if those baseless acusations continue! 😡👞
1 jewdanksdad 2020-02-25
Gottem
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
So in other words what that mod is saying is that we can completely shut down their subreddit just by linking to their threads.
1 tHeSiD 2020-02-25
Careful now, they might complain to AHS mommy
1 Burnnoticelover 2020-02-25
What are they gonna do, ban Pizzashill again?
1 [deleted] 2020-02-25
[removed]
1 Funkyduffy 2020-02-25
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
AHS is already nagging. And it's only a matter of time before reddit bans us anyway, we're quite literally watching reddit in its early end of life stages. The more they try to pander to their extremist base the more they're going to repel normal people, and I doubt fatties, NEETs, and Chapos are enough to pay the bills on such a large site.
1 adhamrlf 2020-02-25
Idk, for every very active internet user, there are 100 r/all users that'll eat up the 12th small orange hands joke. It absolutely makes profitable sense to just turn all sites into Facebook mum tier.
1 Platycel 2020-02-25
Nigga that was banning of FPH years ago
1 vsehorrorshow93 2020-02-25
It’s kinda frightening seeing how the opinions on that have completely changed when it’s brought up. User base has been replaced
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
Yeah, then it was also the implementation of quarantines and shit. I think it's still fairly early in its death cycle, though. Reddit is obviously still profitable, and would continue to be so if they kept things how they are. But they keep pushing the envelope further and further, like how they recently made automated bans for people who upvote shit that gets removed in quarantined subs.
1 jason_frg 2020-02-25
What are you talking about? Reddit has never turned a profit
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
You sure about that?
1 AIDS_IS_A_CHOICE 2020-02-25
Normal people don't care about any of this shit, they just want to repeat jokes and look at cute pics/porn. Reddit doesn't care want their original core of autists with adblock, they want instagram normies who don't even open the comments.
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
If they're repeating shitty jokes then they're in the comments.
1 AIDS_IS_A_CHOICE 2020-02-25
Not strictly, they can just be reposting variations of the same meme over again.
1 aqouta 2020-02-25
I'm not sure where to go when reddit finally dies, if I had a new good place I'd have already switched but everywhere else seems equally shit.
1 MastrTMF 2020-02-25
I was thinking facebook or Twitter. Facebook still has some good meme pages if you know where to look but I don't think it has any places like r/drama. On the other hand Twitter is shitpost central but I hate people on Twitter. There's also discird but you have to be in the know and half of it is child porn and weebs anyway.
2 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
/r/drama Facebook when?
1 southy1995 2020-02-25
r/WatchRedditDie
r/WatchRedditPerish
r/WatchRedditDieDie
1 clubby789 2020-02-25
I think one of the admins likes us tbh
1 questionablyrotten 2020-02-25
Let’s regularly sacrifice pizza to him to stay alive
1 clubby789 2020-02-25
Sounds good to me
1 CMDR-FusionCor3 2020-02-25
remember when /polyamory had the bot that locked our crossposts, so we set up a bot to crosspost ever post and shut down their sub?
good times
1 respaaaaaj 2020-02-25
Jesus christ diets are shit but that doesn't mean you have to intentionally get fatter. Eat more move more, or like eat less move less. Maintaining only being Murcain instead of Mexican or Dubai level fat isn't that hard.
1 HerosEnd 2020-02-25
Heh you guys see that bar graph where they break down fats by race. It's like blacks are omega fat, mayos are catching up and yellows are like where's their bar?
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
Where's the Hispanic bar?
1 greatjasoni 2020-02-25
It's a churro they ate it
1 Peytons_5head 2020-02-25
so here's the thing: this is their holy trinity of books. These are books about not letting food stress you out, consume your life, and make you miserable. These are the books that say listen to your body and establish a healthy, sustainable relationship with food. these are the books that these fatties use to justify their own fatness.
Here's the problem. The Fuck It Diet is written by Christie Harrison. This is Christie Harrison.
The Anti Diet is written is Caroline Dooner. This is Caroline Dooner
The Intuitive Eating Workbook is written by Evelyn Tribole and Elyse Resch. This is Evelyn Tribole and this is Elyse Resch
these people aren't fatties. These people all look relatively normal if not on the thinner side. Let's check out another one, A Parent's Guide to Intuitive Eating: How to Raise Kids Who Love to Eat Healthy by Yami Cazorla-Lancaster.
hmmm, nope, still not a fatty. here's another one: Enjoying Food Peace: Recipes and Intuitive Eating Wisdom to Nourish Your Body and Mind by Bonnie R. Giller
WHY ARE ALL THESE PEOPLE SAYING THAT BALLOONING UP TO 300 POUNDS IS NORMAL WHEN THE PEOPLE WHO WROTE THESE BOOKS ARE ALL AVERAGE SIZED
1 LongPostBot 2020-02-25
This is a really long way of saying you don't fuck.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 companyfry 2020-02-25
LongPostBot honestly makes me smile every time. He’s so pure.
1 twinksforsharia 2020-02-25
So in other words, a bunch of skinny women who have probably never had much of a problem remaining skinny wrote books saying "just eat what you want lol" and that advice is not working out so hot for lard-asses
1 Peytons_5head 2020-02-25
No, because intuitive eating isn't "just eat what you want." These fatties miss the point. The idea behind it is that psychologically dieting is too stressful for people who love feed. So instead of restricting dood it says "eat when you're hungry, when you're hungry eat what you want, and instead of eating until youre full, only until youre not hungry" which sounds a lot like "eat whatever"
But then you think about it, and this means no bored eating, emotional eating, no routine eating when youre not hungry, no social eating when youre friends order food ar the bar and youre not really hungry but youll order food too, and when you do eat you cant stiff your face and eat until youre physically uncomfortable. It basically tricks people into volunteering into a restrictive diet. Theres also the hope youll begin adding more healthy stuff because you will feel like shit of all you eat are processed foods.
What you get instead is what happens when resdit retards even simple, good things. Like this post by someone saying theyre not hungry so they just eat anyway cause food is good
Literally ignoring your body saying no rood is needed because yum
Scheduling meals because you will go through withdrawal from fructose if you dont get your fix.
This is not i tuitive eating, this is self feederism
1 LongPostBot 2020-02-25
This is one of the worst post I have EVER seen. Delete it.
I am a bot. Contact for questions
1 srsh10392 2020-02-25
Methinks there's a lot more fatties in r/drama than it looks like. Self-hating fatties.
1 thowaway_throwaway 2020-02-25
LoL, you got downvoted by the self-hating fatties.
1 companyfry 2020-02-25
Post physique
1 Funkyduffy 2020-02-25
Thank God they banned FPH, otherwise this poor oppressed buttergolem might hear some opinions on her extreme weight gain that would hurt her feelings. 😳😳😳
1 Runeshamangoon 2020-02-25
I can't believe r/hydrohomies is quarantined but not that fucking greasy pile of fats
1 [deleted] 2020-02-25
[removed]
1 [deleted] 2020-02-25
[removed]
1 southy1995 2020-02-25
It reads like the cry for help of someone that is declaring their intent to commit suicide.
1 DOG_ORGASM 2020-02-25
Yeah, it honestly is extremely sad, and not in the way we usually throw sad around here. That poor person is literally eating themselves to death as quickly as they possibly can, and the fatties are cheering them on. They severely need help, not "omg yaaaas u go girl keep eating your buttered croissants!!!" and will probably die from this as those "people" cheer them on. I'm considering trying to get in touch with the authors of the books they worship and showing them some of the worst shit from that sub, then posting the authors' reactions there. It'd probably get removed but might stay up a little while if I spin it correctly with a throwaway.